Simulation of the Axial-Flow Centrifugal Bubble Separator for Liquid-Fueled Molten Salt Reactors Using Eulerian Two-Fluid Model

References

• R. C. ROBERTSON, “Conceptual Design Study of a Single-Fluid Molten-Salt Breeder Reactor,” ORNL-4541, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (1971).
   Google Scholar
• J. R. ENGEL, “Experience with the Molten-Salt Reactor Experiment,” Nucl. Appl. Technol., 8, 2, 118 (1970); https://doi.org/10.13182/NT8-2-118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. ROSENTHAL, P. KASTEN and R. BRIGGS, “Molten-Salt Reactors—History, Status, and Potential,” Nucl. Appl. Technol., 8, 2, 107 (1970); https://doi.org/10.13182/NT70-A28619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. D. SHAPIRO and C. M. REED, “Removal of Tritium from the Molten Salt Breeder Reactor Fuel,” ORNL-MIT-117, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (1970).
   Google Scholar
• V. SINGH et al., “Dynamics and Control of Molten-Salt Breeder Reactor,” Nucl. Eng. Technol., 49, 5, 887 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2017.06.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. W. FORSBERG et al., “Tritium Control and Capture in Salt-Cooled Fission and Fusion Reactors: Status, Challenges, and Path Forward,” Nucl. Technol., 197, 2, 119 (2017); https://doi.org/10.13182/NT16-101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. W. ROSENTHAL, P. N. HAUBENREICH, and F. B. BRIGGS, “Development Status of Molten-Salt Breeder Reactors,” ORNL-4812, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (1972).
   Google Scholar
• C. H. GABBARD, “Development of an Axial-Flow Centrifugal Gas Bubble Separator for Use in MSR Xenon Removal System,” ORNL-CF-72-12-42, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (1972).
   Google Scholar
• F. T. NIEUWSTADT and M. DIRKZWAGER, “A Fluid Mechanics Model for an Axial Cyclone Separator,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 34, 10, 3399 (1995); https://doi.org/10.1021/ie00037a027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. M. ERDAL et al., “CFD Simulation of Single-Phase and Two-Phase Flow in Gas-Liquid Cylindrical Cyclone Separators,” SPE J., 2, 4, 436 (1997); https://doi.org/10.2118/36645-pa.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. SAFIKHANI, M. SHAMS, and S. DASHTI, “Numerical Simulation of Square Cyclones in Small Sizes,” Adv. Powder Technol., 22, 3, 359 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2010.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.-Y. SHI and J.-Y. XU, “Flow Field of Continuous Phase in a Vane-Type Pipe Oil–Water Separator,” Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci., 60, 208 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2014.09.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. FUNAHASHI et al., “Study on Two-Phase Swirling Flows in a Gas–Liquid Separator with Three Pick-Off Rings,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 308, 205 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2016.08.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. CAI et al., “Experimental Study and Numerical Optimization on a Vane-Type Separator for Bubble Separation in TMSR,” Prog. Nucl. Energy, 74, 1 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2014.02.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. YIN et al., “Study on the Air Core Formation of a Gas–Liquid Separator,” J. Fluids Eng., 137, 9 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4030198.
   Google Scholar
• J. YIN et al., “Experimental Investigation of the Bubble Separation Route for an Axial Gas–Liquid Separator for TMSR,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 97, 1 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2016.06.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. YIN et al., “Experimental Study on the Bubble Trajectory in an Axial Gas-Liquid Separator Applied for Tritium Removal for Molten Salt Reactors,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 320, 133 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2017.05.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. YIN et al., “Numerical and Experimental Study on an Isolated Bubble in the Swirling Separator,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 350, 107 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2019.05.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. YIN et al., “Measurement on the Flow Structure of a Gas-Liquid Separator Applied in TMSR,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 126, 20 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2018.11.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. QIAN et al., “Simultaneous PIV/PLIF and Pulsed Shadowgraphy Measurement of Gas-Liquid Flows in a Swirling Separator,” Nucl. Technol., 205, 1–2, 272 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2018.1486161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. YIN et al., “Numerical Investigation on the Bubble Separation in a Gas-Liquid Separator Applied in TMSR,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 114, 122 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2017.12.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. YIN et al., “Numerical Approach on the Performance Prediction of a Gas–Liquid Separator for TMSR,” J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., 53, 8, 1134 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1080/00223131.2015.1092399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. S. KRESS, “Mass Transfer Between Small Bubbles and Liquids in Cocurrent Turbulent Pipeline Flow,” ORNL-TM-3718, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (1972).
   Google Scholar
• A. G. BOWERS, S. L. SHARMA, and M. A. HOWLEY, “CFD Analysis of the Mass Transfer Phenomenon Between Xenon-135 Removal and Helium Bubbles,” Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 123, 1815 (2020); https://doi.org/10.13182/T123-33512.
   Google Scholar
• A. VIKHANSKY and A. SPLAWSKI, “Adaptive Multiply Size Group Method for CFD-Population Balance Modelling of Polydisperse Flows,” Can. J. Chem. Eng., 93, 8, 1327 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.22201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T.-H. SHIH et al., “A New k-ϵ Eddy Viscosity Model for High Reynolds Number Turbulent Flows,” Comput. Fluids, 24, 3, 227 (1995); https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7930(94)00032-T.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. SATO, M. SADATOMI, and K. SEKOGUCHI, “Momentum and Heat Transfer in Two-Phase Bubble Flow—I. Theory,” Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 7, 2, 167 (1981); https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-9322(81)90003-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. BEHZADI, R. I. ISSA, and H. RUSCHE, “Modelling of Dispersed Bubble and Droplet Flow at High Phase Fractions,” Chem. Eng. Sci., 59, 4, 759 (2004); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2003.11.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. SCHILLER, “A Drag Coefficient Correlation,” Zeit. Ver. Deutsch. Ing., 77, 318 (1933).
   Google Scholar
• J. F. RICHARDSON and W. N. ZAKI, “Sedimentation and Fluidisation: Part I,” Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 75, S82 (1997); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-8762(97)80006-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O. SIMONIN, E. DEUTSCH, and J. P. MINIER, “Eulerian Prediction of the Fluid/Particle Correlated Motion in Turbulent Two-Phase Flows,” Appl. Sci. Res., 51, 1, 275 (1993); https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01082549.
   Google Scholar
• D. DREW, L. CHENG, and R. T. LAHEY, “The Analysis of Virtual Mass Effects in Two-Phase Flow,” Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 5, 4, 233 (1979); https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-9322(79)90023-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. ESKIN, S. D. TAYLOR, and D. YANG, “Modeling of Droplet Dispersion in a Turbulent Taylor–Couette Flow,” Chem. Eng. Sci., 161, 36 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2016.12.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. A. COULALOGLOU and L. L. TAVLARIDES, “Description of Interaction Processes in Agitated Liquid-Liquid Dispersions,” Chem. Eng. Sci., 32, 11, 1289 (1977); https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(77)85023-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. LUO, “Coalescence, Breakup and Liquid Circulation in Bubble Column Reactors,” University of Trondheim (1993).
   Google Scholar
• M. R. CONDE, “Properties of Aqueous Solutions of Lithium and Calcium Chlorides: Formulations for Use in Air Conditioning Equipment Design,” Int. J. Therm. Sci., 43, 4, 367 (2004); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2003.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar