Legal Regulation and Professional Discretion in Schools

References

• Aasen, H. S., Gloppen, S., Magnussen, A.-M., & Nilssen, E. (2014). Juridification and social citizenship: Internal law, democracy and professional discretion. In H. S. Aasen, S. Gloppen, A.-M. Magnussen, & E. Nilssen (Eds.), Juridification and social citizenship in the welfare state (pp. 277–299). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Abbott, A. (1988). The system of professions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ananiadou, K., & Smith, P. K. (2002). Legal requirements and nationally circulated materials against school bullying in European countries. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 2(4), 471–491. doi: 10.1177/17488958020020040501
   Google Scholar
• Andenæs, K. (2006). Om maktens rettsliggjøring og rettsliggjøringens maktpotensial [The power of juridification]. Tidsskrift for Samfunnsforskning, 47(4), 587–600.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, G., & Cohen, M. I. (2015). Redesigning the identities of teachers and leaders: A framework for studying new professionalism and educator resistance. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 23(85), 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Bergh, A., & Arneback, E. (2016). Hur villkorar juridifieringen lärarprofessionens arbete med skolans kunskaper och värden? [How does juridification condition the teaching profession’s work with educational knowledge and values]. Utbildning & Demokrati, 25(1), 11–31.
   Google Scholar
• Blichner, L., & Molander, A. (2008). Mapping juridification. European Law Journal, 14(1), 36–54. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00405.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boe, E. (2007). Grunnleggende juridisk metode – en introduksjon til rett og rettstenkning [Legal method – An introduction to identification of problem and factual circumstances]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Brint, S. (1994). In an age of experts. The changing role of professionals in politics and public life. Chichester: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brint, S. (2001). Professionals and the “knowledge economy”: Rethinking the theory of postindustrial society. Current Sociology, 49(4), 101–132. doi: 10.1177/0011392101049004007
   Google Scholar
• Brock, D. M., Powell, M. J., & Hinings, C. R. (1999). The restructured professional organization: Corporate, cobwebs and cowboys. In D. Brock, M. Powell, & C. R. Hinings (Eds.), Restructuring the professional organization: Accounting, health care and law (pp. 215–229). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications, Incorporated.
   Google Scholar
• Dent, M., & Whitehead, S. (2002). Configuring the “new” professional. In M. Dent & S. Whitehead (Eds.), Managing professional identities. Knowledge, performativity and the “new” professional (pp. 1–16). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Education Act. (1998). Act of 17 July 1998 no. 61 relating to Primary and Secondary Education and Training with Amendments (In force as of February 1st 2017). The Royal Ministry of Education and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, T. (2010). Professional discretion in welfare services. Surrey: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Evetts, J. (2009). New professionalism and new public management: Changes, continuities and consequences. Comparative Sociology, 8, 247–266. doi: 10.1163/156913309X421655
   Google Scholar
• Fasting, R. B. (2013). Adapted education: The Norwegian pathway to inclusive and efficient education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 17(3), 263–276. doi: 10.1080/13603116.2012.676083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fjørtoft, H., Vatn, GÅ, & Eriksen, P. F. (2017). Juridisk literacy i skolen. Ikke-juristers lovtekstlesing og rettsanvendelse [Legal literacy in school. Non-lawyers interpretation of legal texts and legal use]. Nordic Journal of Literacy Research, 3, 1–14. doi: 10.23865/njlr.v3.685
   Google Scholar
• Freidson, E. (2001). Professionalism: The third logic. London: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, J. B. (2016a). Examining school inspectors and educational directors within the organisation of school inspection policy: Perceptions and views. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 61(1), 112–126. doi: 10.1080/00313831.2015.1120234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, J. B. (2016b). State school inspection – the Norwegian example (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Faculty of Educational Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, J. B., & Sivesind, K. (2015). State school inspection policy in Norway and Sweden (2002-2012): A reconfiguration of governing modes? Journal of Education Policy, 30(3), s 429–s 458. doi: 10.1080/02680939.2014.945488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haug, P. (1999). Formulation and realization of social justice: The compulsory school for all in Sweden and Norway. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 14(3), 231–239. doi: 10.1080/0885625990140305
   Google Scholar
• Haug, P. (2014). Kompetanse for spesialundervisning [Compentence for special needs education]. Bedre Skole, 3, 81–83.
   Google Scholar
• Hausstätter, R., & Thuen, H. (2014). Special education today in Norway. In A. F. Rotatori, J. P. Bakken, S. Burkhardt, F. E. Obiakor, & U. Sharma (Eds.), Advances in special education, Vol. 28. Special education international perspectives: Practices across the globe (pp. 181–207). West Yorkshire: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Hult, A., & Lindgren, J. (2016). Med lagen som rättesnöre – kunskapsformer i lärares arbete mot kränkande behandling [Judging by the (law) book: Knowledge forms in teachers’ work against degrading behaviour]. Utbildning & Demokrati, 25(1), 73–93.
   Google Scholar
• Imsen, G., Blossing, U., & Moos, L. (2017). Reshaping the Nordic education model in an era of efficiency. Changes in the comprehensive school project in Denmark, Norway, and Sweden since the millennium. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 61(5), 568–583. doi: 10.1080/00313831.2016.1172502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakhelln, H., & Møller, J. (2016). Retten i skolen. Styring og sikring [Legal regulation in schools. Governing and control]. In K. Andenæs & J. Møller (Eds.), Retten i skolen – mellom pedagogikk, juss og politikk [Legal regulation in schools – tensions between pedagogy, law and policy] (pp. 27–39). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, K., Lahn, L., & Nerland, M. (2012). Professional learning in the knowledge society. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Jenssen, E. S. (2011). “Jeg føler jeg har veldig lite ordinær undervisning i den klassen” – hva åtte lærere legger vekt på ved tilpasset opplæring [Stories from how eight teachers give priority to adapted education]. Spesialpedagogikk, 76(7), 41–52.
   Google Scholar
• Jenssen, E. S., & Lillejord, S. (2009). Tilpasset opplæring: Politisk dragkamp om pedagogisk praksis [Inclusive education: Political conflicts about educational practices]. Acta Didactica Norge, 3(1), 1–15. doi: 10.5617/adno.1040
   Google Scholar
• Larsson, B., & Jacobsson, B. (2013). Discretion in the “backyard of law”: Case handling of debt relief in Sweden. Professions & Professionalism, 3(1), 1–17. doi: 10.7577/pp.438
   Google Scholar
• Lundahl, L. (2016). Equality, inclusion and marketization of Nordic education: Introductory notes. Research in Comparative & International Education, 11(1), 3–12. doi: 10.1177/1745499916631059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnussen, A.-M., & Nilssen, E. (2013). Juridification and the construction of social citizenship. Journal of Law and Society, 40, 228–248. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6478.2013.00621.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markussen, E., Frøseth, M. V., & Sandberg, N. (2011). Reaching for the unreachable: Identifying factors predicting early school leaving and non-completion in Norwegian upper secondary education. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 55(3), 225–253. doi: 10.1080/00313831.2011.576876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molander, A. (2016). Discretion in the welfare state. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Molander, A., & Grimen, H. (2010). Understanding professional discretion. In L. G. Svensson & J. Evetts (Eds.), Sociology of professions: Continental and Anglo-Saxon traditions (pp. 167–187). Göteborg: Daidalos.
   Google Scholar
• Molander, A., Grimen, H., & Eriksen, E. O. (2012). Professional discretion and accountability in the welfare state. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 29(3), 214–230. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5930.2012.00564.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Møller, J., & Karseth, B. (2016). Profesjonell skjønnsutøvelse og kravet til tilpasset opplæring [Professionally discretionary and the need for adapted education]. In K. Andenæs & J. Møller (Eds.), Retten i skolen – mellom pedagogikk, juss og politikk [Legal regulation in schools – tensions between pedagogy, law and policy] (pp. 199–215). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Møller, J., Prøitz, T., Rye, E., & Aasen, P. (2013). Kunnskapsløftet som styringsreform [Knowlege promotion as a governing reform]. In B. Karseth, J. Møller, & P. Aasen (Eds.), Reformtakter: Om fornyelse og stabilitet i grunnopplæringen [School reforms: About renewal and stability in primary and secondary education] (pp. 23–41). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Møller, J., & Sivesind, K. (2016). Rektorers blikk på opplæringslovens rettslige regulering [Principals’ perspectives on legal regulation in Education]. In K. Andenæs & J. Møller (Eds.), Retten i skolen – mellom pedagogikk, juss og politikk [Legal regulation in schools – tensions between pedagogy, law and policy] (pp. 161–181). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Møller, J., & Skedsmo, G. (2013). Modernizing education – NPM reform in the Norwegian education system. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 45, 336–353. doi: 10.1080/00220620.2013.822353
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, M., & Skillen, P. (2015). The politics of time on the frontline: Street level bureaucracy, professional judgment, and public accountability. International Journal of Public Administration, 38(9), 632–641. doi: 10.1080/01900692.2014.952823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsen, S. (2014). Spesialundervisning i nasjonale læreplaner – utelatt, uteglemt eller “integrert vekk”? En analyse av nasjonale læreplaner for grunnskolen fra og med 1974 [Special needs education –ignored, neglected or «integrated away». An analysis of national curricula]. Psykologi i Kommunen, (5), 47–62.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsen, S., & Herlofsen, C. (2015). The legal basis for special needs education in Norway: Changing policy principles. In D. L. Cameron & R. Thygesen (Eds.), Transitions in the field of special education. Theoretical perspectives and implications for practice (pp. 229–255). Münster/New York: Waxmann Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Novak, J. (2018). Juridification of educational spheres. The case of Swedish school inspection (PhD thesis). Faculty of Educational Sciences 13. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, Uppsala.
   Google Scholar
• Ombudsman for Children. (2017). Uten mål og mening. Elever med spesialundervisning i grunnskolen. Barneombudet [Without goal and meaning. Pupils with special needs education in compulsory schools]. Oslo: Report from the Ombudsman for Children.
   Google Scholar
• Ot.prp. nr. 46 (1997–1998). Om lov om grunnskolen og den vidaregåande opplæringa (opplæringslova). Kunnskapsdepartementet. [Parliament proposition for a New Education Act for Primary and Secondary Schools. The Ministry of Education and Research].
   Google Scholar
• Østerud, Ø, Engelstad, F., & Selle, P. (2003). Makten og demokratiet [Power and democracy]. Oslo: Gyldendal Norsk Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Ottesen, E., & Møller, J. (2016). Organisational routines – The interplay of legal standards and professional discretion. European Educational Research Journal, 15(4), 395–409. doi: 10.1177/1474904116638853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozga, J. (2009). Governing education through data in England: From regulation to self-evaluation. Journal of Education Policy, 24(2), 149–162. doi: 10.1080/02680930902733121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prop. 129 L. (2012–2013). Endringer i opplæringslova og privatskolelova (spesialundervisning m.m.) Kunnskapsdepartementet [Parliament proposition about changes in the Education Act for primary and secondary schools and private schools (special needs education etc.). The Ministry of Education and Research].
   Google Scholar
• Sandberg, K. (2016). Barnets beste i skolen [Best interests of the pupil]. In K. Andenæs & J. Møller (Eds.), Retten i skolen – mellom pedagogikk, juss og politikk [Legal regulation in schools – tensions between pedagogy, law and policy] (pp. 40–53). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Skedsmo, G. (2009). School governing in transition? Perspectives, purposes and perceptionsof evaluation policy (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Oslo, Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Stefkovich, J. A. (2013). Best interests of the pupil: Applying ethical constructs to legal cases in education. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Telhaug, A. O. (1990). Den nye utdanningspolitiske retorikken [The new rhetoric in educational policy]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Travers, M. (2007). The new bureaucracy: Quality assurance and its critics. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trujillo, T. (2014). The modern cult of efficiency: Intermediate organizations and the new scientific management. Educational Policy, 28(2), 207–232. doi: 10.1177/0895904813513148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UDIR. (2014/2107). Veilederen Spesialundervisning [A guide to special needs education]. Utdanningsdirektoratet. Retrieved from https://www.udir.no/laring-og-trivsel/sarskilte-behov/spesialundervisning/Spesialundervisning/
   Google Scholar
• United Nation. (1948). Universal declaration of human rights. Retrieved from https://www.ohchr.org/EN/UDHR/Documents/UDHR_Translations/eng.pdf
   Google Scholar
• United Nation. (1989). Convention of the right of the child. Retrieved from https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/ProfessionalInterest/crc.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Utdanningsforbundet. (2012). The professional ethics for the teaching profession. Retrieved from https://www.utdanningsforbundet.no/globalassets/larerhverdagen/profesjonsetikk/larerprof_etiske_plattform_a4_engelsk_311012_051015argh.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wallander, L., & Molander, A. (2014). Disentangling professional discretion: A conceptual and methodological approach. Professions & Professionalism, 4(3), 1–19. Retrieved from https://journals.hioa.no/index.php/pp/article/view/808 doi: 10.7577/pp.808
   Google Scholar
• Welstad, T. (2012). Skoleledere som rettsanvendere [school leaders’ use of the law]. In H. Jakhelln & T. Welstad (Eds.), Utdanningsrettslige emner [Topics about education law] (pp. 700–721). Oslo: Cappelen Damm.
   Google Scholar