Horizontal Split-Table Conceptual Design to Support Advanced Reactor Validation Needs

References

• “Advanced Nuclear Reactor Technology, a Primer,” Nuclear Innovation Alliance (2022), https://nuclearinnovationalliance.org/sites/default/files/2022-07/ANRT-APrimer-July2022.pdf (current as of Oct. 26, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• “Mission and Vision FY2019-FY2028, The Mission and Vision of the United States Department of Energy Nuclear Criticality Safety Program,” Nuclear Criticality Safety Program, National Nuclear Security Administration, U.S. Department of Energy (2019), https://ncsp.llnl.gov/sites/ncsp/files/2021-04/ncsp_mission_vision.pdf (current as of Oct. 26, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• “International Handbook of Evaluated Criticality Safety Benchmark Experiments,” NEA 7497, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2019).
   Google Scholar
• C. PERCHER et al., “IER-539 CED-1: Preliminary Design of a New Horizonal Split Table,” LLNL-TR-827933, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (2021), https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1825856 (current as of Oct. 26, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• M. N. DUPONT et al., “Horizontal Split Table Conceptual Design for Advanced Reactor Validation,” Proc. Int. Conf. on Physics of Reactors 2022, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, May 15–20, 2022, American Nuclear Society (2022).
   Google Scholar
• R. SANCHEZ et al., “A New Era of Nuclear Criticality Experiments: The First 10 Years of Planet Operations at NCERC,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 195, S1 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2021.1951077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. KATO, G. FISCHER, and L. R. DATES, “Safety Analysis Report Argonne Fast Critical Facility ZPR-6,” ANL-6271, Argonne National Laboratory (1963).
   Google Scholar
• E. ROHRER, W. TUNNELL, and D. MAGNUSON, “Neutron Physics Division Annual Progress Report for Period Ending September 1, 1961,” ORNL-3193, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (1961).
   Google Scholar
• A. WILLIAMS et al., “Critical Assembly Machine for Plutonium Experiments,” UCRL-70343, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (1967).
   Google Scholar
• A. D. MILLER and G. HARMS, “Integral Experiment Request 226 CED-1 Summary Report Horizontal Split-Table Critical Assembly Conceptual Design for Sandia Experiments,” SAND2013-10178P, Sandia National Laboratories (2013).
   Google Scholar
• “SCALE Code System,” W. A. WIESELQUIST, R. A. LEFEBVRE, and M. A. JESSEE, Eds., ORNL/TM-2005/39, Version 6.2.4, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (2020).
   Google Scholar
• M. B. CHADWICK et al., “ENDF/B-VII.1: Nuclear Data for Science and Technology: Cross Sections, Covariances, Fission Product Yields and Decay Data,” Nucl. Data Sheets, 112, 12, 2887 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• F. BOSTELMANN, G. ILAS, and W. A. WIESELQUIST, “Key Nuclear Data Impacting Reactivity in Advanced Reactors,” ORNL/TM-2020/1557, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (2020).
   Google Scholar
• M. N. DUPONT et al., “Integral Experiment Request 554 CED-1 Summary Report,” ORNL/TM-2022/2682, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (2022).
   Google Scholar
• J. M. SCAGLIONE et al., “An Approach for Validating Actinide and Fission Product Burnup Credit Criticality Safety Analyses-Criticality (keff) Predictions,” NUREG/CR-7109 (ORNL/TM-2011/514), U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2012).
   Google Scholar
• B. T. REARDEN et al., “Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis Capabilities and Data in SCALE,” Nucl. Technol., 174, 236 (2010); https://doi.org/10.13182/NT174-236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. ILAS et al., “Validation of SCALE for High Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactor Analysis,” NUREG/CR-7107 (ORNL/TM-2011/161), U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2012).
   Google Scholar
• M. B. CHADWICK et al., “ENDF/B-VII.0: Next Generation Evaluated Nuclear Data Library for Nuclear Science and Technology,” Nucl. Data Sheets, 107, 12, 2931 (2006); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2006.11.001.
   Google Scholar
• D. BROWN et al., “ENDF/B-VIII.0: The 8th Major Release of the Nuclear Reaction Data Library with CIELO-Project Cross Sections, New Standards and Thermal Scattering Data,” Nucl. Data Sheets, 148, 1, 1 (2018).
   Google Scholar
• W. K. TERRY et al., “Evaluation of the Initial Critical Configuration of the HTR-10 Pebble-Bed Reactor, HTR10-GCR-RESR-001” International Handbook of Evaluated Criticality Safety Benchmark Experiments, NEA 7497, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Nuclear Energy Agency (2019).
   Google Scholar
• International Handbook of Evaluated Reactor Physics Benchmark Experiments, NEA 7496, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Nuclear Energy Agency (2019).
   Google Scholar
• N. N. PONOMAREV-STEPNOI et al., “Graphite Annular Core Assemblies with Spherical Fuel Elements Containing Coated UO2 Fuel Particles, ASTRA-GCR-EXP-001,” International Handbook of Evaluated Reactor Physics Benchmark Experiments, NEA 7496, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Nuclear Energy Agency (2019).
   Google Scholar
• J. D. BESS et al., “HTR-PROTEUS Pebble Bed Experiment Program Cores 1, 1A, 2, and 3: Hexagonal Close Packing with a 1:2 Moderator-to-Fuel Pebble Ratio, PROTEUS-GCR-EXP-001,” International Handbook of Evaluated Reactor Physics Benchmark Experiments, NEA 7496, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Nuclear Energy Agency (2019).
   Google Scholar
• J. D. BESS et al., “Evaluation of the Start-up Core Physics Tests at Japan’s High Temperature Engineering Test Reactor, HTTR-GCR-RESR-001,” International Handbook of Evaluated Reactor Physics Benchmark Experiments, NEA 7496, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Nuclear Energy Agency (2019).
   Google Scholar
• A. I. HAWARI and V. H. GILLETE, “Inelastic Thermal Neutron Scattering Cross Sections for Reactor-Grade Graphite,” Nucl. Data Sheets, 118, 176 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2014.04.030.
   Google Scholar
• N. C. FLEMING et al., “FLASSH 1.0: Thermal Scattering Law Evaluation and Cross Section Generation for Reactor Physics Applications,” Proc. Int. Conf. on Physics of Reactors 2022, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, May 15–20, 2022, American Nuclear Society (2022).
   Google Scholar
• H. MITANI and H. KUROI, “Adjustment of Group Cross Sections by Means of Integral Data, (I), (II),” J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., 9, 383, 642 (1972).
   Google Scholar
• J. B. DRAGT et al., “Methods of Adjustment and Error Evaluation of Neutron Capture Cross Sections; Application to Fission Product Nuclides,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 62, 117 (1977); https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE77-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. PAZY et al., “The Role of Integral Data in Neutron Cross-Section Evaluation,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 55, 280 (1974); https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE55-280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. N. HWANG, “Topics in Data Adjustment Theory and Applications,” CONF-88091–28, Argonne National Laboratory (1988).
   Google Scholar
• A. GANDINI and PETILLI, “AMARA: A Code Using the Lagrange Multipliers Method for Nuclear Data Adjustment,” CNEN-RI/FI(73)39, Comitato Nazionale Energia Nucleare (1973).
   Google Scholar
• H. HÄGGBLOM, “Adjustment of Neutron Cross Section Data by a Least Square Fit of Calculated Quantities to Experimental Results. Part I Theory,” AE-422, Aktiebolaget Atomenergi, Studsvik, Sweden (1971).
   Google Scholar
• M. SALVATORES et al., “Methods and Issues for the Combined Use of Integral Experiments and Covariance Data: Results of a NEA International Collaborative Study,” Nucl. Data Sheets, 118, 38 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2014.04.005.
   Google Scholar
• J. L. CONLIN et al., “NJOY21: Next Generation Nuclear Data Processing Capabilities,” Eur. Phys. J. Conf., 146, 09040 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201714609040.
   Google Scholar
• G. PALMIOTTI, P. BLAISE, and F. MELLIER, “M. Salvatores: Integral Experiments and Their Use for the Validation of Nuclear Data and the Neutronic Design of Advanced Nuclear Systems,” EPJ Nucl. Sci. Technol., 7, 11 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1051/epjn/2021007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. BOSTELMANN et al., “Modeling of the Molten Salt Experiment with SCALE,” Nucl. Technol., 208, 603 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2021.1943122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. WALKER et al., “SCALE Modeling of the Fast Spectrum Heat Pipe Reactor,” ORNL/TM-2021/2021, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (2021).
   Google Scholar
• D. I. POSTON et al., “KRUSTY Reactor Design,” Nucl. Technol., 206, 1, S13 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2020.1725382.
   Google Scholar
• W. J. MARSHALL and M. N. DUPONT, “Critical Experiments in Support of Current Reactors and Advanced Reactor Deployment,” NCERC Futures Workshop, September 7–9, 2022, Los Alamos National Laboratory (2022).
   Google Scholar