Preventing Reverse Engineering of Critical Industrial Data with DIOD

References

• H. P. LUHN, “A Business Intelligence System,” IBM J. Res. Dev., 2, 4, 314 (Apr. 2010); https://doi.org/10.1147/rd.24.0314.
   Google Scholar
• H. J. WATSON and B. H. WIXOM, “The Current State of Business Intelligence,” Computer, 40, 9, 96 (Sep. 2007); https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2007.331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Analytics at Work: Q&A with Tom Davenport—InformationWeek”; https://informationweek.com/software/information-management/analytics-at-work-qanda-with-tom-davenport/d/d-id/1085869 ( accessed June 29, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• H. WANG et al., “Moisture-Carryover Performance Optimization Using Physics-Constrained Machine Learning,” Prog. Nucl. Energy, 135, 103691 (May 2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PNUCENE.2021.103691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. A. FARBER and D. G. COLE, “Detecting Loss-of-Coolant Accidents Without Accident-Specific Data,” Prog. Nucl. Energy, 128, 103469 (Oct. 2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PNUCENE.2020.103469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. ZHANG and J. B. COBLE, “Robust Localized Cyber-Attack Detection for Key Equipment in Nuclear Power Plants,” Prog. Nucl. Energy, 128, 103446 (Oct. 2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PNUCENE.2020.103446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. T. BENSI and K. M. GROTH, “On the Value of Data Fusion and Model Integration for Generating Real-Time Risk Insights for Nuclear Power Reactors,” Prog. Nucl. Energy, 129, 103497 (Nov. 2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PNUCENE.2020.103497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. L. BOONE, I. V. FLOROS, and S. A. JOHNSON, “Redacting Proprietary Information at the Initial Public Offering,” J. Financ. Econ., 120, 1, 102 (Apr. 2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2015.06.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O. ABBOSH and K. BISSELL, “Securing the Digital Economy: Reinventing the Internet | Accenture” (2019); https://www.accenture.com/us-en/insights/cybersecurity/_acnmedia/Thought-Leadership-Assets/PDF/Accenture-Securing-the-Digital-Economy-Reinventing-the-Internet-for-Trust.pdf#zoom=50 (accessed Jan. 26, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• “General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)—Official Legal Text”; https://gdpr-info.eu/ ( accessed July 21, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• “California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) | State of California—Department of Justice—Office of the Attorney General”; https://oag.ca.gov/privacy/ccpa ( accessed July 21, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Y. LI, E. BERTINO, and H. S. ABDEL-KHALIK, “Effectiveness of Model-Based Defenses for Digitally Controlled Industrial Systems: Nuclear Reactor Case Study,” Nucl. Technol., 206, 82 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2019.1626170.
   Google Scholar
• S. E. OTTO and C. W. ROWLEY, “Linearly-Recurrent Autoencoder Networks for Learning Dynamics,” SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst., 18, 1, 558 (Dec. 2017); http://arxiv.org/abs/1712.01378 (accessed May 5, 2021).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. MARDT et al., “VAMPnets for Deep Learning of Molecular Kinetics,” Nat. Commun., 9, 5 (Dec. 2018); https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02388-1.
   Google Scholar
• B. LUSCH, J. N. KUTZ, and S. L. BRUNTON, “Deep Learning for Universal Linear Embeddings of Nonlinear Dynamics,” Nat. Commun., 9, 4950 (Dec. 2018); https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07210-0.
   Google Scholar
• Q. LI et al., “Extended Dynamic Mode Decomposition with Dictionary Learning: A Data-Driven Adaptive Spectral Decomposition of the Koopman Operator,” Chaos, 27, 10, 103111 (July 2017); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4993854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. H. RUDY et al., “Data-Driven Discovery of Partial Differential Equations,” Sci. Adv., 3, 4, e1602614 (Apr. 2017); https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1602614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. L. BRUNTON et al., “Discovering Governing Equations from Data by Sparse Identification of Nonlinear Dynamical Systems,” PNAS, 113, 15, 3932 (Apr. 2016); https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1517384113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. MURALIDHAR and R. SARATHY, “Data Shuffling—A New Masking Approach for Numerical Data,” Manage. Sci., 52, 5, 658 (May 1, 2006); https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “What’s This Data Masking All About Anyway?” DLT; https://www.dlt.com/blog/2015/03/19/whats-data-masking ( accessed Jan. 20, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• C. DWORK et al., “The Algorithmic Foundations of Differential Privacy,” Found. Trends Theor. Comput. Sci., 9, 211 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1561/0400000042.
   Google Scholar
• F. KERSCHBAUM, “Privacy-Preserving Computation,” Privacy Technologies and Policy, p. 41, Springer (2014); https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54069-1_3.
   Google Scholar
• A. OPPERMANN et al., “Secure Cloud Computing: Communication Protocol for Multithreaded Fully Homomorphic Encryption for Remote Data Processing,” Proc. 15th IEEE Int. Symp. Parallel and Distributed Processing with Applications and 16th IEEE Int. Conf. Ubiquitous Computing and Communications (ISPA/IUCC 2017), Guangzhou, China, December 12–15, 2017, p. 503 (May 2018); https://doi.org/10.1109/ISPA/IUCC.2017.00084.
   Google Scholar
• I. J. GOODFELLOW, J. SHLENS, and C. SZEGEDY, “Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examples,” Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. Learning Representations, San Diego, California, May 7–9, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• “Differential Privacy for Census Data Explained,” National Conference of State Legislatures; https://www.ncsl.org/research/redistricting/differential-privacy-for-census-data-explained.aspx ( accessed May 30, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• C. T. KENNY et al., “The Use of Differential Privacy for Census Data and Its Impact on Redistricting: The Case of the 2020 U.S. Census,” Sci. Adv., 7, 41 (Oct. 2021); https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIADV.ABK3283.
   Google Scholar
• Y. LI et al., “Real-Time Monitoring for Detection of Adversarial Subtle Process Variations,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 196, 5, 544 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2021.1997041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. SUNDARAM, Y. LI, and H. ABDEL-KHALIK, “Denoising Algorithm for Subtle Anomaly Detection,” Nucl. Technol., 208, 9, 1365 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2022.2027147.
   Google Scholar
• C. DWORK et al., “Generalization in Adaptive Data Analysis and Holdout Reuse,” Proc. Annual Conf. Neural Information Processing Systems, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, December 7–12, 2015, p. 2350 (2015); https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1506.02629.
   Google Scholar
• A. SUNDARAM, H. ABDEL-KHALIK, and A. AL RASHDAN, “Deceptive Infusion of Data: A Novel Data Masking Paradigm for High-Valued Systems,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 196, 911 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2022.2043542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. CARRARA and J. ERNST, “On the Upper Limit of Separability” (2017); https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1708.09449.
   Google Scholar
• A. SUNDARAM, H. S. ABDEL-KHALIK, and A. AL RASHDAN, “Deceptive Infusion of Data (DIOD) for Nuclear Reactors,” Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 125, 1, 264 (2021); https://doi.org/10.13182/T125-37178.
   Google Scholar
• K. WILLCOX and J. PERAIRE, “Balanced Model Reduction via the Proper Orthogonal Decomposition,” AIAA J., 40, 11, 2323 (2002); https://doi.org/10.2514/2.1570.
   Google Scholar
• Y. BANG, H. S. ABDEL-KHALIK, and J. M. HITE, “Hybrid Reduced Order Modeling Applied to Nonlinear Models,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 91, 9, 929 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.4298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. BANG and H. S. ABDEL-KHALIK, “Reduced Order Modeling for Multi-Physics Problems,” Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 107, 586 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• D. J. LUCIA, P. S. BERAN, and W. A. SILVA, “Reduced-Order Modeling: New Approaches for Computational Physics,” Prog. Aerosp. Sci., 40, 1–2, 51 (Feb 1, 2004); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2003.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. WILLARD et al., “Integrating Physics-Based Modeling with Machine Learning: A Survey,” 1, 34, Association for Computing Machinery (2020); https://doi.org/10.1145/1122445.1122456.
   Google Scholar
• S. ARRIDGE et al., “Solving Inverse Problems Using Data-Driven Models,” Acta Numer., 28, 1 (May 2019); https://doi.org/10.1017/S0962492919000059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. MORSHED and J. J. KALUARACHCHI, “Parameter Estimation Using Artificial Neural Network and Genetic Algorithm for Free-Product Migration and Recovery,” Water Resour. Res., 34, 5, 1101 (May 1998); https://doi.org/10.1029/98WR00006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. J. GOODFELLOW et al., “Generative Adversarial Nets,” Proc. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 27 (NIPS 2014), Montreal, Canada, December 8–14, 2014; https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1406.2661.
   Google Scholar
• H. LI et al., “NETT: Solving Inverse Problems with Deep Neural Networks,” Inverse Prob., 36, 6, 065005 (June 2020); https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6420/ab6d57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. ADLER and O. ÖKTEM, “Solving Ill-Posed Inverse Problems Using Iterative Deep Neural Networks,” Inverse Prob., 33, 12, 124007 (Nov. 2017); https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6420/aa9581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. KNOLL et al., “Deep-Learning Methods for Parallel Magnetic Resonance Imaging Reconstruction: A Survey of the Current Approaches, Trends, and Issues,” IEEE Signal Process. Mag., 37, 1, 128 (Jan. 2020); https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2019.2950640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. ONGIE et al., “Deep Learning Techniques for Inverse Problems in Imaging,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Inf. Theory, 1, 1, 39 (2020); https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2005.06001.
   Google Scholar
• M. RAISSI, P. PERDIKARIS, and G. E. KARNIADAKIS, “Physics-Informed Neural Networks: A Deep Learning Framework for Solving Forward and Inverse Problems Involving Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations,” J. Comput. Phys., 378, 686 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. S. ISKHAKOV and N. T. DINH, “Physics-Integrated Machine Learning: Embedding a Neural Network in the Navier-Stokes Equations. Part I,” Phys. Lett. A, 406 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2021.127456.
   Google Scholar
• A. YAZDANI et al., “Systems Biology Informed Deep Learning for Inferring Parameters and Hidden Dynamics,” PLoS Comput. Biol., 16, 11, e1007575 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007575.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. BONGARD and H. LIPSON, “Automated Reverse Engineering of Nonlinear Dynamical Systems,” PNAS, 104, 24, 9943 (2007); https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0609476104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. F. VILLAVERDE and J. R. BANGA, “Reverse Engineering and Identification in Systems Biology: Strategies, Perspectives and Challenges,” J. R. Soc. Interface, 11, 91, 20130505 (Feb. 2014); https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2013.0505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. SCHMIDT and H. LIPSON, “Distilling Free-Form Natural Laws from Experimental Data,” Science, 324, 5923, 81 (2009); https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1165893.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. RAISSI and G. E. KARNIADAKIS, “Hidden Physics Models: Machine Learning of Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations,” J. Comput. Phys., 357, 125 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2017.11.039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. GAVISH and D. L. DONOHO, “The Optimal Hard Threshold for Singular Values Is 4/√3,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 60, 8, 5040 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.2014.2323359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. VAUTARD, P. YIOU, and M. GHIL, “Singular-Spectrum Analysis: A Toolkit for Short, Noisy Chaotic Signals,” Physica D, 58, 1–4, 95 (Sep. 1992); https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2789(92)90103-T.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. GOLYANDINA and D. STEPANOV, “SSA-Based Approaches to Analysis and Forecast of Multidimensional Time Series,” Proc. 5th St. Petersburg Workshop on Simulation, Vol. 2, p. 293 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• N. CARRARA and J. ERNST, “On the Estimation of Mutual Information,” Proc. 39th Int. Workshop Bayesian Inference and Maximum Entropy Methods in Science and Engineering, Garching, Germany, June 30–July 5, 2019, Vol. 33, No. 1, p. 31 (Jan. 2020); https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019033031.
   Google Scholar
• D. CHARTE et al., “An Analysis on the Use of Autoencoders for Representation Learning: Fundamentals, Learning Task Case Studies, Explainability and Challenges,” Neurocomputing, 404, 93 (2020).
   Google Scholar
• F. ROSENBLATT, “The Perceptron: A Probabilistic Model for Information Storage and Organization in the Brain 1,” Psychol. Rev., 65, 6, 19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. E. BOSER, I. M. GUYON, and V. N. VAPNIK, “A Training Algorithm for Optimal Margin Classifiers,” Proc. 5th Annual ACM Workshop on Computational Learning Theory, Pittsburgh Pennsylvania, July 27–29, 1992, p. 144 (1992); https://doi.org/10.1145/130385.130401.
   Google Scholar
• B. C. MOORE, “Principal Component Analysis in Linear Systems: Controllability, Observability, and Model Reduction,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 26, 1, 17 (1981); https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1981.1102568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. SCHÖLKOPF, A. SMOLA, and K. R. MÜLLER, “Kernel Principal Component Analysis,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1327, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (1997); https://doi.org/10.1007/bfb0020217.
   Google Scholar
• M. I. BELGHAZI et al., “Mutual Information Neural Estimation,” Proc. Int. Conf. Machine Learning Research, Stockholmsmässan, Stockholm, Sweden, July 10–15, 2018, Vol. 80, p. 531 (2018).
   Google Scholar
• A. KRASKOV, H. STOEGBAUER, and P. GRASSBERGER, “Estimating Mutual Information,” Phys. Rev. E, 69, 6, 16 (May 2003); https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.69.066138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. MEYEN, “Relation Between Classification Accuracy and Mutual Information in Equally Weighted Classification Tasks,” Master Thesis, Universität Hamburg (2016).
   Google Scholar
• T. PAPAMARKOU et al., “Automated Detection of Corrosion in Used Nuclear Fuel Dry Storage Canisters Using Residual Neural Networks,” Nucl. Eng. Technol., 53, 2, 657 (Feb. 2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NET.2020.07.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar