To Share or Not to Share: A Study of Educational Dilemmas Regarding the Promotion of Creativity and Innovation in Entrepreneurship Education

References

• Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Amiri, N. S., & Marimaei, M. R. (2013). Concept of entrepreneurship and entrepreneurs traits and characteristic. Scholarly Journal of Business Administration, 3(2), 20–25.
   Google Scholar
• Ascigil, S. F. (2012). Social entrepreneurship: From definition to performance measurement. American Journal of Entrepreneurship, 5(1), 26–36.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, J., Stevenson, H., & Wei-Skillern, J. (2006). Social and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different, or both? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(1), 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boysen, M. S. W. (2017). Embracing the network: A study of distributed creativity in a school setting. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 26, 112–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boysen, M. S. W., Mundt, N., & Thilemann, M. (2017). Ninja-moves, kolbøtter og understøttende fællesskaber [Ninja-moves, somersaults and supporting communities]. Unge Pædagoger, 79(4), 21–29.
   Google Scholar
• Brentnall, C., Rodríguez, I. D., & Culkin, N. (2017). We Need To Talk About Competitions: A theoretically flawed EE intervention? UH Business School Working Papers. University of Hertfordshire, 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Broadbent, E., Gougoulis, J., Lui, N., Pota, V., & Simons, J. (2017). Generation Z: What the world’s young people think and feel. London: Varkey Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (2007). Grounding theory research: Methods and practices. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of grounded theory (pp. 31–57). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Byrge, C., & Hansen, S. (2014). Enhancing creativity for individuals, groups and organizations. Copenhagen: Frydenlund Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, J. (2014). Learning-by-doing as an approach to teaching social entrepreneurship. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 51(5), 459–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Clapp, E. P. (2017). Participatory creativity: Introducing access and equity to the creative classroom. New York and London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, A. E. (2003). Situational analysis. Grounded theory mapping after the postmodern turn. Symbolic Interaction, 26(4), 553–576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobb, P., Confrey, J., DiSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission/EACEA/Eurydice. (2016). Entrepreneurship education at school in Europe. Eurydice report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Gallini, N. T. (2002). The economics of patents: Lessons from recent U.S. patent reform. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(2), 131–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis: Emergence vs. forcing. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Glaveanu, V. P. (2012). What can be done with an egg? Creativity, material objects, and the theory of affordances. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(3), 192–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grieco, C. (2015). Assessing social impact of social enterprises: Does one size really fit all? New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hallberg, L. (2006). The ‘core category’ of grounded theory: Making constant comparisons. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 1, 141–148.
   Google Scholar
• Hessels, J. (2008). International entrepreneurship: An introduction, framework and research agenda. Zoetermeer, The Netherlands: SCALES.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, R., & Casnocha, B. (2012). The start-up of you: Adapt to the future, invest in yourself and transform your career. New York: Crown Business.
   Google Scholar
• Huba, M. E., & Freed, J. E. (2000). Learner-centered assessment on college campuses: Shifting the focus from teaching to learning. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Huster, K., Petrillo, C., O’Malley, G., Glassman, D., Rush, J., & Wasserheit, J. (2017). Global social entrepreneurship competitions: Incubators for innovations in global health? Journal of Management Education, 41(2), 249–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansen, V., & Schanke, T. (2013). Entrepreneurship education in secondary education and training. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 57(4), 357–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, B. R., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26.
   Google Scholar
• Kristjánsson, K. (2010). The self and its emotions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krogstrup, H. K. (2001). Målbaseret, målfri og postmoderne evaluering [Postmodern evaluation]. In P. Dahler-Larsen & H. K. Krogstrup (Eds.), Tendenser i evaluering (pp. 95–106). Odense: Odense Universitets Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Lackéus, M. (2015a). Two flavours of entrepreneurial education: Happiness empowerment versus meaningful creativity. Working paper from May 2015 for doctoral course “Fostering the entrepreneurial self”. Gothenburg: Department of Technology Management and Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Lackéus, M. (2015b). Entrepreneurship in education: What, why, when, how. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lempert, L. B. (2007). Asking questions of the data: Memo writing in the grounded tradition. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of grounded theory (pp. 245–264). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lévêque, F., & Ménière, Y. (2006). Patents and innovation: Friends or foes? Paris: Cerna, Centre d’économie industrielle Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Lilischkis, S., Volkmann, C., Gruenhagen, M., Bischoff, K., & Halbfas, B. (2015). Supporting the entrepreneurial potential of higher education. Luxenbourg: Publication office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Manovich, L. (2001). The language of new media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mars, M. M., & Rios-Aguilar, C. (2010). Academic entrepreneurship (re)defined: Significance and implications for the scholarship of higher education. Higher Education, 59, 441–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez, C. A., Levie, J., Kelley, D. J., Sæmundsson, R. J., & Schøtt, T. (2010). Global entrepreneurship monitor special report: A global perspective on entrepreneurship education and training. London: The Global Entrepreneurship Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. (2013). Lov om ændring af lov om folkeskolen og forskellige andre love. Lov nr. 1640 af 26/12/2013. [New School Legislation].
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Research and Education. (2017). BEK nr. 354 af 07/04/2017.
   Google Scholar
• Neck, H. M., Greene, P. G., & Brush, C. G. (2014). Teaching entrepreneurship. A practice-based approach. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Oosterbeek, H., Van Praag, M., & Ijsselstein, A. (2010). The impact of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurship skills and motivation. European Economic Review, 54(3), 442–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P21 (Partnership for 21st Century Skills). (2011). Framework for 21st century learning. Retrieved from www.p21.org/our-work/p21-framework
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Pestoff, V., Brandsen, T., & Verschuere, B. (2012). New public governance, the third sector and Co-production. New York, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89, 62–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, P. B., Moberg, K., & Vestergaard, L. (2013). Effektmåling af projekt Edison: et entreprenørskabsforløb for 6.-7. klasse [Effect measurement of project edison]. Odense: Fonden for Entreprenørskab.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, L. (1998). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitiative materials (pp. 473–500). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez, J. C. (2011). University training for entrepreneurial competencies: Its impact on intention of venture creation. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 7(2), 239–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez, J. C. (2013). The impact of an entrepreneurship education program on entrepreneurial competencies and intention. Journal of Small Business Management, 51(3), 447–465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, A. (2017). Social entrepreneurship, entrepreneurship, collectivism, and everything in between: Prototypes and continuous dimensions. Public Administration Review, 77(3), 421–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. A. (1934/1983). The theory of economic development. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, H., Lauritzen, J., & Resen, S. (2012). Denmark a country of solutions - Entrepreneurship and innovation in higher education - contribution to the Danish innovation strategy. Danish Technological Institute for the Danish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Sirelkhatim, F., & Gangi, Y. (2015). Entrepreneurship education: A systematic literature review of curricula contents and teaching methods. Cogent Business & Management, 2, 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, P. N. (2007). On solid ground: Essential properties for growing grounded theory. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of grounded theory (pp. 114–126). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Tanggard, L. (2013). The sociomateriality of creativity in everyday life. Culture of Psycology, 19(1), 20–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing innovation: The evolving phenomenon of user innovation. Journal für Betriebswirtschaft, 55(1), 63–78.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (2004). Imagination and creativity in childhood. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 42(1), 7–97.
   Google Scholar
• Welter, F., Baker, T., Audretsch, D. B., & Gartner, B. (2017). Everyday entrepreneurship: A call for entrepreneurship research to embrace entrepreneurial diversity. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(3), 311–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, D. (2017). Knowledge sharing among innovative customers in a virtual innovation community: The roles of psychological capital, material reward and reciprocal relationships. Online Information Review, 41(5), 691–709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar