Taxonomic revision of Eudesme (Ectocarpales s.l., Phaeophyceae) proposing a new species E. borealis sp. nov.

REFERENCES

• Agardh J.G. 1882. Till algernes systematik. Nya bidrag. (Andra afdelningen.), vol. 17(4). Lunds Universitets Års-Skrift, Afdelningen for Mathematik och Naturvetenskap. 1–134 pp., 3 pls.
   Google Scholar
• Berkeley M.J. 1833. Gleanings of British algae; being an Appendix to the Supplement to English Botany. G.B. Sowerby, London, UK. 50 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Ding L. & Lu B. 2004. Four new species of the genera Eudesme and Sphaerotrichia (Chordariaceae, Heterokontophyta) from the Chinese coast. Hydrobiologia 512: 185–192. DOI: 10.1023/B:HYDR.0000020326.90418.e4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fries E.M. 1825. Systema orbis vegetabilis. Primas lineas. Novae construcitonis. I. Plantae homonemeae. E Typographia Academica, Lund, Sweden. vii + 374 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Fritsch F.E. 1945. The structure and reproduction of the algae volume 2. Foreword, Phaeophyceae, Rhodophyceae, Myxophyceae. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. xiv + 939 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Guiry M.D. & Guiry G.M. 2018. AlgaeBase. World-wide electronic publication, National University of Ireland, Galway. http://www.algaebase.org; searched on 05 September 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Inagaki K. 1958. A systematic study of the order Chordariales from Japan and its vicinity. Scientific Papers of the Institute of Algological Research, Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University 4: 87–197.
   Google Scholar
• Jaasund E. 1965. Aspects of the marine algal vegetation of north Norway. Acta Bothoburgensia IV. Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis. Elanders Boktryckeri Aktiebolag, Göteborg, Sweden. 174 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Japan Meteorological Agency. Monthly average sea surface temperature. http://www.data.jma.go.jp/kaiyou/data/db/kaikyo/monthly/sst_HQ.html; searched on 05 September 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Katoh K. & Toh H. 2008. Recent developments in the MAFFT multiple sequence alignment program. Briefings in Bioinformatics 9: 286–298. DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbn022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawai H. 1986. On the life history of Japanese Eudesme virescens (Carm.) J. Ag. (Phaeophyceae, Chordariales) in culture. Japanese Journal of Phycology 34: 203–208.
   Google Scholar
• Kawai H., Hanyuda T., Shibata K., Kamiya M. & Peters A.F. 2019. Proposal of a new brown algal species Mesogloia japonica sp. nov. (Chordariaceae, Phaeophyceae) and transfer of Sauvageaugloia ikomae to Mesogloia. Phycologia 58: 63–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawai H., Hanyuda T., Kim S.-H., Ichikawa Y., Uwai S. & Peters A.F. 2016. Cladosiphon takenoensis sp. nov. (Ectocarpales s.l., Phaeophyceae) from Japan. Phycological Research 64: 212–218. DOI: 10.1111/pre.12140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim W.-S. & Boo S.-M. 2010. Algal flora of Korea: vol. 2 no. 1. Heterokontophyta: Phaeophyceae: Ectocarpales. Marine brown algae I. National Institute of Biological Resources, Incheon, South Korea. 195 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Kylin H. 1933. Über die Entwicklungsgeschichte der Phaeophyceen. Lunds Universitets Årsskrift, Ny Foljd, Andra Afdelningen 29(7): 1–102.
   Google Scholar
• Kylin H. 1940. Die Phaeophyceenordnung Chordariales. Lunds Universitets Årsskrift, Ny Foljd, Andra Afdelningen 36(9): 1–67.
   Google Scholar
• Kylin H. 1947. Die Phaeophyceen der Schwedishen Westküste. Lunds Universitets Arsskrift. N.F. Avd.2. 43: 1–99.
   Google Scholar
• Lis J.T. 1980. Fractionation of DNA fragments by polyethylene glycol induced precipitation. Methods in Enzymology 65: 347–353.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Parke M. 1933. A contribution to knowledge of the Mesogloiaceae and associated families, vol. 9. Publications of the Hartley Botanical Laboratories, Liverpool, UK. 43 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Rambaut A. & Drummond A. 2007. Tracer v1.5. http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/tracer/.
   Google Scholar
• Ronquist F., Teslenko M., van der Mark P., Ayres D.L., Darling A., Höhna S., Larget B., Liu L., Suchard M.A. & Huelsenbeci J.P. 2012. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61: 539–542. DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/sys029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenvinge K.L. & Lund S. 1943. The marine algae of Denmark. Vol. II. Phaeophyceae. Det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab. Biologiske Skrifter 2(6): 1–59.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz G. 1978. Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics 6: 461–464. DOI: 10.1214/aos/1176344136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Setchell W.A. & Gardner N.L. 1925. The marine algae of the Pacific Coast of North America. Part III. Melanophyceae. University of California Publications in Botany 8(3): 383–898.
   Google Scholar
• Silvestro D. & Michalak I. 2012. raxmlGUI: a graphical front-end for RAxML. Organisms Diversity & Evolution 12: 335–337. DOI: 10.1007/s13127-011-0056-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanabe A.S. 2011. Kakusan4 and Aminosan: two programs for comparing nonpartitioned, proportional and separate models for combined molecular phylogenetic analyses of multilocus sequence data. Molecular Ecology Resources 11: 914–921. DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02924.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thuret G. 1850. Recherches sur les zoospores des algues et les anthéridies des cryptogames. Annales des sciences naturelles série 3, Botanique 14: 214–260.
   Google Scholar
• Tokida J. 1954. The marine algae of southern Saghalien. Memoirs of the Faculty of Fisheries, Hokkaido University 2: 1–164.
   Google Scholar
• Tseng C.K. 1983. Common seaweeds of China. Science Press, Beijing. x + 316 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Womersley H.B.S. 1987. The marine benthic flora of southern Australia. Part II. South Australian Government Printing Division, Adelaide. 481 pp., 169 figs, 1 table, 8 pls., 4 maps.
   Google Scholar