An Assessment of Deep Borehole Disposal Post-Closure Safety

References

• P. BRADY et al., “Deep Borehole Disposal of Nuclear Waste: Final Report,” SAND2012-7789, Sandia National Laboratories (2012).
   Google Scholar
• N. CHAPMAN, “Who Might Be Interested in a Deep Borehole Disposal Facility for Their Radioactive Waste?” Energies, 12, 8, 1542 (2019); https://doi.org/10.3390/en12081542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. FINSTERLE et al., “Thermal Evolution Near Heat-Generating Nuclear Waste Canisters Disposed in Horizontal Drillholes,” Energies, 12, 4, 596 (2019); https://doi.org/10.3390/en12040596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. FREEZE et al., “Deep Borehole Disposal Safety Case,” SAND2019-1915, Sandia National Laboratories (2019).
   Google Scholar
• G. FREEZE et al., “Progress Toward a Deep Borehole Field Demonstration,” Proc. IHLRWM 2022, p. 1002, Phoenix, Arizona, November 13–17, 2022 (2022).
   Google Scholar
• D. MALLANTS et al., “The State of the Science and Technology in Deep Borehole Disposal of Nuclear Waste,” Energies, 13, 4, 1 (2020); https://doi.org/10.3390/en13040833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. MALLANTS et al., “Borehole Disposal Demonstration Project: Overview & Collaboration Opportunities,” presented at IFNEC Reliable Nuclear Fuel Services Working Group Webinar, November 4–5, 2020, International Framework for Nuclear Energy Cooperation ( 2020).
   Google Scholar
• D. MALLANTS, J. PHALEN, and H. GRIFFITHS, “Deep Borehole Disposal of Intermediate-Level Waste: Progress from Australia’s RD&D Project,” presented at Int. Conf. on Radioactive Waste Management, Solutions for a Sustainable Future, p. 10, Vienna, Austria, November 1–5, 2021, IAEA-CN-61, International Atomic Energy Agency (2021).
   Google Scholar
• D. MALLANTS et al., “A Framework for Streamlining RD&D Activities for Deep Borehole Disposal,” Proc. WM2022 Symp., Phoenix, Arizona, March 6, 2022, (2022).
   Google Scholar
• D. MALLANTS and Y. BEIRAGHDAR, “Heat Transport in the Near Field of a Deep Vertical Disposal Borehole: Preliminary Performance Assessment,” Proc. WM2021 Symp., Phoenix, Arizona, March 7, 2021 (2021).
   Google Scholar
• P. SCHAUBS et al., “Using Numerical Simulation of Fault Zones to Aid Site Selection for Deep Borehole Waste Repositories,” presented at WM2022 Conf., Phoenix, Arizona, March 6–10, 2022 (2022).
   Google Scholar
• K. S. LARI and D. MALLANTS, “Coupled Heat-Mass Transport Modelling of Radionuclide Migration from a Nuclear Waste Disposal Borehole,” Geofluids, 2022, 5264257 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5264257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Safety Cases for Deep Geological Disposal of Radioactive Waste: Where Do We Stand?” Proc. Symp. Paris, Paris, France, January 23–25, 2007, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Nuclear Energy Agency ( 2007).
   Google Scholar
• G. FREEZE et al., “Deep Borehole Disposal Safety Analysis,” FCRD-UFD-2016-000075 Rev. 0, SAND2016-10949R, Sandia National Laboratories (2016).
   Google Scholar
• B. W. ARNOLD et al., “Deep Borehole Disposal Research: Demonstration Site Selection Guidelines, Borehole Seals Design, and RD&D Needs,” SAND2013-9490P, Sandia National Laboratories (2013).
   Google Scholar
• B. W. ARNOLD et al., “Deep Borehole Disposal Research: Geological Data Evaluation, Alternative Waste Forms, and Borehole Seals,” SAND2014-17430R, Sandia National Laboratories (2014).
   Google Scholar
• “The Nature and Purpose of the Post-Closure Safety Cases for Geological Repositories,” NEA/RWM/R(2013)1, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Nuclear Energy Agency (2013).
   Google Scholar
• C. WILSKE et al., “Noble Gas Composition of Deep Rocks to Interpret Provenance and Residence Time of Fluids at a Granite Site in Australia,” Proc. WM2022 Symp., Phoenix, Arizona (2022).
   Google Scholar
• C. WILSKE et al., “Noble Gas Analyses of Fluid Inclusions in the Deep Hiltaba Suite Granite (South Australia) Reveal Fluid Circulation on the Billion Year Time Scale,” presented at Goldschmidt 2023, Lyon, France, July 9–14, 2023 (2023).
   Google Scholar
• L. ESTEBAN et al., “Combining Petrophysics and Mineralogy to Infer Containment Potential of Granites for Borehole Disposal of ILW in Australia,” Proc. WM2022 Symp., Phoenix, Arizona (2022).
   Google Scholar
• J. BOURDET et al., “Natural Hydrogen in Low Temperature Geofluids in a Precambrian Granite, South Australia. Implications for Hydrogen Generation and Movement in the Upper Crust,” Chem. Geol., 638, 121698 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2023.121698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. SAROUT et al., “Geomechanical and Petrophysical Properties of Rock Salt for Waste Disposal or Energy/Gas Storage,” presented at the American Geophysical Union Fall Mtg., MR21B-02, Chicago, Illinois, December 12–16, 2022 (2022).
   Google Scholar
• J. ZHANG, D. MALLANTS, and P. V. BRADY, “Molecular Dynamics Study of Uranyl Adsorption from Aqueous Solution to Smectite,” Appl. Clay Sci., 218, 106361 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2021.106361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. SHEN et al., “Modelling of Geomechanical Stability of a Large-Diameter, Deep Borehole for Disposal of Long-Lived Intermediate Level Waste,” Proc. WM2022 Symp., Phoenix, Arizona (2022).
   Google Scholar
• J. SHI et al., “Analytical and Numerical Estimation of Fracture Initiation and Propagation Regions Around Large-Diameter, Deep Boreholes for Disposal of Long-Lived Intermediate-Level Waste,” Energies, 15, 7, 2445 (2022); https://doi.org/10.3390/en15072445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. SCHAUBS and U. KELKA, “Fault Conceptualisation and Numerical Simulation of Safe Waste Disposal Sites,” CSIRO Report, CSIRO (2021).
   Google Scholar
• U. KELKA et al., “Deep Borehole Disposal of Long-Lived Intermediate Level Waste. Generic Site Screening Tools Accounting for Geological Faults,” presented at 3rd Conf. on Key Topics in Deep Geological Disposal Challenges of a Site Selection Process: Society—Procedures—Safety, p. 78, S8-05, Cologne, Germany, July 4–6, 2022 (2022).
   Google Scholar
• C. DOBLIN, S. GULIZIA, and D. MALLANTS, “Assessment of Technologies to Produce Corrosion Resistant Coatings on Nuclear Waste Disposal Canisters,” MRS Adv., 2022, 7, 170 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1557/s43580-022-00223-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. SMITH et al., “The Long-Term Safety Assessment Methodology for the Geological Disposal of Radioactive Waste,” NIROND-TR REPORT 2009-14 E, Nationale instelling voor radioactief afval en verrijkte splijtstof / Organisme national des déchets radioactifs et des matières fissiles enrichies (Belgian National Agency for Radioactive Waste and enriched Fissile Material) (2009).
   Google Scholar
• M. MAZUREK et al., “Natural Tracer Profiles Across Argillaceous Formations,” Appl. Geochem., 26, 7, 1035 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2011.03.124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. SUCKOW et al., “The Role of Environmental Tracers for Underpinning the Safety of Deep Borehole Disposal,” Proc. Int. High-Level Waste Management Conf., Phoenix, Arizona, November 13–17, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• “Blanche 001 Well Completion Report,” Government of Australia; https://minerals.sarig.sa.gov.au/Details.aspx?DRILLHOLE_NO=206086.
   Google Scholar
• M. D. RAVEN, P. G. SELF, and R. GOMEZ-CAMACHO, “XRD Report—Quantitative Mineralogy and Major and Minor Element Analysis of Granite Samples,” CSIRO Report, CSIRO (2020).
   Google Scholar
• L. ESTEBAN et al., “Blanche-1 Well: Lab and Logs Petrophysical Integration,” CSIRO Report EP2021-2664, CSIRO (2021).
   Google Scholar
• L. ESTEBAN et al., “Influence of Mineral Alteration Intensity of Hiltaba Granite and Its Vertical Distribution on Physicochemical Containment for Borehole Disposal of Intermediate Level Waste in Australia,” Proc. IHLRWM, p. 857, Phoenix, Arizona, November 13–17, 2022 (2022).
   Google Scholar
• D. MALLANTS et al., “Global Review of Site Suitability Conditions for the Geological Disposal of Radioactive Waste,” Proc. WM2018 Symp., p. 14, Phoenix, Arizona, March 18–27, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• R. J. MILLINGTON and J. P. QUIRK, “Permeability of Porous Solids,” Trans. Faraday Soc., 57, 1200 (1961); https://doi.org/10.1039/tf9615701200.
   Google Scholar
• C. WILSKE et al., “Mineral Crushing Methods for Noble Gas Analyses of Fluid Inclusions: A Review,” Geofluids, 2023, 8040253 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8040253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. R. CHERRY et al., “Precise Geochronological Constraints on the Origin, Setting and Incorporation of Ca. 1.59 Ga Surficial Facies into the Olympic Dam Breccia Complex, South Australia,” Precambrian Res., 315, 162 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2018.07.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. STRAND, “Deep Borehole Disposal Research: Conceptual Models of Australian Salt Rocks Potentially Suitable for Geological Disposal,” CSIRO Report EP2023-1985, CSIRO (2023).
   Google Scholar
• J. C. STORMONT and J. J. K. DAEMEN, “Laboratory Study of Gas Permeability Changes in Rock Salt During Deformation,” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr., 29, 4, 325 (1992); https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(92)90510-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. A. SHELDON and D. MALLANTS, “Deep Borehole Disposal Research: Modelling Radionuclide Migration from a Deep Borehole in Rock Salt,” CSIRO Report EP2023-1068, CSIRO (2023).
   Google Scholar
• S. SEETHARAM et al., “Additional Parameters for the Cementitious Near Field and Multi-Layer Cover of the Dessel Near Surface Repository,” Project Near Surface Disposal of Category A Waste at Dessel, NIROND-TR 2010–07 E, Nationale instelling voor radioactief afval en verrijkte splijtstof / Organisme national des déchets radioactifs et des matières fissiles enrichies (Belgian National Agency for Radioactive Waste and enriched Fissile Material) (2011).
   Google Scholar
• R. V. BURNE and A. J. KANTSLER, “Geothermal Constraints on the Hydrocarbon Potential of the Canning Basin, Western Australia,” BMR J. Aust. Geol. Geophys., 2, 271 (1977).
   Google Scholar
• S. NAKASHIMA, “Diffusivity of Ions in Pore Water as a Quantitative Basis for Rock Deformation Rate Estimates,” Tectonophysics, 245, 3–4, 185 (1995); https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(94)00234-Z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. WERME et al., “Chemical Corrosion of Highly Radioactive Borosilicate Nuclear Waste Glass Under Simulated Repository Conditions,” J. Mater. Res., 5, 5, 1130 (1990); https://doi.org/10.1557/JMR.1990.1130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. KAMEI, “Kinetics of Long-Term Illitization of Montmorillonite—A Natural Analogue of Thermal Alteration of Bentonite in the Radioactive Waste Disposal System,” J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 66, 2–4, 612 (2005); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2004.06.067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. XU et al., TOUGHREACT User’s Guide: A Simulation Program for Non-isothermal Multiphase Reactive Geochemical Transport in Variable Saturated Geologic Media, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (2004).
   Google Scholar
• J.-C. H. SUBLET et al., “FISPACT-II: An Advanced Simulation System for Activation, Transmutation and Material Modelling,” Nucl. Data Sheets, 139, 77 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2017.01.002.
   Google Scholar
• J. P. CULL, “An Appraisal of Australian Heat-Flow Data,” J. Aust. Geol Geophys., 7, 11 (1982).
   Google Scholar
• S. OZIMIC et al., “Australian Petroleum Accumulations Report,” Bureau of Mineral Resources, Australia (1986).
   Google Scholar
• H.-D. VOSTEEN and R. SCHELLSCHMIDT, “Influence of Temperature on Thermal Conductivity, Thermal Capacity and Thermal Diffusivity for Different Types of Rock,” Phys. Chem. Earth, 28, 9–11, 499 (2003); https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-7065(03)00069-X.
   Google Scholar
• C. CLAUSER and E. HUENGES, “Thermal Conductivity of Rocks and Minerals. Rock Physics and Phase Relations: A Handbook of Physical Constants,” AGU Reference Shelf, 3, 105 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• O. KOLDITZ and L. GLENN, “Computational Methods in Environmental Fluid Mechanics,” Appl. Mech. Rev., 55, 6, B117 (2002); https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1508157.
   Google Scholar
• “Reference Biospheres for Solid Radioactive Waste Disposal,” in the “Report of BIOMASS Theme 1 of the BIOsphere Modelling and ASSessment (BIOMASS) Programme,” International Atomic Energy Agency (2003).
   Google Scholar
• “Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality,” 3rd ed., Vol. 1—Recommendations, World Health Organization (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Compendium of Dose Coefficients Based on ICRP Publication 60. ICRP Publication 119. Ann. ICRP 41(Suppl.), International Commission on Radiological Protection (2012).
   Google Scholar
• D. MALLANTS and Y. BEIRAGHDAR, “Radionuclide Transport and Deep Borehole Disposal: Preliminary Safety Assessments,” Proc. WM2021 Symp., Phoenix, Arizona, March 7–11, 2021 (2021).
   Google Scholar
• L. H. JOHNSON, “Calculations of the Temperature Evolution of a Repository for Spent Fuel, Vitrified High-Level Waste and Intermediate Level Waste in Opalinus Clay,” National Cooperative for the Disposal of Radioactive Waste, Switzerland (2002).
   Google Scholar
• “International Basic Safety Standards for Protection Against Ionizing Radiation and for the Safety of Radiation Sources,” International Atomic Energy Agency (1996).
   Google Scholar
• D. CLAYTON et al., “Generic Disposal System Modeling, Fiscal Year 2011,” Progress Report, Department of Energy, United States (2011).
   Google Scholar
• P. FRUGIER et al., “Modeling Glass Corrosion with GRAAL,” npj Mater. Degrad., 2, 1, 35 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1038/s41529-018-0056-z.
   Google Scholar
• C. L. THORPE et al., “Forty Years of Durability Assessment of Nuclear Waste Glass by Standard Methods,” npj Mater. Degrad., 5, 1, 1 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1038/s41529-021-00210-42021.
   Google Scholar
• J. D. VIENNA et al., “Current Understanding and Remaining Challenges in Modeling Long-Term Degradation of Borosilicate Nuclear Waste Glasses,” Int. J. Appl. Glass Sci., 4, 4, 283 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1111/ijag.120502013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. FREEZE et al., “Generic Disposal System Analysis (GDSA): Generic Salt Disposal System Reference Case and Model Implementation,” presented at the UFDC Annual Working Group Mtg., SAND2014-4697P, Las Vegas, Nevada (2014).
   Google Scholar
• D. MALLANTS, J. MARIVOET, and X. SILLEN, “Performance Assessment of the Disposal of Vitrified High-Level Waste in a Clay Layer,” J. Nucl. Mater., 298, 1–2, 125 (2001); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3115(01)00577-3(2001).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. J. NEEWAY et al., “The Dissolution Behavior of Borosilicate Glasses in Far-From Equilibrium Conditions,” Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 226, 132 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GCA.2018.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. MOORS et al., “Assessment of the in situ pH and Eh of Boom Clay,” Proc. Natural and Engineered Barriers for Radioactive Waste Confinement Int. Mtg., pp. 257–258, Reims, France, December 9–12, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• J. A. BERNAUF, “Fluid Inclusion Analyses of Bedded Halite from the Neoproterozoic Browne Formation of Central Australia to Determine Parent Water Origin and pH,” West Virginia University (2017); https://doi.org/10.33915/etd.5192.
   Google Scholar
• T. SANDÉN et al., “Sealing Site Investigation Boreholes: Phase 2,” Final Report RWM/03/046, Radioactive Waste Management Limited, United Kingdom (2016).
   Google Scholar
• D. MALLANTS and D. JACQUES, “Modelling Multi-Phase Flow Phenomena in Concrete Barriers Used for Geological Disposal of Radioactive Waste,” presented at the Int. Conf. Cementitious Materials as Model Porous Media: Nanostructure and Transport Processes,” Monte Verita, Switzerland, July 17–22, 2005 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• “Gas Generation and Migration in Radioactive Waste Disposal Safety-Relevant Issues,” Proc. Workshop, Reims, France, June 26–28, 2000, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Nuclear Energy Agency ( 2000).
   Google Scholar
• L. ORTIZ, G. VOLCKAERT, and D. MALLANTS, “Gas Generation and Migration in Boom Clay, a Potential Host Rock Formation for Nuclear Waste Storage,” Eng. Geol., 64, 2–3, 287 (2002); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7952(01)00107-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. KLEE et al., “In situ Stresses in Borehole Blanche-1/South Australia Derived from Breakouts, Core Discing and Hydraulic Fracturing to 2 km Depth,” Rock Mech. Rock Eng., 44, 5, 531 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-011-0157-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. SHEN and O. STEPHANSSON, “Modification of the G-Criterion of Crack Propagation in Compression,” Int. J. Eng. Fract. Mech., 47, 2, 177 (1994); https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7944(94)90219-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. ZHANG, D. MALLANTS, and B. CLENNELL, “Molecular Dynamics Study of Radionuclide Diffusion in Bentonite: Effects of Density, Pore Size, Specific Surface Area, and Adsorption,” Appl. Clay Sci., 216 (submitted for publication) (2022).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. SHEN et al., “Modelling Geomechanical Stability of a Large Deep Borehole in Shale for Radioactive Waste Disposal,” presented at Waste Management 2022, Phoenix, Arizona, November 13–17, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• D. MALLANTS and N. CHAPMAN, “How Much Does Corrosion of Nuclear Waste Matrices Matter,” Nat. Mater., 19, 9, 959 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-020-0741-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Technical Evaluation of the U.S. Department of Energy Deep Borehole Disposal Research and Development Program,” U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board (2016).
   Google Scholar
• D. MALLANTS, V. CROMBEZ, and J. PHALEN, “Site Selection Criteria for Deep Borehole Disposal of Intermediate Level Waste in Australia,” presented at Waste Management 2019 Conf., March 3–7, 2019 (2019).
   Google Scholar
• S. FINSTERLE et al., “Sealing of a Deep Horizontal Borehole Repository for Nuclear Waste,” Energies, 14, 1, 91 (2021); https://doi.org/10.3390/en14010091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. LU et al., “Sorption Kinetics and Impact of Temperature, Ionic Strength and Colloid Concentration on the Adsorption of Plutonium-239 by Inorganic Colloids,” Radiochim. Acta, 91, 12, 713 (2003); https://doi.org/10.1524/ract.91.12.713.23422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. RUNDE et al., “Solubility and Sorption of Redox-Sensitive Radionuclides (Np, Pu) in J-13 Water from the Yucca Mountain Site: Comparison Between Experiment and Theory,” Appl. Geochem., 17, 6, 837 (2002); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-2927(02)00043-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. BAUER, “Influence of Temperature on Sorption of Europium onto Smectite: The Role of Organic Contaminants,” Appl. Clay Sci., 30, 1, 1 (2005); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2005.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. TERTRE, “Experimental Sorption of Ni2+, Cs+ and Ln3+ onto a Montmorillonite up to 150°C,” Geochimca et Cosmochimica Acta, 69, 21, 4937 (2005); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2005.04.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. ANGOVE, “The Influence of Temperature on the Adsorption of Cadmium(II) and Cobalt(II) on Kaolinite,” J. Colloid Interface Sci., 204, 1, 93 (1998); https://doi.org/10.1006/jcis.1998.5549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. R. FRÖHLICH, “Influence of Temperature and Background Electrolyte on the Sorption of Neptunium(V) on Opalinus Clay,” Appl. Clay Sci., 69, 43 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2012.08.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar