An Inferentialist Perspective on How Note-taking can Constrain the Orchestration of Math-Talk

References

• Anthony, G., & Walshaw, M. (2009). Characteristics of effective teaching of mathematics: A view from the West. Journal of Mathematics Education, 2(2), 147–164.
   Google Scholar
• Applebee, A. N. (1984). Writing and reasoning. Review of Educational Research, 54(4), 577–596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakhurst, D. (2011). The formation of reason. London: Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Bakker, A., & Derry, J. (2011). Lessons from inferentialism for statistics education. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 13(1–2), 5–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(3), 307–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauersfeld, H. (1998). Interaction, construction, and knowledge: Alternative perspectives for mathematics education. In D. Grouws, T. Cooney, & D. Jones (Eds.), Perspectives on research on effective mathematics teaching (pp. 27–46). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1985). Cognitive coping strategies and the problem of “inert knowledge”. In S. F. Chipman, J. W. Segal, & R. Glaser (Eds.), Thinking and learning skills: Current research and open questions (Vol. 2, pp. 65–80). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Bills, L., Mason, J., Watson, A., Zaslavsky, O., Goldenberg, P., Rowland, T., & Zazkis, R. (2006). RF02 Exemplification: The use of examples in teaching and learning mathematics. Paper presented at the 30th Annual Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education ( Vol. 1, pp. 125–154), Prague.
   Google Scholar
• Blumer, H. (1954). What is wrong with social theory? American Sociological Review, 19(1), 3–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandom, R. (1994). Making it explicit: Reasoning, representing, and discursive commitment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brandom, R. (1995). Knowledge and the social articulation of the space of reasons. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 55(4), 895–908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandom, R. (2000). Articulating reasons: An introduction to inferentialism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brandom, R. (2002). The centrality of Sellars’s Two-Ply account of observation. In R. B. Brandom (Ed.), Tales of the mighty dead: Historical essays in the metaphysics of intentionality (pp. 349–358). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bransen, J. (2002). Normativity as the key to objectivity: An exploration of Robert Brandom’s Articulating reasons. Inquiry, 45(3), 373–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodie, K. (2011). Working with learners’ mathematical thinking: Towards a language of description for changing pedagogy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 174–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodie, K. (2013). The power of professional learning communities. Education as Change, 17(1), 5–18. doi: 10.1080/16823206.2013.773929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brousseau, G. (1997). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics (N. Balacheff, M. Cooper, R. Sutherland, & V. Warfield, Trans.). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Charalambous, C. Y., & Hill, H. C. (2012). Teacher knowledge, curriculum materials, and quality of instruction: Unpacking a complex relationship. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(4), 443–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conner, A., Singletary, L. M., Smith, R. C., Wagner, P. A., & Francisco, R. T. (2014). Teacher support for collective argumentation: A framework for examining how teachers support students’ engagement in mathematical activities. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 86(3), 401–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Vesta, F. J., & Gray, G. S. (1972). Listening and note taking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63(1), 8–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Vesta, F. J., & Gray, G. S. (1973). Listening and note taking: Immediate and delayed recall as functions of variations in thematic continuity, note taking, and length of listening-review intervals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 64(3), 278–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emanuelsson, J., & Sahlström, F. (2008). The price of participation: Teacher control versus student participation in classroom interaction. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 52(2), 205–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraivillig, J. L., Murphy, L. A., & Fuson, K. C. (1999). Advancing children’s mathematical thinking in everyday mathematics classrooms. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(2), 148–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidi, S., & Klaiman, R. (1983). Notetaking by experts and novices: An attempt to identify teachable strategies. Curriculum Inquiry, 13(4), 377–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiebert, J., & Lefevre, P. (1986). Conceptual and procedural knowledge in mathematics: An introductory analysis. In J. Hiebert (Ed.), Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics (pp. 1–27). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hintz, A., & Tyson, K. (2015). Complex listening: Supporting students to listen as mathematical sense-makers. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 17(4), 296–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoekstra, A., Brekelmans, M., Beijaard, D., & Korthagen, F. (2009). Experienced teachers’ informal learning: Learning activities and changes in behavior and cognition. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(5), 663–673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hufferd-Ackles, K., Fuson, K. C., & Sherin, M. G. (2004). Describing levels and components of a math-talk learning community. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(2), 81–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, K., Garrison, A., Wilson, J., Gibbons, L., & Shahan, E. (2013). Exploring relationships between setting up complex tasks and opportunities to learn in concluding whole-class discussions in middle-grades mathematics instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(4), 646–682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi, K. (2005). What limits the encoding effect of note-taking? A meta-analytic examination. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30(2), 242–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lew, K., Fukawa-Connelly, T. P., Mejía-Ramos, J. P., & Weber, K. (2016). Lectures in advanced mathematics: Why students might not understand what the mathematics professor is trying to convey. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 47(2), 162–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lithner, J. (2008). A research framework for creative and imitative reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67(3), 255–276.
   Google Scholar
• McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2012). Conducting educational design research. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, D. K., & Turner, J. C. (2002). Using instructional discourse analysis to study the scaffolding of student self-regulation. Educational Psychologist, 37(1), 17–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millar, R., Leach, J., & Osborne, J. (2001). Improving science education: The contribution of research. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nathan, M. J., & Knuth, E. J. (2003). A study of whole classroom mathematical discourse and teacher change. Cognition and Instruction, 21(2), 175–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panayiotou, A., Kyriakides, L., Creemers, B. P. M., McMahon, L., Vanlaar, G., Pfeifer, M., … Bren, M. (2014). Teacher behavior and student outcomes: Results of a European study. Educational Assessment Evaluation and Accountability, 26(1), 73–93. doi: 10.1007/s11092-013-9182-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryve, A., Larsson, M., & Nilsson, P. (2013). Analyzing content and participation in classroom discourse: Dimensions of variation, mediating tools, and conceptual accountability. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 57(1), 101–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellars, W., Rorty, R., & Brandom, R. (1997). Empiricism and the philosophy of mind. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stefanou, C., Hoffman, L., & Vielee, N. (2008). Note-taking in the college classroom as evidence of generative learning. Learning Environments Research, 11(1), 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, M. K., Engle, R. A., Smith, M. S., & Hughes, E. K. (2008). Orchestrating productive mathematical discussions: Five practices for helping teachers move beyond show and tell. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10(4), 313–340.
   Google Scholar
• Walshaw, M., & Anthony, G. (2008). The teacher’s role in classroom discourse: A review of recent research into mathematics classrooms. Review of Educational Research, 78(3), 516–551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, L. (1968). Philosophical investigations (Vol. 3). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, T. (2002). What Does It Mean To Teach Mathematics Differently? Paper presented at the 25th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australas, Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 458–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications.
   Google Scholar