Drying of Spent Nuclear Fuel: Considerations and Examples

References

• R. L. SINDELAR, “Nuclear Fuel Cycle: Safe Management of Spent Nuclear Fuel,” J. South Carolina Acad. Sci., 20, 1, 21 (2022); https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/jscas/vol20/iss1/7.
   Google Scholar
• “ASTM C1553-21, Standard Guide for Drying of Spent Nuclear Fuel,” American Society for Testing and Materials International (Aug. 2021).
   Google Scholar
• M. KOCHSIEK, “Measurement of Water Adsorption Layers on Metals Surfaces,” Metrologia, 18, 153 (1982); https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/18/3/007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. HERMANN et al., “Hydrogen Distribution Between Fuel Cladding Metal and Overlying Corrosion Layers,” Proc. ANS Int. Topl. Mtg. on LWR Fuel Performance, 1, 372, Park City, Utah April 10–13, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• “Spent Fuel Project Office Interim Staff Guidance 11, Revision 3,” ISG-11, Rev. 3, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Nov. 17, 2003); https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/isg/isg-11R3.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• A. K. WERTSCHING, “Material Interactions on Canister Integrity During Storage and Transport,” DOE/SNF/REP-104, Rev. 0, U.S. Department of Energy. (Dec. 2007).
   Google Scholar
• M. V. GLAZOFF, T. E. LISTER, and R. E. SMITH, “Transition of Spent Nuclear Fuel to Dry Storage,” Task 1 Report: Modeling of Aluminum Spent Nuclear Fuel Cladding Alloy Stability, INL/EXT-18-51694, Rev. 1, Idaho National Laboratory(Jan. 2020).
   Google Scholar
• R. MONTGOMERY, J. M. SCAGLIONE, and B. BEVARD, “Post-Irradiation Examinations of High Burnup PWR Rods,” presented at the 18456 WM2018 Conf., Phoenix, Arizona, March 18–22, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• R. KOHLI, V. PASUPATHI, and E. R. GILBERT, “Investigation of Water-Logged Spent Fuel Rods Under Dry Storage Conditions,” PNL-5987, UC-85, Battelle Columbus Division (Sep. 1986).
   Google Scholar
• T. KNIGHT, “Experimental Determination and Modeling of Used Fuel Drying by Vacuum and Gas Circulation for Dry Cask Storage,” NEUP-IRP Project No. 14-7730, University of South Carolina (2018).
   Google Scholar
• S. PETERS, D. VINSON, and J. T. CARTER, “Spent Nuclear Fuel and Reprocessing Waste Inventory,” FCRD-NFST-2013-000263. Rev. 8, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Nuclear Energy, Spent Fuel and Waste Disposition (Nov. 2021).
   Google Scholar
• S. L. E. CAER, “Water Radiolysis: Influence of Oxide Surfaces on H2 Production Under Ionizing Radiation,” Water, 3, 1, 235 (2011); https://doi.org/10.3390/w3010235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “River Bend Nuclear Generating Station NRC Inspection Report 050-00458/05-009; 072-00049/05-001,” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ADAMS accession number ML051380576 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• “Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities—Final Report,” NUREG 2215, ADAMS accession number ML20121A190, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2020).
   Google Scholar
• A. B. CHRISTENSEN, “Intact ATR Plate Fuel Drying Characteristics and Requirements,” EDF-5063, Rev. 3., CH2M-Washington Group Idaho (2017).
   Google Scholar
• H. JUNG et al., “Extended Storage and Transportation: Evaluation of Drying Adequacy,” Center for Nuclear Waste Regulatory Analyses, San Antonio, Texas (2013).
   Google Scholar
• P. K. SHUKLA et al., “Consequence Analysis of Residual Water in a Storage Canister,” Paper 20484, WM2020 Conf., March 3–7, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• C. R. BRYAN et al., “Analysis of Gas Samples Taken from the High Burnup Demonstration Cask,” SAND2019–2281, Sandia National Laboratories (2019).
   Google Scholar
• C. R. BRYAN et al., “SNL Contribution: Consequence Analysis for Moisture Remaining in Dry Storage Canisters After Drying,” SAND2019-8532 R, Sandia National Laboratories (2019).
   Google Scholar
• RAMON J. M. PULIDO et al., “Pressurized Water Reactor Dashpot Region Response to Commercial Drying Cycles,” SAND2022-8388 O, Sandia National Laboratories.
   Google Scholar
• A. L. D’ENTREMONT, R. L. KESTERSON, and R. L. SINDELAR, “Evaluation of Hydrogen Generation in High Burnup Demonstration Dry Storage Cask,” SRNL-STI-2020-00268, Savannah River National Laboratory (2020).
   Google Scholar
• A. L. D’ENTREMONT et al., “Evaluation of Radiolytic Hydrogen Generation in the High Burnup Demonstration Dry Storage Cask,” Proc. Waste Management Symposia 2021, Paper number 21279 (2021).
   Google Scholar
• A. L. D’ENTREMONT et al., “Investigation of Hydrogen Generation in SNF Canisters Using Lab-Scale ‘Mini-Canister’ Radiolysis Testing,” SRNL-STI-2022-00290, Savannah River National Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• A. L. D’ENTREMONT, C. G. VERST, and R. L. SINDELAR, “Measurement of Radiolytic Hydrogen Generation from Surrogate Zr-Based Materials in a ‘Mini-Canister,’” SRNL-STI-2022-00434, Savannah River National Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• E. EIDELPES et al., “Technical Basis for Extended Dry Storage of Aluminum-Clad Spent Nuclear Fuel,” J. Nucl. Mater., 577, 154299 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2023.154299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. PERRY et al., “Engineering-Scale Drying of Aluminum-Clad Spent Nuclear Fuel,” INL/EXT-21-62416, A. W. ABBOUD and R. E. SMITH, Eds., Idaho National Laboratory (2019).
   Google Scholar
• A. L. D’ENTREMONT and R. L. SINDELAR, “Review and Summary of Oxide Thickness Data for Aluminum-Clad Spent Nuclear Fuel,” SRNL-STI-2023-00038, Savannah River National Laboratory.
   Google Scholar