Problem Finding in Professional Learning Communities: A Learning Study Approach

References

• Åhlberg, M., Äänismaa, P., & Dillon, P. (2005). Education for sustainable living: Integrating theory, practice, design, and development. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 49(2), 167–185. doi: 10.1080/00313830500048923
   Google Scholar
• Borko, H., & Putnam, R. T. (1996). Learning to teach. In R. C. Calfee & D. Berliner (Eds.), Handbook on educational psychology (pp. 673–708). New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bray, J. N. (2002). Uniting teacher learning: Collaborative inquiry for professional development. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2002(94), 83–92. doi: 10.1002/ace.62
   Google Scholar
• Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1996). Becoming critical: Education, knowledge and action research. Lewes, UK: Farmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chiu, M. M. (2008). Effects of argumentation on group micro-creativity: Statistical discourse analyses of algebra students' collaborative problem solving. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(3), 382–402. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, W. H., & Kong, C. A. (2012). Teacher collaborative learning and teacher self-efficacy: The case of lesson study. Journal of Experimental Education, 80(3), 263–283. doi: 10.1080/00220973.2011.596854
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, A. (1992). Toward a design science of education. In E. Scanlon & T. O'Shea (Eds.), New directions in educational technology (pp. 15–22). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, A. (1999). The changing infrastructure of educational research. In E. C. Lagemann, & L. S. Shulman (Eds.), Issues in educational research: Problems and possibilities (pp. 289–298). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3–21. doi: 10.1007/BF00988593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• DuFour, R. (2004). What is a “professional learning community”? Educational Leadership, 61(8), 6–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, R. G., & Reiser, B. J. (2007). Reasoning across ontologically distinct levels: Students’ understandings of molecular genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(7), 938–959. doi: 10.1002/tea.20186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, J. (2012). Developing a science of teaching through lesson study. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 1(2), 108–125. doi: 10.1108/20468251211224163
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, D., Allison, S., Coombes, H., Case, J., & Linder, C. (2006). Using variation to enhance learning in engineering. International Journal of Engineering Education, 22(1), 102–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. (1999). Complexity and the change process. Change forces: The sequel. Philadelphia: Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. (2001). The new meaning of educational change (3rd ed.). Toronto: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gericke, N. M., & Hagberg, M. (2007). Definition of historical models of gene function and their relation to students’ understanding of genetics. Science and Education, 16, 849–881. doi: 10.1007/s11191-006-9064-4
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, A. (2010). Teacher learning on problem-solving teams. [Article]. Teaching & Teacher Education, 26(3), 608–615. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy, T., & Kirkwood, V. (1994). Towards creating effective learning environments for science teachers: The role of science educator in the tertiary setting. International Journal of Science Education, 16(2), 231–251. doi: 10.1080/0950069940160210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., & Stigler, J. W. (2002). A knowledge base for the teaching profession: What would it look like and how can we get one?. Educational Researcher, 31(5), 3–15. doi: 10.3102/0013189X031005003
   Google Scholar
• Hipp, K. K., Huffman, J. B., Pankake, A. M., & Olivier, D. F. (2008). Sustaining professional learning communities: Case studies. Journal of Educational Change, 9, 173–195. doi: 10.1007/s10833-007-9060-8
   Google Scholar
• Holmqvist, M. (2011). Teachers' learning in a learning study. Instructional Science, 39(4), 497–511. doi: 10.1007/s11251-010-9138-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmqvist, M., Gustavsson, L., & Wernberg, A. (2007). Generative learning: learning beyond the learning situation. Educational Action Research, 15(2), 181–208. doi: 10.1080/09650790701314684
   Google Scholar
• Hord, S. (1997). Professional learning communities: Communities of continuous inquiry and improvement. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Hord, S. (2009). Professional learning communities. Journal of Staff Development, 30(1), 40–43.
   Google Scholar
• Kincheloe, J. L., & Steinberg, S. R. (1998). Lesson plans from the outer limits: Unauthorized methods. In J. L. Kincheloe & S. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Unauthorized methods: Strategies for critical teaching (pp. 1–23). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Koballa, T. R., Glynn, S. M., Upson, L., & Coleman, D. C. (2005). Conceptions of teaching science held by novice teachers in an alternative certification program. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 16, 287–308. doi: 10.1007/s10972-005-0192-5
   Google Scholar
• Laughlin, P. R., Zander, M. L., Knievel, E. M., & Tan, T. K. (2003). Groups perform better than the best individuals on letters-to-numbers problems: Informative equations and effective strategies. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 85(4), 684–694. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.4.684
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H., & Cho, H. (2007). Factors affecting problem finding depending on degree of structure of problem stuation. Journal of Educational Research, 101(2), 113–123. doi: 10.3200/JOER.101.2.113-125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, T. H. (2010). Tools for the study and design of collaborative teacher learning: The affordances of different conceptions of teacher community and activity theory. Teacher Education Quarterly, 37(1), 109–130.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, C., Perry, R. R., & Hurd, J. (2009). Improving mathematics instruction through lesson study: A theoretical model and North American case. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12, 285–304. doi: 10.1007/s10857-009-9102-7
   Google Scholar
• Lieberman, A., & Miller, L. (2011). Learning communities: The starting point for professional learning is in schools and classrooms. Journal of Staff Development, 32(4), 16–20.
   Google Scholar
• Linder, C., Fraser, D., & Pang, M. F. (2006). Using variation approach to enhance physics learning in a college classroom. The Physics Teacher, 44(9), 589–592. doi: 10.1119/1.2396777
   Google Scholar
• Lo, M. L. (2009). The development of the learning study approach in classroom research in Hong Kong. Educational Research Journal, 24(1), 165–184.
   Google Scholar
• Lo, M. L., Chik, P., & Pang, M. F. (2006). Patterns of variation in teaching the colour of light to Primary 3 students. Instructional Science, 34, 1–19. doi: 10.1007/s11251-005-3348-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, M. W., & Talbert, J. E. (2001). Professional communities and the work of high school teaching. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maloney, C., & Konza, D. (2011). A case study of teachers’ professional learning: Becoming a community of professional learning or not?. Issues in Educational Research, 21(1), 75–87.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F., & Tsui, A. B. M. (Eds.). (2004). Classroom discourse and the space of learning. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, M. W., & Talbert, J. E. (2001). Professional communities and the world of high school teaching. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mumford, M. D., Costanza, D. P., Threlfall, K. V., Baughman, W. A., & Reiter-Palmon, R. (1993). Personality variables and problem construction: An exploratory investigation. Creativity Research Journal, 6, 365–389. doi: 10.1080/10400419309534493
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, T. H. (2009). Teachers' collaborative inquiry and professional growth: Should we be optimistic?. Science Education, 93(3), 548–580. doi:10.1002/sce.20302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemeth, C., & Chiles, C. (1988). Modelling courage: The role of dissent in fostering independence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18(3), 275–280. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2420180306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nokes-Malach, T. J., Meade, M. L., & Morrow, D. G. (2012). The effect of expertise on collaborative problem solving. Thinking & Reasoning, 18(1), 32–58. doi: 10.1080/13546783.2011.642206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okuda, S. M., Runco, M. A., & Berger, D. E. (1991). Creativity and the finding and solving of real-world problems. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 9(1), 45–53. doi:10.1177/073428299100900104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padwad, A., & Dixit, K. K. (2008). Impact of professional learning community participation on teachers' thinking about classroom problems. TESL-EJ, 12(3), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Pang, M. F., & Lo, M. L. (2012). Learning study: Helping teachers to use theory, develop professionally, and produce new knowledge to be shared. Instructional Science, 40(3), 589–606. doi: 10.1007/s11251-011-9191-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pang, M. F., & Marton, F. (2003). Beyond “;lesson study”: Comparing two ways of facilitating the grasp of some economic concepts. Instructional Science, 31, 175–194. doi: 10.1023/A:1023280619632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pang, M. F., & Marton, F. (2005). Learning theory as teaching resource: Enhancing students’ understanding of economic concepts. Instructional Science, 33, 159–191. doi: 10.1007/s11251-005-2811-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedretti, E., & Hodson, D. (1995). From rhetoric to action: Implementing STS education through action research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(5), 463–485. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660320505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pella, S. (2011). A situative perspective on developing writing pedagogy in a teacher professional learning community. Teacher Education Quarterly, 38(1), 107–125.
   Google Scholar
• Ramirez, V. E. (2002). Finding the right problem. Asia Pacific Education Review, 3(1), 18–23. doi: 10.1007/BF03024917
   Google Scholar
• Reiter-Palmon, R., & Robinson, E. J. (2009). Problem identification and construction: What do we know, what is the future?. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(1), 43–47. doi: 10.1037/a0014629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, S. I. (2001). Problem solving. Hove: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. D. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In C. E. O'Malley (Ed.), Computer-supported collaborative learning (pp. 69–197). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Runesson, U., Kullberg, A., & Maunula, T. (2011). Sensitivity to student learning: A possible way to enhance teachers’ and students’ learning?. Constructing Knowledge for Teaching Secondary Mathematics, Mathematics Teacher Education, 6(4), 263–278. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-09812-8_16
   Google Scholar
• Samuelowicz, K., & Bain, J. D. (1992). Conceptions of teaching held by academic teachers. Higher Education, 24, 93–111. doi: 10.1007/BF00138620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandberg, J. (2005). How do we justify knowledge produced within interpretive approaches. Organizational Research Methods, 8, 41–68. doi: 10.1177/1094428104272000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scribner, J. P., Sawyer, R. K., Watson, S. T., & Myers, V. L. (2007). Teacher teams and distributed leadership: A study of group discourse and collaboration. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43(1), 67–100. doi: 10.1177/0013161X06293631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidel, T., Rimmele, R., & Prenzel, M. (2005). Clarity and coherence of lesson goals as a scaffold for student learning. Learning and Instruction, 15, 539–556. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavit, D., & Nelson, T. H. (2010). Collaborative teacher inquiry as a tool for building theory on the development and use of rich mathematical tasks. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13(3), 201–221. doi: 10.1007/s10857-009-9136-x
   Google Scholar
• Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stoll, L., Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Wallace, M., & Thomas, S. (2006). Professional learning communities: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Change, 7, 221–258. doi: 10.1007/s10833-006-0001-8
   Google Scholar
• Tan, Y. S. M. (2014a). A researcher-facilitator's reflection: Implementing a Singapore case of learning study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 37, 44–54. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2013.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, Y. S. M. (2014b). Enriching a collaborative teacher inquiry discourse – Exploring teachers’ experiences of a theory-framed discourse in a Singapore case of lesson sutdy. Educational Action Research. doi:10.1080/09650792.2014.880360
   Google Scholar
• Tan, Y. S. M., & Nashon, S. M. (2013). Promoting teacher learning through learning study discourse: The case of science teachers in Singapore. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(5), 859–877. doi: 10.1007/s10972-013-9340-5
   Google Scholar
• Tan, Y. S. M., & Nashon, S. M. (2014). Promoting teachers’ collaborative exploration of a new science curriculum: the case of a Singapore learning study. Professional Development in Education. doi:10.1080/19415257.2014.944670.
   Google Scholar
• Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (1996). Changing approaches to teaching: A relational perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 21(3), 275–284. doi: 10.1080/03075079612331381211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsui, A. B. M. (2004). The shared space of learning. In F. Marton & A. B. M. Tsui (Eds.), Classroom discourse and the space of learning (pp. 165–186). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Venville, G. J., Gribble, S. J., & Donovan, J. (2005). An exploration of young children's understandings of genetics concepts from ontological and epistemological perspectives. Science Education, 89(4), 614–633. doi: 10.1002/sce.20061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, D. R. (2007). Teachers' learning communities: Catalyst for change or a new infrastructure for the status quo?. Teachers College Record, 109(3), 699–739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar