What Makes the Difference in Reading Achievement? Comparisons Between Finland and Shanghai

References

• Adams, R. J. (2003). Response to “cautions on OECD's recent educational survey (PISA)”. Oxford Review of Education, 29, 377–389. doi: 10.1080/03054980307445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ammermüller, A. (2007). PISA: What makes the difference? Explaining the gap in test scores between Finland and Germany. Empirical Economics, 33, 263–287. doi: 10.1007/s00181-006-0102-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, L., Dreher, M. J., & Guthrie, J. T. (2000). Why teachers should promote reading engagement. In L. Baker, M. J. Dreher, & J. T. Guthrie (Eds.), Engaging young readers: Promoting achievement and motivation (pp. 1–16). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Beese, B., & Liang, X. (2010). Do resources matter? PISA science achievement comparison between students in the United States, Canada and Finland. Improving Schools, 13, 266–279. doi: 10.1177/1365480210390554
   Google Scholar
• Blinder, A. (1973). Wage discrimination: Reduced form and structural estimates. The Journal of Human Resources, 8, 436–455. doi: 10.2307/144855
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, H. (2010). Balancing teacher quality and quantity. In M. D. Lytras, P. O. De Pablos, D. Avison, J. Sipior, Q. Jin, W. Leal, … D. Horner (Eds.), Technology enhanced learning: Quality of teaching and educational reform (pp. 474–481). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Botezat, A. (2012). Decomposing the gap in school achievement between Finland and Romania: Some methodological aspects. Annals of Faculty of Economics, 1, 165–171.
   Google Scholar
• Chiu, M. M., & McBride-Chang, C. (2006). Gender, context, and reading: A comparison of students in 43 countries. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10, 331–362. doi: 10.1207/s1532799xssr1004_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, J. (2009). An investigation of reasons for Finland's success in PISA (Doctoral thesis, University of Oxford, England). Retrieved July 6, 2013, from http://ora.ox.ac.uk/resolve/info:fedora/uuid:62b7a22f-d930-4eb0-893d-d703fd9d182d/THESIS01
   Google Scholar
• Cornelius-White, J. (2007). Learner-centered teacher-student relationships are effective: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 77, 113–143. doi: 10.3102/003465430298563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. (2009). The flat world and education: How America's commitment to equity will determine our future. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davidov, E., Dülmer, H., Schlüter, E., Schmidt, P., & Meuleman, B. (2012). Using a multilevel structural equation modeling approach to explain cross-cultural measurement noninvariance. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43, 558–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J. W. (2009). Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real world. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 549–576. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085530
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, J. -E. (2007). Understanding causal influences on educational achievement through analysis of differences over time within countries. In T. Loveless (Ed.), Lessons learned: What international assessment tell us about math achievement (pp. 37–63). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Harzing, A-W. (2006). Response styles in cross-national survey research: A 26-country study. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 6, 243–266. doi: 10.1177/1470595806066332
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hausstätter, R. S., & Takala, M. (2011). Can special education make a difference? Exploring the differences of special educational systems between Finland and Norway in relation to the PISA results. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 13, 271–281. doi: 10.1080/15017419.2010.507372
   Google Scholar
• Jahnukainen, M. (2011). Different strategies, different outcomes? The history and trends of the inclusive and special education in Alberta (Canada) and in Finland. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 55, 489–502. doi: 10.1080/00313831.2010.537689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jann, B. (2005). Standard errors for the Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition. German Stata Users’ Group Meetings 2005. Retrieved July 6, 2013, from http://repec.org/dsug2005/oaxaca_se_handout.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jann, B. (2008). A Stata implementation of the Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition. The Stata Journal, 8, 453–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, E. S. (2007). On the standard errors of Oaxaca-type decompositions for inter-industry gender wage differentials. Economics Bulletin, 10(6), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Linnakylä, P., & Malin, A. (2008). Finnish students’ school engagement profiles in the light of PISA 2003. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 52, 583–602. doi: 10.1080/00313830802497174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linnakylä, P., Malin, A., & Taube, K. (2006). What lies behind low reading literacy performance? A comparative analysis of the Finnish and Swedish students. In J. Mejding & A. Roe (Eds.), Northern lights on PISA 2003 – A reflection from the Nordic countries (pp. 143–158). Copenhagen, Denmark: Nordic Council of Ministers.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, X. (2008). Within-school gender gaps in reading, mathematics, and science literacy. Comparative Education Review, 52, 437–460. doi: 10.1086/588762
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mistler, S. A. (2013). A SAS macro for applying multiple imputation to multilevel data. SAS Global Forum 2013. Paper 438–2013. Retrieved July 6, 2013, from http://support.sas.com/resources/papers/proceedings13/438-2013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ning, B., Van Damme, J., Liu, H., Vanlaar, G, & Gielen, S. (2013). Students’ individual perceptions of school climate predict reading achievement in Shanghai. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology, 1, 188–198. doi: 10.1080/21683603.2013.821638
   Google Scholar
• Ning, B., Van Damme, J., Vanlaar, G., Liu, H., & Gielen, S. (2012). The influence of school climate on reading achievement: An exploration of school differences in Shanghai. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Ning, B., Van Damme, J., Yang, X., & Gielen, S. (2013, September). Does classroom disciplinary climate in a school matter everywhere? A cross-country comparative study. Paper presented at the 2013 annual meeting of the European Educational Research Association, Istanbul, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Oaxaca, R. (1973). Male-female wage differentials in urban labor markets. International Economic Review, 14, 693–709. doi: 10.2307/2525981
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2003). Literacy skills for the world of tomorrow: Further results from PISA 2000. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2004). Learning for tomorrow's world – First results from PISA 2003. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2007). PISA 2006 volume 2: Data. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2010a). PISA 2009 results: What students know and can do – Student performance in reading, mathematics and science (Volume I). Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2010b). PISA 2009 results: What makes a school successful? Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2011). Strong performers and successful reformers in education. Lessons from PISA for the United States. Pairs, France: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2012a). How do some students overcome their socio-economic background. PISA in Focus, 5. Retrieved August 10, 2013, from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/pisa2009/48165173.pdf
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2012b). Does money buy strong performance in PISA? PISA in Focus, 13, 1–4. Retrieved August 6, 2013, from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/49685503.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Perelman, S., & Santin, D. (2011). Measuring educational efficiency at student level with parametric stochastic distance functions: An application to Spanish PISA results. Education Economics, 19, 29–49. doi: 10.1080/09645290802470475
   Google Scholar
• PISA 2009 Shanghai Administration Team. (2010). 上海2009年学生评价项目(PISA)结果情况介绍统发稿 [The introduction of PISA 2009 Shanghai results]. Retrieved July 6, 2013, from http://www.pjky.com/article.asp?articleid=959
   Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Simola, H. (2005). The Finnish miracle of PISA: Historical and sociological remarks on teaching and teacher education. Comparative Education, 41, 455–470. doi: 10.1080/03050060500317810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todd, P. E., & Wolpin, K. I. (2003). On the specification and estimation of the production function for cognitive achievement. The Economic Journal, 113, F3–F33. doi: 10.1111/1468-0297.00097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Välijärvi, J., Linnakylä, P., Kupari, P., Renikainen, P., Sulkunen, S., Törnroos, J., & Arffman, I. (2007). The Finnish success in PISA – And some reasons behind it 2: PISA 2003. Jyväskylä, Finland: Jyväskylä University Institution for Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J. H. Y., & Guthrie, J. T. (2004). Modeling the effects of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, amount of reading, and past reading achievement on text comprehension between U.S. and Chinese students. Reading Research Quarterly, 39, 162–186. doi: 10.1598/RRQ.39.2.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worthington, A. C. (2001). An empirical survey of frontier efficiency measurement techniques in education. Education Economics, 9, 245–268. doi: 10.1080/09645290110086126
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, M., & Kong, L. (2012). An exploration of reasons for Shanghai's success in the OECD Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2009. Frontiers of Education in China, 7, 124–162.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., & Lee, K. A. (2011). Decomposing achievement gaps among OECD countries. Asia Pacific Education Review, 12, 463–474. doi: 10.1007/s12564-011-9151-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar