Upper Secondary Schools and Sparsity: The Case of Northern Sweden

References

• Amcoff, J., & Westholm, E. (2007). Understanding rural change—Demography as a key to the future. Futures, 39(4), 363–379. doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2006.08.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arreman, I. E., & Holm, A. S. (2011). Privatisation of public education? The emergence of independent upper secondary schools in Sweden. Journal of Education Policy, 26(2), 225–243. doi: 10.1080/02680939.2010.502701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beach, D., & Sernhede, O. (2011). From learning to labour to learning for marginality: School segregation and marginalization in Swedish suburbs. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 32, 257–274. doi: 10.1080/01425692.2011.547310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity (Vol. 17). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, A., & Sigsworth, A. (1987). The small rural primary school: A matter of quality. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Böhlmark, A., & Lindahl, M. (2015). Independent schools and long-run educational outcomes: Evidence from Sweden’s large-scale voucher reform. Economica, 82(327), 508–551. doi: 10.1111/ecca.12130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daun, H. (2003). Markets forces and decentralization in Sweden: Impetus for school development or threat to comprehensiveness and equity? In D. Plank and G. Sykes (Eds.), Choosing choice: School choice policies in international perspective. New York: Teachers' College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dickerson, A., & McIntosh, S. (2012). The impact of distance to nearest education institution on the post-compulsory education participation decision. Urban Studies, 50, 742–758. 0042098012455717. doi: 10.1177/0042098012455717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falch, T., Lujala, P., & Strøm, B. (2013). Geographical constraints and educational attainment. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 43(1), 164–176. doi: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2012.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galiani, S., Gertler, P., & Schargrodsky, E. (2008). School decentralization: Helping the good get better, but leaving the poor behind. Journal of Public Economics, 92(10), 2106–2120. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2008.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerger, T. (1972). Skolans geografiska utveckling i sverige [The school’s geographic development in Sweden]. (Vol. 25). Sweden: Norstedt.
   Google Scholar
• Hammarström, M. (2004). En högskola för alla?: Vägen dit för glesbygdens ungdomar [A university for all?: The pathway there for rural youth]. Rapport 3:2004, Jönköping: Encell.
   Google Scholar
• Gov. bill. (1989/90:41). Om kommunalt huvudmannaskap för lärare, skolledare, biträdande skolledare och syofunktionärer [Municipal chiefdom over teachers, principals, assistant principals, and study and career advisers]. Retrieved from http://data.riksdagen.se/fil/A64696E0-830E-4FCB-8001-C62E8D4234BC
   Google Scholar
• Gov. bill. (1991/92:95). Om valfrihet och fristående skolor [Freedom of choice and independent schools]. Retrieved from http://data.riksdagen.se/fil/5277FE6D-7C0B-47CB-AE25-7B2234DE5FBE
   Google Scholar
• Gov. bill. (1992/93:230). Valfrihet i skolan [Freedom of choice in the school]. Retrieved from http://data.riksdagen.se/fil/EB93DF05-0BE2-400C-A8AF-AB89E185204D
   Google Scholar
• Gov. bill. (2006/07:71). Frisökning – ökade valmöjligheter till gymnasieskolan, m.m. [Free search – increased choice of secondary school, etc]. Retrieved from http://www.regeringen.se/contentassets/4366931061a747fe85e4c7bfa9b6ed4f/frisokning---okade-valmojligheter-till-gymnasieskolan-m.m.-Gov. bill-20060771
   Google Scholar
• Hanushek, E. A., Link, S., & Woessmann, L. (2013). Does school autonomy make sense everywhere? Panel estimates from PISA. Journal of Development Economics, 104, 212–232. doi: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2012.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjertström, A. (2015, 15 December). Kalix tar över naturbruksgymnasiet. [Kalix takes over the agricultural upper secondary school.] Sveriges Television. Retrieved March 30, 2016, from http://www.svt.se/nyheter/lokalt/norrbotten/beredda-att-ta-over-naturbruksgymnasierna
   Google Scholar
• Holm, A.-S. (2013). A sea of options. Student perspectives on market competition in upper secondary schools in Sweden. Nordic Studies in Education, 33(4), 284–299.
   Google Scholar
• Kommun- och landstingsdatabasen. (2016). [Database for municipal and county council statistics in Sweden]. Retrieved from http://www.kolada.se/
   Google Scholar
• Lidström, L., Holm, A. S., & Lundström, U. (2014). Maximising opportunity and minimising risk? Young people’s upper secondary school choices in Swedish quasi-markets. Young, 22(1), 1–20. doi: 10.1177/1103308813512932
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lind, T., & Stjernström, O. (2015). Organizational challenges for schools in rural municipalities: Cross-national comparisons in a nordic context. Journal of Research in Rural Education (Online), 30(6), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Lubienski, C. (2009). Do Quasi-Markets Foster Innovation in Education?: A Comparative Perspective. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 25. OECD Publishing (NJ1).
   Google Scholar
• Lund, S. (2006). Marknad och medborgare: - elevers valhandlingar i gymnasieutbildningens integrations- och differentieringsprocesser [Market and citizenship – Pupils’ actions of choice in the integration and differentiation processes of upper secondary education]. In Swedish with a summary in English. Växjö: Växjö University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lundahl, L. (2002). Sweden: Decentralization, deregulation, quasi-markets-and then what? Journal of Education Policy, 17(6), 687–697. doi: 10.1080/0268093022000032328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundahl, L., Arreman, I. E., Holm, A. S., & Lundström, U. (2013). Educational marketization the Swedish way. Education Inquiry, 4(3), 497–517. doi: 10.3402/edui.v4i3.22620
   Google Scholar
• Lundahl, L., Arreman, I. E., Lundström, U., & Rönnberg, L. (2010). Setting things right? Swedish upper secondary school reform in a 40-year perspective. European Journal of Education, 45(1), 46–59. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-3435.2009.01414.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muilu, T., & Rusanen, J. (2003). Rural young people in regional development—The case of Finland in 1970–2000. Journal of Rural Studies, 19(3), 295–307. doi: 10.1016/S0743-0167(03)00003-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musset, P. (2012). School choice and equity: Current policies in OECD countries and a literature review. OECD Education Working Papers No. 66. OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• National Board of Student Aid. (2016). För dig som inte läser på hemorten. [If you are not studying in your home municipality.] Retrieved March 30, 2016, from http://www.csn.se/komv-folkh-gymn/studiehjalp/hur-mycket-kan-du-fa/inackorderingstillagg/1.2847
   Google Scholar
• Niedomysl, T., & Amcoff, J. (2011). Is there hidden potential for rural population growth in Sweden? Rural Sociology, 76(2), 257–279. doi: 10.1111/j.1549-0831.2010.00032.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson, E. & Kardell, D. (2012, 12 August). Skolan läggs ned [The school is closing]. Sveriges Television. Retrieved March 30, 2016, from http://www.svt.se/nyheter/lokalt/norrbotten/skolan-laggs-ned
   Google Scholar
• Nygård Scott, A. (2014, 24 June). AWPE-Gymnasiet avvecklas [AWPE upper secondary school is being phased out]. Sundsvalls Tidning. Retrieved March 30, 2016, from http://www.st.nu/medelpad/ange/awpe-gymnasiet-avvecklas
   Google Scholar
• Östh, J., Andersson, E., & Malmberg, B. (2013). School choice and increasing performance difference: A counterfactual approach. Urban Studies, 50(2), 407–425. doi: 10.1177/0042098012452322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roscigno, V. J., Tomaskovic-Devey, D., & Crowley, M. L. (2006). Education and the inequalities of place. Social Forces, 84, 2121–2145. doi: 10.1353/sof.2006.0108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rönnberg, L. (2014). Justifying the need for control. Motives for Swedish national school inspection during two governments. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 58(4), 385–399. doi: 10.1080/00313831.2012.732605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skollagen. (SFS 2010:800). Stockholm: Utbildningsdepartementet.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Agency for Public Management (Statskontoret). (2013). Resurserna i skolan [The resources in the school.] 2013:10. Statskontoret, Finansdepartementet, Regeringen.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish National Agency for Education (Skolverket). (1996). Varför kostar elever olika?: En analys av skillnader i kommunernas kostnader för grundskolan [Why do pupils cost different amounts?: an analysis of differences in municipal expenditures for primary school]. Sverige. Stockholm: Skolverket.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish National Agency for Education. (2010). Konkurrensen om eleverna. Kommunernas hantering av minskande gymnasiekullar och en växande skolmarknad. [Competition for pupils. The municipalities’ handling of decreasing upper secondary cohorts and a growing school market]. Rapport 346. Stockholm: Skolverket.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish National Agency for Education. (2011). Skolmarknadens geografi - Om gymnasieelevers pendling på lokala och regionala skolmarknader. [School market geography – upper secondary school pupils commuting to local and regional school markets]. Stockholm: Skolverket.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish National Agency for Education. (2012a). Likvärdig utbildning i svensk grundskola? – en kvantitativ analys av likvärdighet över tid [Equal education in Swedish comprehensive school? – A quantitative analysis of the equivalence over time]. rapport 374, Stockholm: Skolverket.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish National Agency for Education. (2012b). Elevutveckling och kostnadsutveckling i gymnasieskolan 2005–2009 [Pupil development and cost in upper secondary schools 2005–2009]. Stockholm: Skolverket.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish National Agency for Education. (2013). Det svåra valet: Elevers val av utbildning på olika slags gymnasiemarknader. [The difficult choice: students’ choice of education in various upper secondary markets]. Rapport 394. Stockholm: Skolverket.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish National Agency for Education. (2016a). http://siris.skolverket.se/siris/f?p=SIRIS:53:0::NO:::
   Google Scholar
• Swedish National Agency for Education. (2016b). Språkintroduktion. [Language introduction]. Rapport 436. Stockholm: Skolverket.
   Google Scholar
• Walford, G. (Ed.) (1996). School choice and the quasi-market. Wallingford: Triangle.
   Google Scholar
• Whitty, G. (1997). Creating quasi-markets in education: A review of recent research on parental choice and school autonomy in three countries. Review of Research in Education, 22, 3–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar