Pressure Drop Correlation Improvement for the Near-Wall Region of Pebble-Bed Reactors

References

• S. ERGUN, “Fluid Flow Through Packed Columns,” J. Chem. Eng. Prog., 48, 2, 89 (1952).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. MEHTA and M. HAWLEY, “Wall Effect in Packed Columns,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev., 8, 2, 280 (1969); https://doi.org/10.1021/i260030a021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. REICHELT, “Zur berechnung des druckverlustes einphasig durch- stromter kugel- und zylinderschuttungen,” Rheol. Acta, 17, 676 (1978).
   Google Scholar
• R. HICKS, “Pressure Drop in Packed Beds of Spheres,” Indus. Eng. Chem. Fundam., 9, 3, 500 (1970); https://doi.org/10.1021/i160035a032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. CHOI, S. KIM, and D. KIM, “A Semi-Empirical Correlation for Pressure Drop in Packed Beds of Spherical Particles,” Transp. Porous Media, 75, 2, 133 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. WU, B. YU, and M. YUN, “A Resistance Model for Flow Through Porous Media,” Transp. Porous Media, 71, 3, 331 (2008); https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-007-9129-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “KTA, Reactor Core Design of High-Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactors—Part 3: Loss Pressure Through Friction Pebble Bed Cores,” Kerntechnischer Ausschuss (1981).
   Google Scholar
• H. P. A. CALIS et al., “CFD Modelling and Experimental Validation of Pressure Drop and Flow Profile in a Novel Structured Catalytic Reactor Packing,” Chem. Eng. Sci., 56, 4, 1713 (2001); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509(00)00400-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. KENIG and T. ATMAKIDIS, “CFD-based Analysis of the Wall Effect on the Pressure Drop in Packed Beds with Moderate Tube/Particle Diameter Ratios in the Laminar Flow Regime,” Chem. Eng. J., 155, 1–2, 404 (2009); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2009.07.057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. A. YILDIZ et al., “Direct Numerical Simulation of the Flow Through a Randomly Packed Pebble Bed,” J. Fluids Eng., 142, 4, 041405 (2020).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. JUN, Z. YANHUA, and L. FU, “Various Bypass Flow Paths and Bypass Flow Ratios in HTRPM,” Energy Procedia, 39, 258 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2013.07.212.
   Google Scholar
• D. REGER et al., “Improved Point Kinetic Parameters Generation for Pebble Bed Reactor Transient Simulation Using NEAMS Tools,” Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 125, 114 (2021); https://doi.org/10.13182/T125-37037.
   Google Scholar
• P. FISCHER et al., “NekRS, a GPU-Accelerated Spectral Element Navier-Stokes Solver,” arXiv (2021).
   Google Scholar
• P. FISCHER et al., “Nek5000 User Documentation,” ANL/MCS-TM-351, Argonne National Laboratory (2016).
   Google Scholar
• E. MERZARI et al., “Toward Exascale: Overview of Large Eddy Simulations and Direct Numerical Simulations of Nuclear Reactor Flows with the Spectral Element Method in Nek5000,” Nucl. Technol., 206, 9, 1308 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2020.1748557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. REZAEIRAVESH, R. VINUESA, and P. SCHLATTER, “On Numerical Uncertainties in Scale-Resolving Simulations of Canonical Wall Turbulence,” Comput. Fluids, 227, 105024 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2021.105024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. REGER et al., “Large Eddy Simulation of a 67-Pebble Bed Experiment,” presented at Advances in Thermal Hydraulics, June 12–16, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• J. LAI et al., “Verification and Validation of Large Eddy Simulation with Nek5000 for Cold Leg Mixing Benchmark,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 358, 110427 (2020).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. OBABKO et al., “Verification and Validation of Nek5000 for T-Junction, Matis, Siberia, and Max Experiments,” presented at the Int. Conf. Nuclear Reactor Thermal Hydraulics, August 30–September 4, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• “Chrono: An Open Source Framework for the Physics-Based Simulation of Dynamic Systems,” Project Chrono Development Team (2016); https://github.com/projectchrono/chro (current as of May 9, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• E. MERZARI et al., “Cardinal: A Lower-Length-Scale Multiphysics Simulator for Pebble-Bed Reactors,” Nucl. Technol., 207, 7, 1118 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2020.1824471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. LAN et al., “All-Hex Meshing Strategy for Densely Packed Spheres,” arXiv (2021).
   Google Scholar
• S. DONG, G. E. KARNIADAKIS, and C. CHRYSSOSTOMIDIS, “A Robust and Accurate Outflow Boundary Condition for Incompressible Flow Simulations on Severely-Truncated Unbounded Domains,” J. Comput. Phys., 261, 83 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2013.12.042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. DE KLERK, “Voidage Variation in Packed Beds at Small Column to Particle Diameter Ratio,” AIChE, 49, 8, 2022 (2003); https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690490812.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. J. NOVAK et al., “Pronghorn: A Multidimensional Coarse-Mesh Application for Advanced Reactor Thermal Hydraulics,” Nucl. Technol., 207, 7, 1015 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2020.1825307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. J. PERMANN et al., “MOOSE: Enabling Massively Parallel Multiphysics Simulation,” SoftwareX, 11, 100430 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2020.100430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar