5,197
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Skilled Students and Effective Schools: Reading Achievement in Denmark, Sweden, and France

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 850-864 | Received 14 Apr 2016, Accepted 01 Feb 2017, Published online: 27 Apr 2017

References

  • Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Alivernini, F. (2013). An exploration of the gap between highest and lowest ability readers across 20 countries. Educational Studies, 39(4), 399–417. doi: 10.1080/03055698.2013.767187
  • Araújo, L., & Costa, P. (2012). Reading Literacy in PIRLS 2006: What explains achievement in 20 EU countries?. EUR 66894 EN. Retrieved from http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/111111111/25703/1/lbna24949enn.pdf
  • Araújo, L., & Costa, P. (2015). Home book reading and reading achievement in EU countries: The Progress in International Reading Literacy Study 2011 (PIRLS). Educational Research and Evaluation: from Theory to Practice, 21, 422–438. 10.1080/13803611.2015.1111803
  • Araújo, L., Costa, A., & Morais, J. (2013). Assessments of reading comprehension: Different measures, different explanatory variables and achievement. L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 13, 1–21.
  • Bond, G. L., & Dykstra, R. (1967). The cooperative research program in first-grade reading instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 2, 10–141. 10.2307/746948
  • Caravolas, M., Volin, J., & Hulme, C. (2005). Phoneme awareness is a key component of alphabetic literacy skills in consistent and inconsistent orthographies: Evidence from Czech and English children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 92, 107–139. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2005.04.003
  • Caro, D. H., Sandoval-Hernández, A., & Lüdtke, O. (2014). Cultural, social, and economic capital constructs in international assessments: An evaluation using exploratory structural equation modelling. School effectiveness and School Improvement, 25, 433–450. doi:10.1080/0924343453.2013.812568 doi: 10.1080/09243453.2013.812568
  • Catts, H. W. (2009). The narrow view of reading promotes a broad view of comprehension. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in the Schools, 40, 178–183. doi: 10.1044/0161-1461(2008/08-0035)
  • Chall, J. (1996). Learning to read: The great debate (revised). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Cheung, W. M., Kam Tse, S., Lam, J. W. I., & Ka Yee Loh, E. (2009). Progress in International Reading Literacy Study 2006 (PIRLS): Pedagogical correlates of fourth-grade students in Hong Kong. Journal of Research in Reading, 32(3), 293–308. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01395.x
  • Connor, C. M., Morrison, F. J., & Katch, L. E. (2004). Beyond the reading wars: Exploring the effect of child–instruction interaction on growth in early reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 8, 305–336. doi: 10.1207/s1532799xssr0804_1
  • Cortina, K., Carlisle, J., & Zeng, J. (2008). Context effects on students’ gains in reading comprehension in Reading First Schools in Michigan. Zeitschrift Für Erziehungswissenschaft, 11, 47–66. doi: 10.1007/s11618-008-0003-9
  • Creemers, B. P. M., & Kyriakides, L. (2008). The dynamics of educational effectiveness: A contribution to policy, practice and theory in contemporary schools. London: Routledge.
  • Cullinan, B. E. (1992). Read to me: Raising kids who love to read. New York: Scholastic.
  • Dompnier, B., Patisu, P., & Bressoux, P. (2006). An integrative model of scholastic judgments: Pupils’ characteristics, class context, halo effect and internal attributions. European Journal of Psychology of Education,, 21(2), 119–133. doi: 10.1007/BF03173572
  • Ehri, L. C. (1983). A critique of five studies related to letter-name and learning to read. In L. M. Gentile, M. L. Kamil, & J.S. Blanchard, (Eds.), Reading Research Revisited (pp. 131–153). Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
  • European Commission. (2012). EU high level group of experts on literacy (Final report, September 2012). Luxembourg: Publications office of the European Union. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/education/policy/school/doc/literacy-report_en.pdf
  • Eurydice. (2013). Key data on tTeachers and school leaders in Europe. (Eurydice Report). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  • Goldstein, H. (1986). Multilevel mixed linear model analysis using iterative generalized least squares. Biometrika, 73, 43–56. doi: 10.1093/biomet/73.1.43
  • Goldstein, H. (2003). Multilevel statistical models (3rd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.
  • Guthrie, J. T., & Humenick, N. M. (2004). Motivating students to read: Evidence for classroom practices that increase reading motivation and achievement. In P. McCardle, & V. Chhabra (Eds.), The voice of evidence in reading research (pp. 329–354). Baltimore: Brookes.
  • Kalb, G., & van Ours, J. C. (2014). Reading to young children: A head-start in life? Economics of Education Review, 40, 1–24. doi: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2014.01.002
  • Krashen, S. (2004). The power of reading: Insights from the research. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  • Lenkeit, J., Chan, J., Hopfenbeck, T. N., & Baird, J. (2016). A review of the representation of PIRLS related research in scientific journals. Educational Research Review, 16, 102–115. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2015.10.002
  • Mägi, K., Torppa, M., Lerkkanen, M. K., Poikkeus, A. M., Puttonen, H. R., & Nurmi, J. E. (2013). Developmental profiles of task-avoidant behaviour and reading skills in Grades 1 and 2. Learning and Individual Differences, 23, 22–31. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2012.09.011
  • Martin, M. O., Foy, P., Mullis, I. V. S., & O’Dwyer, L. M. (2013). Effective schools in reading, mathematics, and science at the fourth grade. In M.O. Martin, & I.V.S. Mullis (Eds.), TIMSS and PIRLS 2011: Relationships among reading, mathematics, and science achievement at the fourth grade—Implications for early learning (pp. 109–178). Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
  • Masters, G. N., & Wright, B. D. (1997). The partial credit model. In W.J. van der Linden, & R.K. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory (pp. 101–122). New York: Springer.
  • Mol, S. E., & Bus, A. G. (2011). To read or not to read: A meta-analysis of print exposure from infancy to early adulthood. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 267–296. doi: 10.1037/a0021890
  • Mullis, I.V.S., Kennedy, A. M., Martin, M.O., & Sainsbury, M. (2006). PIRLS 2006 Assessment framework and specification (2nd ed.). Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center Lynch School of Education, Boston College.
  • Mullis, V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Drucker, K. T. (2012). PIRLS 2011 International Results in Reading. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
  • Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Minnich, C. A., Drucker, K. T., & Ragan, M. A. (2012). PIRLS 2011 encyclopedia: Education policy and curriculum in reading. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
  • Myrberg, E., & Rosén, M. (2006). Reading achievement and social selection into independent schools in Sweden - Results from IEA PIRLS 2001. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50(2), 185–205. doi: 10.1080/00313830600576005
  • Myrberg, E., & Rosén, M. (2008). A path model with mediating factors of parents’ education on reading achievement in seven countries. Educational Research and Evaluation: From Theory to Practice, 14(6), 507–520. doi:10.1080/1380610802576742 doi: 10.1080/13803610802576742
  • Myrberg, E., & Rosén, M. (2009). Direct and indirect effects of parents’ education on reading achievement among third graders in Sweden. British Journal of Education Psychology, 79, 695–711. doi: 10.1348/000709909X453031
  • OECD. (2010). PISA 2009 Results: Learning to Learn – Student Engagement, Strategies and Practices (Volume III). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264083943-en
  • OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 Results: Ready to Learn: Students’ Engagement, Drive and Self-Beliefs (Volume III). PISA: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264201170-en
  • Park, H. (2008). Home literacy environments and children’s reading performance: A comparative study of 25 countries. Educational Research and Evaluation, 14, 489–505. doi: 10.1080/13803610802576734
  • Perfetti, C. A. (1992). The representation problem in reading acquisition. In P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri, & R. Trieman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 145–174). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Perfetti, C. A., Landi, N., & Oakhill, J. (2005). The acquisition of reading comprehension skills. In M. J. Snowling, & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 227–274). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
  • Piasta, S. B., & Wagner, K. (2010). Developing early literacy skills: A meta-analysis of alphabet learning and instruction. Reading Reasearch Quarterly, 45(1), 8–38. doi: 10.1598/RRQ.45.1.2
  • Rasbash, J., Charlton, C., Browne, W. J., Healy, M., & Cameron, B. (2009). MLwiN Version 2.1. Centre for Multilevel Modelling. Bristol: University of Bristol.
  • Riley, J. (1996). The teaching of reading: The development of literacy in the early years of school. London: Sage Publications.
  • Sénéchal, M. (2012). Child language and literacy development at home. In B. Wasik (Eds.), Handbook of Family Literacy (pp. 38–50). London: Taylor and Francis.
  • Sénéchal, M., & LeFréve, J. A. (2002). Parental involvement in the development of children’s reading skill: A five-year longitudinal study. Child Development, 73, 445–460. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00417
  • Sénéchal, M., Pagan, S., Lever, R., & Ouellette, G. P. (2008). Relations among the frequency of shared reading and 4-year-old children’s vocabulary, morphological and syntax comprehension, and narrative skills. Early Education and Development, 19, 27–44. doi: 10.1080/10409280701838710
  • Seymour, P., Aro, M., & Erskine, J. M. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 143–174. doi: 10.1348/000712603321661859
  • Silinskas, G., Kiuru, N., Tolvanen, A., Niemi, P., Lerkkanen, M. K., & Nurmi, J. E. (2013). Maternal teaching of reading and children's reading skills in Grade 1: Patterns and predictors of positive and negative associations. Learning and Individual Differences, 27, 54–66. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2013.06.011
  • Shager, H. M., Schindler, H. S., Magnuson, K. A., Duncan, G. J., Yoshikawa, H., & Hart, C. M. (2013). Meta-Analysis of cognitive and achievement outcomes. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 35, 76–95. doi: 10.3102/0162373712462453
  • Share, D. L. (2008). On the Anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance of on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 584–615. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.584
  • Shiel, G., & Eivers, E. (2009). International comparisons of reading literacy: What can they tell us? Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(3), 345–360. doi: 10.1080/03057640903103736
  • Soodla, P., Lerkkanen, M., Niemi, P., Kikas, E., Silinskas, G., & Nurmi, J. (2015). Does early reading instruction promote the rate of acquisition? A comparison of two transparent orthographies. Learning and Instruction, 38, 14–23. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.02.002
  • Stancel-Piatak, A., Mirazchiyski, P., & Desa, D. (2013). Promotion of reading and early literacy skills in schools: A comparison of three European Countries. European Journal of Education, 48, 449–510. doi: 10.1111/ejed.12050
  • Stanovich, K. E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Teddlie, C., Stringfield, S., & Reynolds, D. (2000). Context issues within school effectiveness research. In C. Teddlie, & D. Reynolds (Eds.), The international handbook of school effectiveness research (pp. 160–185). London and new York: Falmer Press.
  • Vaessen, A., Bertrand, D., Toth, D., Csepe, V., Faisca, L., Reis, A., & Blomert, L. (2010). Cognitive development of fluent word reading does not qualitatively differ between transparent and opaque orthographies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 827–842. doi: 10.1037/a0019465
  • Verhoeven, L., van Leeuwe, J., Irausquin, R., & Segers, E. (2016). The unique role of lexical accessibility in predicting kindergarten emergent literacy. Reading and Writing, 29 (4), 591–608. doi: 10.1007/s11145-015-9614-8
  • Whitehurst, G. J. (2001). Emergent literacy: Development from prereaders to readers. In S. B. Neuman & D. K. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (Vol. 1, pp. 11–29). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Ziegler, J. C., Bertrand, D., Tóth, D., Csépe, V., Reis, A., Faísca, L., & Blomert, L. (2010). Orthographic depth and its impact on universal predictors of reading: A cross-language investigation. Psychological Science, 21(4), 551–559. doi: 10.1177/0956797610363406