Package Performance Study: A Historical Perspective and Planning for a Path Forward

References

• “Final Environmental Statement on the Transportation of Radioactive Material by Air and Other Modes,” NUREG-0170, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Dec. 1977).
   Google Scholar
• L. E. FISCHER et al., “Shipping Container Response to Severe Highway and Railway Accident Conditions,” NUREG/CR-4829, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Feb. 1987).
   Google Scholar
• J. L. SPRUNG et al., “Reexamination of Spent Fuel Shipment Risk Estimates,” NUREG/CR-6672, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Mar. 2000).
   Google Scholar
• Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 71, “Packaging and Transportation of Radioactive Material,” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
   Google Scholar
• J. L. SPRUNG et al., “Spent Nuclear Fuel Transportation Package Performance Study Issues Report,” NUREG/CR-6768, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (June 2002).
   Google Scholar
• “United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Package Performance Study Test Protocols,” NUREG-1768, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Feb. 2003).
   Google Scholar
• “Options for Full-Scale Spent Nuclear Fuel Transportation Cask Testing Under the Package Performance Study,” SECY-04-0029, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Feb. 2004).
   Google Scholar
• “The Commission,” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission; https://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/organization/commfuncdesc.html (current as of May 30, 2023).
   Google Scholar
• “Commission Papers (SECY),” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission; https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/commission/secys/index.html (current as of March 2, 2023).
   Google Scholar
• “Staff Requirements—SECY-04-0029—Options for Full-Scale Spent Nuclear Fuel Transportation Cask Testing Under the Package Performance Study (Revised),” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (May 2004).
   Google Scholar
• “Staff Requirements Memoranda (SRMs),” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission; https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/commission/srm/index.html (current as of March 2, 2023).
   Google Scholar
• “Demonstration Test Plan for Full-Scale Spent Nuclear Fuel Rail Transportation Cask Testing Under the Package Performance Study,” SECY-04-0135, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (July 2004).
   Google Scholar
• “Staff Requirements—SECY-04-0135—Demonstration Test Plan for Full-Scale Spent Nuclear Fuel Rail Transportation Cask Testing Under the Package Performance Study,” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Dec. 2004).
   Google Scholar
• B. DROSTE, “Experiences and Perspectives of Package Testing Under Hypothetical Accident Conditions,” Proc. 15th Int. Symp. on the Packaging and Transportation of Radioactive Materials (PATRAM 2007), Miami, Florida, October 21–26, 2007 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• A. MUSOLFF et al., “Drop Test Results of the Full-Scale CONSTOR® V/TC Prototype,” Proc. 15th Int. Symp. on the Packaging and Transportation of Radioactive Materials (PATRAM 2007), Miami, Florida, October 21–26, 2007 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• “Details and Projected Cost of a Demonstration Test of a Full-Scale Spent Nuclear Fuel Rail Transportation Cask Under the Package Performance Study,” SECY-05-0051, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Mar. 2005).
   Google Scholar
• “Performance Specification for Trains Used to Carry High-Level Radioactive Material,” Standard S-2043, Association of American Railroads.
   Google Scholar
• “Staff Requirements—SECY-05-0051—Details and Projected Cost of a Demonstration Test of a Full-Scale Spent Nuclear Fuel Rail Transportation Cask Under the Package Performance Study,” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (June 2005).
   Google Scholar
• “Package Performance Study Status Update,” SECY-06-0053, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Mar. 2006).
   Google Scholar
• “Staff Requirements—SECY-06-0053—Package Performance Study Status Report,” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Apr. 2006).
   Google Scholar
• “Staff Actions Taken in Response to the National Academy of Sciences’ Study on Transportation of High-Level Waste and Spent Nuclear Fuel in the United States,” SECY-07-0095, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (June 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Going the Distance? The Safe Transport of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste in the United States, The National Academies Press (2006).
   Google Scholar
• H. E. ADKINS JR. et al., “Spent Fuel Transportation Package Response to the Baltimore Tunnel Fire Scenario,” NUREG/CR-6886, Rev. 2, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Feb. 2009).
   Google Scholar
• H. E. ADKINS JR. et al., “Spent Fuel Transportation Package Response to the Caldecott Tunnel Fire Scenario,” NUREG/CR-6894, Rev. 1, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Jan. 2007).
   Google Scholar
• H. E. ADKINS JR. et al., “Spent Fuel Transportation Package Response to the MacArthur Maze Fire Scenario,” NUREG/CR-7206, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Oct. 2016).
   Google Scholar
• H. E. ADKINS JR. et al., “Spent Fuel Transportation Package Response to the Newhall Pass Tunnel Fire Scenario,” NUREG/CR-7207, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Oct. 2016).
   Google Scholar
• J. A. FORT, J. M. CUTA, and H. E. ADKINS JR., “A Compendium of Spent Fuel Transportation Package Response Analyses to Severe Fire Accident Scenarios,” NUREG/CR-7209, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Mar. 2017).
   Google Scholar
• A. S. GARABEDIAN, D. S. DUNN, and A. H. CHOWDHURY, “Analysis of Rail Car Components Exposed to a Tunnel Fire Environment,” NUREG/CR-6799, Rev. 1, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Mar. 2003).
   Google Scholar
• D. S. DUNN, R. E. SHEWMAKER, and A. H. CHOWDHURY, “Analysis of Structural Materials Exposed to a Severe Fire Environment,” NUREG/CR-6987, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Feb. 2009).
   Google Scholar
• K. AXLER et al., “Structural Materials Analyses of the Newhall Pass Tunnel Fire, 2007,” NUREG/CR-7101, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (June 2011).
   Google Scholar
• G. ADAMS et al., “Analysis of Severe Railway Accidents Involving Long Duration Fires,” NUREG/CR-7034, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Feb. 2011).
   Google Scholar
• G. ADAMS and T. MINTZ, “Analysis of Severe Roadway Accidents Involving Long Duration Fires,” NUREG/CR-7035, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Feb. 2011).
   Google Scholar
• “Recommended Railroad Operating Practices for Transportation of Hazardous Materials,” Circular No. OT-55, Association of American Railroads (2006).
   Google Scholar
• “Report to the Secretary of Energy,” Blue Ribbon Commission on America’s Nuclear Future (Jan. 2012).
   Google Scholar
• R. A. BLYTHE et al., “The Central Electricity Generating Board Flask Test Project,” IAEA-SM-286/78P, Proc. Int. Symp. on the Packaging and Transportation of Radioactive Materials (PATRAM ’86), Vol. 2, p. 433 (1987).
   Google Scholar
• C.-F. TSO, D. VINCE, and C. YOUNG, “Smash Hit! Magnox Lesson for Today,” Packag. Transp. Storage Secur. Radioact. Mat., 19, 1, 11 (2008); https://doi.org/10.1179/174651008X279019.
   Google Scholar
• “Advisory Material for the IAEA Regulations for the Safe Transport of Radioactive Material (2012 Edition),” SSG-26, International Atomic Energy Agency (2014).
   Google Scholar