Teaching Traditions in Science Teachers’ Practices and the Introduction of National Testing

References

• Aikenhead, G. S. (2006). Science education for everyday life. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aikenhead, G. S., Orpwood, G., & Fensham, P. (2011). Scientific literacy for a knowledge society. In C. Linder, L. Östman, D. A. Roberts, P.-O. Wickman, G. Erickson, & A. MacKinnon (Eds.), Exploring the landscape of scientific literacy (pp. 28–44). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Almqvist, J., & Lundqvist, E. (2013). De nationella provens innehåll: Vilken scientific literacy mäts i NO-proven [The content in the national tests: What scientific literacy is measured in the science tests?]. In E. Lundqvist, R. Säljö, & L. Östman (Eds.), Scientific literacy (pp. 101–117). Malmö: Gleerups Utbildning AB.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, K. J. B. (2012). Science education and test-based accountability: Reviewing their relationship and exploring implications for future policy. Science Education, 96, 104–129. doi: 10.1002/sce.20464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, T. M. (2008). Response rates to expect from web-based surveys and what to do about it. Journal of Extension, 46(3), Retrieved from http://www.joe.org/joe/2008june/rb3.php
   Google Scholar
• Au, W. (2007). High-stakes testing and curricular control: A qualitative metasynthesis. Educational Researcher, 36, 258–267. doi: 10.3102/0013189X07306523
   Google Scholar
• Au, W. (2011). Teaching under the new Taylorism: High-stakes testing and the standardization of the 21st century curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43(1), 25–45. doi: 10.1080/00220272.2010.521261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, M., Clarke, D., & Stephens, M. (2000). Assessment: The engine of systemic curricular reform? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32, 623–650. doi: 10.1080/00220270050116923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borg, C., Gericke, N., Höglund, H.-O., & Bergman, E. (2012). The barriers encountered by teachers implementing education for sustainable development: Discipline bound differences and teaching traditions. Research in Science & Technological Education, 30(2), 185–207. doi: 10.1080/02635143.2012.699891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clark, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Cimbricz, S. (2002). State-mandated testing and teachers’ beliefs and practice. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10(2), Retrieved January 1, 2015, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v10n2.html
   Google Scholar
• Donnelly, L. A., & Sadler, T. D. (2009). High school science teachers’ views of standards and accountability. Science Education, 93, 1050–1075. doi: 10.1002/sce.20347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggen, A. B. (2004). Alfa and Omega in student assessment. Exploring identities of secondary school science teachers. Oslo, Norway: Department of Teacher Education and School Development, University of Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Englund, T. (1986). Curriculum as a political problem. Changing educational conceptions, with special reference to citizenship education. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Fensham, P. J. (1988). Familiar but different: Some dilemmas and new directions in science education. In P. J. Fensham (Eds.), Development and dilemmas in science education (pp. 1–26). London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferketich, S. (1991). Focus on psychometrics. Aspects of item analysis. Research in Nursing & Health, 14, 165–168. doi: 10.1002/nur.4770140211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, S. G. (2001). An uncertain lever: Exploring the influence of state-level testing in New York state on teaching social studies. Teachers College Record, 103, 398–426. doi: 10.1111/0161-4681.00120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, L. S., & Berends, M. (2006). Instructional practices related to standards and assessments. RAND. Retrieved from http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/working_papers/2006/RAND_WR374.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kahle, J. B. (2007). Systematic reform: Research, vision, and politics. In S. Abell, & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 911–942). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, R. (2010). Science education and democratic participation: An uneasy congruence? Studies in Science Education, 46(1), 69–119. doi: 10.1080/03057260903562433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linder, C., Östman, L., Roberts, D. A., Wickman, P. O., Erickson, G., & MacKinnon, A. (Eds.). (2011). Exploring the landscape of scientific literacy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Linn, R. L. (2000). Assessment and accountability. Educational Researcher, 29, 4–16.
   Google Scholar
• Lundgren, U. P. (1979). Att organisera omvärlden - en introduktion till läroplansteori [ To Organize the World - An Introduction to Curriculum Theory]. Stockholm: Liber.
   Google Scholar
• Lundqvist, E., & Lidar, M. (2013). Nationella prov i NO och lärares val av undervisningsinnehåll [National tests in science education and teachers’ selection of teaching content]. Utbildning & Demokrati, 22(3), 85–106.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. (2008). Departementspromemoria. Fler obligatoriska nationella prov i grundskolan m.m [Departmental memorandum. More Compulsory National Tests in Compulsory Education, etc]. Retrived October 10, 2008, from http://www.regeringen.se/content/1/c6/10/82/84/8c8adb7a.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Orpwood, G. (2001). The role of assessment in science curriculum reform. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 8(2), 135–151. doi: 10.1080/09695940125120
   Google Scholar
• Orpwood, G. (2007). Assessing scientific literacy: Threats and opportunities. In C. Linder, L. Östman, & P.-O. Wickman (Eds.), Promoting scientific literacy: Science education research in transaction. Proceedings of the linnaeus tercentenary symposium (pp. 120–129). Uppsala: Uppsala University.
   Google Scholar
• Öhman, J. (2004). Moral perspective in selective traditions of environmental education. In P. Wickenberg, H. Axelsson, L. Fritzén, G. Helldén, & J. Öhman (Eds.), Learning to change our world (pp. 33–57). Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Öhman, J., & Östman, L. (2002). Miljöundervisning och utbildning för hållbar utveckling i svensk skola [ Environmental education and education for sustainable development in Swedish schools]. Stockholm: Skolverket.
   Google Scholar
• Östman, L. (1995). Socialisation och mening: No-utbildning som politiskt och miljömoraliska problem. In Uppsala studies in education, 61. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.
   Google Scholar
• Östman, L. (1996). Discourses, discursive meanings and socialization in chemistry education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 28, 37–55. doi: 10.1080/0022027980280102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Östman, L. (1998). How companion meanings are expressed by science education discourse. In D. A. Roberts & L. Östman (Eds.), Problems of meaning in science curriculum (pp. 54–70). New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2008). Introduction to applied multivariate analysis. New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, D. A. (1982). Developing the concept of “curriculum emphases” in science education. Science Education, 66, 243–260. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730660209
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, D. A. (2007). Scientific literacy/science literacy. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 729–780). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Ryder, J., & Banner, I. (2011). Multiple aims in the development of a major reform of The National curriculum for science in England. International Journal of Science Education, 33, 709–725. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2010.485282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryder, J., & Banner, I. (2013). School teachers’ experiences of science curriculum reform. International Journal of Science Education, 35, 490–514. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2012.665195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon, J. (1998). The science curricula of Europe and the notion of scientific culture. In D. A. Roberts & L. Östman (Eds.), Problems of meaning in science curriculum (pp. 166–177). New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sund, P. (2016). Discerning selective traditions in science education: A qualitative study of teachers’ responses to what is important in science teaching. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11, 387–409. doi: 10.1007/s11422-015-9666-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Driel, J. H., Bulte, A. M., & Verloop, N. (2008). Using the curriculum emphasis concept to investigate teachers’ curricular beliefs in the context of educational reform. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40(1), 107–122. doi: 10.1080/00220270601078259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahlström, N. & Sundberg, D. (2015). Theory-based evaluation of the curriculum Lgr 11 ( Working paper 2015:11). Uppsala: Institute for Evaluation of Labour Market and Education Policy IFAU.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, C., & Priestley, M. (2011). Teacher beliefs and the mediation of curriculum innovation in Scotland: A socio-cultural perspective on professional development and change. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43, 357–381. doi: 10.1080/00220272.2011.563447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeidler, D. (Ed.). (2003). The role of moral reasoning on socioscientific issues and discourse in science education. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar