EBR-II MOX Fuel Characterization Enabling ARES Phase I Testing

References

• J. D. BESS et al., “Nuclide Inventory Characterization of EBR-II MOX Fuel Test Pins,” Proc. Int. Conf. on Physics of Reactors 2022 (PHYSOR 2022), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, May 15–20, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• J. D. BESS et al., “Utility of EBR-II Benchmark Model to Enable MOX Fuel Pin Characterization,” Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 124, 238 (2021).
   Google Scholar
• J. D. BESS, “Utility of EBR-II Benchmark Model to Enable Fuel Pin Reactor Physics Characterization,” ECAR-5374, Idaho National Laboratory (2021).
   Google Scholar
• J. D. BESS, “Neutronics Characterization of EBR-II X462/X462A Test Fuel Pins UW02009, UW02011, and UW06024,” ECAR-5391, Idaho National Laboratory (2021).
   Google Scholar
• A. S. CHIPMAN, “Neutronics Analysis of the MOXTOP Experiment Within the THOR Capsule in TREAT,” ECAR-5405, Idaho National Laboratory (2021).
   Google Scholar
• C. B. JENSEN et al., “Advanced Reactor Experiments for Sodium Fast Reactor Fuels (ARES) Project: Transient Irradiation Experiments for Metallic and MOX Fuels,” Proc. Int. Conf. on Fast Reactors and Related Fuel Cycles: Sustainable Clean Energy for the Future (FR22), Beijing, China, April 25–28, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• C. L. POPE et al., “Transient Reactor Test (TREAT) Facility Design and Experiment Capability,” Nucl. Technol., 205, 1378 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2019.1599615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. D. GARKISCH, S. MAEDA, and G. W. KUHNS, “Data Report: SPA-2 Test Assembly Irradiation in EBR-II,” WCAP-14184/WAES-TR-94-002, Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (1995).
   Google Scholar
• R. D. MCKNIGHT, “Validation of the REBUS-3/RCT Methodologies for EBR-II Core-Follow Analysis,” Proc. 1992 Topl. Mtg, on Advances in Reactor Physics, Charleston, South Carolina, March 8–11, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• R. D. MCKNIGHT, “Validation of the Rebus-3/RCT Methodologies for EBR-II Core-Follow Analysis,” ANL-IFR-153, Argonne National Laboratory (1991).
   Google Scholar
• “Nuclear Material Experiment Execution Plan: MOXTOP Irradiations at TREAT, Project Number 32794,” PLN-6245, Idaho National Laboratory (2021).
   Google Scholar
• “Functional and Operational Requirements: MOXTOP Irradiations at TREAT,” FOR-594, Idaho National Laboratory (2021).
   Google Scholar
• “Technical and Functional Requirements: THOR-Based aLEU-P2M, EPIC, and MOXTOP Experiments,” Idaho National Laboratory (2021).
   Google Scholar
• “Data Package: THOR-MOXTOP Experiment Data Package,” Idaho National Laboratory (2021).
   Google Scholar
• D. D. IMHOLTE et al., “Temperature Heat Sink Overpower Response (THOR) Module,” CDR-196, Idaho National Laboratory (2020).
   Google Scholar
• “Characterization of Mixed-Oxide Fuel Pins UW02010 and UW08036,” ANL-E-U819, Argonne National Laboratory (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Y. FUKANO et al., “Fuel Pin Behavior Under Slow-Ramp-Type Transient-Overpower Conditions in the CABRI-FAST Experiments,” J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., 46, 1049 (2009); https://doi.org/10.1080/18811248.2009.9711615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. A. FREUND, H. P. ISKENDARIAN, and D. OKRENT, “TREAT, A Pulsed Graphite-Moderated Reactor for Kinetics Experiments,” Proc. 2nd United Nations Int. Conf. on the Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy, Geneva, Switzerland (1958).
   Google Scholar
• D. R. MACFARLANE, G. A. FREUND, and J. F. BOLAND, “Hazards Summary Report on the Transient Reactor Test Facility (TREAT),” ANL-5923, Argonne National Laboratory (1958).
   Google Scholar
• N. WOOLSTENHULME et al., “Development of Irradiation Test Devices for Transient Testing,” Nucl. Technol., 205, 1251 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2019.1590072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. D. BESS et al., “Nuclear Characterization of a General-Purpose Instrumentation and Materials Testing Location in TREAT,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 124, 270 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2018.10.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. J. KOCH, EBR-II Experimental Breeder Reactor-II, American Nuclear Society, La Grange, Illinois (2008).
   Google Scholar
• J. I. SACKETT, “Operating and Test Experience with EBR-II, the IFR Prototype,” Prog. Nucl. Energy, 31, 111 (1997); https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-1970(96)00006-6.
   Google Scholar
• R. D. MARIANI et al., “Metallic Fuels: The EBR-II Legacy and Recent Advances,” Procedia Chem., 7, 513 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proche.2012.10.078.
   Google Scholar
• T. SUMNER and T. Y. C. WEI, “Benchmark Specifications and Data Requirements for EBR-II Shutdown Heat Removal Tests SHRT-17 and SHRT-45R,” ANL-ARC-225, Rev. 1, Argonne National Laboratory (2012).
   Google Scholar
• J. B. BRIGGS and J. GULLIFORD, “An Overview of the International Reactor Physics Experiment Evaluation Project,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 178, 269 (2014); https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE14-27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. S. LUM et al., “Evaluation of Run 138B at Experimental Breeder Reactor II, a Prototypic Liquid Metal Fast Breeder Reactor,” International Handbook of Evaluated Reactor Physics Benchmark Experiments, EBR2-LMFR-RESR-001, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Nuclear Energy Agency (2019).
   Google Scholar
• G. PALMIOTTI et al., “Applications of Integral Benchmark Data,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 178, 295 (2014); https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE14-33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. D. BESS and T. IVANOVA, “Current Overview of ICSBEP and IRPhEP Benchmark Evaluation Practices,” EPJ Web Conferences, 239, 18002 (2020).
   Google Scholar
• T. GOORLEY et al., “Initial MCNP6 Release Overview,” Nucl. Technol., 180, 298 (2012); https://doi.org/10.13182/NT11-135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. STEWART, C. POPE, and E. RYAN, “Fast Spectrum Reactor Fuel Assembly Sensitivity Analysis,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 110, 1091 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2017.06.058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. BOSTELMANN, G. ILAS, and W. WIESELQUIST, “Nuclear Data Sensitivity Study for the EBR-II Fast Reactor Benchmark Using SCALE with ENDF/B-VII.1 and ENDF/B-VIII.0,” J. Nucl. Eng., 2, 345 (2021); https://doi.org/10.3390/jne2040028.
   Google Scholar
• L. J. COX and L. F. CASSWELL, “MCNP Release 6.1.1 Beta: Creating and Testing the Code Distribution,” LA-UR-14-24330, Los Alamos National Laboratory (2014).
   Google Scholar
• M. B. CHADWICK et al., “ENDF/B-VII.0: Next Generation Evaluated Nuclear Data Library for Nuclear Science and Technology,” Nucl. Data Sheets, 107, 2931 (2006); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2006.11.001.
   Google Scholar
• C. J. WERNER et al., “MCNP Version 6.2: Release Notes,” LA-UR-18-20808, Los Alamos National Laboratory (2018).
   Google Scholar
• D. A. BROWN et al., “ENDF/B-VIII.0: The 8th Major Release of the Nuclear Reaction Data Library with CIELO-Project Cross Sections, New Standards and Thermal Scattering Data,” Nucl. Data Sheets, 148, 1 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2018.02.001.
   Google Scholar
• J. L. CONLIN et al., “Release of ENDF/B-VIII.0-Based ACE Data Files,” LA-UR-18-24034, Los Alamos National Laboratory (2018).
   Google Scholar
• W. A. WIESELQUIST, R. A. LEFEBVRE, and M. A. JESSEE, “SCALE Code System: Version 6.2.4,” ORNL/TM-2005-39, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (2020).
   Google Scholar
• G. ŽEROVNIK, M. PODVRATNIK, and L. SNOJ, “On Normalization of Fluxes and Reaction Rates in MCNP Criticality Calculations,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 63, 126 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2013.07.045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “EBR-II Division Experiment Guide,” 2nd ed., Rev. 0, Argonne National Laboratory (Sep. 7, 1990).
   Google Scholar
• D. G. DORAN and N. J. GRAVES, “Displacement Cross Sections and PKA Spectra: Tables and Applications,” HEDL-TME-76-70, Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory, Richland, Washington (1976).
   Google Scholar
• R. L. SIMONS, J. A. ULSETH, and N. J. GRAVES, “EBR-II Spectral Parameters (Reactor Run 50H),” HEDL-TME-74-44, Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory, Richland, Washington (1974).
   Google Scholar
• C. LEE and W. S. YANG, “MC2-3: Multigroup Cross Section Generation Code for Fast Reactor Analysis,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 187, 268 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2017.1320893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. L. DERSTINE, “DIF3D: A Code to Solve One-, Two-, and Three-Dimensional Finite-Difference Diffusion Theory Problems,” ANL-82-64, Argonne National Laboratory (1984).
   Google Scholar
• G. PALMIOTTI, E. E. LEWIS, and C. B. CARRICO, “VARIANT: VARIational Anisotropic Nodal Transport for Multidimensional Cartesian and Hexagonal Geometry Calculation,” ANL-95/40, Argonne National Laboratory (1995).
   Google Scholar
• J. BOTTCHER, S. UKAI, and M. INOUE, “ODS Steel Clad MOX Fuel-Pin Fabrication and Irradiation Performance in EBR-II,” Nucl. Technol., 138, 238 (2002); https://doi.org/10.13182/NT02-A3291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. E. CRAFT et al., “Neutron Radiography of Irradiated Nuclear Fuels at Idaho National Laboratory,” Physcs Proc., 69, 483 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2015.07.068.
   Google Scholar
• “SPA-II Fuel Pin Certification Data,” ANL-E-C806, Argonne National Laboratory (1989).
   Google Scholar
• S. G. POPOV et al., “Thermophysical Properties of MOX and UO2 Fuels Including the Effects of Irradiation,” ORNL/TM-2000/351, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (2000).
   Google Scholar
• E. M. BAUM et al., Nuclides and Isotopes: Chart of the Nuclides, 17th ed., Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory, Schenectady, New York (2010).
   Google Scholar
• J. JENSEN, “Argonne National Laboratory—West IFR Operations Division Report: EBR-II Run 169, June 22, 1994–August 9, 1994,” ANL-EBR-R-169, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne-West (1994).
   Google Scholar
• “Addendum to the Experiment Description and Safety Analysis Data Package for the SPA-2B (X462A) Experiments,” Memo from H. D. GARKISCH TO L. WELKER, SE-92-024, Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Madison, Pennsylvania (Feb. 28, 1992).
   Google Scholar
• M. B. CHADWICK et al., “ENDF/B-VII.1 Nuclear Data for Science and Technology: Cross Sections, Covariances, Fission Produce Yields and Decay Data,” Nucl. Data Sheets, 112, 2887 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2011.11.002.
   Google Scholar
• A. S. CHIPMAN, “Neutronics Analysis of the THOR Commissioning Tests (THOR-C) in TREAT,” ECAR-5215, Idaho National Laboratory (2020).
   Google Scholar
• J. D. BESS and M. D. DEHART, “Baseline Assessment of TREAT for Modeling and Analysis Needs,” INL/EXT-15-35372, Idaho National Laboratory (2015).
   Google Scholar
• V. SEKER, H. ZHOU, and N. KUCINSKI, “Transient Reactor Test (TREAT) Facility: Start-Up Measurements,” TREAT-FUND-RESR-001, International Handbook of Evaluated Reactor Physics Benchmark Experiments, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Nuclear Energy Agency (2020).
   Google Scholar
• V. SEKER and H. ZHOU, “Transient Reactor Test (TREAT) Facility M8 Calibration (M8CAL) Core Tests,” TREAT-FUND -RESR-002, International Handbook of Evaluated Reactor Physics Benchmark Experiments, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Nuclear Energy Agency (2020).
   Google Scholar
• N. C. FLEMING, “Transient Reactor Test Facility (TREAT): M2 Calibration (M2CAL) Steady-State Experiments,” TREAT-FUND -RESR-003, International Handbook of Evaluated Reactor Physics Benchmark Experiments, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Nuclear Energy Agency (2020).
   Google Scholar
• J. T. GOORLEY et al., “Initial MCNP6 Release Overview-MCNP6 Version 1.0,” LA-UR-13-22934, Los Alamos National Laboratory (2013).
   Google Scholar
• B. T. REARDEN and M. A. JESSEE, “SCALE Code System: Version 6.2.3,” ORNL/TM-2005-39, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (2018).
   Google Scholar
• C. M. HILL, “Neutronics Analysis of TREAT ATF Experiment MARCH-SETH,” ECAR-3994, Idaho National Laboratory (2018).
   Google Scholar
• D. OKRENT et al., “The Reactor Kinetics of the Transient Reactor Test Facility (TREAT),” ANL-6174, Argonne National Laboratory (1960).
   Google Scholar
• A. S. CHIPMAN, “Neutronics Analysis of MIMIC-N2 Reactivity Worth,” ECAR-5241, Idaho National Laboratory (2021).
   Google Scholar
• R. L. WILLIAMSON et al., “BISON: A Flexible Code for Advanced Simulation of the Performance of Multiple Nuclear Fuel Forms,” Nucl. Technol., 207, 954 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2020.1836940.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. J. PERMANN et al., “MOOSE: Enabling Massively Parallel Multiphysics Simulation,” SoftwareX, 11, 100430 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2020.100430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. LIU et al., “Used Fuel Modeling: An Integral Approach Using PEGASUS Code,” Proc. 2022 ANS Annual Meeting, Anaheim, California, June 12–16, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• M. D. DEHART, B. A. BAKER, and J. ORTENSI, “Interpretation of Energy Deposition Data from Historical Operation of the Transient Test Facility (TREAT),” Nucl. Eng. Des., 322, 504 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2017.07.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. ORTENSI et al., “Full Core TREAT Kinetics Demonstration Using Rattlesnake/BISON Coupling Within MAMMOTH,” INL/EXT-15-36268, Idaho National Laboratory (2015).
   Google Scholar
• J. ORTENSI, “Validation of the Griffin Application for TREAT Transient Modeling and Simulation,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 385, 111478 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2021.111478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. D. DEHART et al., “Research in Support of TREAT Kinetics Calculations Using Rattlesnake/BISON Coupling within MAMMOTH,” Proc. PHYSOR 2016, Sun Valley, Idaho, May 1–5, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• F. MICHEL-SENDIS et al., “SFCOMPO-2.0: An OECD NEA Database of Spent Nuclear Fuel Isotopic Assays, Reactor Design Specifications and Operating Data,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 110, 779 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2017.07.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. C. GAULD et al., “Integral Nuclear Data Validation Using Experimental Spent Nuclear Fuel Compositions,” Nucl. Eng. Technol., 49, 1226 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2017.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar