Measuring the sociability of virtual learning environments for interdisciplinary student teams – a validation study

References

• Abedin, B., Daneshgar, F., & D’Ambra, J. (2011). Enhancing non-task sociability of asynchronous CSCL environments. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2535–2547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abedin, B., Daneshgar, F., & D’Ambra, J. (2012). Do nontask interactions matter? The relationship between nontask sociability of computer supported collaborative learning and learning outcomes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(3), 385–397. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01181.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2016). Online report card: Tracking online education in the United States. ERIC.
   Google Scholar
• Almendingen, K., Sandsmark Morseth, M., Gjølstad, E., Brevik, A., & Tørris, C. (2021). Student’s experiences with online teaching following COVID-19 lockdown: A mixed methods explorative study. PLOS One, 16(8). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balacheff, N., Ludvigsen, S., Jong, T., Lazonder, A., & Barnes, S. (2009). Technology-enhanced learning: Principles and products (1st ed.). Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated.
   Google Scholar
• Bales, R. F. (2001). Social interaction systems: Theory and measurement (1st ed.). CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bearden, W. O., Sharma, S., & Teel, J. E. (1982). Sample size effects on Chi square and other statistics used in evaluating causal models. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(4).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, A. J., Smillie, L. D., & Corr, P. J. (2010). A confirmatory factor analysis of the mini-IPIP five-factor model personality scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(5), 688–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Fruyt, F., Mervielde, I., & van Leeuwen, K. (2002). The consistency of personality type classification across samples and five-factor measures. European Journal of Personality, 16(1_suppl), S57–S72. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.444
   Google Scholar
• Donnellan, M. B., Oswald, F. L., Baird, B. M., & Lucas, R. E. (2006). The mini-IPIP scales: Tiny-yet-effective measures of the big five factors of personality. Psychological Assessment, 18(2), 192–203. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.18.2.192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elken, M., Maassen, P., Nerland, M., Prøitz, T. S., Stensaker, B., & Vabø, A. (2020). Quality work in higher education. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Farnell, T., Skledar Matijevic, A., & Scukanec Smith, N. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 on higher education: A review of emerging evidence. European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Fransen, J., Weinberger, A., & Kirschner, P. A. (2013). Team effectiveness and team development in CSCL. Educational Psychologist, 48(1), 9–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.747947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, Q., Dai, Y., Fan, Z., & Kang, R. (2010). Understanding factors affecting perceived sociability of social software. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1846–1861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1988). An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment. Journal of Marketing Research, 25(2), 186–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378802500207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public-domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In I. Mervielde, I. Deary, F. De Fruyt, & F. Ostendorf (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe (pp. 7–28). Tilburg University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gunawardena, C. N., & Zittle, F. J. (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer-mediated conferencing environment. American Journal of Distance Education, 11(3), 8–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923649709526970
   Google Scholar
• Hair, R. E., Babin, BJ, & Black, W. C. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective. Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Hämäläinen, R., & Arvaja, M. (2009). Scripted collaboration and group-based variations in a higher education CSCL context. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 53(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830802628281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60.
   Google Scholar
• Hostetter, C. (2013). Community matters: Social presence and learning outcomes. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 13(1), 77–86.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2020). Applying collaborative cognitive load theory to computer-supported collaborative learning: Towards a research agenda. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(2), 783–805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09729-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2003). Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: A review of the research. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(3), 335–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00057-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., Jochems, W., & van Buuren, H. (2007). Measuring perceived sociability of computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Computers & Education, 49(2), 176–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Vermeulen, M. (2013). Social aspects of CSCL environments: A research framework. Educational Psychologist, 48(4), 229–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.750225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, G.-Y. (2020). Scripts and mastery goal orientation in face-to-face versus computer-mediated collaborative learning: Influence on performance, affective and motivational outcomes, and social ability. Computers & Education, 143, 103691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowenthal, P. R., & Dennen, V. P. (2017). Social presence, identity, and online learning: Research development and needs. Distance Education, 38(2), 137–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2017.1335172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludvigsen, S., Lund, K., & Oshima, J. (2021). A conceptual stance on CSCL history. In U. Cress, C. Rosé, A. F. Wise, & J. Oshima (Eds.), International handbook of computer-supported collaborative learning (pp. 45–63). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50(9), 741–749. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.50.9.741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molinillo, S., Aguilar-Illescas, R., Anaya-Sánchez, R., & Vallespín-Arán, M. (2018). Exploring the impacts of interactions, social presence and emotional engagement on active collaborative learning in a social web-based environment. Computers & Education, 123, 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• NESH. (2021). Guidelines for research ethics in the social sciences, humanities, law and theology. Retrieved from Downloaded February 2, 2021 from https://www.forskningsetikk.no/retningslinjer/hum-sam/forskningsetiske-retningslinjer-forsamfunnsvitenskap-og-humaniora/.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, I., Tinoca, L., & Pereira, A. (2011). Online group work patterns: How to promote a successful collaboration. Computers & Education, 57(1), 1348–1357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.01.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Mateo, M., & Guitert, M. (2012). Which social elements are visible in virtual groups? Addressing the categorization of social expressions. Computers & Education, 58(4), 1234–1246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radkowitsch, A., Vogel, F., & Fischer, F. (2020). Good for learning, bad for motivation? A meta-analysis on the effects of computer-supported collaboration scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 15(1), 5–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-020-09316-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis, R. C. D., Isotani, S., Rodriquez, C. L., Lyra, K. T., Jaques, P. A., & Bittencourt, I. I. (2018). Affective states in computer-supported collaborative learning: Studying the past to drive the future. Computers & Education, 120, 29–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.01.015`
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remesal, A., & Colomina, R. (2013). Social presence and online collaborative small group work: A socioconstructivist account. Computers & Education, 60(13), 357–367. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.07.009
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. C., Maeda, Y., Lv, J., & Caskurlu, S. (2017). Social presence in relation to students’ satisfaction and learning in the online environment: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 402–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. (2003). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students’ perceived learning and satisfaction. JALN, 7(1), 68–88.
   Google Scholar
• Rourke, L., & Anderson, T. (2002). Exploring social communication in computer conferencing. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 13(3), 259–275.
   Google Scholar
• Rovai, A. P. (2002). Sense of community, perceived cognitive learning, and persistence in asynchronous learning networks. The Internet and Higher Education, 5(4), 319–332.
   Google Scholar
• Saghafian, M., & O’Neill, D. K. (2018). A phenomenological study of teamwork in online and face-to-face student teams. Higher Education, 75(1), 57–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0122-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjølie, E., Espenes, T. C., & Buø, R. (2022). Changes in social interaction among self-organizing student teams following a transition from face-to-face to online learning. Computers and Education, 189, 104580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjølie, E., & Moe, N. B. (2022). Work from X. Den digitale hverdagen [work from X. Digital collaboration in a hybrid everyday life]. In A. Rolstadås, A. Krokan, G. E. D. Øien, M. Rolfsen, G. Sand, H. Syse, L. M. Husby, & T. I. Waag (Eds.), Den digitale hverdagen (pp. 227–240). John Grieg Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Smite, D., Tkalich, A., Moe, N. B., Papatheocharous, E., Klotins, E., & Buvik, M. P. (2021). Changes in perceived productivity of software engineers during COVID-19 pandemic: The voice of evidence. Journal of Systems and Software, 186, 111197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2021.111197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spronken-Smith, R., & Walker, R. (2010). Can inquiry-based learning strengthen the links between teaching and disciplinary research? Studies in Higher Education, 35(6), 723–740. doi:10.1080/03075070903315502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng, H. W., & Yeh, H.-T. (2013). Team members' perceptions of online teamwork learning experiences and building teamwork trust: A qualitative study. Computers & Education, 63, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng, H. W., Yeh, H.-T., & Tang, Y. (2019). A close look at trust among team members in online learning communities. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 17(1), 52–65. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJDET.2019010104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usher, M., & Barak, M. (2020). Team diversity as a predictor of innovation in team projects of face-to-face and online learners. Computers & Education, 144, 103702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weidlich, J., & Bastiaens, T. J. (2017). Explaining social presence and the quality of online learning with the SIPS model. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 479–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weidlich, J., & Bastiaens, T. J. (2019). Designing sociable online learning environments and enhancing social presence: An affordance enrichment approach. Computers & Education, 142, 103622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar