Continuity and Development in the Phenomenography and Variation Theory Tradition

References

• Berge, M. (2011). Group work and physics: Characteristics, learning possibilities and patterns of interaction. Göteborg: Chalmers University of Technology. Retrieved from http://publications.lib.chalmers.se/publication/148758?pubid=95941
   Google Scholar
• Booth, S. (1992). Learning to program: A phenomenographic perspective. Gothenburg Studies in Educational Science, 89. Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis. Göteborg, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, S., & Hultén, M. (2003). Opening dimensions of variation: An empirical study of learning in a web-based discussion. Instructional Science, 31(1–2), 65–86. doi: 10.1023/A:1022552301050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and teacher education, 18(8), 947–967. doi: 10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00053-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1991). How we think. New York: Prometheus Books.
   Google Scholar
• Eckerdal, A., & Thuné, M. (2013). Analysing the enacted object of learning in lab assignments in programming education. In Proc. 1st International Conference on Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering (pp. 208–211). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/LaTiCE.2013.25
   Google Scholar
• Ekeblad, E., & Lindström, B. (1995). Collaboration as pedagogy, collaboration as window. Paper presented at the first CSCL (Computer supported collaborative learning) Conference, Bloomington, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, J. (2012). Developing a science for teaching through lesson study. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 1(2), 108–125. doi: 10.1108/20468251211224163
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, J., & Yu, C. (2008). An independent evaluation of the ‘variation for improvement of teaching and learning’ (VITAL) project. Hong Kong: School Partnership and Field Experience Office & Hong Kong Institute of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Emanuelsson, J. (2001). En fråga om frågor: hur lärares frågor i klassrummet gör det möjligt att få reda på elevernas sätt att förstå det som undervisningen behandlar i matematik och naturvetenskap. [A question about questions]. Gothenburg Studies in Educational Science, 168. Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis. Göteborg, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
   Google Scholar
• Emanuelsson, J., & Sahlström, F. (2008). The price of participation: Teacher control versus student participation in classroom interaction. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 52(2), 205–223. doi: 10.1080/00313830801915853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurwitsch, A. (1964). The field of consciousness. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gustavsson, L. (2008). Att bli bättre lärare: Hur undervisningsinnehållets behandling blir till samtalsämne lärare emellan [Becoming a better teacher. Ways of dealing with the content made a topic of conversation among teachers]. Sweden: Högskolan Kristianstad, Sektionen för lärarutbildning. Retrieved from http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-1576
   Google Scholar
• Harris, L. R. (2011). Phenomenographic perspectives on the structure of conceptions: The origins, purposes, strengths, and limitations of the what/how and referential/structural frameworks. Educational Research Review, 6(2), 109–124. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2011.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingerman, Å. (2013). Collaborative learning in physics group discussions: A phenomenographic perspective. Paper presented at 15th Conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI) 2013, Munich, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Ingerman, Å. (2014). Collaborative meaning-making in group discussions: A phenomenographic perspective. Keynote presentation at the EARLI SIG 9 Conference on “Disciplinary Knowledge and Necessary Conditions of Learning”, Oxford., UK.
   Google Scholar
• Ingerman, Å., Berge, M., & Booth, S. (2009). Physics group work in a phenomenographic perspective: Learning dynamics as the experience of variation and relevance. European Journal of Engineering Education, 34(4), 349–358. doi: 10.1080/03043790902989382
   Google Scholar
• Ingerman, Å., Linder, C., & Marshall, D. (2009). The learners’ experience of variation: Following students’ threads of learning physics in computer simulation sessions. Instructional science, 37(3), 273–292. doi: 10.1007/s11251-007-9044-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kullberg, A. (2010). What is taught and what is learned: Professional insights gained and shared by teachers in mathematics. Gothenburg Studies in Educational Sciences, 293. Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis. Göteborg, Sweden: University of Gothenburg.
   Google Scholar
• Kullberg, A., Mårtensson, P., & Runesson, U. (2016). What is to be learned? Teachers’ collective inquiry into the object of learning. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 60(3), 309–322.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, C. (2015). What is improvement science? Do we need it in education? Educational Researcher, 44(1), 54–61. doi: 10.3102/0013189X15570388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, C., & Perry, R. (2014). Lesson study with mathematical resources: A sustainable model for locally-led teacher professional learning. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 16(1), 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, C., Perry, R., & Murata, A. (2006). How should research contribute to instructional improvement? The case of lesson study. Educational Researcher, 35(3), 3–14. doi: 10.3102/0013189X035003003
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, C., & Tsuchida, I. (1997). Planned educational change in Japan: The case of elementary science instruction. Journal of Educational Policy, 12(5), 313–331. doi: 10.1080/0268093970120502
   Google Scholar
• Lilliestam, A.-L. (2013). Aktör och struktur i historieundervisningen. Om utveckling av elevers historiska resonerande [Agent and structure in teaching history. On pupils’ development of historical reasoning.] Gothenburg Studies in Educational Science, 345. Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis. Göteborg, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
   Google Scholar
• Lo, M. L. (2006). Learning study – The Hong Kong version of lesson study: Development, impact and challenges. In M. Matoba, K. A. Crawford, & M. R. Sarkar Arani (Eds.), Lesson study: International perspective on policy and practice (pp. 133–157). Beijing, China: Educational Science Publishing House.
   Google Scholar
• Lo, M. L. (2012). Variation theory and the improvement of teaching and learning. Gothenburg Studies in Educational Science, 323. Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis. Göteborg, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
   Google Scholar
• Lo, M. L., & Chik, P. P. M. (2016). Two horizons of fusion. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 60 (3), 296–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo, M. L., Marton, F., Pang, M. F., & Pong, W. Y. (2004). Toward a pedagogy of learning. In F. Marton & A. B. Tsui (Eds.), Classroom discourse and the space of learning (pp. 189–225). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lybeck, L. (1981). Arkimedes i klassen. En ämnespedagogisk berättelse [Archimedes in the classroom: A subject-matter story]. Gothenburg Studies in Educational Science, 37. Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis. Göteborg, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
   Google Scholar
• Mardis, M. A., Hoffman, E. S., & Rich, P. J. (2014). Trends and issues in qualitative research methods. In J. Michael Spector, M. David Merrill, Jan Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (4th ed., pp. 173–193). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mårtensson, P. (2015). Att få syn på avgörande skillnader: Lärares kunskap om lärandeobjektet [Learning to see distinctions: Teachers gaining knowledge of the object of learning]. Jönköping: Jönköping University, School of Education and Communication. Retrieved from http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-26352
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F. (1975). On non-verbatim learning: 1. Level of processing and level of outcome. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 16(1), 273–279. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.1975.tb00193.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marton, F. (1981). Phenomenography: Describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science, 10(2), 177–200. doi: 10.1007/BF00132516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marton, F. (1986). Phenomenography: A research approach to investigating different understandings of reality. Journal of Thought, 21(3), 28–49.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F. (1995). Cognosco ergo sum: Reflections on reflections. Nordisk Pedagogik, 15(3), 165–180.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F. (1996). Cognesco ergo sum: Reflections on reflections. In G. Dall'Alba & B. Hasselgren (Eds.), (1996). Reflections on phenomenography. Towards a methodology? (pp. 163–187). Gothenburg Studies in Educational Science, 109. Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis. Göteborg, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F. (2000). The practice of learning. Nordisk Pedagogik, 20(4), 230–236.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F. (2015). Necessary conditions of learning. New York & London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1996). The learner's experience of learning. In D. Olson & N. Torrance (Eds), The handbook of education and human development (pp. 533–564). Massachusetts: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F., Dahlgren, L. O., Svensson, L., & Säljö, R. (1977). Inlärning och omvärldsuppfattning: En bok om den studerande människan [Learning and conceptions of reality]. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F., Hounsell, D., & Entwistle, N. J. (Eds.). (1984). The experience of learning (pp. 36–55). Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F., & Morris. (Eds). (2002). What matters? Gothenburg studies in educational science, 181. Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis. Göteborg, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F., & Pang, M. F. (1999). Two faces of variation. Paper presented at the 8th Conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI), 24–28 August 1999, Göteborg, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F., & Pang, M. F. (2006). On some necessary conditions of learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(2), 193–220. doi: 10.1207/s15327809jls1502_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marton, F., & Pong, W. Y. (2005). On the unit of description in phenomenography. Higher Education Research & Development, 24(4), 335–348. doi: 10.1080/07294360500284706
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976a). On qualitative differences in learning: I– Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(1), 4–11. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02980.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976b). On qualitative differences in learning: II– Outcome as a function of the learner's conception of the task. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(2), 115–127. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02304.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marton, F., & Tsui, A. (2004). Classroom discourse and the space of learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Molenaar, I. (2014). Advances in temporal analysis in learning and instruction. Frontline Learning Research, 2(4), 15–24.
   Google Scholar
• Pang, M. F. (2003). Two faces of variation: On continuity in the phenomenographic movement. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47(2), 145–156. doi: 10.1080/00313830308612
   Google Scholar
• Pang, M. F., & Marton, F. (2005). Learning theory as teaching resource: Enhancing students’ understanding of economic concepts. Instructional Science, 33(2), 159–191. doi: 10.1007/s11251-005-2811-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pang, M. F., & Wing, W. K. (2016). Revisiting the Idea of “Critical Aspects”. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 60(3), 323–336.
   Google Scholar
• Pramling, I. (1983). The child's conception of learning. Studies in Educational Science, 46. Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis. Göteborg, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
   Google Scholar
• Pramling, I. (1988). Developing children's thinking about their own learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 58(3), 266–278. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1988.tb00902.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pramling Samuelsson, I., & Asplund Carlsson, M. (2008). The playing learning child: Towards a pedagogy of early childhood. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 52(6), 623–641. doi: 10.1080/00313830802497265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pramling Samuelsson, I., & Pramling, N. (2016). Variation theory of learning and developmental pedagogy: Two context-related models of learning grounded in phenomenography. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 60(3), 286–295.
   Google Scholar
• Rovio-Johansson, A. (1999). Being good at teaching: Exploring different ways of handling the same subject in higher education. Studies in Educational Science, 140. Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis. Göteborg, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
   Google Scholar
• Rovio-Johansson, A. (2013). An application of variation theory of learning in higher education. In J. Huisman & M. Tight (Eds.), Theory and method in higher education research. International perspectives on higher education research (Vol. 9, pp. 261–279). Bingley, UK: Emerald.
   Google Scholar
• Rovio-Johansson, A., & Lumsden, M. (2012). Collaborative production of pedagogical knowledge: Enhancing students’ learning. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 4(1), 72–83. doi: 10.1108/17581181211230694
   Google Scholar
• Runesson, U. (1999). Variationens pedagogik. [The Pedagogy of variation]. Gothenburg Studies in Educational Science, 129. Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis. Göteborg, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
   Google Scholar
• Runesson, U. (2005). Beyond discourse and interaction. Variation: A critical aspect for teaching and learning mathematics. Cambridge Journal of Education, 35(1), 69–87. doi: 10.1080/0305764042000332506
   Google Scholar
• Runesson, U. (2006). What is it possible to learn? On variation as a necessary condition for learning. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50(4), 397–410. doi: 10.1080/00313830600823753
   Google Scholar
• Runesson, U. (2008). Learning to design for learning: The potential of learning study to enhance learning on two levels: teachers’ and students’ learning. In P. Sullivan & T. Wood (Eds), The international handbook of mathematics teacher education. Vol.1, knowledge and beliefs in mathematics teaching and teaching development (pp. 153–172). Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Saito, E., & Sato, M. (2012). Lesson study as an instrument for school reform: A case of Japanese practices. Management in Education, 26(4), 181–186. doi: 10.1177/0892020612445101
   Google Scholar
• Säljö, R. (1994). Minding action: Conceiving of the world versus participating in cultural practices. Nordisk Pedagogik, 14(2), 71–80.
   Google Scholar
• Säljö, R. (1997). Talk as data and practice: A critical look at phenomenographic inquiry and the appeal to experience. Higher Education Research & Development, 16(2), 173–190. doi: 10.1080/0729436970160205
   Google Scholar
• Säljö, R. (2001). The individual in social practices. Comments to Ference Marton's “the practice of learning”. Nordisk Pedagogik, 21(2), 108–116.
   Google Scholar
• Svensson, L. (2016). Towards an Integration of Research on Teaching and Learning. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 60(3), 272–285.
   Google Scholar
• Takahashi, A. (2014a). The role of the knowledgeable other in lesson study: Examining the final comments of experienced lesson study practitioners. Mathematics Teacher Education & Development, 16(1), 2–17.
   Google Scholar
• Takahashi, A. (2014b). Supporting the effective implementation of a new mathematics curriculum: A case study of school-based lesson study at a Japanese public elementary school. In I. Y. Li & G. Lappan (Eds.), Mathematics curriculum in school education (pp. 417–442). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Tight, M. (2015). Phenomenography: The development and application of an innovative research design in higher education research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, (e-pub ahead of print). doi:10.1080/13645579.2015.1010284
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vikström, A. (2014). What makes the difference? Teachers explore what must be taught and what must be learned in order to understand the particulate character of matter. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(6), 709–727. doi: 10.1007/s10972-014-9397-9
   Google Scholar
• Xu, L. H. (2010). Comparing theoretical analyses of student learning of science: The case of chemistry in a year 7 classroom. PhD thesis, Education, The University of Melbourne. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11343/35392
   Google Scholar