Revealing hidden diversity in the Cryptomonas erosa clade (Cryptophyceae), with the description of two new species from acidic habitats

REFERENCES

• Altenburger A., Blossom H.E., Garcia-Cuetos L., Jakobsen H.H., Carstensen J., Lundholm N., Hansen P.J., Moestrup Ø. & Haraguchi L. 2020. Dimorphism in cryptophytes – the case of Teleaulax amphioxeia/Plagioselmis prolonga and its ecological implications. Science Advances 6: Article eabb1611. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abb1611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen R.A. 2005. Algal culturing techniques. Elsevier Academic Press, New York, New York, USA. 577 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Annenkova N.V., Giner C.R. & Logares R. 2020. Tracing the origin of planktonic protists in an ancient lake. Microorganisms 8: Article 543. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8040543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagley M., Pilgrim E., Knapp M., Yoder C., Domingo J.S. & Banerji A. 2019. High-throughput environmental DNA analysis informs a biological assessment of an urban stream. Ecological Indicators 104: 378–389. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.04.088.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock C., Jensen M., Forster D., Marks S., Nuy J., Psenner R., Beisser D. & Boenigk J. 2020. Factors shaping community patterns of protists and bacteria on a European scale. Environmental Microbiology 22: 2243–2260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.14992.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boenigk J., Wodniok S., Bock C., Beisser D., Hempel C., Grossmann L., Lange A. & Jensen M. 2018. Geographic distance and mountain ranges structure freshwater protist communities on a European scale. Metabarcoding and Metagenomics 2: Article e21519. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/mbmg.2.21519.
   Google Scholar
• Byun Y. & Han K. 2006. PseudoViewer: web application and webservice for visualizing RNA pseudoknots and secondary structures. Nucleic Acids Research 34: 416–422. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkl210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caisová L., Marin B. & Melkonian M. 2013. A consensus secondary structure of ITS2 in the Chlorophyta identified by phylogenetic reconstruction. Protist 164: 482–496. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protis.2013.04.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerino F. & Zingone A. 2006. A survey of cryptomonad diversity and seasonality at a coastal Mediterranean site. European Journal of Phycology 41: 363–378. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09670260600839450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi B., Son M., Kim J.I. & Shin W. 2013. Taxonomy and phylogeny of the genus Cryptomonas (Cryptophyceae, Cryptophyta) from Korea. Algae 28: 307–330. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4490/algae.2013.28.4.307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman A.W. 2000. The significance of a coincidence between evolutionary landmarks found in mating affinity and a DNA sequence. Protist 151: 1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1078/1434-4610-00002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman A.W. 2009. Is there a molecular key to the level of “biological species” in eukaryotes? A DNA guide. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 50: 197–203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2008.10.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darriba D., Taboada G.L., Doallo R. & Posada D. 2012. jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nature Methods 9: 772. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deane J.A., Strachan I.M., Saunders G.W., Hill D.R. & McFadden G.I. 2002. Cryptomonad evolution: nuclear 18S rDNA phylogeny versus cell morphology and pigmentation. Journal of Phycology 38: 1236–1244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1529-8817.2002.01250.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eddy S.R. 1998. Profile hidden Markov models. Bioinformatics 14: 755–763. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/14.9.755.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrenberg C.G. 1831. Animalia Evertebrata. Symbolae physicae seu icones et descriptiones animalium evertebratorum sepositis insectis quae ex itinere per Africanum Borealem et Asiam Occidentalem Friderici Guilelmi Hemprich et Christiani Godofredi Ehrenberg medicinae et chirurgiae doctorum studio novae aut illustratae redierunt. In: Symbolae physicae … Pars Zoologica IV [ Text] (Ed. by P.C. Hemprich, and C.G. Ehrenberg), unpaginated. Mittler, Berlin, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie J.J., Johnston J.S., Cannone J.J. & Gutell R.R. 2006. Characteristics of the nuclear (18S, 5.8S, 28S and 5S) and mitochondrial (12S and 16S) rRNA genes of Apis mellifera (Insecta: Hymenoptera): structure, organization, and retrotransposable elements. Insect Molecular Biology 15: 657–686. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2583.2006.00689.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guiry M.D. & Guiry G.M. 2021. AlgaeBase. World-wide electronic publication, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland. http://www.algaebase.org; searched on 30 March 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Gusev E., Podunay Y., Martynenko N., Shkurina N. & Kulikovskiy M. 2020. Taxonomic studies of Cryptomonas lundii clade (Cryptophyta: Cryptophyceae) with description of a new species from Vietnam. Fottea, Olomouc 20: 137–143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5507/fot.2020.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill D.R. & Wetherbee R. 1986. Proteomonas sulcata gen. et sp. nov. (Cryptophyceae), a cryptomonad with two morphologically distinct and alternating forms. Phycologia 25: 521–543. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2216/i0031-8884-25-4-521.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoef-Emden K. 2005. Multiple independent losses of photosynthesis and differing evolutionary rates in the genus Cryptomonas (Cryptophyceae): combined phylogenetic analyses of DNA sequences of the nuclear and the nucleomorph ribosomal operons. Journal of Molecular Evolution 60: 183–195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00239-004-0089-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoef-Emden K. 2007. Revision of the genus Cryptomonas (Cryptophyceae) II: incongruences between classical morphospecies concept and molecular phylogeny in smaller pyrenoid-less cells. Phycologia 46: 402–428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2216/06-83.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoef-Emden K. 2012. Pitfalls of establishing DNA barcoding systems in protists: the Cryptophyceae as a test case. PLOS One 7: Article e43652. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoef-Emden K. 2018. Revision of the genus Chroomonas Hansgirg: the benefits of DNA-containing specimens. Protist 169: 662–681. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protis.2018.04.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoef-Emden K. & Archibald J.M. 2017. Cryptophyta (Cryptomonads). In: Handbook of the protists (Ed. by J.M. Archibald, A.G.B. Simpson, C.H. Slamovits, L. Margulis, M. Melkonian, D.J. Chapman, and J.O. Corliss), pp 851–891. Springer, Cham, Switzerland. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28149-0_35.
   Google Scholar
• Hoef-Emden K. & Melkonian M. 2003. Revision of the genus Cryptomonas (Cryptophyceae): a combination of molecular phylogeny and morphology provides insights into a long-hidden dimorphism. Protist 154: 371–409. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1078/143446103322454130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katoh K. & Toh H. 2010. Parallelization of the MAFFT multiple sequence alignment program. Bioinformatics 26: 1899–1900. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller A., Schleicher T., Schultz J., Müller T., Dandekar T. & Wolf M. 2009. 5.8S-28S rRNA interaction and HMM-based ITS2 annotation. Gene 430: 50–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2008.10.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim J.I., Moore C.E., Archibald J.M., Bhattacharya D., Yi G., Yoon H.S. & Shin W. 2017. Evolutionary dynamics of cryptophyte plastid genomes. Genome Biology and Evolution 9: 1859–1872. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evx123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kisselev I.A. 1954. Pyrrophyta. In: Identification guide for freshwater algae of the USSR, vol. 6 (Ed. by M.M. Hollerbach, and V.I. Poljansky), Sovetskaya Nauka, Moscow, Russia. 212 pp [ in Russian].
   Google Scholar
• Kulizin P.V., Martynenko N.A., Gusev E.S., Kapustin D.A., Vodeneeva E.L. & Kulikovskiy M.S. 2022. New species of genus Cryptomonas for the flora of Russia. Inland Water Biology 15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar S., Stecher G., Li M., Knyaz C. & Tamura K. 2018. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across computing platforms. Molecular Biology and Evolution 35: 1547–1549. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msy096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane C.E. & Archibald J.M. 2008. New marine members of the genus Hemiselmis (Cryptomonadales, Cryptophyceae). Journal of Phycology 44: 439–450. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8817.2008.00486.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lisin Y.V. [Ed.] 2011. Atlas of the Komi Republic. Feoriya, Moscow, Russia. 448 pp [ in Russian].
   Google Scholar
• Marin B., Klingberg M. & Melkonian M. 1998. Phylogenetic relationships among the Cryptophyta: analyses of nuclear-encoded SSU rRNA sequences support the monophyly of extant plastid-containing lineages. Protist 149: 265–276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1434-4610(98)70033-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martynenko N.A., Gusev E.S., Kapustin D.A., Guseva E.E. & Kulikovskiy M.S. 2020a. Cryptomonas cattiensis sp. nov. (Cryptophyceae: Cryptomonadales), a new species described from Vietnam. Phytotaxa 454: 127–136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.454.2.4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martynenko N.A., Gusev E.S., Kulizin P.V., Guseva E.E., McCartney K. & Kulikovskiy M.S. 2020b. A new species of Cryptomonas (Cryptophyceae) from the Western Urals (Russia). European Journal of Taxonomy 649: 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2020.649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matvienko O.M. & Litvinenko R.M. 1977. Pyrrophyta. Identification guide for freshwater algae of the Ukrainian SSR, vol. 3, 2. Naukova Dumka, Kiev, Ukraine. 387 pp [ in Ukrainian].
   Google Scholar
• McFadden G.I. & Melkonian M. 1986. Use of Hepes buffer for microalgal culture media and fixation for electron microscopy. Phycologia 25: 551–557. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2216/i0031-8884-25-4-551.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller T., Philippi N., Dandekar T., Schultz J. & Wolf M. 2007. Distinguishing species. RNA 13: 1469–1472. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1261/rna.617107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakayama T., Watanabe S., Mitsui K., Uchida H. & Inouye I. 1996. The phylogenetic relationship between the Chlamydomonadales and Chlorococcales inferred from 18SrDNA sequence data. Phycological Research 44: 47–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1835.1996.tb00037.x.
   Google Scholar
• Nazarov N.N. 2006. Geography of the Perm region. Part I. Natural (physical) geography. Publishing House of Perm State University, Perm, Russia. 138 pp [ in Russian].
   Google Scholar
• Patova E., Novakovskaya I., Martynenko N., Gusev E. & Kulikovskiy M. 2021. Mychonastes frigidus sp. nov. (Sphaeropleales/Chlorophyceae), a new species described from a mountain stream in the Subpolar Urals (Russia). Fottea, Olomouc 21: 8–15. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5507/fot.2020.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pruesse E., Peplies J. & Glöckner F.O. 2012. SINA: accurate high-throughput multiple sequence alignment of ribosomal RNA genes. Bioinformatics 28: 1823–1829. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rambaut A., Drummond A.J., Xie D., Baele G. & Suchard M.A. 2018. Posterior summarization in Bayesian phylogenetics using Tracer 1.7. Systematic Biology 67: 901–904. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syy032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronquist F. & Huelsenbeck J.P. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 1572–1574. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruppert K.M., Kline R.J. & Rahman M.S. 2019. Past, present, and future perspectives of environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding: a systematic review in methods, monitoring, and applications of global eDNA. Global Ecology and Conservation 17: Article e00547. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz J., Maisel S., Gerlach D., Müller T. & Wolf M. 2005. A common core of secondary structure of the internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) throughout the Eukaryota. RNA 11: 361–364. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1261/rna.7204505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seibel P.N., Müller T., Dandekar T., Schultz J. & Wolf M. 2006. 4SALE – a tool for synchronous RNA sequence and secondary structure alignment and editing. BMC Bioinformatics 7: Article 498. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-7-498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shalchian-Tabrizi K., Brate J., Logares R., Klaveness D., Berney C. & Jakobsen K.S. 2008. Diversification of unicellular eukaryotes: cryptomonad colonizations of marine and fresh waters inferred from revised 18S rRNA phylogeny. Environmental Microbiology 10: 2635–2644. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01685.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanifuji G., Kamikawa R., Moore C.E., Mills T., Onodera N.T., Kashiyama Y. & Hashimoto T. 2020. Comparative plastid genomics of Cryptomonas species reveals fine-scale genomic responses to loss of photosynthesis. Genome Biology and Evolution 12: 3926–3937. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evaa001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson J.D., Higgins D.G. & Gibson T.J. 1994. CLUSTALW: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence through weighing, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Research 22: 4673–4680. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/22.22.4673.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Hoff J., Bell E. & Whittock L. 2020. Dimorphism in the Antarctic cryptophyte Geminigera cryophila (Cryptophyceae). Journal of Phycology 56: 1028–1038. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpy.13004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voloshko L.N. 2009. New taxa of the genus Mallomonas (Chrysophyta, Synurophyceae) from lakes of the Polar Ural. Botanicheskii Zhurnal 94: 1068–1076 [ in Russian].
   Google Scholar
• Voloshko L.N. 2012. A new species of the genus Mallomonas (Chrysophyta, Synurophyceae) from the lakes in Vorkutinskaya tundra. Botanicheskii Zhurnal 97: 1226–1234 [ in Russian].
   Google Scholar
• Wolf M., Chen S., Song J., Ankenbrand M. & Müller T. 2013. Compensatory base changes in ITS2 secondary structures correlate with the biological species concept despite intragenomic variability in ITS2 sequences – a proof of concept. PLOS One 8: Article e66726. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wuyts J., Van de Peer Y. & De Wachter R. 2001. Distribution of substitution rates and location of insertion sites in the tertiary structure of ribosomal RNA. Nucleic Acids Research 29: 5017–5028. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/29.24.5017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia X. & Lemey P. 2009. Assessing substitution saturation with DAMBE. The phylogenetic handbook: a practical approach to DNA and protein phylogeny, vol. 2 (Ed. by P. Lemey, M. Salemi & A. Vandamme), pp 615–630. Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819049.
   Google Scholar
• Xia X. & Xie Z. 2001. DAMBE: software package for data analysis in molecular biology and evolution. Journal of Heredity 92: 371–373. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/92.4.371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia X., Xie Z., Salemi M., Chen L. & Wang Y. 2003. An index of substitution saturation and its application. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 26: 1–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1055-7903(02)00326-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuker M. 2003. Mfold web server for nucleic acid folding and hybridization prediction. Nucleic Acids Research 31: 3406–3415. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkg595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar