Predictive value of diagnoses of endocervical glandular abnormalities in cervical smears

References

• Vizcaino AP, Moreno V, Bosch FX, et al. International trends in incidence of cervical cancer: I. Adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous cell carcinomas. Int J Cancer 1998; 75: 536–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vizcaino AP, Moreno V, Bosch FX, et al. International trends in incidence of cervical cancer: II. Squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Cancer 2000; 86: 429–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee KR. Adenocarcinoma in-situ with a small cell (endometrioid) pattern in cervical smears. Cancer Cytopathol 1999; 87: 254–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee KR, Genest DR, Minter Li, Granter SR, Cibas ES. Adeno-carcinoma in situ in cervical smears with a small cell (endometrioid) pattern: distinction from cells directly sampled from the upper endo-cervical canal or lower segment of the endometrium. Am J Clin Pathol 1999; 111: 567–8.
   Google Scholar
• Hanau CA, Begley N, Bibbo M. Cervical endometriosis: a potential pitfall in the evaluation of glandular cells in cervical smears. Diagn Cytopathol 1997; 16: 127–80.
   Google Scholar
• Lundeen Si, Horwitz CA, Larson CJ, Stanley MW. Abnormal cervicovaginal smears due to endometriosis: a continuing problem. Diagn Cytopathol 2002; 26: 35–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulvany Ni, Surtees V. Cervical/vaginal endometriosis with atypia: a cytohistopathologic study. Diagn Cytopathol 1999; 21: 188–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Peralta-Venturino MN, Purslow MJ, Kini SR. Endometrial cells of the "lower uterine segment" (LUS) in cervical smears obtained by endocervical brushings: a source of potential diagnostic pitfall. Diagn Cytopathol 1995; 12: 263–8.
   Google Scholar
• Krane JF, Granter SR, Trask CE, Hogan CL, Lee KR. Papanicolaou smear sensitivity for the detection of adenocarcinoma of the cervix: a study of 49 cases. Cancer 2001; 93: 8–15.
   Google Scholar
• Schoolland M, Segal A, Allpress S, Miranda A, Frost F, Sterrett G. Adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix. Cancer 2002; 96: 330–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raab SS, Snider TE, Potts SA, et al. Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance. Diagnostic accuracy and interobserver variability using select cytologic criteria. Am J Clin Pathol 1997; 107: 299–307.
   Google Scholar
• Burja IT, Thompson SK, Sawyer WL Jr, et al. Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance on cervical smears. A study with cytohistologic correlation. Acta Cytol 1999; 43: 351–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiTomasso JP, Ramzy I, Mody DR. Glandular lesions of the cervix. Validity of cytologic criteria used to differentiate reactive changes, glandular intraepithelial lesions and adenocarcinoma. Acta Cytol 1996; 40: 1127–35.
   Google Scholar
• Kim Ti, Kim HS, Park CT, et al. Clinical evaluation of follow-up methods and results of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS) detected on cervicovaginal Pap smears. Gynecol Oncol 1999; 732: 292–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manetta A, Keefe K, Lin F, et al. Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance in cervical cytologic findings. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 180: 883–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korn AP, Judson PL, Zaloudek CJ. Importance of atypical glandular cells of uncertain significance in cervical cytologic smears. J Reprod Med 1998; 43: 774–8.
   Google Scholar
• Chhieng DC, Elgert PA, Cangiarella JF, Cohen JM. Clinical significance of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance. A follow-up study from an academic medical center. Acta Cytol 2000; 44: 557–66.
   Google Scholar
• Hecht JL, Sheets EE, Lee KR. Atypical glandular cells of undeter-mined significance in conventional cervical/vaginal smears and thin-layer preparations. Cancer 2002; 96: 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Geier CS, Wilson M, Creasman W. Clinical evaluation of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 184: 64–9.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts JM, Thurloe JK, Bowditch RC, Laverty CR. Subdividing atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance according to the Australian modified Bethesda, system: analysis of outcomes. Cancer 2000; 90: 87–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laverty CR, Farnsworth A, Thurloe J, Bowditch R. The reliability of a cytological prediction of cervical adenocarcinoma in situ. Aust NZ Obstet Gynaecol 1988; 4: 307–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathers ME, Johnson J, Wadehra V. How predictive is a cervical smear suggesting glandular neoplasia? Cytopathology 2002; 13: 83–91.
   Google Scholar
• Lee KR, Sun D, Crum CP. Endocervical intraepithelial glandular atypia (dysplasia): a histopathologic, human papillomavirus, and MIB-1 analysis of 25 cases. Hum Pathol 2000; 31: 656–64.
   Google Scholar
• Zaino RJ. Symposium Part I: adenocarcinoma in situ, glandular dysplasia, and early invasive adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2002; 21: 314–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaino RJ. Glandular lesions of the uterine cervix. Mod Pathol 2000; 13: 261–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronnett BM, Manos MM, Ransley JE, et al. Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS): Cytopathologic features, histopathologic results, and human papillomavirus DNA detection. Hum Pathol 1999; 30: 816–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keyhani-Rofagha S, Vesey-Shecket M. Diagnostic value, feasibility, and validity of preparing cell blocks from fluid-based gynaecologic cytology specimens. Cancer Cytopathol 2002; 96: 204–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selvaggi SM. Cytologic features of squamous cell carcinoma in situ involving endocervical glands in endocervical cytobrush specimens. Acta Cytol 1994; 38: 687–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine PH, Waisman J, Mittal K. Significance of the cytologic diagnosis of endocervical glandular involvement in high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions. Diagn Cytopathol 2002; 26: 217–21.
   Google Scholar
• Raab SS, Geisinger KR, Silverman JF, Thomas PA, Stanley MW. Interobserver variability of a Papanicolaou smear diagnosis of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance. Am J Clin Pathol 1998; 110: 653–9.
   Google Scholar
• Riethdorf L, Riethdorf S, Lee KR, Cviko A, Loning T, Crum CP. Human papillomaviruses, expression of p16, and early endocervical glandular neoplasia. Hum Pathol 2002; 33: 899–904.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar