Advanced search
Publication Cover
Pathology Volume 34, 2002 - Issue 5
Submit an article Journal homepage
10
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Atypical ductal hyperplasia and atypia of uncertain significance in core biopsies from mammographically detected lesions: correlation with excision diagnosis

Jennet M. Harvey Department of Pathology, University of Western Australia; and Division of Tissue Pathology, PathCentre, Western Australia
,
Gregory F. Sterrett Department of Pathology, University of Western Australia; Division of Tissue Pathology, PathCentre, Western Australia; and Breast Assessment Centre, The Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital (SCGH) and BreastScreen WA, Western Australia; and Division of Tissue Pathology, PathCentre, Western Australia
&
Felicity A. Frost Division of Tissue Pathology, PathCentre, Western Australia; and Breast Assessment Centre, The Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital (SCGH) and BreastScreen WA, Western Australia; and Division of Tissue Pathology, PathCentre, Western Australia
Pages 410-416 | Published online: 06 Jul 2009

  • Parker, SH, Lovin JD, Jobe WE, Burke BJ, Hopper KD, Yakes WF. Nonpalpable breast lesions: stereotactic automated large-core biopsies. Radiology 1991; 180: 403-7.
  • Elvecrog EL, Lechner MC, Nelson MT. Nonpalpable breast lesions: correlation of stereotaxic large core needle biopsy and surgical biopsy results. Radiology 1993; 188: 453-5.
  • Parker SH, Burbank F, Jackman RJ, et al. Percutaneous large core breast biopsy: a multi-institutional study. Radiology 1994; 193: 359-64.
  • Meyer JE, Christian RL, Lester SC, et al. Evaluation of nonpalpable solid breast masses with stereotaxic large-needle core biopsy using a dedicated unit. AJR 1996; 167: 179-82.
  • Page DL, Rogers LW. Combined histologie and cytologie criteria for the diagnosis of mammary atypical ductal hyperplasia. Hum Pathol 1992; 23: 1095-7.
  • Gisvold JJ, Goellner JR, Grant CS, et ai. Breast biopsy: a comparative study of stereotaxically guided core and excisional techniques. AJR 1994; 162: 815-20.
  • Jackman RJ, Nowels KW, Shepard MJ, Finkelstein SI, Marzoni FA. Stereotaxic large-core needle biopsy of 450 nonpalpable breast lesions with surgical correlation in lesions with cancer or atypical hyperplasia. Radiology 1994; 193: 91-5.
  • Liberman L, Cohen MA, Dershaw DD, Abramson AF, Hann LE, Rosen PP. Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at stereotaxic core biopsy of breast lesions: an indication for surgical biopsy. AJR 1995; 164: 1111-3.
  • Dahlstrom JE, Jain S, Sutton T, Sutton S. Diagnostic accuracy of stereotactic core biopsy in a mammographie breast cancer screening programme. Histopathology 1996; 28: 421-7.
  • Tocino I, Garcia BM, Carter D. Surgical biopsy findings in patients with atypical hyperplasia diagnosed by stereotaxic core needle biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol 1996; 3: 483-8.
  • Dershaw DD, Morris EA, Liberman L, Abramson AF. Nondiagnostic stereotaxic core breast biopsy: results of rebiopsy. Radiology 1996; 198: 323-5.
  • Burbank F. Stereotactic breast biopsy of atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in-situ lesions: improved accuracy with directional, vacuum-assisted biopsy. Radiology 1997; 202: 843-7.
  • Gadzala DE, Cederbom GJ, Bolton JS, et al. Appropriate management of atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed by stereotactic core needle breast biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol 1997; 4: 283-6.
  • Moore MM, Hargett CW, Hanks JB, et al. Association of breast cancer with the finding of atypical ductal hyperplasia at core breast biopsy. Ann Surg 1997; 225: 726-33.
  • Jackman RJ, Burbank F, Parker SH, et al. Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at stereotactic beast biopsy: improved reliability with 14-gauge, directional, vacuum-assisted biopsy. Radiology 1997; 204: 485-8.
  • Stolier AJ. Stereotactic breast biopsy: a surgical series. J Am Coll Surg 1997; 185: 224-8.
  • Brown TA, Wall JW, Christensen ED, et al. Atypical hyperplasia in the era of stereotactic core needle biopsy. J Surg Oncol 1998; 67: 168-73.
  • Lin PH, Clyde JC, Bates DM, Garcia JM, Matsumoto GH, Girvin GW. Accuracy of stereotactic core-needle breast biopsy in atypical ductal hyperplasia. Am J Surg 1998; 175: 380-2.
  • Ioffe OB, Berg WA, Silverberg SG, Kumar D. Mammographic-histopathologic correlation of large-core needle biopsies of the breast. Mod Pathol 1998; 11: 721-7.
  • Liberman L, Smolkin JH, Dershaw DD, Morris EA, Abramson AF, Rosen PP. Calcification retrieval at stereotactic, 11-gauge, directional, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. Radiology 1998; 208: 251-60.
  • Jackman RJ, Novels KW, Rodriguez-Soto J, Marzoni FA, Finkelstein SI, Shepard MJ. Stereotaxic, automated, large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable lesions: false negative and histologie underestimation rates after long-term follow-up. Radiology 1999; 210: 799-805.
  • Brem RF, Behrndt VS, Sanow L, Gatewood OMB. Atypical ductal hyperplasia: histologie underestimation of carcinoma in tissue harvested from impalpable breast lesions using 11-gauge stereotactically guided directional vacuum assisted biopsy. AJR 1999; 172: 1405-7.
  • Philpotts LE, Shaheen NA, Carter D, Lange RC, Lee CH. Comparison rebiopsy rates after stereotactic core needle biopsy of the breast with 11-gauge vacuum suction probe versus 14-gauge needle and automatic gun. AJR 1999; 172: 683-7.
  • Meyer JE, Smith DN, Lester SC, et al. Large core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions. J AM Med Assoc 1999; 281: 1638-41.
  • Burak WE, Owens KE, Tighe MB, et al. Vacuum-assisted stereotactic breast biopsy: histologie underestimation of malignant lesions. Arch Surg 2000; 135: 700-3.
  • O'Hea BJ, Tornos C. Mild duct atypia after large-core needle biopsy of the breast: is surgical excision always necessary? Surgery 2000; 128: 738-43.
  • Adrales G, Turk P, Wallace T, Bird R, Norton J, Greene F. Is surgical excision necessary for atypical ductal hyperplasia of the breast diagnosed by Mammotome? Am J Surg 2000; 180: 313-5.
  • Darling ML, Smith DN, Lester SC, et al. Atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in-situ as revealed by large-core needle breast biopsy: results of surgical excision. AJR 2000; 175: 1341-6.
  • Renshaw AA, Cartagena N, Schenkman RH, Derhagopian RP, Gould EW. Atypical ductal hyperplasia in breast core needle biopsies: correlation of size of the lesion, complete removal of the lesion and the incidence of carcinoma in follow-up biopsies. Am J Clin Pathol 2001 ; 116: 92-6.
  • Schnitt SJ, Connolly JL, Tava Soli FA, et al. Inter-observer reproducibility in diagnosis of ductal proliferative breast lesions using standardized criteria. Am J Surg Pathol 1992; 16: 1133-43.
  • Dupont WD, Page DL. Risk factors for breast cancer in women with proliferative breast disease. New Engl J Med 1985; 312: 146-51.
  • Page DL. The woman at high risk for breast cancer: importance of hyperplasia. Surg Clin North Am 1996; 76: 221-30.
  • Page DL, Rogers LW. Combined histologie and cytologie criteria for the diagnosis of mammary atypical ductal hyperplasia. Hum Pathol 1992; 23: 1095-7.
  • Tavassoli FA, Norris HJ. A comparison of the results of long-term follow-up for atypical intraductal hyperplasia and intraductal hyper-plasia of the breast. Cancer 1990; 65: 518-29.
  • Renshaw AA. Improved reporting methods for atypia and atypical ductal hyperplasia in breast core needle biopsy specimens: potential for inter-laboratory comparisons. Am J Clin Pathol 2001; 116: 87-91.
  • Burbank F, Parker SH, Fogarty TJ. Stereotactic breast biopsy: improved tissue harvesting with the Mammotome. Am Surg 1996; 62: 128-50.
  • Burbank F. Stereotactic breast biopsy: comparison of 14- and 11-gauge Mammotome probe performance and complication rates. Am Surg 1997; 63: 988-95.
  • Dahlstrom JE, Sutton S, Jain S. Histological precision of stereotactic core biopsy in diagnosis of malignant and premalignant breast lesions. Histopathology 1996; 28: 537-41.
  • Ely KA, Carter BA, Jensen RA, Simpson JF, Page DL. Core biopsy of the breast with atypical ductal hyperplasia: a probabilistic approach to reporting. Am J Surg Pathol 2001; 25: 1017-21.
  • Fraser JL, Raza S, Chorny K, Connolly JL, Schnitt SJ. Columnar alteration with prominent apical snouts and secretions: a spectrum of changes frequently present in breast biopsies performed for micro-calcifications. Am J Surg Pathol 1998; 22: 1521-7.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.