Dependency Idioms for Quantitative Human Reliability Analysis

References

• A. SWAIN and H. GUTTMANN, “Handbook of Human Reliability Analysis with Emphasis on Nuclear Power Plant Applications,” NUREG/CR-1278, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (1983).
   Google Scholar
• D. GERTMAN et al., “The SPAR-H Human Reliability Analysis Method,” NUREG/CR-6883, INL/EXT-05-00509,” Idaho National Laboratory (2004).
   Google Scholar
• R. L. BORING, “Fifty Years of THERP and Human Reliability Analysis,” Proc. 11th Int. Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Conf. and Annual European Safety and Reliability Conf. 2012 (PSAM11 ESREL 2012), Vol. 5, p. 3523 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• R. BORING, J. PARK, and T. MORTENSON, “Formative vs. Summative Dependence in Human Reliability Analysis,” Proc. Virtual Conf. Advances in Safety Management and Human Performance, July 25–29, 2021, p. 62, P. M. AREZES and R. L. BORING, Eds., Springer International Publishing, Cham (2021); https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80288-2.
   Google Scholar
• V. P. PAGLIONI and K. M. GROTH, “Dependency Definitions for Quantitative Human Reliability Analysis,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 220, 108274 (2022).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. S. BLACKMAN and R. L. BORING, “Assessing Dependency in SPAR-H: Some Practical Considerations,” Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput., 589, 13 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60645-3_2.
   Google Scholar
• F. IBISOGLU and K. M. GROTH, “Methods for Dependency Between Human Failure Events in Human Reliability Analysis: An Overview of the State-of-the-Art,” Proc. 29th European Safety and Reliability Conf., Hannover, Germany, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• V. P. PAGLIONI and K. M. GROTH, “Unified Definitions for Dependency in Quantitative Human Reliability Analysis,” Proc. 30th European Safety and Reliability Conf. and 15th Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Conf., Venice, Italy, November 1–5, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• S. E. COOPER et al., “A Technique for Human Error Analysis (ATHEANA),” NUREG-6350, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (1996).
   Google Scholar
• S. LEWIS and S. COOPER, “EPRI/NRC-RES Fire Human Reliability Analysis Guidelines,” NUREG-1921, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission; http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm.html (2012).
   Google Scholar
• T. MORTENSON and R. L. BORING, “Is Dependency in Human Reliability Analysis a Real Phenomenon? Refining the Dependency Concept Through Research,” Proc. Virtual Conf. Advances in Safety Management and Human Performance, July 25–29, 2021, p. 55, P. M. AREZES and R. L. BORING, Eds., Springer International Publishing, Cham (2021).
   Google Scholar
• M. T. BARRIERE et al., “Multidisciplinary Framework for Human Reliability Analysis with an Application to Errors of Commission and Dependencies,” NUREG/CR-6265, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (1995).
   Google Scholar
• J. XING, Y. CHANG, and J. DEJESUS SEGARRA, “The General Methodology of an Integrated Human Event Analysis System (IDHEAS-G),” NUREG-2198, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2020).
   Google Scholar
• M. KICHLINE et al., “Integrated Human Event Analysis System Dependency Analysis Guidance,” RIL 2021-14, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2021).
   Google Scholar
• R. L. BORING, “A Dynamic Approach to Modeling Dependence Between Human Failure Events,” Proc. 25th European Safety and Reliability Conf. Safety and Reliability of Complex Engineered Systems (ESREL 2015), Zurich, Switzerland, September 7–10, 2015, p. 2845 (2015).
   Google Scholar
• J. PARK, R. L. BORING, and J. KIM, “An Identification of PSF Lag and Linger Effects for Dynamic Human Reliability Analysis: Application of Experimental Data,” Proc. 12th Int. Conf. Human System Interaction, Richmond, Virginia, June 25–27, 2019; https://doi.org/10.1109/HSI47298.2019.8942621.
   Google Scholar
• A. M. WHALEY et al., “Cognitive Basis for Human Reliability Analysis,” NUREG-2114, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2016).
   Google Scholar
• K. M. GROTH, R. SMITH, and R. MORADI, “A Hybrid Algorithm for Developing Third Generation HRA Methods Using Simulator Data, Causal Models, and Cognitive Science,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 191, 106507 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2019.106507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. C. LI et al., “Methodology for Analyzing the Dependencies Between Human Operators in Digital Control Systems,” Fuzzy Sets Syst., 293, 127 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2015.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. PODOFILLINI et al., “Using Expert Models in Human Reliability Analysis—A Dependence Assessment Method Based on Fuzzy Logic,” Risk Anal., 30, 8, 1277 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01425.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. MARSEGUERRA, E. ZIO, and M. LIBRIZZI, “Human Reliability Analysis by Fuzzy ‘CREAM,’” Risk Anal., 27, 1, 137 (2007); https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00865.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. ZIO et al., “A Fuzzy Set-Based Approach for Modeling Dependence Among Human Errors,” Fuzzy Sets Syst., 160, 13, 1947 (2009); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2009.01.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. SU et al., “Dependence Assessment in Human Reliability Analysis Using Evidence Theory and AHP,” Risk Anal., 35, 7, 1296 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. ZHENG and Y. DENG, “Dependence Assessment in Human Reliability Analysis Based on Evidence Credibility Decay Model and IOWA Operator,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 112, 673 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2017.10.045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. GUO et al., “Using Evidence Credibility Decay Model for Dependence Assessment in Human Reliability Analysis,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 100, 107 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2016.10.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. CHEN et al., “Evidential Analytic Hierarchy Process Dependence Assessment Methodology in Human Reliability Analysis,” Nucl. Eng. Technol., 49, 1, 123 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2016.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. ZHOU et al., “Dependence Assessment in Human Reliability Analysis Based on D Numbers and AHP,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 313, 243 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2016.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. DE AMBROGGI and P. TRUCCO, “Modelling and Assessment of Dependent Performance Shaping Factors Through Analytic Network Process,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 96, 7, 849 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2011.03.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Y. SUN, J. L. ZHOU, and L. F. GAN, “Safety Assessment in Oil Drilling Work System Based on Empirical Study and Analytic Network Process,” Saf. Sci., 105, 86 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.02.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. W. HERRMANN, Engineering Decision Making and Risk Management, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey (2015).
   Google Scholar
• K. M. GROTH and A. MOSLEH, “Deriving Causal Bayesian Networks from Human Reliability Analysis Data: A Methodology and Example Model,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part O: J. Risk Reliab., 226, 4, 361 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1177/1748006X11428107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. M. GROTH and L. P. SWILER, “Bridging the Gap Between HRA Research and HRA Practice: A Bayesian Network Version of SPAR-H,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 115, 33 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2013.02.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. RUIZ-TAGLE et al., “A Framework to Extrapolate and Evaluate Human Reliability Causal Models from Event Report Narratives,” Proc. 2021 Int. Topl. Mtg. Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Analysis (PSA 2021), Virtual Conference, November 2021.
   Google Scholar
• K. ZWIRGLMAIER, D. STRAUB, and K. M. GROTH, “Capturing Cognitive Causal Paths in Human Reliability Analysis with Bayesian Network Models,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 158, 117 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2016.10.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. J. KIM and P. H. SEONG, “Influencing Factors on Situation Assessment of Human Operators in Unexpected Plant Conditions,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 132, 526 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2019.06.051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. PARK, A. M. ARIGI, and J. KIM, “A Comparison of the Quantification Aspects of Human Reliability Analysis Methods in Nuclear Power Plants,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 133, 297 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2019.05.031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. YONTAY and R. PAN, “A Computational Bayesian Approach to Dependency Assessment in System Reliability,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 152, 104 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2016.03.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. M. HERBERGER and R. L. BORING, “Human Failure Event Dependence: What are the Limits?” Proc. 13th Int. Conf. Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management (PSAM 13), Seoul, Korea, October 2–7, 2016; www.psam13.org.
   Google Scholar
• M. ČEPIN, “Comparison of Methods for Dependency Determination Between Human Failure Events Within Human Reliability Analysis,” Sci. Technol. Nucl. Ins., 2008, 987165 (2008); https://doi.org/10.1155/2008/987165.
   Google Scholar
• Y. KIM, J. KIM, and J. PARK, “Procedure Progression Similarity, An Aspect of Dependence Between Human Failure Events,” AHFE Int., 33 (2022); https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1001569.
   Google Scholar
• K. M. GROTH and A. MOSLEH, “A Data-Informed PIF Hierarchy for Model-Based Human Reliability Analysis,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 108, 154 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. PARK, A. M. ARIGI, and J. KIM, “Treatment of Human and Organizational Factors for Multi-Unit HRA: Application of SPAR-H Method,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 132, 656 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2019.06.053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. PARK, W. JUNG, and J. KIM, “Inter-Relationships Between Performance Shaping Factors for Human Reliability Analysis of Nuclear Power Plants,” Nucl. Eng. Technol., 52, 87 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2019.07.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. FENTON and M. NEIL, Risk Assessment and Decision Analysis with Bayesian Networks, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida (2018).
   Google Scholar
• V. P. PAGLIONI, T. MORTENSON, and K. M. GROTH, “The Human Failure Event: What Is It and What Should It Be?” Proc. 16th Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Conf. (PSAM16), Honolulu, Hawaii, June 26–July 1, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• D. LOPEZ-PAZ, “From Dependence to Causation,” PhD Thesis, University of Cambridge (2016); http://arxiv.org/abs/1607.03300.
   Google Scholar
• J. PEARL, Causality, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom (2009); https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803161.
   Google Scholar
• M. BENSI, A. D. KIUREGHIAN, and D. STRAUB, “Efficient Bayesian Network Modeling of Systems,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 112, 200 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2012.11.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. M. BISHOP, Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (2006).
   Google Scholar
• C. HITCHCOCK, “Probabilistic Causation,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, E. N. ZALTA, Ed., Metaphysics Research Laboratory, Stanford University (2021).
   Google Scholar
• Y. J. CHANG et al., “The SACADA Database for Human Reliability and Human Performance,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 125, 117 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2013.07.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar