- Melamed MR, Flehinger BJ. Reevaluation of quality assurance in the cytology laboratory (editorial). Acta Cytol 1992; 36: 461-5.
- Baker A, M elcher DH. Rapid cervical cytology screening. Cytopathology 1991:2:299-301.
- Faraker CA. Partial rescreening of all negative smears: an improved method of quality assurance in laboratories undertaking cervical screening. Cytopathology 1993; 4: 47-50.
- Dudding N. Rapid rescreening of cervical smears: an improved method of quality control. Cytopathology 1995; 6: 95-9.
- Johnson, Hair T, Gibson L, et al. An assessment of partial rescreening as an internal quality control method for cervical smears. Cytopathology 1995; 6: 376-87.
- Baker A, Melcher D1 Smith R. Role of »screening of cervical smears in internal quality control. J Clin Pathol 1995; 48: 1002-4.
- Faraker CA, Boxer ME. Rapid review (partial rescreening) of cervical cytology. Four years experience and quality assurance implications. J Clin Pathol 1996; 49: 587-91.
- Faraker CA. Partial rescreening for quality assurance in gynaecological cytology. Diagn Cytopathol 1997; 16 (2): 191-2.
- Cross PA. Rapid rescreening of cervical smears as a quality control method. Cytopathology 1997; 8: 79-84.
- Achievable standards, benchmarks for reporting criteria for evaluating cervical Cytopathology. Report of a working party set up by the Royal College of Pathologists, the British Society for Clinical Cytology and the NHS Cervical Screening Program. Cytopathology 1995; 6 (Suppl. 2): 1-32.
- National Pathology Accreditation Advisory Council. Requirements for Gynaecological (Cervical) Cytology 1997. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service, 1997.
- Farrell DJ, Gibson LM, Wadehra V. Rapid rescreening of cervical smears as a method of internal quality control. For how long should we rescreen? Acta Cytol 1997; 41: 251-60.
- Shield PW, Cox N. The sensitivity of rapid (partial) review of cervical smears. Cytopathology 1998; 9: 84-92.
- Baker RW, Wadsworth J, Brugal G, et al. An evaluation of "rapid review" as a method of quality control of cervical smears using the axioHOME microscope. Cytopathology 1997; 8: 85-9.
- Wolfendale M. Internal quality control with reference to rapid rescreening (editorial). Cytopathology 1995; 6: 365-7.
- Mitchell H, Medley G. Cellular differences between true negative and false negative papanicolaou smears. Cytopathology 1993; 4: 285-90.
- Halford JA, Wright RG, Ditchmen EJ. Quality assurance in cervical cytology screening. Comparison of rapid rescreening and the PAPNET testing system. Acta Cytol 1997; 41: 79-81.
Detection of False-Negative Papanicolaou Smears by Rapid Rescreening in a Large Routine Cervical Cytology Laboratory
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.