Prospects for Nuclear Microreactors: A Review of the Technology, Economics, and Regulatory Considerations

References

• “Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change,” V. DELMOTTE et al. Eds., Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Cambridge University Press (2021).
   Google Scholar
• Energy, Electricity and Nuclear Power Estimates for the Period up to 2050,” Reference Data Series No. 1, 2020 ed., International Atomic Energy Agency (2020).
   Google Scholar
• D. SHROPSHIRE et al., “Global Market Analysis of Microreactors,” INL/EXT-21-63214, Idaho National Laboratory/DOE Microreactor Program (2021).
   Google Scholar
• J. KENNEDY et al., “Special Purpose Application Reactors: Systems Integration Decision Support,” INL/EXT-18-51369, Rev. 1, Idaho National Laboratory (2019).
   Google Scholar
• T. BOSTICK et al., “Resilience Science, Policy and Investment for Civil Infrastructure,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 175, 19 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2018.02.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. MUKHERJEE et al., “A Multi-Hazard Approach to Assess Severe Weather-Induced Major Power Outage Risks in the U.S,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 175, 283 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2018.03.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “U.S. Dept. Energy Report Explores US Adv. Small Modular Reactors to Boost Grid Resiliency,” U.S. Department of Energy (2018).
   Google Scholar
• “Exploring Options for Microreactors in Alaska,” Homeland Security Newswire (Aug. 13, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• “Emergency Planning Zones,” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission; https://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/emerg-preparedness/about-emerg-preparedness/planning-zones.html ( current as of May 20, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• “2021 Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Micro-reactors Licensing Strategies, Draft White Paper,” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2021); https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML2123/ML21235A418.pdf (accessed Nov. 15, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• J. BUONGIORNO et al., “Can Nuclear Batteries Be Economically Competitive in Large Markets?” Energies, 14, 4385 (2021); https://doi.org/10.3390/en14144385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Advances in Small Modular Reactor Technology Developments,” International Atomic Energy Agency, Advanced Reactors Information System (2020).
   Google Scholar
• “eVinciTM Microreactor,” Westinghouse; https://www.westinghousenuclear.com/new-plants/evinci-micro-reactor ( current as of May 20, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Micro-Reactor Workshop, June 18–19, 2019, Idaho National Laboratory (2019); https://gain.inl.gov/SitePages/Workshops.aspx (current as of Jan. 21, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• J. BUONGIORNO, “An Economic Evaluation of Micro-Reactors for the State of Washington,” MIT-ANP-TR-190, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Center for Advanced Nuclear Energy Systems (2021).
   Google Scholar
• “Strategic Capabilities Office Selects Two Mobile Microreactor Concepts to Proceed to Final Design,” U.S. Department of Defense (2021); https://www.defense.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/2545869/strategic-capabilities-office-selects-two-mobile-microreactor-concepts-to-proce/ (current as of Jan. 21, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• “Eielson AFB Announced as Site for Air Force Micro-Reactor Pilot,” Eielson Air Force Base (2021); https://www.eielson.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/2812077/eielson-afb-announced-as-site-for-air-force-micro-reactor-pilot (current as of Jan 21, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• “Westinghouse Micro-Reactor Feasible Option for Canada, Study Finds,” World Nuclear News ( Oct. 27, 2021); https://world-nuclear-news.org/Articles/Westinghouse-micro-reactor-feasible-option-for-Can (current as of Jan. 21, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• H. KHATIB and C. DIFIGLIO, “Economics of Nuclear and Renewables,” Energy Policy, 96, 740 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.04.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. SEVERENCE, “Business Risks to Utilities as New Nuclear Power Costs Escalate,” Electr J., 22, 4, 112 (2009); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tej.2009.03.010.
   Google Scholar
• J. VUJIC et al., “Small Modular Reactors: Simpler, Safer, Cheaper?” Energy, 45, 1, 288 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2012.01.078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. RAMANA, “Small Modular and Advanced Nuclear Reactors: A Reality Check,” IEEE Access, 9, 42090 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3064948.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. INGERSOLL, “Deliberately Small Reactors and the Second Nuclear Era,” Prog. Nucl. Energy, 51, 589 (2009); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2009.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. SOVACOOL and M. RAMANA, “Back to the Future: Small Modular Reactors, Nuclear Fantasies, and Symbolic Convergence,” Sci. Technol. Human Val., 40, 1, 96 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243914542350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Cost Estimating Guidelines for Generation IV Nuclear Energy Systems,” Rev. 4.2, Generation IV International Forum, Economic Modeling Working Group (2007).
   Google Scholar
• “Current Status, Technical Feasibility and Economics of Small Nuclear Reactors,” Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Nuclear Energy Agency (2011).
   Google Scholar
• C. R. HUDSON II, “Cost Estimate Guidelines for Advanced Nuclear Power Technologies,” ORNL/TM-10071/R1, Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc./Oak Ridge National Laboratory (1987).
   Google Scholar
• P. BERBEY et al., “Top-Down and Bottom-Up Approaches for Cost Estimating New Reactor Designs,” Int. Congr. Adv. Nucl. Power Plants, 3, 1367 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• “Arrangements for Preparedness for a Nuclear or Radiological Emergency,” SG- GS-G2.1, International Atomic Energy Agency (2007).
   Google Scholar
• J. G. DELENE and C. R. HUDSON II, “Cost Estimate Guidelines for Advanced Nuclear Power Technologies,” ORNL/TM-1P071/R2, Martin Marietta Energy Systems Inc./Oak Ridge National Laboratory (1990).
   Google Scholar
• D. HOLCOMB et al., “Advanced High Temperature Reactor Systems and Economic Analysis,” ORNL/TM-2011/364, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (2011).
   Google Scholar
• J. JOHNSTON, Statistical Cost Analysis, McGraw Hill, New York (1960).
   Google Scholar
• J. HALDI and D. WHITCOMB, “Economies of Scale in Industrial Plants,” J. Polit. Econ., 75, 373 (1967); https://doi.org/10.1086/259293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. BLACK et al., “Economic Viability of Light Water Small Modular Nuclear Reactors,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 103, 1, 248 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.12.041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. VEGEL and J. C. QUINN, “Economic Evaluation of Small Modular Nuclear Reactors and the Complications of Regulatory Fee Structures,” Energy Policy, 104, 395 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.01.043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. D. CARELLI et al., “Competitiveness of Small-Medium, New Generation Reactors: A Comparative Study on Capital and O&M Costs,” 16th Int. Conf. Nuclear Engineering, Proc., 4, 499 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• M. CARELLI et al., “Economic Features of Integral, Modular, Small-to-Medium Size Reactors,” Prog. Nucl. Energy, 53, 1, 403 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2009.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. LOCATELLI et al., “Small Modular Reactors: A Comprehensive Overview of Their Economics and Strategic Aspects,” Prog. Nucl. Energy, 73, 75 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2014.01.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. ALONSO et al., “Economic Competitiveness of Small Modular Reactors Versus Coal and Combined Cycle Plants,” Energy, 116, 4, 867 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.10.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. MIGNACCA and G. LOCATELLI, “Economics and Finance of Small Modular Reactors: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 118, Article 109519 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. MIGNACCA et al., “Modularisation as Enabler of Circular Economy in Energy Infrastructure,” Energy Policy, 139, Article 11371 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Opportunities in SMR Emergency Planning,” INL/EXT-14-33137, Idaho National Laboratory (2014).
   Google Scholar
• J. CHRISTENSEN et al., “Determining the Appropriate Emergency Planning Attributes for Microreactors,” INL/EXT-20-58467, Idaho National Laboratory (2020).
   Google Scholar
• “The Economics of Nuclear Power,” World Nuclear Association (2017); http://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/economic-aspects/economics-of-nuclear-power.aspx (current as of Jan. 21, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• “The Economic Future of Nuclear Power,” University of Chicago (2004); https://www.eusustel.be/public/documents_publ/links_to_docs/cost/uoc-study.pdf (current as of Jan. 21, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• “What Is Generation Capacity?” U.S. Department of Energy (2020); https://www.energy.gov/ne/articles/what-generation-capacity (current as of Jan. 21, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• “Plans for New Reactors Worldwide,” World Nuclear Association (2020); http://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/current-and-future-generation/plans-for-new-reactors-worldwide.aspx (current as of Jan. 21, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• “Projected Costs of Generating Electricity,” Nuclear Energy Agency (2015); https://www.oecd-nea.org/ndd/pubs/2015/7057-proj-costs-electricity-2015.pdf (current as of Jan. 21, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• “Capital Cost and Performance Characteristic Estimates for Utility Scale Electric Power Generating Technologies,” U.S. Energy Information Administration (2020).
   Google Scholar
• “Nuclear Costs in Context,” Nuclear Energy Institute (2019); https://www.nei.org/CorporateSite/media/filefolder/resources/reports-and-briefs/nuclear-costs-in-context-201909.pdf (current as of Jan. 21, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• “Cost Competitiveness of Micro-Reactors for Remote Markets,” White Paper, Nuclear Energy Institute (2019); https://www.nei.org/resources/reports-briefs/cost-competitiveness-micro-reactors-remote-markets (current as of Jan. 21, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• “Cost Reduction Through Learning in Manufacturing Industries and in the Manufacture of Mobile Sources,” EPA-420-R-16- 018, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2016).
   Google Scholar
• A. ABOU-JAOUDE et al., “An Economics-by-Design Approach Applied to a Heat Pipe Microreactor Concept,” INL/EXT-21-01201, Idaho National Laboratory (2021).
   Google Scholar
• “Customer Discovery and Perception,” University of Alaska, Center for Economic Development (2020); https://static1.squarespace.com/static/59f6b60bcf81e02892fd0261/t/60189afcbc397811525aca24/1612225286635/Customer±Discover±and±Perception±Analysis.pdf (current as of Jan. 21, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• “Use Case Analysis: Executive Summary,” University of Alaska, Center for Economic Development (2020); https://static1.squarespace.com/static/59f6b60bcf81e02892fd0261/t/60189a8fc18e871112eff45b/1612225177349/Use±Case±Analysis_Executive±Summary.pdf (current as of Jan. 21, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• R. HILL, “Our Smart Mine,” Roy Hill Website (2021); https://www.royhill.com.au/our-operation/our-smart-mine (current as of Jan. 21, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• “Tata Says Microgrids May Trump Main Grid in Niches: BNEF,” BloombergNEF (June 2, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• P. BIKASH et al., “Net-Zero Microgrid Program Project Report: Small Reactors in Microgrids,” INL/ EXT-21-64616, U.S. Department of Energy Net-Zero Microgrid Program (2021).
   Google Scholar
• D. MICHAELSON and J. JIANG, “Review of Integration of Small Modular Reactors in Renewable Energy Microgrids,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 152, Article 111638 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “68% of the World Population Projected to Live in Urban Areas by 2050, Says UN,” United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (2018); https://www.un.org/development/desa/en/news/population/2018-revision-of-world-urbanization-prospects.html (current as of May 16, 2018).
   Google Scholar
• R. P. DICK et al., “Embedded Intelligence in the Internet-of-Things,” IEEE Des. Test, 37, 1, 7 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1109/MDAT.2019.2957352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. E. GARCIA et al., “Secure Embedded Intelligence in Nuclear Systems: Framework and Methods,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 140, 107261 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2019.107261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. FORSBERG and A. FOSS, “Markets and Economic Requirements for Fission Batteries and Other Nuclear Systems,” MIT CANES/INL, MIT-ANP-TR-191, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2021).
   Google Scholar
• “Technology Radar: Climate-Tech Investing,” BloombergNEF Technology Radar (Feb. 16, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• “Climate Change and Social Vulnerability in the United States: A Focus on Six Impacts,” EPA 430-R-21-003, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2021).
   Google Scholar
• “Solar Power Is Being Used as Disaster Relief. Here’s How,” World Economic Forum (2018); https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2018/05/how-solar-power-is-impacting-natural-disaster-relief (current as of Jan. 21, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• “Draft EIS Released for Project Pele Mobile Microreactor Demo at INL,” ANS Nuclear Newswire (Sep. 17, 2021); https://www.ans.org/news/article-3260/draft-eis-released-for-project-pele-mobile-microreactor-demo-at-inl (current as of Jan. 21, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• “The Commercial Outlook for U.S. Small Modular Nuclear Reactors,” U.S. Department of Commerce International Trade Administration; https://www.pserc.cornell.edu/empire/Commercial-Outlook-for-US-Small-Modular-Nukes.pdf ( current as of May 20, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• D. SOLAN et al., “Assessing Member State Readiness for the Deployment of Small and Medium-sized Reactors (SMRs): Methodology and Analysis of Key Factors,” Report for the International Atomic Energy Agency, Phase 1 Report, Energy Policy Institute (2017).
   Google Scholar
• D. SOLAN et al., “Assessing the Potential Global Demand for Small and Medium-Sized Reactors: 2020-2050,” Report for the International Atomic Energy Agency, Phase 2 Report, Energy Policy Institute (2015).
   Google Scholar
• G. BLACK et al., “Carbon Free Energy Development and the Role of Small Modular Reactors: A Review and Decision Framework for Deployment in Developing Countries,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 43, 1, 83 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.11.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Deployment Indicators for Small Modular: Reactors, Methodology, Analysis of Key Factors and Case Studies,” TECDOC No. 1854, International Atomic Energy Agency (2018).
   Google Scholar
• “Standard Country or Area Codes for Statistical Use,” Statistics Division of the United Nations, Rev. 3, Series M: Miscellaneous Statistical Papers, No. 49, United Nations (2019).
   Google Scholar
• E. LYMAN, “Small Isn’t Always Beautiful,” Union of Concerned Scientists (Sep. 2013); https://www.cleanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/UCS-SMR-Rpt-Sept-2013.pdf ( current as of May 20, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• M. GOSPODARCZYK and M. FISHER, “IAEA Releases 2019 Data on Nuclear Power Plants Operating Experience,” International Atomic Energy Agency (June 25, 2020); https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/news/iaea-releases-2019-data-on-nuclear-power-plants-operating-experience (current as of Jan. 21, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• T. PALMIERI et al.,” Analysis of the Case for Federal Support of Micro-Scale Nuclear Reactors to Provide Secure Power at U.S. Government Installations,” University of Wisconsin-Madison, Institute for Nuclear Energy Systems (2021).
   Google Scholar
• P. SAMANTA et al., “Regulatory Review of Micro-reactors,” BNL-212380-2019-INRE, Brookhaven National Laboratory (Dec. 17, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• T. CHANDRASEKARAN et al., “Releases of Radioactive Materials in Gaseous and Liquid Effluents from Pressurized Water Reactors,” NUREG 7-11, Rev. 1, Division of System Integration, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Apr. 1985).
   Google Scholar
• “Micro-Reactors Licensing Strategies, Draft White Paper,” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2021); https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML2123/ML21235A418.pdf (current as of Jan. 21, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• A. BRADFORD, “Fuel and Waste Considerations for SMRs and Advanced Reactors,” Presentation, Vol. ML1417, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2014); https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1417/ML14170A133.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• E. FLEMING et al., “Human Factors Considerations for Automating Microreactors,” SAND2020-5635, Sandia National Laboratories (2020).
   Google Scholar
• R. PARASURAMAN et al., “Situation Awareness, Mental Workload, and Trust in Automation,” J. Cogn. Eng. Decis. Mak., 2, 2, 140 (2008); https://doi.org/10.1518/155534308X284417.
   Google Scholar
• P. SUBHARWALL et al., “Cybersecurity for Microreactors in Advanced Energy Systems,” Cyber Secur., 4, 345 (2021).
   Google Scholar
• P. DAY, “NRC, CNSC See Eventual Path to Multi-lateral Licensing,” Reuters (Sep. 21, 2021); https://www.reutersevents.com/nuclear/nrc-cnsc-see-eventual-path-multi-lateral-licensing (current as of Jan. 21, 2022).
   Google Scholar