Revisiting the Idea of “Critical Aspects”

References

• Booth, S. A. (1997). On phenomenography, learning and teaching. Higher Education Research and Development, 16(2), 135–158. doi: 10.1080/0729436970160203
   Google Scholar
• Booth, S., & Hulten, M. (2003). Opening dimensions of variation: An empirical study of learning in a Web-based discussion. Instructional Science, 31(1), 65–86. doi: 10.1023/A:1022552301050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowden, J., & Marton, F. (1998). The university of learning: Beyond quality and competence in higher education. London: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Collier-Reed, B., & Ingerman, Å. (2013). Phenomenography: From critical aspects to knowledge claim. In M. Tight & J. Huisman (Eds.), International perspectives on higher education research (Vol. 9, pp. 243–260). Bingley, UK: Emerald.
   Google Scholar
• Cope, C. (2000). Educationally critical aspects of the experience of learning about the concept of an information system (Unpublished PhD thesis). LaTrobe University, Bendigo.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlgren, L. O. (1979). Children's conception of price as a function of questions asked. Reports from the Institute of Education, 81, University of Gothenburg, Sweden: University of Gothenburg.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlin, B. (2007). Enriching the theoretical horizons of phenomenography, variation theory and learning studies. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 51(4), 327–346. doi: 10.1080/00313830701485437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekeblad, E. (1996). Children • learning • numbers: A phenomenographic excursion into first-grade children's arithmetic. Gothenburg Studies in Educational Research, 105, Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis. University of Gothenburg, Sweden: University of Gothenburg.
   Google Scholar
• Ingerman, Å., Linder, C., & Marshall, D. (2009). The learners’ experience of variation: Following students’ threads of learning physics in computer simulation sessions. Instructional Science, 37(3), 273–292. doi: 10.1007/s11251-007-9044-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, A., Lesh, R., & Baek, J. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of design research methods in education. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kullberg, A., Mårtensson, P., & Runesson, U. (2013, August). Teachers’ exploration and search for the external and internal horizon of the object of learning. Paper presented at the 14th Biennial Conference of European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction, Munich, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Lo, M. L. (2009, August). Building a teacher learning network for developing the ability to teach for learning. Paper presented at the 13th Biennial Conference of European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Lo, M. L. (2012). Variation theory and the improvement of teaching and learning. Göteborg, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
   Google Scholar
• Lo, M. L., Marton, F., Pang, M. F., & Pong, W. Y. (2004). Towards a pedagogy of learning. In F. Marton & A. B. M. Tsui, with P. Chik, P. Y. Ko, M. L. Lo, I. Mok, D. Ng, M. F. Pang,  … U. Runesson (Eds.), Classroom discourse and the space of learning (pp. 189–225). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F. (1981). Phenomenography: Describing the conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science, 10(2), 177–200. doi: 10.1007/BF00132516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marton, F. (2001). The learning study. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F. (2015). Necessary conditions of learning. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F., & Morris, P. (Eds.). (2002). What matters? Discovering critical conditions of classroom learning. Gothenburg, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F., & Pang, M. F. (2006). On some necessary conditions of learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(3), 193–220. doi: 10.1207/s15327809jls1502_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marton, F., & Pang, M. F. (2008). The idea of phenomenography and the pedagogy for conceptual change. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 533–559). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F., & Pang, M. F. (2013). Meanings are acquired from experiencing differences against a background of sameness, rather than from experiencing sameness against a background of difference: Putting a conjecture to the test by embedding it in a pedagogical tool. Frontier Learning Research, 1(1), 24–41.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F., & Tsui, A. B. M., with Chik, P. M., Ko, P. Y., Lo, M. L., Mok, I. A. C., Ng, F. P., Pang, M. F., … Runesson, U. (2004). Classroom discourse and the space of learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Msonde, C. E. (2011). Enhancing teachers’ competencies on learner-centred approaches through learning study in Tanzanian schools (Unpublished PhD thesis). The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
   Google Scholar
• Pang, M. F. (2003). Two faces of variation: On continuity in the phenomenographic movement. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47(2), 145–156. doi: 10.1080/00313830308612
   Google Scholar
• Pang, M. F. (2010). Boosting financial literacy: Benefits from learning study. Instructional Science, 38(6), 659–677. doi: 10.1007/s11251-009-9094-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pang, M. F. (in press). What is critical? A study on the development of students’ informal reasoning through the use of learning study.
   Google Scholar
• Pang, M. F., & Chik, P. P. M. (2005). Primary 4 general studies: Price. In M. L. Lo & W. Y. Pong (Eds.), For each and everyone: Catering for individual differences through learning studies (pp. 96–115). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pang, M. F., & Ki, W. W. (2015, August). Differentiation and integration of phenomenographic research: Dialogue between two faces of variation. Paper presented at The 15th European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction Conference, Limassol, Cyprus.
   Google Scholar
• Pang, M. F., & Lo, M. L. (2012). Learning study: Helping teachers to use theory, develop professionally, and produce new knowledge to be shared. Instructional Science, 40(3), 589–606. doi: 10.1007/s11251-011-9191-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pang, M. F., & Marton, F. (2003). Beyond “lesson study”: Comparing two ways of facilitating the grasp of economic concepts. Instructional Science, 31(3), 175–194. doi: 10.1023/A:1023280619632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pang, M. F., & Marton, F. (2005). Learning theory as teaching resource: Another example of radical enhancement of students’ understanding of economic aspects of the world around them. Instructional Science, 33(2), 159–191. doi: 10.1007/s11251-005-2811-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pang, M. F., & Marton, F. (2007). The paradox of pedagogy: The relative contribution of teachers and learners to learning. Iskolakultura, 1(1), 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Pang, M. F., & Marton, F. (2013). Interaction between the learners’ initial grasp of the object of learning and the learning resource afforded. Instructional Science, 41(6), 1065–1082. doi: 10.1007/s11251-013-9272-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pramling Samuelsson, I., & Asplund-Carlsson, M. (2008). The playing learning child: Towards a pedagogy of early childhood. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 52(6), 623–641. doi: 10.1080/00313830802497265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rovio-Johansson, A. (1999). Being good at teaching: Exploring different ways of handling the same subject in higher education. Gothenburg Studies in Educational Research, 140, Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis. University of Gothenburg, Sweden: University of Gothenburg.
   Google Scholar
• Runesson, U. (1999). The pedagogy of variation: Different ways to handle a mathematical content. Gothenburg Studies in Educational Research, 129, Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis. University of Gothenburg, Sweden: University of Gothenburg.
   Google Scholar
• Svensson, L., Anderberg, E., Alvegård, C., & Johansson, T. (2009). The use of language in understanding subject matter. Instructional Science, 37(3), 205–225. doi: 10.1007/s11251-007-9046-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tullberg, A. (1997). Teaching “the mole”: A phenomenographic inquiry into the didactics of chemistry. Gothenburg Studies in Educational Research, 118, Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis. University of Gothenburg, Sweden: University of Gothenburg.
   Google Scholar
• Vikström, A. (2014). What makes the difference? Teachers explore what must be taught and what must be learned in order to understand the particulate character of matter. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(6), 709–727. doi: 10.1007/s10972-014-9397-9
   Google Scholar