520
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Using phenomenography to investigate the enacted object of learning in teaching activities: the case of teaching Chinese characters in Hong Kong preschools

Pages 169-186 | Received 10 Oct 2014, Accepted 12 Aug 2015, Published online: 17 Feb 2016

References

  • Adams, M. J. (1994). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Ashworth, P. & Lucas, U. (1998). What is the ‘world’ of phenomenography? Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 42(4), 415–431. doi:10.1080/0031383980420407
  • Bowden, J. (2005). Reflections on the phenomenographic team research process. In J. A. Bowden & P. Green (Eds.), Doing developmental phenomenography (pp. 11–31). Melbourne: RMIT University Press.
  • Bowden, J. & Marton, F. (1998). The university of learning: Beyond quality and competence. London: Kogan Page.
  • Bowden, J. A. & Walsh, E. (Eds.). (2000). Phenomenography. Melbourne: RMIT University Press.
  • Brousseau, G. (1997). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Chall, J. S. (1983). Learning to read: The great debate. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
  • Chen, S. C. (2000). 幼兒語文教材教法;全語言教學觀 [Methods and materials for teaching language to children: A whole language perspective]. Taipei: Kuangyu.
  • Chou, P. H. (2012). 識字教學 [Teaching Chinese characters]. In M. C. Cheng (Ed.), 國語文教學理論與應用 [Theories and practices of teaching Chinese language] (pp. 149–158). Taipei: Hungyeh.
  • Curriculum Development Council. (2006). Guide to the Pre-primary Curriculum. Hong Kong: Education Bureau.
  • Dall'Alba, G. (1991). Foreshadowing conceptions of teaching. Research and Development in Higher Education, 13, 293–297.
  • Dall'Alba, G. (1994). Reflections on some faces of phenomenography. In J. A. Bowden & E. Walsh (Eds.), Phenomenographic research: Variations in method: The Warburton symposium (pp. 73–88). Melbourne: RMIT University Press.
  • Education Bureau of Jingyan, Sichuan. (1994). 字族文識字教學實驗研究 [Experimental study of teaching texts of a family of characters]. Educational Research, 172(5), 49–53.
  • Jia, G. J. (2001). 科學適用的字理識字教學法 [Scientifically useful character rationale teaching method]. Changsha: Hunan People's Publishing House.
  • Kwan, G. C. Y. (2000). 四種漢字識字教學方法的比較分析 [A comparative analysis of four ways to teach Chinese characters]. In Y .C. Cheng, K. W. Chow, & K. T. Tsui (Eds.), School curriculum change and development in Hong Kong (pp. 123–144). Hong Kong: The Hong Kong Institute of Education.
  • Lam, H. C. (2011). Critical analysis of the various ways of teaching Chinese characters. e-FLT—Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 8(1), 57–70.
  • Lam, H. C. (2012). 學前字、詞教學:現象圖析學分析 [A phenomenographic study on the learning and teaching of Chinese characters in preschools]. Journal of Chinese Language Teaching, 9(3), 47–73.
  • Lam, H. C. (2014). 學前認讀字詞評估方式:現象圖析學分析 [Different ways of assessing the recognition of Chinese characters in preschools: A phenomenographic analysis]. Journal of National Taiwan Normal University: Linguistics & Literature, 59(2), 105–134.
  • Lam, H. C., Ki, W. W., Chung, A. L. S., Ko, P. Y., Lai, A. C. Y., Lai, S. M. S., … Lau, E. C. C. (2004). Designing learning objects that afford learners the experience of important variations in Chinese characters. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20, 114–123. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2004.00071.x
  • Linguistic Society of Hong Kong. (2002). Guide to LSHK Cantonese romanization of Chinese characters (2nd ed.). Hong Kong: Linguistic Society of Hong Kong.
  • Lundgren, U. (1977). Model analysis of pedagogical processes. Lund: Gleerup.
  • Marton, F. (1981). Phenomenography: Describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science, 10, 177–200. doi: 10.1007/BF00132516
  • Marton, F. (1986). Phenomenography: A research approach to investigating different understandings of reality. Journal of Thought, 21(3), 28–49.
  • Marton, F. (1988). Phenomenography: Exploring different conceptions of reality. In D. M. Fetterman (Ed.), Qualitative approaches to evaluation in education: The silent scientific revolution (pp. 176–205). New York: Praeger.
  • Marton, F. (2015). Necessary conditions of learning. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Marton, F. & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Marton, F. & Morris, P. (2002). What matters? In F. Marton & P. Morris (Eds.), What matters? Discovering critical conditions of classroom learning (pp. 133–143). Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
  • Marton, F., Runesson, U., & Tsui, A. B. M. (2004). The space of learning. In F. Marton & A. B. M. Tsui (Eds.), Classroom discourse and the space of learning (pp. 3–40). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Marton, F. & Säljö, R. (1984). Approaches to learning. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell, & N. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning (pp. 36–55). Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.
  • Marton, F. & Tsui, A. B. M. (Eds.). (2004). Classroom discourse and the space of learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Pang, M. F. (2003). Two faces of variation: on continuity in the phenomenographic movement. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47(2), 145–156. doi: 10.1080/00313830308612
  • Pramling, I. (1983). The child's conception of learning. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
  • Prosser, M., Trigwell, K., & Taylor, P. (1994). A phenomenographic study of academics’ conceptions of science learning and teaching. Learning and Instruction, 4, 217–231. doi: 10.1016/0959-4752(94)90024-8
  • Rayner, K., Foorman, B. R., Perfetti, C. A., Pesetsky, D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2002). How should reading be taught? Scientific American, 286, 84–91. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0302-84
  • Rovio-Johansson, A. (1999). Being good at teaching: Exploring different ways of handling the same subject in higher education. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
  • Runesson, U. (1999, August). Teaching as constituting a space of variation. Paper presented at the 8th EARLI conference, Göteborg, Sweden.
  • Sandberg, J. (2005). How do we justify knowledge produced within interpretive approaches? Organizational Research Methods, 8(1), 41–68. doi: 10.1177/1094428104272000
  • Tong, L. Q. & Zhang, Y. C. (1999). 小學識字教學研究 [Research on the teaching of Chinese characters in Primary schools]. Guangzhou: Guangdong Educational Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.