483
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Standard articles

Processes of Writing as Mediational Tool in Higher Education

Pages 444-460 | Received 01 Feb 2016, Accepted 25 Aug 2016, Published online: 20 Dec 2016

References

  • Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (2000). Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research. London: Sage.
  • Ask, S. (2015). Tillgång till framgång. Lärare och studenter om stadieövergången till högre utbildning. [Accsess to development: Teachers and students on the transformation from school to higher education] Licentiatavhandling i Nordiska språk: alternativet Svenska med didaktisk inriktning. Växjö universitet. Institutionen för humaniora. 2005. Trondheim: Tapir Akademisk forlag.
  • Aveyard, H. (2007). Doing a literature review in health and social care: A practical guide. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
  • Barton, D. (2007). Literacy: An introduction to the ecology of written language (2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  • Barton, D., & Hamilton, M. (1998). Local literacies: Reading and writing in one community. London: Routledge.
  • Barton, D., Hamilton, M., & Ivanič, R. (Eds.). (2000). Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context. London: Routledge.
  • Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Blåsjö, M. (2010). Skrivteori och skrivforskning. En forskningsöversikt. [Theory and research on writing: A research review]. Institusjonen för nordiska språk. Stockholm: Stockholms Universitet.
  • Blåsjö, M. 2004 Studenters skrivande i i två kunskapsbyggande miljöer [Student writing in two different environments of knowledge building]. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.
  • Burgess, A., & Ivanič, R. (2010). Writing and being written: Issues of identity across timescales. Written Communication, 27(2), 228–255. doi: 10.1177/0741088310363447
  • Carter, M. (2007). Ways of knowing, doing, and writing in the disciplines. College Composition and Communication, 58(3), 385–418.
  • Daniels, H. (2016). Vygotsky and dialogic pedagogy. In D. Skidmore & K. Murakami (Eds.), Dialogic pedagogy: The importance of dialogue teaching and learning (pp. 34–50). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
  • de Lange, T., & Wittek, L. (2014). Divergent paths to parallel ends: Two routes to the doctoral dissertation. Special Edition of the Journal of School Public Relations, 35(3), 383–401.
  • Dreier, O. (1999). Personal trajectories of participation across contexts of social practice. Outlines: Critical Social Studies, 1, 5–32.
  • Dreier, O. (2008). Psychotherapy in everyday life. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Dysthe, O. (2002). Professors as mediators of academic text cultures: An interview study with advisors and master’s degree students in three disciplines in a Norwegian university. Written Communication, 19(4), 493–544. doi:10.1177/0741088022380
  • Emig, J. (1977). Writing as a mode of learning. College Composition and Communication, 28(2), 122–128. doi: 10.2307/356095
  • Flower, L. 1994. The construction of negotiated meaning: A social cognitive theory of writing. Carbondale, IL: Sothern Illinois University Press.
  • Flower, L. & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 188(32), 365–387. doi: 10.2307/356600
  • Guidelines. (2012). Anonymous University College, Norway, submitted online and downloaded Sept. 2012.
  • Goodsen, I., & Sikes, P. (2001). Life history research in educational settings: Learning from lives. Studies in Education and Change. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • Grossman, P., & Stodolsky, S. (1995). Content as context: The role of school subjects in secondary school teaching. Educational Researcher, 24(8), 5–11. doi: 10.3102/0013189X024008005
  • Ivanič, R. (2004). Discourses of writing and learning to write. Language and Education, 18(3), 220–245. doi:10.1080/09500780408666877
  • Jonsmoen, K. M. & M. Greek 2012. “Hodet blir tungt – og tomt” – om det å skrive seg til profesjonsøvelse [“The head becomes heavy and empty” – on processes of writing towards professional work]. Norsk pedagogisk tidsskrift, 96(1), 15–26.
  • Kellogg, R.T. (2008). Training writing skills: A cognitive developmental perspective. Journal of Writing Research, 1, 1–26. doi: 10.17239/jowr-2008.01.01.1
  • Krampetz, E. M. (2005). Monograph: International comparative education. Stanford, CA: School of Education, Stanford University.
  • Kruse, O. (2006). The origins of writing in the disciplines: Traditions of seminar writing and the Humboldtian ideal of the research university. Written Communication, 23(3), 331–352. doi: 10.1177/0741088306289259
  • Lea, M. R., & Street, B. V. (1998). Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education, 23(2), 157–172. doi: 10.1080/03075079812331380364
  • Lea, M. R., & Street, B. V. (2006). The “academic literacies” model: Theory and applications. Theory into Practice, 45(4), 368–377. doi: 10.1207/s15430421tip4504_11
  • Lerner, N. (2007). Laboratory lessons for writing and science. Written Communication, 24(3), 191–222. doi: 10.1177/0741088307302765
  • Leontèv, A. (1974). The problem of activity in psychology. Soviet Psychology, 27(1), 22–39.
  • Linell, P. (1998). Approaching dialogue: Talk, interaction and contexts in dialogical perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Linell, P. (2009). Rethinking language, mind, and world dialogically: Interactional and contextual theories of human sense-making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
  • Macken-Horarik, M., Devereux, L., Trimingham-Jack, C., & Wilson, K. (2006). Negotiating the territory of tertiary literacies: A case study of teacher education. Linguistics and Education, 17, 240–257. doi: 10.1016/j.linged.2006.11.001
  • Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2011). Designing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Mercer, N. (2013). The social brain, language, and goal-directed collective thinking: A social conception of cognition and its implications for understanding how we think, teach, and learn. Educational Psychologist, 48(3), 148–168. doi:10.1080/00461520.2013.804394
  • Newell, G. E. (2006). Writing to learn: How alternative theories of school writing account for student performance. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 235–247). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Renold, E. (2002). Using vignettes in qualitative research. Building Research Capacity, 3, 3–5.
  • Russel, W. N. & Guggenheim, L. (2011). The evolution of Media Effects Theory: A six-stage model of cumulative research. Communication Theory, 21(2), 169–196. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2011.01381.x
  • Smagorinsky, P. (2015) Designing the task of teaching novice teachers to design instructional tasks. In I. Thompson (Ed.), Designing tasks in secondary education: Enhancing subject understanding and student engagement (pp. 191–207). London: Routledge.
  • Smagorinsky, P. (1994). Speaking about writing: Reflections on research methodology ( Sage series in Written Communication, Vol. 8). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
  • Solbrekke, T. D., & Helstad, K. (2016). Student formation in higher education: Teachers approaches matters. Teaching in Higher Education. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1207624
  • Säljö, R. (1999). Learning as the use of tools. In K. A. Littleton. (Ed.), Learning with computers: Analyzing productive interactions (pp. 144–161). London: Routledge.
  • Thompson, I. (2015). Communication, culture, and conceptual learning: Task design in the English classroom. In I. Thompson (Ed.), Designing tasks in secondary education: Enhancing subject understanding and student engagement (pp. 86–107). London: Routledge.
  • Thompson, I., & Wittek, L. (2016). Writing as a tool for learning: Mediation in the dialogical classroom. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221065611630068X
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. London: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Library of Congress Catalog-in-publication Data.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech. In L. S. Vygotsky, Collected works (Vol. 1). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
  • Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Wertsch, J. V. (2007). Mediation. In H. Daniels, M. Cole, & J. Wertsch (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky (pp. 178–192). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wittek, L. (2013). The activity of “writing for learning” in a nursing program. Outlines. Critical Practice Studies, 14(1), 73–94.
  • Wittek, L., Askeland, B., & Aamotsbakken, B. (2015). Learning from and about writing: A case study of the learning trajectories of Norwegian student teachers. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 6, 16–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2015.02.001
  • Wittek, L., & Habib, L. (2014). Quality teaching and learning as practice within different disciplinary discourses. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 25(3), 275–287.
  • Wittek, L., Tone, D. S., & Helstad, K. (in press). Student teacher’s emerging meaning making about writing for learning. Outlines.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.