Revisiting section Compressa of Chaetoceros (Bacillariophyceae), with descriptions of C. brevispinosus sp. nov. and C. ornatus comb. nov.

References

• Anonymous. 1975. Proposals for a standardization of diatom terminology and diagnoses. Nova Hedwigia Beiheft 53: 323‒354.
   Google Scholar
• Bosak S. & Sarno D. 2017. The planktonic diatom genus Chaetoceros Ehrenberg (Bacillariophyta) from the Adriatic Sea. Phytotaxa 314: 1‒44. DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.314.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunel J. 1972. Orientation of setae in the genus Chaetoceros, in regard to the apical axis. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of India 14: 315‒327.
   Google Scholar
• Chamnansinp A., Li Y., Lundholm N. & Moestrup Ø. 2013. Global diversity of two widespread, colony-forming diatoms of the marine plankton, Chaetoceros socialis (syn. C. radians) and Chaetoceros gelidus sp. nov. Journal of Phycology 49: 1128–1141. DOI: 10.1111/jpy.12103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamnansinp A., Moestrup Ø. & Lundholm N. 2015. Diversity of the marine diatom Chaetoceros (Bacillariophyceae) in Thai waters – revisiting Chaetoceros compressus and Chaetoceros contortus. Phycologia 54: 161–175. DOI: 10.2216/14-074.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaonkar C.C., Kooistra W.H.C.F., Lange C.B., Montresor M. & Sarno D. 2017. Two new species in the Chaetoceros socialis complex (Bacillariophyta): C. sporotruncatus and C. dichatoensis, and characterization of its relatives, C. radicans and C. cinctus. Journal of Phycology 53: 889–907. DOI: 10.1111/jpy.12554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaonkar C.C., Piredda R., Minucci C., Mann D., Montresor M., Sarno D, & Kooistra W.H.C.F. 2018. Annotated 18S and 28S rDNA reference sequences of taxa in the planktonic diatom family Chaetocerotaceae. PLOS ONE 13: e0208929.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gran H.H. 1908. Diatomeen. Nordisches Plankton 19: 1–146.
   Google Scholar
• Gran H.H. & Yendo K. 1914. Japanese Diatoms. I. On Chaetoceros. II. On Stephanopyxis, Videnskapsselskapets Skrifter I. Matematisk-Naturvidenskapelig Klasse 8: 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Guiry M.D. & Guiry G.M. 2019. AlgaeBase. World-wide electronic publication, National University of Ireland, Galway. http://www.algaebase.org; searched on 25 March 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Hall T.A. 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41: 95‒98.
   Google Scholar
• Hasle G.R. & Syvertsen E.E. 1997. Marine Diatoms. In: Identifying marine diatoms and dinoflagellates (Ed. by C.R. Tomas), pp. 5‒385. Academic Press, San Diego.
   Google Scholar
• Hernández-Becerril D.U. 1993a. Note on the morphology of two planktonic Chaetoceros species: C. bacteriastroides and C. seychellarus, with comments on their taxonomy and distribution. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 111: 117–128. DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8339.1993.tb01894.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernández-Becerril D.U. 1993b. Study of the morphology and distribution of two planktonic diatoms: Chaetoceros paradoxus and C. filiferus (Bacillariophyceae). Cryptogamic Botany 3: 169–175.
   Google Scholar
• Hernández-Becerril D.U. 1996. A morphological study of Chaetoceros species (Bacillariophyta) from the plankton of the Pacific Ocean of Mexico. Bulletin of the Natural History Museum, London (Botany) 26: 1–73.
   Google Scholar
• Hernández-Becerril D.U. & Flores Granados C. 1998. Species of the diatom genus Chaetoceros (Bacillariophyceae) in the plankton from the southern Gulf of Mexico. Botanica Marina 41: 505–519. DOI: 10.1515/botm.1998.41.1-6.505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishii K.I., Iwataki M., Matsuoka K. & Ima I. 2011. Proposal of identification criteria for resting spores of Chaetoceros species (Bacillariophyceae) from a temperate coastal sea. Phycologia 50: 351‒362. DOI: 10.2216/10-36.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen K.G. & Moestrup Ø. 1998. The genus Chaetoceros (Bacillariophyceae) in inner Danish coastal waters. Opera Botanica 133: 5–68.
   Google Scholar
• Kooistra W.H.C.F., Sarno D., Hernández-Becerril D.U., Assmy P., Prisco C.D. & Montresor M. 2010. Comparative molecular and morphological phylogenetic analyses of taxa in the Chaetocerataceae (Bacillariophyta). Phycologia 49: 471–500. DOI: 10.2216/09-59.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraus D. 2014. Daniel’s XL Toolbox addin for Excel, version 6.10. http://xltoolbox.sourceforge.net.
   Google Scholar
• Lee S.D., Joo H.M. & Lee J.H. 2014. Critical criteria for identification of the genus Chaetoceros (Bacillariophyta) based on setae ultrastructure. II. Subgenus Hyalochaete. Phycologia 53: 614‒638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y., Zhu S., Lundholm N. & Lü S. 2015. Morphology and molecular phylogeny of Chaetoceros dayaensis sp. nov. (Bacillariophyceae), characterized by two 90° rotations of the resting spore during maturation. Journal of Phycology 51: 469–479. DOI: 10.1111/jpy.12290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundholm N., Daugbjerg N. & Moestrup Ø. 2002. Phylogeny of the Bacillariaceae with emphasis on the genus Pseudo-nitzschia (Bacillariophyceae) based on partial LSU rDNA. European Journal of Phycology 37: 115‒134. DOI: 10.1017/S096702620100347X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nylander J.A.A. 2004. MrModeltest v2. Program distributed by the author. Evolutionary Biology Center, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Ostenfeld C.H. 1903. Plankton from the sea around the Færöes. In: Botany of the Færöes based upon Danish Investigations. Part II (Ed. by E. Warming), pp. 588–612. Det Nordisk Forlag Ernst Bojesen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Rines J.E.B. 1999. Morphology and taxonomy of Chaetoceros contortus Schütt 1895, with preliminary observations on Chaetoceros compressus Lauder 1864 (Subgenus Hyalochaete, Section Compressa). Botanica Marina 42: 539‒551. DOI: 10.1515/BOT.1999.061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rines J.E.B. & Hargraves P.E. 1988. The Chaetoceros Ehrenberg (Bacillariophyceae) flora of Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island, U.S.A. Bibliotheca Phycologica 79: 1–196.
   Google Scholar
• Rines J.E.B. & Hargraves P.E. 1990. Morphology and taxonomy of Chaetoceros compressus Lauder var. hirtisetus var. nova, with preliminary consideration of closely related taxa. Diatom Research 5: 113–127. DOI: 10.1080/0269249X.1990.9705097.
   Google Scholar
• Ross R., Cox E.J., Kareyeva N.I., Mann D.G., Paddock T.B.B., Simonsen R. & Sims P.A. 1979. An amended terminology for the siliceous components of the diatom cell. Nova Hedwigia Beihefte 64: 513‒533.
   Google Scholar
• Round F.E., Crawford R.M. & Mann D.G. 1990. The diatoms. Biology and morphology of the genera. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. 747 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Schütt F. 1895. Arten von Chaetoceros und Peragallia. Ein Beitrag zur Hochseeflora. Berichte Der Deutschen Botanischen Gesellschaft 13: 35–48.
   Google Scholar
• Shevchenko O.G. & Orlova T.Y. 2010. Morphology and ecology of the bloom-forming diatom Chaetoceros contortus from Peter the Great Bay, Sea of Japan. Russian Journal of Marine Biology 36: 243–251. DOI: 10.1134/S1063074010040024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shevchenko O.G., Orlova T.Y. & Hernández-Becerril D.U. 2006. The genus Chaetoceros (Bacillariophyta) from Peter the Great Bay, Sea of Japan. Botanica Marina 49: 236‒258. DOI: 10.1515/BOT.2006.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stockwell D.A. & Hargraves P.E. 1984. Morphological variability within resting spores of the marine diatom genus Chaetoceros Ehrenberg. In: Proceedings of the 8th diatom symposium on living and fossil diatoms (Ed. by M. Ricard), pp. 81–85. Koeltz, Königstein, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Sunesen I., Hernández-Becerril D.U. & Sar E.A. 2008. Marine diatoms from Buenos Aires coastal waters (Argentina). V. Species of the genus Chaetoceros. Revista de Biología Marinay Oceanografía 43: 303–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamura K., Stecher G., Peterson D., Filipski A. & Kumar S. 2013. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30: 2725–2729. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/mst197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu X.J., Chen Z.Y., Lundholm N. & Li Y. 2018. Revisiting Chaetoceros subtilis and C. subtilis var. abnormis (Bacillariophyceae), reinstating the latter as C. abnormis. Phycologia 57: 659–673. DOI: 10.2216/18-8.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu X.J., Chen Z.Y., Lundholm N. & Li Y. 2019. Diversity in the section Compressa of the genus Chaetoceros (Bacillariophyceae), with description of two new species from Chinese warm waters. Journal of Phycology 55: 104–117. DOI: 10.1111/jpy.12807.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhen Y., Mi T.Z. & Yu Z.G. 2008. Detection of Phaeocystis globosa using sandwich hybridization integrated with nuclease protection assay (NPA-SH). Journal of Environmental Science 20: 1481–1486. DOI: 10.1016/S1001-0742(08)62553-X.
   Google Scholar