Diversity of Cryptophyte Cultures from the Canary Islands

REFERENCES

• Adl S.M., Bass D., Lane C.E., Lukeš J., Schoch C.L., Smirnov A., Agatha S., Berney C., Brown M.W., Burki F. et al. 2019. Revisions to the classification, nomenclature, and diversity of eukaryotes. Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology 66: 4–119. DOI: 10.1111/jeu.12691
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altenburger A., Blossom H.E., Garcia-Cuetos L., Jakobsen H.H., Carstensen J., Lundholm N., Hansen P.J., Moestrup Ø. & Haraguchi L. 2020. Dimorphism in cryptophytes—The case of Teleaulax amphioxeia/Plagioselmis prolonga and its ecological implications. Science Advances 6: eabb1611. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abb1611
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amato A., Kooistraa W.H.C.F., Levialdi Ghirona J.L., Mann D.G., Pröschold T. & Montresor M. 2007. Reproductive isolation among sympatric cryptic species in marine diatoms. Protist 158: 193–207. DOI: 10.1016/j.protis.2006.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anguita F. & Hernán F. 2000. The Canary Islands origin: a unifying model. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 103: 1–26. DOI: 10.1016/S0377-0273(00)00195-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryan S.E., Cook A.G., Evans J.P., Hebden K., Hurrey L., Colls P., Jell J.S., Weatherley D. & Firn J. 2012. Rapid, long-distance dispersal by pumice rafting. PLoS ONE 7(7): e40583. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040583
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casteleyn G., Leliaert F., Backeljau T., Debeer A.-E., Kotaki Y., Rhodes L., Lundholm N., Sabbe K. & Vyverman W. 2010. Limits to gene flow in a cosmopolitan marine planktonic diatom. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 107: 12952–12957. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1001380107
   Google Scholar
• Choi B., Son M., Kim J. I. & Shin W. 2013. Taxonomy and phylogeny of the genus Cryptomonas (Cryptophyceae, Cryptophyta) from Korea. Algae 28: 307–330. DOI: 10.4490/algae.2013.28.4.307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deane J.A., Strachan I.M., Saunders G.W., Hill D.R.A. & McFadden G.I. 2002. Cryptomonad evolution: nuclear 18S rDNA phylogeny versus cell morphology and pigmentation. Journal of Phycology 38: 1236–1244. DOI: 10.1046/j.1529-8817.2002.01250.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• del Arco Aguilar M.J. & Rodríguez Delgado O. 2018. Vegetation of the canary islands. 1st Edition. Plant and Vegetation Vol. 16, Springer, 429 p. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-77255-4_6
   Google Scholar
• Fenchel T. & Finlay B.J. 2004. The ubiquity of small species: Patterns of local and global diversity. BioScience 54: 777–784. DOI: 10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054 [0777:TUOSSP 2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Palacios J.M., de Nascimento L., Otto R., Delgado J.D., Garcı́a-del-Rey E. & Arévalo J.R. 2011. A reconstruction of Palaeo-Macaronesia, with particular reference to the long-term biogeography of the Atlantic island laurel forests. Journal of Biogeography 38: 226–246. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2010.02427.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gusev E., Martynenko N., Kulizin P. & Kulikovskiy M. 2022. Molecular diversity of the genus Cryptomonas (Cryptophyceae) in Russia. European Journal of Phycology 57: 526–550. DOI: 10.1080/09670262.2022.2031304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill D.R.A. & Wetherbee R. 1986. Proteomonas sulcata gen. et sp. nov. (Cryptophyceae), a cryptomonad with two morphologically distinct and alternating forms. Phycologia 25: 521–543. DOI: 10.2216/i0031-8884-25-4-521.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoef-Emden K. 2007. Revision of the genus Cryptomonas (Cryptophyceae) II: incongruences between the classical morphospecies concept and molecular phylogeny in smaller pyrenoid-less cells. Phycologia 46: 402–428. DOI: 10.2216/06-83.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoef-Emden K. 2008. Molecular phylogeny of phycocyanin-containing cryptophytes: evolution of biliproteins and geographical distribution. Journal of Phycology 44: 985–993. DOI: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2008.00530.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoef-Emden K. 2018. Revision of the genus Chroomonas Hansgirg: The benefits of DNA-containing specimens. Protist 169: 662–681. DOI: 10.1016/j.protis.2018.04.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoef-Emden K. & Melkonian M. 2003. Revision of the genus Cryptomonas (Cryptophyceae): a combination of molecular phylogeny and morphology provides insights into a long-hidden dimorphism. Protist 154: 371–409. Corrigenda: Hoef-Emden K., Melkonian M. 2008. Protist 159: 507; Hoef-Emden K., Melkonian M. 2017. Protist 168: 467. DOI: 10.1078/143446103322454130
   Google Scholar
• Hoef-Emden K., Tran H.-D. & Melkonian M. 2005. Lineage-specific variations of congruent evolution among DNA sequences from three genomes, and relaxed selective constraints on rbcL in Cryptomonas (Cryptophyceae). BMC Evolutionary Biology 5: 56. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-5-56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Incagnone G., Marrone F., Barone R., Robba L. & Naselli-Flores L. 2015. How do freshwater organisms cross the “dry ocean”? A review on passive dispersal and colonization processes with a special focus on temporary ponds. Hydrobiologia 750: 103–123. DOI: 10.1007/s10750-014-2110-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John U., Litaker R.W., Montresor M., Murray S., Brosnahane M.L. & Anderson D.M. 2014. Formal revision of the Alexandrium tamarense species complex (Dinophyceae) taxonomy: The introduction of five species with emphasis on molecular-based (rDNA) classification. Protist 165: 779–804. DOI: 10.1016/j.protis.2014.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane C.E. & Archibald J.M. 2008. New marine members of the genus Hemiselmis (Cryptomonadales, Cryptophyceae). Journal of Phycology 44: 439–450. DOI: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2008.00486.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson M.E., Laczka, O.F., Suthers I.M., Ajani P.A. & Doblin M.A. 2018. Hitchhiking in the East Australian Current: rafting as a mechanism for harmful epibenthic dinoflagellates. Marine Ecology Progress Series 569: 49–60. DOI: 10.1007/s11120-017-0400-0
   Google Scholar
• Lundholm N., Moestrup Ø., Hasle G.R. & Hoef-Emden K. 2003. A study of the Pseudo-nitzschia pseudodelicatissima/cuspidata complex (Bacillariophyceae). What is P. pseudodelicatissima? Journal of Phycology 39: 797–813. DOI: 10.1046/j.1529-8817.2003.02031.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magalhães K., Lopes Santos A., Vaulot D. & Cabral Oliveira M. 2021. Hemiselmis aquamarina sp. nov. (Cryptomonadales, Cryptophyceae), a cryptophyte with a novel phycobiliprotein type (Cr-PC 564). Protist 172: 125832. DOI: 10.1016/j.protis.2021.125832
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maier U.G. 1992. The four genomes of the alga Pyrenomonas salina (Cryptophyta). Biosystems 28: 69–73. DOI: 10.1016/0303-2647(92)90009-N
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novarino G. A companion to the identification of cryptomonad flagellates (Cryptophyceae = Cryptomonadea). Hydrobiologia 502: 225–270. DOI: 10.1023/B:HYDR.0000004284.12535.25
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tesson S.V.M., Weißbach A., Kremp A., Lindström Å. & Rengefors K. 2018. The potential for dispersal of microalgal resting cysts by migratory birds. Journal of Phycology 54: 518–528. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpy.12756
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Hoff J., Bell E. & Whittock L. 2020. Dimorphism in the antarctic cryptophyte Geminigera cryophila (Cryptophyceae). Journal of Phycology 56: 1028–1038. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpy.13004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanormelingen P., Verleyen E. & Vyverman W. 2008. The diversity and distribution of diatoms: From cosmopolitanism to narrow endemism. Biodiversity and Conservation 17: 393–405. DOI: 10.1007/s10531-007-9257-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vesk M., Dwarte D., Fowler S. & Hiller R.G. 1992. Freeze fracture immunocytochemistry of light-harvesting pigment complexes in a cryptophyte. Protoplasma 170: 166–176. DOI: 10.1007/BF01378791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilk K.E., Harrop S.J., Jankova L., Edler D., Keenan G. Sharples F., Hiller R.G. & Curmi P.M.G. 1999. Evolution of a light-harvesting protein by addition of new subunits and rearrangement of conserved elements: Crystal structure of a cryptophyte phycoerythrin at 1.63-Å resolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 96: 8901–8906. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.96.16.8901
   Google Scholar