Diagnostic pitfalls in the cytological interpretation of breast cancer

References

• Sneige N. Fine-needle aspiration of the breast: a review of 1995 cases with emphasis on diagnostic pitfalls. Diagn Cytopathol 1992; 9: 106–112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Layfield LT, Glasgow BJ, Cramer H. Fine needle aspirates in the management of breast masses. Pathol Annu 1990; 223–262
   Google Scholar
• Kline TS. Masqucrades of malignancy. A review of 4,241 aspirates from the breast. Acta Cytol 1981; 25: 263–266
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oertel YC. Fine needle aspiration cytology of the breast1st edn. Butterworth, Boston 1987
   Google Scholar
• Orell SR, Sterrett GF, Walters MN-I, Whitaker D. Fine needle aspiration cytology. Manual and Atlas2nd edn. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh 1992
   Google Scholar
• Kline TS, Kline IK. Guides to clinical aspiration biopsy, Breast. Igaku-Shoin, New York 1989
   Google Scholar
• Bondeson L, Lindholm K. Aspiration cytology of tubular breast carcinoma. Acta Cytol 1990; 34: 15–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen PP. Frozen section diagnosis of breast lesions: recent experience with 556 consecutive biopsies. Ann Surg 1978; 187: 17–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermansen, C, et al. Diagnostic reliability of combined physical examination, mammography and fine needle puncture (“Triple test”) in breast tumors. Cancer 1987; 60: 1866–1871
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamb, J, Anderson, TJ, Dixon, MJ, et al. Role of fine needle aspiration cytology in breast cancer screening. J Clin Pathol 1987; 40: 705–709
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciatto, S, Cariaggi, P, Bulgaresi, P, et al. Fine needle aspiration cytology of the breast: review of 9533 consecutive cases. The Breast 1993; 2: 87–90
   Google Scholar
• Azavedo E, Svane G, Auer G. Stereotactic fine-needle biopsy in 2594 mammographically detected non-palpable lesions. Lancet 1989; 1: 1033–1036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benoit, JL, Kara, R, McGregor, SE, et al. Fibroadenoma of the breast: diagnostic pitfall of fine-needle aspiration. Diagn Cytopathol 1992; 8: 643–648
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley MW, Tani EM, Skoog L. Fine needle aspiration of fibroadenoma of the breast with atypia. Spectrum including cases that cytologically mimic cancer. Diagn Cytopathol 1990; 6: 375–382
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fessia, L, Botta, C, Arisic, R, et al. Fine-needle aspiration of breast lesions. Role and accuracy in a review of 7495 cases. Diagn Cytopathol 1987; 3: 121–125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuda, M, Wada, A, Nagumo, S, et al. Pitfalls in fine needle aspiration cytology of breast tumors: a report of two cases. Acta Cytol 1993; 37: 247–251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamb J, McGoogan E. Fine needle aspiration cytology of breast in invasive carcinoma of tubular type and in radial scar/complex sclerosing lesions. Cytopathology 1994; 5: 17–26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de la Torre M, Lindholm K, Lindgren A. Fine needle aspiration cytology of tubular breast carcinoma and radial scar. Acta Cytol 1994; 38: 884–890
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makunura, CN, Curling, OM, Yeomans, P, et al. Apocrine adenosis within radial scar: a case of false positive breast cytodiagnosis. Cytopathology 1994; 5: 123–128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg ML, Middleton PD, Bilous AM. Infarcted intraduct papilloma diagnosed by fine-needle biopsy. A cytologic, clinical and mammographic pitfall. Diagn Cytopathol 1994; 11: 188–194
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fanning TV, Sneige N, Staerkel G. Mucinous breast lesions: fine needle aspiration findings. Acta Cytol 1990; 34: 754–755
   Google Scholar
• Peterse JL, Thunnissen FBJM, van Heerde P. Fine needle aspiration cytology of radiation induced changes in non neoplastic breast lesions. Possible pitfalls in cytodiagnosis. Acta Cytol 1986; 30: 176–180
   Google Scholar
• Dornfeld JM, Thompson SK, Shurbaji MS. Radiation-induced changes in the breast: a potential diagnostic pitfall on fine-needle aspiration. Diagn Cytopathol 1992; 8: 79–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bondeson L. Aspiration cytology of radiation-induced changes of normal breast epithelium. Acta Cytol 1986; 30: 309–310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dusenbery D, Frable WJ. Fine needle aspiration cytology of phyllodes tumor. Potential diagnostic pitfalls. Acta Cytol 1991; 36: 215–221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kube MJ, Greenberg ML. Cytology of a benign phyllodes tumor with keratin cyst formation: a spectrum of diagnostic pitfalls. Cytopathology 1995; 6: 121–125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzara PF, Flint A, Naylor B. Adenoma of the nipple. Acta Cytol 1989; 33: 188–190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stormby N, Bondeson L. Adenoma of the nipple. An unusual diagnosis in aspiration cytology. Acta Cytol 1984; 28: 729–732
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi, TK, Ueda, M, Nishino, T, et al. Spontaneous infarction of an intraductal papilloma of the breast: cytological presentation on fine needle aspiration. Cytopathol 1992; 3: 379–384
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers LA, Lee KR. Breast carcinoma simulating fibroadenoma or fibrocystic change by fine-needle aspiration. A study of 16 cases. Am J Clin Pathol 1992; 98: 155–160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindholm K. Cytology versus histology in carcinoma in situ of the breast and the role of fine-needle aspiration cytology in the treatment of carcinoma in situ. New Frontiers in Cytology. Modern aspect of research and practice. Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1988; 331–339
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, JF, Masood, S, Ducatman, BS, et al. Can FNA biopsy separate atypical hyperplasia, carcinoma in situ and invasive carcinoma of the breast?. Diagn Cytopathol 1993; 9: 713–728
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malamud YR, Ducatman BS, Wang HH. Comparative features of comedo and non-comedo ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast on fine needle aspiration biopsy. Diagn Cytopathol 1992; 8: 571–576
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theocharous C, Greenberg ML. Cytologic features of ductal carcinoma in situ. Accepted for publication in Diagn Cytopathol 1995
   Google Scholar
• Birdsong GG, Bishara HM, Costa MJ. Adenomyoepithelioma of the breast: report of a case initially examined by fine-needle aspiration. Diagn Cytopathol 1993; 9: 547–550
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vielh, P, Thiery, JP, Validire, P, et al. Adenomyoepithelioma of the breast: report of a case initial examined by fine needle aspiration. Diagn Cytopathol 1993; 9: 188–193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loose, SH, Patchefsky, AS, Holland, W, et al. Adenomyoepithelioma of the breast. Am J Surg Pathol 1992; 16: 868–876
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans AT, Hussein KAH. A microglandular adenosis-like lesion simulating tubular adenocarcinoma of the breast. A case report with cytological and histological appearances. Cytopathology 1990; 1: 311–316
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gherardi G, Bernardi C, Marveggio C. Microglandular adenosis of the breast: fine needle aspiration biopsy of two cases. Diagn Cytopathol 1992; 9: 72–76
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson AE, Logan-Young W, Mulford DK. Aspiration cytology of tubular carcinoma. Diagnostic features with mammographic correlation. Am J Clin Pathol 1994; 101: 488–492
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson, KF, Hirschowitz, S, Nieberg, RK, et al. Pitfalls in the cytologic diagnosis of angiosarcoma of the breast by fine-needle aspiration. A case report. Diagn Cytopathol 1994; 11: 297–300
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar