A Weighted Least-Squares Transport Equation Compatible with Source Iteration and Voids

References

• Y. WANG et al., “Hybrid PN-SN with Lagrange Multiplier and Upwinding for the Multiscale Transport Capability in Rattlesnake,” Prog. Nucl. Energy, 101, 381 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2017.03.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. WANG, H. ZHANG, and R. C. MARTINEAU, “Diffusion Acceleration Schemes for Self-Adjoint Angular Flux Formulation with a Void Treatment,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 176, 2, 201 (2014); https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE12-83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. GASTON et al., “MOOSE: A Parallel Computational Framework for Coupled Systems of Nonlinear Equations,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 239, 10, 1768 (2009); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2009.05.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. J. GESH, “Finite Element Methods for Second Order Forms of the Transport Equation,” PhD Thesis, Texas A&M University (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Y. SAAD, Iterative Methods for Sparse Linear Systems, 2nd ed., Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (2003).
   Google Scholar
• R. T. ACKROYD, J. G. ISSA, and N. S. RIYAIT, “Treatment of Voids in Finite Element Transport Methods,” Prog. Nucl. Energy, 18, 1–2, 85 (1986); https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-1970(86)90015-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. E. MOREL and J. M. McGHEE, “A Self-Adjoint Angular Flux Equation,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 132, 3, 312 (1999); https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE132-312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. HANSEN et al., “A Least-Squares Transport Equation Compatible with Voids,” J. Comput. Theor. Transp., 43, 1–7, 374 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1080/00411450.2014.927364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. R. PETERSON et al., “Conservative Nonlinear Diffusion Acceleration Applied to the Unweighted Least-Squares Transport Equation in MOOSE,” Proc. Int. Conf. Mathematics and Computations, Supercomputing in Nuclear Applications and Monte Carlo (M&C+SNA+MC 2015), Nashville, Tennessee, April 19–23, 2015, Vol. 1, p. 636, American Nuclear Society (2015).
   Google Scholar
• M. L. ADAMS and E. W. LARSEN, “Fast Iterative Methods for Discrete-Ordinates Particle Transport Calculations,” Prog. Nucl. Energy, 40, 1, 3 (2002); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-1970(01)00023-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. PARK, D. A. KNOLL, and C. K. NEWMAN, “Nonlinear Acceleration of Transport Criticality Problems,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 172, 1, 52 (2012); https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE11-81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. HAMMER, J. E. MOREL, and Y. WANG, “Nonlinear Diffusion Acceleration of the Least-Squares Transport Equation in Geometries with Voids,” Nucl. Sci. Eng. (submitted for publication).
   Google Scholar
• C. DRUMM et al., “Least-Squares Finite-Element Algorithms in the SCEPTRE Radiation Transport Code,” International Conference on Mathematics and Computational Methods Applied to Nuclear Science and Engineering (M&C 2011), American Nuclear Society, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil (2011).
   Google Scholar
• W. ZHENG, “Least-Squares and Other Residual Based Techniques for Radiation Transport Calculations,” PhD Dissertation, Texas A&M University (2016).
   Google Scholar
• V. M. LABOURE, Y. WANG, and M. D. DeHART, “Least-Squares PN Formulation of the Transport Equation Using Self-Adjoint-Angular-Flux Consistent Boundary Conditions,” Proc. PHYSOR 2016: Unifying Theory and Experiments in the 21st Century, Sun Valley, Idaho, May 1–5, 2016, Vol. 5, p. 3376, American Nuclear Society (2016).
   Google Scholar
• V. E. HENSON and U. M. YANG, “BoomerAMG: A Parallel Algebraic Multigrid Solver and Preconditioner,” Appl. Numer. Math., 41, 1, 155 (2000); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9274(01)00115-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. DE STERCK et al., “Smoothed Aggregation Multigrid for Markov Chains,” SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 32, 1, 40 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1137/080719157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. A. MANTEUFFEL et al., “A Root-Node Based Algebraic Multigrid Method”; arXiv:1610.03154 [math] (2016).
   Google Scholar
• D. A. KNOLL, H. PARK, and C. NEWMAN, “Acceleration of k-Eigenvalue/Criticality Calculations Using the Jacobian-Free Newton-Krylov Method,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 167, 2, 133 (2011); https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE09-89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. A. SMITH, E. E. LEWIS, and B.-C. NA, “Benchmark on Deterministic 2-D MOX Fuel Assembly Transport Calculations Without Spatial Homogenization,” Prog. Nucl. Energy, 45, 2, 107 (2004); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnueene.2004.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. N. McGRAW et al., “Accuracy of the Linear Discontinuous Galerkin Method for 3D Reactor Analysis with Resolved Fuel Pins,” Proc. Int. Conf. Mathematics and Computations, Supercomputing in Nuclear Applications and Monte Carlo (M&C+SNA+MC 2015), Nashville, Tennessee, April 19–23, 2015, Vol. 4, p. 3155, American Nuclear Society (2015).
   Google Scholar
• Y. WANG et al., “Convergence Study of Rattlesnake Solutions for the Two-Dimensional C5G7 Mox Benchmark,” Proc. Int. Conf. Mathematics and Computations, Supercomputing in Nuclear Applications and Monte Carlo (M&C+SNA+MC 2015), Nashville, Tennessee, April 19–23, 2015, Vol. 4, p. 2881, American Nuclear Society (2015).
   Google Scholar
• J. R. SHEWCHUK, “Triangle: Engineering a 2D Quality Mesh Generator and Delaunay Triangulator,” Applied Computational Geometry Towards Geometric Engineering, pp. 203–222, Springer.
   Google Scholar
• TOP500: The List website, Idaho National Laboratory (2017); https://www.top500.org/site/47650 (current as of June 22, 2018).
   Google Scholar