The Associations Between Math Achievement and Perceived Relationships in School Among High Intelligent Versus Average Adolescents

References

• Bainbridge, F. A., & House, M. (1999). The teacher-student relationship as an interpersonal relationship. Communication Education, 49(3), 207–219. doi:10.1080/03634520009379209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, R. A. (1988). Negative effects of destructive criticism: Impact on conflict, self-efficacy, and task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(2), 199–207. doi: 10.1037//0021-9010.73.2.199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benbow, C. P., & Lubinski, D. (1993). Consequences of gender differences in mathematical reasoning ability: Some biological linkages. In M. Haug, R. E. Whalen, C. Aron, & K. L. Olsen (Eds.), The development of sex differences and similarities in behaviour (pp. 87–109). The Hauge: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Benbow, C. P., Lubinski, D., Shea, D., & Eftekhari-Sanjani, H. (2000). Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability at age 13: Their status 20 years later. Psychological Science, 11, 474–480. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00291
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betts, J. R., & Shkolnik, J. L. (2000). The effects of ability grouping on student achievement and resource allocation in secondary schools. Economics of Education Review, 19(1), 1–15. doi: 10.1016/s0272-7757(98)00044-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Børte, K., Lillejord, S., & Johansson, L. (2016). Evnerike elever og elever med stort læringspotensial: En forskingsoppsummering. Oslo: Kunnskapssenter for Utdanning. Retrieved from http://www.forskningsradet.no/servlet/Satellite?c=Rapport&cid=1254016758197&pagename=kunnskapssenter%2FHovedsidemal
   Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen, & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bru, E., Boyesen, E., Munthe, E., & Roland, E. (1998). Perceived social support at school and emotional and musculoskeletal complaints among Norwegian 8th grade students. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 42(4), 339–356. doi: 10.1080/0031383980420402
   Google Scholar
• Bru, E., Stephens, P., & Torsheim, T. (2002). Students’ perceptions of class management and reports of their own misbehavior. Journal of School Psychology, 40(4), 287–307. doi: 10.1016/s0022-4405(02)00104-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J. J. L. (2005). Relation of academic support from parents, teachers, and peers to Hong Kong adolescents' academic achievement: The mediating role of academic engagement. Genetic, social, and general psychology monographs, 131(2), 77–127. doi: 10.3200/mono.131.2.77-127
   Google Scholar
• Clark, B. (2013). Growing up gifted: Developing the potential of children at school and at home (8 issue.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke-Stewart, K. A., Vandell, D. L., Burchinal, M., O’Brien, M., & McCartney, K. (2002). Do regulable features of child-care homes affect children’s development? Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 17(1), 52–86. doi: 10.1016/s0885-2006(02)00133-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosmovici, E. M., Idsoe, T., Bru, E., & Munthe, E. (2009). Perceptions of learning environment and on-task orientation among students reporting different achievement levels: A study conducted among Norwegian secondary school students. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 53(4), 379–396. doi: 10.1080/00313830903043174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalland, C. P., & Klette, K. (2014). Work-plan heroes: Student strategies in lower-secondary Norwegian classrooms. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 58(4), 400–423. doi: 10.1080/00313831.2012.739200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dauber, S., & Benbow, C. P. (1990). Aspects of personality and peer relations of extremely talented adolescents. Gifted Child Quarterly, 34(1), 10–14. doi: 10.1177/001698629003400103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deary, I. J., Strand, S., Smith, P., & Fernandes, C. P. (2007). Intelligence and educational achievement. Intelligence, 35(1), 13–21. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2006.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci, L. E., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “What” and “Why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. doi: 10.1207/s15327965pli1104_01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duckworth, A. L., & Seligman, E. P. M. (2005). Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents. Psychological Science, 16(12), 939–944. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01641.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Early, D. M., Bryant, D. N., Pianta, R. C., Clifford, M. R., Burchinal, M. R., Ritchie, S., … Barbarin, O. (2006). Are teacher education, major, and credentials related to classroom quality and children’s academic gains in pre-kindergarten? Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 21(2), 174–195. doi: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2006.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. S., Early, D., Fraser, K., Belansky, E., & McCarthy, K. (1997). The relation of connection, regulation, and support for autonomy to adolescents’ functioning. Journal of Adolescent Research, 12(2), 263–286. doi: 10.1177/0743554897122007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feingold, A. (1992). Sex differences in variability in intellectual abilities: A new look at an old controversy. Review of Educational Research, 62(1), 61–84. doi: 10.2307/1170716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feingold, A. (1994). Gender differences in personality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 116(3), 429–456. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.116.3.429
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagnê, F., & St Pêre, F. (2001). When IQ is controlled, does motivation still predict achievement? Intelligence, 30(1), 71–100. doi: 10.1016/s0160-2896(01)00068-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, A. M., & Kaufman, J. C. (2005). Gender differences in mathematica. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gliem, J. A., & Gliem, R. R. (2003). Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient for Likert-type scales. Midwest Research-to-Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education Retrieved from: https://scholarworks.iupui.edu/bitstream/handle/1805/344/Gliem%20%26%20Gliem.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
   Google Scholar
• Gottfredson, L. S. (2002). G: Highly general and highly practical. In R. J. Sternberg, & E. L. Grigorenko (Eds.), The general intelligence factor: How general is it? (pp. 331–380). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, A., & Weinstein, S. R. (2004). Connecting and regulation at home and in school. Predicting growth in achievement for adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 19(4), 405–427. doi: 10.1177/0743558403258859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, M. U. (1989). The pursuit of excellence or the search for intimacy? The forced-choice dilemma of gifted youth. Roeper Review, 11(4), 189–194. doi: 10.1080/02783198909553207
   Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, J. E., & Undheim, J. O. (1996). Individual differences in cognitive functioning: Psychology. In B. David, & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 186–242). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2005). Can instructional and emotional support in the first-grade classroom make a difference for children at risk of school failure? Child Development, 76(5), 949–967. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/3696607?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrmann, A., & Nevo, B. (2011). Gifted education in German-speaking countries. Gifted and Talented International, 26(1–2), 47–62. doi: 10.1080/15332276.2011.11673588
   Google Scholar
• Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 371–406. doi: 10.3102/00028312042002371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, C., & Ensor, R. (2011). Individual differences in growth in executive function across the transition to school predict externalizing and internalizing behaviors and children’s self-perceived academic success at age 6. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology (Special Issue on Executive Functions, 108, 663–676. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2010.06.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hur, E., Buettner, C. K., & Jeon, L. (2015). The association between teachers’ child-centered beliefs and children’s academic achievement: The indirect effect of children’s behavioral self-regulation. Child & Youth Care Forum, 44(2), 309–325. doi: 10.1007/s10566-014-9283-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60(6), 581–592. doi: 10.1037/0003-066x.60.6.581
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyde, S. J., Fennema, E., Ryan, M., Frost, L. A., & Hopp, C. (1990). Gender comparisons of mathematics attitudes and affect. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 14(3), 299–324. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1990.tb00022.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (1988). LISREL VII: A guide to the program and applications. Chicago, IL: SPSS International.
   Google Scholar
• Karbach, J., Gottschling, J., Spengler, M., Hegewald, K., & Spinath, F. M. (2013). Parental involvement and general cognitive ability as predictors of domain-specific academic achievement in early adolescence. Learning and Instruction, 23, 43–51. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, K. H. (2008). Underachievement and creativity: Are gifted underachievers highly creative? Creativity Research Journal, 20(2), 234–242. doi: 10.1080/10400410802060232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klem, A. M., & Connell, P. J. (2004). Relationships matter: Linking teacher support to student engagement and achievement. Journal of School Health, 74(7), 262–273. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2004.tb08283.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knutsen, B. (2016). Høytpresterende elevers opplevelse av naturfagundervisningen i prestasjonslike elevgrupper på ungdomstrinnet. Nordisk tidsskrift for pedagogikk & kritikk, 2(1). Retrieved from https://pedagogikkogkritikk.no/index.php/ntpk/article/view/162
   Google Scholar
• Kulik, C. L. C., & Kulik, J. A. (1982). Effects of ability grouping on secondary school students: A meta-analysis of evaluation findings. American Educational Research Journal, 19(3), 415–428. doi: 10.2307/1162722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuncel, N. R., Hezlett, S. A., & Ones, D. S. (2004). Academic performance, career potential, creativity, and job performance: Can one construct predict them all? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 148–116. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.86.1.148
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lachance, J. A., & Mazzocco, M. M. M. (2006). A longitudinal analysis of sex differences in math and spatial skills in primary school age children. Learning and Individual Differences, 16(3), 195–216. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2005.12.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leahey, E., & Guo, G. (2001). Gender differences in mathematical trajectories. Social Forces, 80(2), 713–732. doi: 10.1353/sof.2001.0102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liem, G. A. D. (2015). Academic and social achievement goals: Their additive, interactive, and specialized effects on school functioning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(1), 37–56. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12085
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCallum, R. C., Wegener, D. T., Uchino, B. N., & Fabrigar, L. R. (1993). The problems of equivalent models in applications of covariance structure analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 185–199. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.114.1.185
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mashburn, A. J., Hamre, B. K., Downer, J. T., & Pianta, R. C. (2006). Teacher and classroom characteristics associated with teachers’ ratings of pre-kindergartners’ relationships and behaviors. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 24(4), 367–380. doi: 10.1177/0734282906290594
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCoach, D. B., & Siegle, D. (2003). Factors that differentiate underachieving gifted students from high-achieving gifted students. Underachieving Gifted, 47(2), 144–153. doi: 10.1177/001698620304700205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meece, J., Bower, G., & Burg, S. (2006). Gender and motivation. Journal of School Psychology, 44(5), 351–373. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2014). Mplus 7.3. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Neihart, M. (1999). The impact of giftedness on psychological wellbeing: What does the empirical literature say? Roeper Review, 22(1), 10–17. doi: 10.1080/02783199909553991
   Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218. doi: 10.1080/03075070600572090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NOU 2016:14. (2016). Mer å hente – Bedre læring for elever med stort læringspotensial [Official Norwegian Reports]. Oslo: Kunnskapsdepartementet.
   Google Scholar
• Pianta, R. C. (1999). Enhancing relationships between children and teachers. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Preckel, F., & Thiemann, H. (2003). Online- versus paper-pencil version of a high potential intelligence test. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 62(2), 131–138. doi: 10.1024//1421-0185.62.2.131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preckel, T. F., Goetz, R., Pekrun, R., & Kleine, M. (2008). Gender differences in gifted and average-ability students: Comparing girls’ and boys’ achievement, self-concept, and motivation in mathematics. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52(2), 146–159. doi:10.1177/0016986208315834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rambaren, J. A., Hopmeyer, D. S., Schwartz, D., Steglich, C., Badaly, D., & Veenstra, R. (2017). Academic functioning and peer influences: A short-term longitudinal study of network-behavior dynamics in middle adolescence. Child Development, 88(2), 523–543. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12611
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis, S. M., Burns, D. E., & Renzulli, J. S. (1998). Underachievement for some – dropping out with dignity for others. Communicator, 29(1), 19–24.
   Google Scholar
• Reis, S. M., & McCoach, D. B. (2000). The underachievement of gifted students: What do we know and where do we go? Gifted Underachievers, 44(3), 152–170. doi: 10.1177/001698620004400302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romano, E., Babchishin, L., Pagani, L. S., & Kohen, D. (2010). School readiness and later achievement: Replication and extension using a nationwide survey. Developmental Psychology, 46(5), 995–1007. doi: 10.1037/a0018880
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, F. L., Oh, I. S., & Shaffer, J. A. (2016). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 100 years of research findings. Fox School of Business, Research Paper. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2853669
   Google Scholar
• Shernoff, D. J., Ruzek, E. A., & Sinha, S. (2017). The influence of the high school classroom environment on learning as mediated by student engagement. School Psychology International, 38(2), 201–218. doi: 10.1177/0143034316666413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shim, S. S., & Finch, W. H. (2014). Academic and social achievement goals and early adolescents’ adjustment: A latent class approach. Learning and Individual Differences, 30, 98–105. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2013.10.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skaalvik, E. M. (1997). Self-enhancing and self-defeating ego orientation: Relations with task and avoidance orientation, achievement, self-perceptions, and anxiety. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(1), 71–81. doi: 10.1037//0022-0663.89.1.71
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2011). Teacher job satisfaction and motivation to leave the teaching profession: Relations with school context, feeling of belonging, and emotional exhaustion. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(6), 1029–1038. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2011.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skaalvik, S., & Skaalvik, E. (2004). Gender differences in math and verbal self-concept, performance expectations, and motivation. Sex Roles, 50(3), 241–252. doi: 10.1023/b:sers.0000015555.40976.e6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skoglund, T. H., Martinussen, M., & Lang-Ree, O. C. (2014). Papir versus PC. Tidsskrift for Norsk Psykologi Forening, 51, 450–452.
   Google Scholar
• Soares, D. L., Lemos, G. C., Primi, R., & Almeida, L. S. (2015). The relationship between intelligence and academic achievement throughout middle school: The role of students’ prior academic performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 41, 73–78. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2015.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinath, B., Freudenthaler, H. H., & Neubauer, A. C. (2010). Domain-specific school achievement in boys and girls as predicted by intelligence, personality and motivation. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(4), 481–486. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2009.11.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starko, A. J. (2008). Teacher preparation. In I. J. A. Plucker, & C. Callahan (Eds.), Critical issues and practices in gifted education. What the research says (pp. 681–695). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
   Google Scholar
• Summers, J. J., Davis, H. A., & Hoy, A. W. (2017). The effects of teachers’ efficacy beliefs on students’ perceptions of teacher relationship quality. Learning and Individual Differences, 53, 17–25. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2016.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundet, J. M., Barlaug, D. G., & Torjussen, T. M. (2004). The end of the Flynn effect? A study of secular trends in Eman intelligence test scores of Norwegian conscripts during half a century. Intelligence, 32(4), 349–362. doi: 10.1016/s0160-2896(04)00052-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundet, J. M., Tambs, K., Magnus, P., & Berg, K. (1988). On the question of secular trends in the heritability of intelligence test scores: A study of Norwegian twins. Intelligence, 12(1), 47–59. doi: 10.1016/0160-2896(88)90022-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swiatek, M. A. (1995). An empirical investigation of the social coping strategies used by gifted adolescents. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39(3), 154–160. doi: 10.1177/001698629503900305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55. doi: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thuen, E., & Bru, E. (2000). Learning environment, meaningfulness of schoolwork, and on-task-orientation among Norwegian ninth grade students. School Psychology International, 21(4), 393–413. doi: 10.1177/0143034300214004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torjussen, T. M., & Hansen, I. (1999). Forsvaret: Best i test? Bruk av psykologiske tester i forsvaret, med spesiell vekt på flygerseleksjon. Tidsskrift for Norsk Psykologi Forening, 36, 772–779.
   Google Scholar
• Véronneau, M. H., Vitaro, F., Brendgen, M., Dishion, T. J., & Tremblay, R. E. (2010). Transactional analysis of the reciprocal links between peer experiences and academic achievement from middle childhood to early adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 46(4), 773–790. doi: 10.1037/a0019816
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendelborg, C., & Caspersen, J. (2016). Høyt presterende elevers vurdering av læringsmiljøet: Analyser av elevundersøkelsen 2013 og 2014. Rapport 2016, Mangfold og inkludering, NTNU: Trondheim.
   Google Scholar
• Whitmore, J. R. (1982). Giftedness, conflict and underachievement. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. doi: 10.1086/461268
   Google Scholar
• Winner, E. (2000). The origins and ends of giftedness. American Psychologist, 55(1), 159–169. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, M. D., Strom, D., Guerrero, L. R., Chung, P. J., Lopez, D., Arellano, K., & Dudovitz, R. N. (2017). The role of social-emotional and social network factors in the relationship between academic achievement and risky behaviors. Academic Pediatrics 17(6), 633–641. doi:10.1016/j.acap.2017.04.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yun Dai, D., Moon, S. M., & Feldhusen, J. F. (1998). Achievement motivation and gifted students: A social cognitive perspective. Educational Psychologist, 33(2–3), 45–63. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep3302&3_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar