The Legendre Polynomial Axial Expansion Method

References

• M. WILLIAMS, Mathematical Methods in Particle Transport Theory, Butterworth and Company, London, United Kingdom (1971).
   Google Scholar
• J. ASKEW, “A Characteristics Formulation of the Neutron Transport Equation in Complicated Geometries,” Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Nuclear Energy Agency, Nuclear Science Committee (1972).
   Google Scholar
• B. COLLINS et al., “Stability and Accuracy of 3D Neutron Transport Simulations Using the 2D/1D Method in MPACT,” J. Comput. Phys., 326, 612 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2016.08.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. SNOJ, J. GEHIN, and I. REMEC, “KRITZ-2:1 Experiment on Regular H2O/Fuel Pin Lattices with Low Enriched Uranium Fuel at Temperatures 19.7 °C and 248.5 °C,” Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Nuclear Energy Agency, Nuclear Science Committee (2006).
   Google Scholar
• M. JARRETT, B. KOCHUNAS, and T. DOWNAR, “KRITZ-2 Benchmark Results with MPACT,” Consortium for Advanced Simulation of Light Water Reactors (2018).
   Google Scholar
• M. JARRETT, Nuclear Engineer at TerraPower LLC,Personal Communication.
   Google Scholar
• B. KELLEY, “An Investigation of 2D/1D Approximations to the 3D Boltzmann Transport Equation,” Ph.D. Thesis, University of Michigan, Nuclear Engineering and Radiological Sciences (2015).
   Google Scholar
• N. HERRING, “The Legendre Polynomial Axial Expansion Method,” Ph.D. Thesis, University of Michigan, Nuclear Engineering and Radiological Sciences (2022).
   Google Scholar
• A. MARIN-LAFLECHE, M. A. SMITH, and C. LEE, “Proteus-MOC: A 3D Deterministic Solver Incorporating 2D Method of Characteristics,” Proc. Int. Conf. Mathematics and Computational Methods Applied to Nuclear Science and Engineering (M&C 2013), Sun Valley, Idaho, May 5–9, 2013, American Nuclear Society (2013).
   Google Scholar
• N. F. HERRING, B. S. COLLINS, and T. J. DOWNAR, “Legendre Polynomial Expansion for Axial Transport Approximations,” Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 123, 671 (2020); https://doi.org/10.13182/T123-33486.
   Google Scholar
• N. F. HERRING, B. S. COLLINS, and T. J. DOWNAR, “Legendre Polynomial Expansion for Axial Transport Approximations,” Proc. Int. Conf. Mathematics and Computational Methods Applied to Nuclear Science and Engineering (M&C 2021), Virtual Conference, October 3–7, 2021, American Nuclear Society (2021).
   Google Scholar
• E. LARSEN and B. KELLEY, “The Relationship Between the Coarse-Mesh Finite Difference and the Coarse-Mesh Diffusion Synthetic Acceleration Methods,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 178, 1, 1 (2014); https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE13-47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. HIGHAM, Functions of Matrices: Theory and Computation, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (1985).
   Google Scholar
• C. MOLER and C. VAN LOAN, “Nineteen Dubious Ways to Compute the Exponential of a Matrix,” SIAM Rev., 20, 4, 801 (1978); https://doi.org/10.1137/1020098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. MOLER and C. VAN LOAN, “Nineteen Dubious Ways to Compute the Exponential of a Matrix, Twenty-Five Years Later,” SIAM Rev., 45, 1, 3 (2003); https://doi.org/10.1137/S00361445024180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. ARIOLI, B. CODENOTTI, and C. FASSINO, “The Padé Method for Computing the Matrix Exponential,” Linear Algebra Appl., 240, 111 (1996); https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3795(94)00190-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. A. SMITH, E. E. LEWIS, and B. C. NA, “Benchmark on Deterministic Transport Calculations Without Spatial Homogenisation—A 2-D/3-D Mox Fuel Assembly Benchmark,” Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Nuclear Energy Agency, Nuclear Science Committee (2003).
   Google Scholar
• A. GAMMICCHIA, S. SANTANDREA, and S. DULLA, “Cross Sections Polynomial Axial Expansion Within the APOLLO3® 3D Characteristics Method,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 165, 108673 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2021.108673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar