Validation of an Early Numeracy Screener for First Graders

References

• American Educational Research Association (AERA), American Psychological Association (APA), & National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME). (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychological Association, American Educational Research Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1974). Standards for educational and psychological tests. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Aunio, P., Hautamäki, J., Heiskari, P., & van Luit, J. (2006). The early numeracy test in Finnish: Children’s norms. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 47(5), 369–378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aunio, P., & Niemivirta, M. (2010). Predicting children's mathematical performance in grade one by early numeracy. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(5), 427–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aunio, P., & Räsänen, P. (2016). Core numerical skills for learning mathematics in children aged five to eight years – a working model for educators. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 24(5), 684–704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baroody, A. J. (2003). The development of adaptive expertise and flexibility: The integration of conceptual and procedural knowledge. In A. J. Baroody, & A. Dowker (Eds.), The development of arithmetic concepts and skills: Constructing adaptive expertise (pp. 1–34). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Baroody, A. J., Eiland, M., & Thompson, B. (2009). Fostering at-risk preschoolers’ number sense. Early Education and Development, 20, 80–128. doi: 10.1080/10409280802206619
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baroody, J. (2006). Why children have difficulties mastering the basic number combinations and how to help them. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/41198838?origin=JSTOR- pdf&seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
   Google Scholar
• Berch, D. B. (2005). Making sense of number sense: Implications for children with mathematical disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(4), 333–339. doi: 10.1177%2F00222194050380040901
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brankaer, C., Ghesquière, P., & De Smedt, B. (2017). Symbolic magnitude processing in elementary school children: A group administered paper-and-pencil measure (SYMP test). Behavior Research Methods, 49(4), 1361–1373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butterworth, B., Varma, S., & Laurillard, D. (2011). Dyscalculia: From brain to education. Science, 332(6033), 1049–1053. doi: 10.1126/science.1201536
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canobi, K. H., Reeve, R. A., & Pattison, P. E. (2002). Young children’s understanding of addition concepts. Educational Psychology, 22(5), 513–532. doi: 10.1080/0144341022000023608
   Google Scholar
• Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464–504. doi: 10.1080/10705510701301834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, B., Doabler, C., Smolkowski, K., Nelson, E. K., Fien, H., Baker, S. K., & Kosty, D. (2016). Testing the immediate and long-term efficacy of a tier 2 kindergarten mathematics intervention. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 9, 607–663. doi:10.1080/19345747.2015.11160 34
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clements, D. H., Sarama, J. H., & Liu, X. H. (2008). Development of a measure of early mathematics achievement using the Rasch model: The research-based early maths. Assessment, Educational Psychology, 28(4), 457–482.
   Google Scholar
• Connely, A. J. (2007). KeyMath-3 diagnostic assessment: Manual forms A and B. Minneapolis, MN: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. Retrieved from https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/h0040957
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Smedt, B., Noël, M.-P., Gilmore, C., & Ansari, D. (2013). How do symbolic and non- symbolic numerical magnitude processing skills relate to individual differences in children’s mathematical skills? A review of evidence from brain and behavior. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 2(2), 48–55. doi: 10.1016/j.tine.2013.06.001
   Google Scholar
• De Smedt, B., Verschaffel, L., & Ghesquière, P. (2009). The predictive value of numerical magnitude comparison for individual differences in mathematics achievement. 103(4), 469–479. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2009.01.010
   Google Scholar
• Desoete, A., Ceulemans, A., De Weerdt, F., & Pieters, S. (2012). Can we predict mathematical learning disabilities from symbolic and non-symbolic comparison tasks in kindergarten? Findings from a longitudinal study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 64–81. doi: 10.1348/2044-8279.002002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desoete, A., Stock, P., Schepens, A., Baeyens, D., & Rieyers, H. (2009). Classification, seriation, and counting in grades 1, 2, 3 as two-year longitudinal predictors for low achieving in numerical facility and arithmetical achievement? Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 27(3), 252–264. doi: 10.1177%2F0734282908330588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dockrell, J., Llaurado, A., Hurry, J., Cowan, R., Flouri, E., & Dawson, A. (2017). Review of assessment measures in the early years. Language and literacy, numeracy, and social-emotional development and mental health, education Endowment foundation (EEF), Institute of education. London: UCL.
   Google Scholar
• Dougherty, C. (2003). Numeracy, literacy, and earnings: Evidence from the national longitudinal survey of youth. Economics of EducationReview, 22, 511–521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, G. J., Dowsett, C. J., Claessens, A., Magnuson, K., Huston, A. C., Klebanov, P., … Japel, C. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1428–1446. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1428
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evers, A., Hagemeister, C., & Hostmealingen, A. (2013). EFPA a review model for the description and evaluation of psychological and educational tests. Tech. Rep. Version 4.2.(6). Brussels: European Federation of Psychology Associations.
   Google Scholar
• Evers, A., Muñiz, C., Høstmælingen, A., Sjöberg, A., & Bartram, D. (2013). Assessing the quality of tests: Revision of the EFPA review model. Psicothema, 25(3), 283–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Geary, D. C., Compton, D. L., Fuchs, D., Schatschneider, C., Hamlett, C. L., … Changas, P. (2013). Effects of first-grade number knowledge tutoring with contrasting forms of practice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 58–77. doi: 10.1037/a0030127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geary, D. C. (2011). Cognitive predictors of achievement growth in mathematics: A 5-year longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 47(6), 1539–1552. doi: 10.1037/a0025510
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geary, D. C., Bailey, D. H., & Hoard, M. K. (2009). Predicting mathematical achievement and mathematical learning disability with a simple screening tool. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 27(3), 265–279. doi: 10.1177%2F0734282908330592
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geary, D. C., Hoard, M. K., Byrd-Craven, J., & DeSoto, M. C. (2004). Strategy choices in simple and complex addition: Contributions of working memory and counting knowledge for children with mathematical disability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 88(2), 121–151. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2004.03.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geary, D. C., Hoard, M. K., Nugent, L., Bailey, D. H., & Krueger, F. (2013). Adolescents’ functional numeracy is predicted by their school entry number system knowledge. PLoS ONE, 8(1), 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geary, D. C., & vanMarle, K. (2016). Young children’s core symbolic and nonsymbolic quantitative knowledge in the prediction of later mathematics achievement. Developmental Psychology, 52(12), 2130–2144. doi: 10.1037/dev0000214
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gersten, R., Clarke, B., Jordan, N. C., Newman-Gonchar, R., Haymond, K., & Wilkins, C. (2012). Universal screening in mathematics for the primary grades: Beginnings of a research base. Exceptional Children, 78, 423–445. doi: 10.1177/001440291207800403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gersten, R., Jordan, N. C., & Flojo, J. R. (2005). Early identification and interventions for students with math difficulties. Journal of Learning Difficulties, 38, 293–304. doi: 10.1177%2F00222194050380040301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gersten, R., Rolfhus, E., Clarke, B., Decker, L., Wilkins, C., & Dimino, J. (2015). Intervention for first graders with limited number knowledge: Large-scale replication of a randomized controlled trial. American Educational Research Journal, 52, 516–546. doi: 10.3102/0002831214565787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goyder, J., Warriner, K., & Miller, S. (2002). Evaluating socio-economic status (SES) bias in survey nonresponse. Journal of Official Statistics, 18(1), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Halberda, J., Mazzocco, M. M., & Feigenson, L. (2008). Individual differences in non-verbal number acuity correlate with maths achievement. International Journal of Science, 455, 665–668.
   Google Scholar
• Hannula-Sormunen, M. M., Lehtinen, E., & Räsänen, P. (2015). Preschool children’s spontaneous focusing on numerosity, subitizing, and counting skills as predictors of their mathematical performance seven years later at school. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 17(2-3), 155–177. doi: 10.1080/10986065.2015.1016814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holloway, I. D., & Ansari, D. (2009). Mapping numerical magnitudes onto symbols: The numerical distance effect and individual differences in children’s mathematics achievement. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103(1), 17–29. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2008.04.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L.-t., & Bentler, P. M. (1991). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, N. C., Glutting, J., Dyson, N., Hassinger-Das, B., & Irwin, C. (2012). Building kindergartners’ number sense: A randomized controlled study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 647–660. doi: 10.1037/a0029018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, N. C., Glutting, J., & Ramineni, C. (2010). The importance of number sense to mathematics achievement in first and third grades. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 82–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, N. C., Kaplan, D., Ramineni, C., & Locuniak, M. N. (2009). Early math matters: Kindergarten number competence and later mathematics outcome. Developmental Psychology, 45(3), 850–867.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krajewski, K., & Schneider, W. (2009). Exploring the impact of phonological awareness, visual-spatial working memory, and preschool quantity-number competencies on mathematics achievement in elementary school: Findings from a 3-year longitudinal study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103, 516–531. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2009.03.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., & Grayson, D. (2005). Goodness of fit in structural equation models. In A. Maydeu-Olivares, & J. J. McArdle (Eds.), Multivariate applications book series. Contemporary psychometrics: A festschrift for Roderick P. McDonald (pp. 275–340). Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• McGuire, P., Kinzie, M. B., & Berch, D. B. (2012). Developing number sense in pre-k with five-frames. Early Childhood Education, 40(4), 213–222.
   Google Scholar
• McIntosh, A. (2012). Alle teller! Trondheim: Matematikksenteret.
   Google Scholar
• Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50(9), 741–749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moeller, K., Pixner, J., Zuber, J., Kaufmann, L., & Nuerk, H.-C. (2011). Early place-value understanding as a precursor for later arithmetic performance – A longitudinal study on numerical development. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 38, 1837–1851. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.03.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, O. (1998) 2004. Mplus user’s guide. (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthèn & Muthèn.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2009). Mathematics learning in early childhood: Paths toward excellence and equity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Purpura, D. J., Baroody, A. J., & Lonigan, C. J. (2013). The transition from informal to formal mathematical knowledge: Mediation by numeral knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 453–464. doi: 10.1037/a0031753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purpura, D. J., & Lonigan, C. J. (2013). Informal numeracy skills: The structure and relations among numbering, relations and arithmetic operations in preschool. American Educational Research Journal, 50(19), 178–209. doi: 10.3102%2F0002831212465332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie, S. J., & Bates, T. C. (2013). Enduring links from childhood mathematics and reading achievement to adult socioeconomic status. Psychological Science, 24(7), 1301–1308. doi: 10.1177%2F0956797612466268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salminen, J. B., Koponen, T. K., & Tolvanen, A. L. (2018). Individuality in the early number skill components underlying basic arithmetic skills. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1–11. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, M., Beeres, K., Coban, L., Merz, S., Schmidt, S., Stricker, J., & De Smedt, B. (2016). Associations of non-symbolic and symbolic numerical magnitude processing with mathematical competence: A meta-analysis. Developmental Science. doi: 10.1111/desc.12372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics Norway. (2019). Retrieved from https://www.ssb.no/utniv
   Google Scholar
• Stock, P., Desoete, A., & Roeyers, H. (2009). Detecting children with arithmetic disabilitiesfrom kindergarten: Evidence from a 3-year longitudinal study on the role ofpreparatory arithmetic abilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43, 250–268. doi: 10.1177/0022219409345011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorndike, R. M., & Thorndike-Christ, T. (2014). Measurement and evaluation in psychology and education (8th ed.). Harlow: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Udir. (2016). The Norwegian Directorate of Education and Training.
   Google Scholar
• Vanbinst, K., Ghesquière, P., & De Smedt, B. (2015). Does numerical processing uniquely predict first graders’ future development of single-digit arithmetic? Learning and Individual Differences, 37, 153–160. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2014.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Eye, A. (1990). Introduction to configural frequency analysis. The search for types and anti-types in cross classification. Cambridge: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Von Eye, A., Spiel, C., & Wood, P. H. (1996). Configural frequency analysis. Applied Psychological Research, 45(4), 310–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Rijt, B. A. M., Van Luit, J. E. H., & Pennings, A. H. (1999). The construction of the Utrecht early mathematical competence scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59, 289–309. doi: 10.1177%2F0013164499592006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Luit, J. E. H., Van de Rijt, B. A. M., & Hasemann, K. (2001). OTZ Osnabrücker test für zahlbegriffsentwicklung [ German version of the Uterecht test of number sense]. Göttingen: Hogrefe-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Van Luit, J. E. H., Van de Rijt, B. A. m., & Pennings, A. H. (1994). Utrechtse Getalbegrip Toets [ Utrecht test of number sense]. Doetinchem: Graviant.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkins, J. L. M., Baroody, A. J., & Tiilikainen, S. (2001). Kindergartner’s understanding of additive commutativity within the context of word problems. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 79(1), 23–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, R. J., Martland, J., & Stafford, A. K. (2006). Early numeracy. Assessment for teaching and intervention (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., Koponen, T., Räsänen, P., Aunola, K., Lerkkanen, M.-K., & Nurmi, J.-E. (2014). Linguistic and spatial skills predict early arithmetic development via counting sequence knowledge. Child Development, 85(3), 1091–1107. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zumbo, B. D., & Chan, E. K. H. (2009). Setting the stage for validity and validation in social, behavioral, and health sciences: Trends in validation practices. In B. Zumbo, & E. Chan (Eds.), Validity and validation in social, behavioral, and health sciences. Social indicators research series, vol 54. (pp. 3–8). Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar