Frequency Transform Method for Transient Analysis of Nuclear Reactors in Monte Carlo

References

• G. GRANDI, “SIMULATE3-K Models & Methodology,” SIMULATE3-K, Studsvik Scandpower (2011).
   Google Scholar
• S. SHANER, “Development of High Fidelity Methods for 3D Monte Carlo Analysis of Nuclear Reactors,” PhD Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2018).
   Google Scholar
• B. BANDINI, “A Three-Dimensional Transient Neutronics Routine for the TRAC-PF1 Reactor Thermal Hydraulic Computer Code,” PhD Thesis, The Pennsylvania State University (1990).
   Google Scholar
• D. FERGUSON and K. HANSEN, “Solution of the Space-Dependent Reactor Kinetics Equations in Three Dimensions,” MIT-2903-4, U.S. Atomic Energy Commission Research and Development, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1985).
   Google Scholar
• Y. CHAO and A. ATTARD, “A Resolution of the Stiffness Problem of Reactor Kinetics,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 90, 1, 40 (1985); https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE85-A17429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. CHAO and P. HUANG, “Theory and Performance of the Fast-Running Multidimensional Pressurized Water Reactor Kinetics Code, SPNOVA-K,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 103, 3, 415 (1989); https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE89-A23693.
   Google Scholar
• Y. BAN, T. ENDO, and A. YAMAMOTO, “A Unified Approach for Numerical Calculation of Space-Dependent Kinetic Equation,” J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., 49, 5, 496 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1080/00223131.2012.677126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Y. CHO et al., “Transient Capability for a MOC-Based Whole Core Transport Code DeCART,” Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 92, 721 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• M. KREHER, K. SMITH, and B. FORGET, “Direct Comparison of High-Order/Low-Order Transient Methods on the 2D-LRA Benchmark,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 196, 409 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2021.1980363.
   Google Scholar
• V. Y. GOL’DIN, G. V. DANILOVA, and B. N. CHETVERUSHKIN, “Approximate Method for Solving Time-Dependent Kinetic Equation,” Computational Methods in Transport Theory, Atomizdat, Moscow (1969).
   Google Scholar
• A. TAMANG and D. ANISTRATOV, “A Multilevel Projective Method for Solving the Space-Time Multigroup Neutron Kinetics Equations Coupled with the Heat Transfer Equation,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 177, 1, 1 (2014); https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE13-42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. GHASSEMI and D. ANISTRATOV, “An Approximation Method for Time-Dependent Problems in High Energy Density Thermal Radiative Transfer,” J. Comput. Theoret. Transp., 49, 31 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1080/23324309.2019.1709082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. OTT, “Quasistatic Treatment of Spatial Phenomena in Reactor Dynamics,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 26, 4, 563 (1966); https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE66-A18428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. OTT and D. MENELEY, “Accuracy of the Quasistatic Treatment of Spatial Reactor Kinetics,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 36, 402 (1969); https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE36-402.
   Google Scholar
• T. TRAHAN, “A Quasi-Static Monte Carlo Algorithm for the Simulation of Sub-Prompt Critical Transients,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 127, 257 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2018.11.055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. BENTLEY, “Improvements in a Hybrid Stochastic/ Deterministic Method for Transient Three Dimensional Neutron Transport,” PhD Thesis, University of Tennessee Knoxville (1996).
   Google Scholar
• B. SJENITZER, “The Dynamic Monte Carlo Method for Transient Analysis of Nuclear Reactors,” PhD Thesis, Delft University of Technology (2014).
   Google Scholar
• V. VALTAVIRTA, M. HESSAN, and J. LEPPÄNEN, “Delayed Neutron Emission Model for Time Dependent Simulations with the SERPENT 2 Monte Carlo Code—First Results,” Proc. PHYSOR 2016, Sun Valley, Idaho, May 1–5, 2016, American Nuclear Society (2016).
   Google Scholar
• D. FERRARO et al., “SERPENT and TRIPOLI-4 Transient Calculations Comparisons for Several Reactivity Insertion Scenarios in a 3D Minicore Benchmark,” Proc. Int. Conf. Mathematics and Computational Methods Applied to Nuclear Science and Engineering (M&C2019), Portland, Oregon, August 25–29, 2019, American Nuclear Society (2019).
   Google Scholar
• M. FAUCHER, D. MANCUSI, and A. ZOIA, “New Kinetic Simulation Capabilities for TRIPOLI-4: Methods and Applications,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 120, 74 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2018.05.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. CULLEN, “Tart 2002: A Coupled Neutron-Photon, 3D, Combinatorial Geometry, Time Dependent Monte Carlo Transport Code,” UCRL-ID-126455, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (2002).
   Google Scholar
• P. ROMANO et al., “OpenMC: A State-of-the-Art Monte Carlo Code for Research and Development,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 82, 90 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2014.07.048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. HOU et al., “OECD/NEA Benchmarks for Time-Dependent Neutron Transport Calculations Without Spatial Homogenization,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 317, 177 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2017.02.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. LIU et al., “Cumulative Migration Method for Computing Rigorous Diffusion Coefficients and Transport Cross Sections from Monte Carlo,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 112, 507 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2017.10.039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar