A Framework to Assess Advanced Reactor Spent Fuel Management Facility Deployment

References

• R. STOLL et al., “Development of an Execution Strategy Analysis (ESA) Capability and Tool for Storage of Used Nuclear Fuel (UNF),” presented at the IAEA Int. Conf. on Management of Spent Fuel Nuclear Power Plants, Vienna, Austria (2015).
   Google Scholar
• N. SARAEVA et al., “Development of an Execution Strategy Analysis (ESA) Capability and Tool for the Management of Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF),” presented at the Waste Management Symp., Phoenix, Arizona (2016).
   Google Scholar
• N. SARAEVA et al., “Further Development of an Execution Strategy Analysis (ESA) Capability and Tool for the Management of Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF),” presented at the Waste Management Symp., Phoenix, Arizona (2017).
   Google Scholar
• R. STOLL et al., “Evolution of an Execution Strategy Analysis Capability and Tool for the Disposition of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High Level Waste,” presented at the Int. Conf. Management of Spent Fuel Nuclear Power Reactors, Vienna, Austria (2019).
   Google Scholar
• “Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976,” 42 U.S.C. §6901 et seq. (1976).
   Google Scholar
• Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, “Protection of Environment,” Part 261, “Identification and Listing of Hazardous Waste,” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (1980).
   Google Scholar
• Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, “Energy,” Part 72, “Licensing Requirements for the Independent Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel and high-level Radioactive Waste, and reactor-related Greater than Class C Waste,” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
   Google Scholar
• T. NEIDER and P. HEJZLAR, “Natrium,” presented at NASEM (2021); https://www.terrapower.com/natrium-program-summary/ (accessed May 2023).
   Google Scholar
• “Westinghouse AP1000 Design Control Document Rev. 18,” Tier 2, Chapter 4: Fuel System Design, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2010).
   Google Scholar
• A. E. DUBBERLY et al., “SUPERPRISM Oxide and Metal Fuel Core Designs,” Proc. ICONE 8, Baltimore, Maryland (2000).
   Google Scholar
• D. E. JANNEY, “Metallic Fuels Handbook, Part 1: Alloys Based on U-Zr, Pu-Zr, U-Pu, or U-Pu-Zr, Including Those with Minor Actinides (Np, Am, Cm), Rare-Earth Elements (La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Gd), and Y,” INL/EXT-15-36520, Idaho National Laboratory (2017).
   Google Scholar
• “Westinghouse AP1000 Design Control Document Rev. 19,” Tier 2 Chapter 4: Nuclear Design, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2011).
   Google Scholar
• “Evaluation of Options for Permanent Geologic Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste in Support of a Comprehensive National Nuclear Fuel Cycle Strategy, Volume I,” SAND2014-0187P (Vol. 1), Sandia National Laboratories (2014).
   Google Scholar
• “Progress on Approaches to the Management of Separated Plutonium,” SMS/TS/B1-PLUT/002/A, Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (2014).
   Google Scholar
• “Idaho National Laboratory Preferred Disposition Plan for Sodium-Bonded Spent Nuclear Fuel,” Idaho National Laboratory (2007).
   Google Scholar
• “Department of Energy-Managed Spent Nuclear Fuel at the Idaho National Laboratory: Fact Sheet (Rev. 1),” U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board (2020).
   Google Scholar
• N. HALL et al., “Storage Experience with Spent (Irradiated) Advanced Reactor Fuel Types,” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2019).
   Google Scholar
• “Record of Decision for the Treatment and Management of Sodium-Bonded Spent Nuclear Fuel,” Fed. Regist., 65, 182, 56565 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• E. D. KITCHER, “A White Paper: Disposition Options for Sodium-Cooled Fast Reactors,” INL/EXT-20-59581, Idaho National Laboratory (2020).
   Google Scholar
• K. L. TOEWS et al., “Application of the MEDEC Process to Treat Fermi-1 Sodium-Bonded Spent Nuclear Fuel,” presented at the ANS Topl. Mtg. on DOE Spent Nuclear Fuel Fissile Materials, Charleston, South Carolina (2002).
   Google Scholar
• C. H. DELEGARD and A. J. SCHMIDT, “Uranium Metal Reaction Behavior in Water, Sludge, and Grout Matrices,” PNNL-17815, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (2008).
   Google Scholar
• “Yucca Mountain Science and Engineering Report,” DOE/RW-0539-1, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management (2002).
   Google Scholar
• D. E. SHROPSHIRE and J. S. HERRING, “Fuel-Cycle and Nuclear Material Disposition Issues Associated with High-Temperature Gas Reactors,” presented at the Americas Nuclear Energy Symp., Miami Beach, Florida (2004).
   Google Scholar
• E. J. MULDER, “Overview of X-Energy’s 200 MWth Xe-100 Reactor,” presented at NASEM (2021).
   Google Scholar
• L. LOMMERS, “Framatome Steam Cycle High-Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactors,” presented at NASEM (2021).
   Google Scholar
• “Technologies for Gas Cooled Reactor Decommissioning, Fuel Storage, and Waste Disposal,” IAEA-TECDOC-1043, International Atomic Energy Agency (1997).
   Google Scholar
• P. HUANG et al., “Introduction of Interim Storage of SNF in INET,” Proc. 18th Int. Conf. on Nuclear Engineering, Vol. 1 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• L. VERGARI and M. FRATONI, “Spent Fuel Management Strategies for Fluoride-Cooled Pebble Bed Reactors,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 378, 111189 (2021); http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2021.111189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. KOVACIC et al., “Advanced Reactor Safeguards: Nuclear Material Control and Accounting for Pebble Bed Reactors,” ORNL/SPR-2020/1849, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (2021).
   Google Scholar
• A. O. DELLEY et al., “Feasibility and Alternatives for Receipt, Storage, and Processing of HTGR Pebble Fuel at SRS,” SRNL-TR-2014-00184, Savannah River National Laboratory (2014).
   Google Scholar
• P. W. HUMRICKHOUSE, “HTGR Dust Safety Issues and Needs for Research and Development,” INL/EXT-11-21097, Idaho National Laboratory (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Q. SUN et al., “A Review of HTGR Graphite Dust Transport Research,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 360, 110477 (2020); http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2019.110477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “High Temperature Gas Cooled Reactor Fuels and Materials,” IAEA-TECDOC-1645, International Atomic Energy Agency (2010).
   Google Scholar
• G. BUSTER et al., “Fracture Analysis of Reduced Diameter Spherical Graphite Fuel Elements Under Diametrical Loading Conditions,” UCBTH-15-004, University of California, Berkeley (2015).
   Google Scholar
• “Draft Environmental Assessment for the Acceptance and Disposition of Spent Nuclear Fuel Containing U.S.-Origin Highly Enriched Uranium from the Federal Republic of Germany,” U.S. Department of Energy, Savannah River Operations Office (2016).
   Google Scholar
• R. W. LAUG et al., “CASTOR THTR Transport/Storage Casks,” presented at the IAEA Technical Committee Mtg. on Technologies for Gas Cooled Reactor Decommissioning, Fuel Storage and Waste Disposal, Juelich, Germany (1997).
   Google Scholar
• M. MAXTED, “Update on the German Graphite Fuel Project,” Savannah River National Laboratory (2018).
   Google Scholar
• M. ATZ, “Methodologies for the Evaluation of Nuclear Waste Management Strategies and Applications to Advanced Fuel Cycles,” PhD Thesis, Department of Nuclear Engineering, University of California, Berkeley (2019).
   Google Scholar
• A. L. LOTTS et al., “Options for Treating High-Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactor Fuel for Repository Disposal,” ORNL/TM-12027, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (1992).
   Google Scholar
• B. P. VAN DEN AKKER and J. AHN, “Performance Assessment for Geological Disposal of Graphite Waste Containing TRISO Particles,” Nucl. Technol., 181, 408 (2013); http://dx.doi.org/10.13182/NT11-103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. LATKOWSKI, “TerraPower’s Molten Chloride Fast Reactor (MCFR),” presented at NASEM (2021).
   Google Scholar
• D. LEBLANC, “Overview of the IMSR” presented at NASEM (2021).
   Google Scholar
• J. CHOE et al., “Fuel Cycle Flexibility of Terrestrial Energy’s Integral Molten Salt Reactor (IMSR).” Presented at the 38th Annual Conf. of the Canadian Nuclear Society, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada (2018).
   Google Scholar
• D. E. HOLCOMB et al., “Fast Spectrum Molten Salt Reactor Options,” ORNL/TM-2011/105, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (2011).
   Google Scholar
• JACOBS EM TEAM, “Record of Decision for Interim Action to Remove Fuel and Flush Salts from the Molten Salt Reactor Experiment Facility at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee,” DOE/OR/02-1671&D2, U.S. Department of Energy (1998).
   Google Scholar
• F. J. PERETZ, “Disposition of the Fluoride Fuel and Flush Salts from the Molten Salt Reactor Experiment at Oak Ridge National Laboratory,” presented at the American Institute of Chemical Engineers Spring Mtg. (AIChE), New Orleans, Louisiana (1996).
   Google Scholar
• F. J. PERETZ et al., “Removal of Uranium and Salt from the Molten Salt Reactor Experiment,” presented at SPECTRUM ‘98, Denver, Colorado (1998).
   Google Scholar
• R. PRICE, Bringing the Back-End to the Forefront: Spent Fuel Management and Safeguards Considerations for Emerging Reactors, Stimson Center, Washington, District of Columbia (2021).
   Google Scholar
• B. J. RILEY et al., “Molten Salt Reactor Waste and Effluent Management Strategies: A Review,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 345, 94 (2019); http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2019.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. R. VANCE et al., “Candidate Waste Forms for Immobilisation of Waste Chloride Salt from Pyroprocessing of Spent Nuclear Fuel,” J. Nucl. Mater., 420, 1–3, 396 (2012); http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.09.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. R. VANCE et al., “Synroc Development—Past and Present Applications,” MRS Energy & Sustainability, 4, 8 (2017); http://dx.doi.org/10.1557/mre.2017.9.
   Google Scholar
• C. F. SMITH and L. CINOTTI, “Lead-Cooled Fast Reactor,” in the Handbook of Generation IV Nuclear Reactors, Woodhead Publishing Series in Energy, pp. 119–155 (2016).
   Google Scholar
• D. M. KING and S. T. LIDDLE, “Progress in Molecular Uranium-Nitride Chemistry,” Coord. Chem. Rev., 266–267, 2 (2014); http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2013.06.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. EKBERG et al., “Nitride Fuel for Gen IV Nuclear Power Systems,” J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 318, 1713 (2018); http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10967-018-6316-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. R. SHEMON, Y. YU, and T. K. KIM, “Demonstration of NEAMS Multiphysics Tools for Fast Reactor Applications,” ANL/NSE-20/25, Argonne National Laboratory (2020).
   Google Scholar
• J. BUONGIORNO, “Conceptual Design of a Lead-Bismuth Cooled Fast Reactor with In-Vessel Direct-Contact Steam Generation,” PhD Thesis, Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (Feb. 2001).
   Google Scholar
• J. J. SIENICKI et al., “Status Report on the Small Secure Transportable Autonomous Reactor (SSTAR)/Lead-Cooled Fast Reactor (LFR) and Supporting Research and Development,” ANL-GenIV-089, Argonne National Laboratory (Sep. 2006).
   Google Scholar
• “Demonstration Lead-Cooled Fast Reactor,” Attachment to INL/EXT-16-37867 (Rev. 3), Westinghouse Electric Company LLC (2016).
   Google Scholar
• “Waste from Innovative Types of Reactors and Fuel Cycles—A Preliminary Study,” IAEA Nuclear Energy Series No. NW-T-1.7, International Atomic Energy Agency (2019).
   Google Scholar
• G. J. YOUINOU and S. SEN, “Impact of Accident-Tolerant Fuels and Claddings on the Overall Fuel Cycle: A Preliminary Systems Analysis,” Nucl. Technol., 188, 2, 123 (2014); http://dx.doi.org/10.13182/NT14-22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. JOLKKONEN et al., “Uranium Nitride Fuels in Superheated Steam,” J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., 54, 5, 513 (2017); http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00223131.2017.1291372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Nuclear Power Reactors,” World Nuclear Association (Oct. 2021); https://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/nuclear-fuel-cycle/nuclear-power-reactors/nuclear-power-reactors.aspx (accessed Dec. 16, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• “Evaluation of Options for Permanent Geologic Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste in Support of a Comprehensive National Nuclear Fuel Cycle Strategy, Volume II: Appendices,” SAND2014-0189P (Vol. II), Sandia National Laboratories (2014).
   Google Scholar
• L. M. FERRIS, “Reactions of Uranium Mononitride, Thorium Monocarbide, and Uranium Monocarbide with Nitric Acid and Other Aqueous Reagents,” J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem., 30, 2661 (1968); http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-1902(68)80393-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. SUGIHARA and S. IMOTO, “Hydrolysis of Uranium Nitrides,” J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., 6, 5, 237 (1969); http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/18811248.1969.9732878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. J. BRIDGER, R. M. DELL, and V. J. WHEELER, “Oxidation and Hydrolysis of Uranium and Plutonium Nitrides,” Reactivity in Solids, Proc. of an Int. Symp., New York (1969).
   Google Scholar
• M. B. SEARS, “Reactions of Uranium Carbonitrides and Uranium Nitride with Aqueous Solutions of Hydrochloric, Sulfuric, and Nitric Acids,” J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem., 32, 2971 (1970); http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-1902(70)80363-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. E. ANTILL and B. L. MYAT, “Kinetics of the Oxidation of UN and U(CO) in Carbon Dioxide, Steam and Water at Elevated Temperatures,” Corros. Sci., 6, 1, 17 (1966); http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0010-938X(66)80046-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. A. RAMA RAO et al., “Oxidation and Hydrolysis Kinetic Studies on UN,” J. Nucl. Mater., 185, 231 (1991); http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-3115(91)90340-D.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. SUNDER and N. H. MILLER, “XPS and XRD Studies of Corrosion of Uranium Nitride by Water,” J. Alloys Compd., 271–273, 568 (1998); http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0925-8388(98)00157-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. SUNDER and N. H. MILLER, “Corrosion of UN in Water,” AECL-11656, Whiteshell Laboratories (1996).
   Google Scholar
• J. CHOI et al., “Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) on Mono-uranium Nitride Fuel Development for SSTAR and Space Applications,” UCRL-TR-218931, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (2006).
   Google Scholar