References
- Bard AJ, Faulkner LR. Electrochemical methods: fundamentals and applications. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2001.
- Smallwood IM. Introduction. Handb. Org. Solvent Prop. [Internet]. Oxford: Elsevier; 1996. vii. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/B9780080523781500037
- Aurbach D, Weissman I. Nonaqueous electrochemistry: an overview. In: Aurbach D, editor. Nonaqueous electrochem. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc; 1999.
- Izutsu K. Electrochemistry in nonaqueous solutions. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA; 2002.
- Barek J, Fogg AG, Muck A, et al. Polarography and voltammetry at mercury electrodes. Crit Rev Anal Chem [Internet]. 2001;31:291–309. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/20014091076776
- Driebergen RJ, Moret EE, Janssen LHM, et al. Electrochemistry of potentially bioreductive alkylating quinones. Part 3. Quantitative structure-electrochemistry relationships of aziridinylquinones. Anal Chim Acta. 1992;257:257–273.
- Yousefinejad S, Bagheri M, Moosavi-Movahedi AA. Quantitative sequence-activity modeling of antimicrobial hexapeptides using a segmented principal component strategy: an approach to describe and predict activities of peptide drugs containing L/D and unnatural residues. Amino Acids [Internet]. 2015;47:125–134. [cited 2014 Dec 9]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25323737
- González-Durruthy M, Castro M, Nunes SM, et al. QSPR/QSAR-based perturbation theory approach and mechanistic electrochemical assays on carbon nanotubes with optimal properties against mitochondrial Fenton reaction experimentally induced by Fe 2+ -overload. Carbon N. Y. [Internet]. 2017;115:312–330. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0008622317300027
- Pourbasheer E, Aalizadeh R, Ardabili JS, et al. QSPR study on solubility of some fullerenes derivatives using the genetic algorithms — multiple linear regression. J Mol Liq [Internet]. 2015;204:162–169. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0167732215000392
- Samari F, Yousefinejad S. Quantitative structural modeling on the wavelength interval (Δ λ) in synchronous fluorescence spectroscopy. J Mol Struct [Internet]. 2017;1148:101–110. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022286017309663
- Stec M, Spietz T, Więcław-Solny L, et al. Predicting normal densities of amines using quantitative structure-property relationship (QSPR). SAR QSAR Environ Res [Internet]. 2015;26:893–904. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1062936X.2015.1095239
- Yousefinejad S, Hemmateenejad B. Chemometrics tools in QSAR/QSPR studies: A historical perspective. Chemom Intell Lab Syst [Internet]. 2015;149:177–204. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0169743915001641
- Tömpe P, Clementis G, Petneházy I, et al. Quantitative structure-electrochemistry relationships of α, β-unsaturated ketones. Anal Chim Acta. 1995;305:295–303.
- Li H, Xu L, Su Q. Structure-property relationship between half-wave potentials of organic compounds and their topology. Anal Chim Acta. 1995;316:39–45.
- Shamsipur M, Siroueinejad A, Hemmateenejad B, et al. Cyclic voltammetric, computational, and quantitative structure-electrochemistry relationship studies of the reduction of several 9,10-anthraquinone derivatives. J Electroanal Chem. 2007;600:345–358.
- Hemmateenejad B, Shamsipur M. Quantitative structure–electrochemistry relationship study of some organic compounds using PC–ANN and PCR. Internet Electron J Mol Des. 2004;3:316–334.
- Elhabiri M, Sidorov P, Cesar-Rodo E, et al. Electrochemical properties of substituted 2-Methyl-1,4-Naphthoquinones: redox behavior predictions. Chem Eur J [Internet]. 2015;21:3415–3424.
- Nesměrák K, Doležal R, Hudská V, et al. Quantitative structure-electrochemistry relationship of 1-Phenyl-5-benzyl-sulfanyltetrazoles and their electrooxidation as a metabolic model. Electroanalysis [Internet]. 2010;22:2117–2122. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/elan.201000092
- Garkani-Nejad Z, Rashidi-Nodeh H. Comparison of conventional artificial neural network and wavelet neural network in modeling the half-wave potential of aldehydes and ketones. Electrochim Acta. 2010;55:2597–2605.
- Fatemi MH, Gharaghani S, Mohammadkhani S, et al. Prediction of selectivity coefficients of univalent anions for anion-selective electrode using support vector machine. Electrochim Acta. 2008;53:4276–4282.
- Hemmateenejad B, Yazdani M. QSPR models for half-wave reduction potential of steroids: a comparative study between feature selection and feature extraction from subsets of or entire set of descriptors. Anal Chim Acta [Internet]. 2009;634:27–35. [cited 2011 Aug 4]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19154806
- Moraleda D, El Abed D, Pellissier H, et al. Linear relationships in α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compounds between the half-wave reduction potentials, the frontier orbital energies and the Hammett σp values. J Mol Struct THEOCHEM. 2006;760:113–119.
- Tian M, Thind SS, Simko M, et al. Quantitative structure–reactivity study of electrochemical oxidation of phenolic compounds at the SnO 2 –based electrode. J Phys Chem [Internet]. 2012;116:2927–2934. Available from.
- Dai Y, Liu H, Niu L, et al. Estimation of half-wave potential of anabolic androgenic steroids by means of QSER approach. J Cent South Univ [Internet]. 2016;23:1906–1914. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11771-016-3246-2
- Honarasa F, Yousefinejad S, Nasr S, et al. Structure–electrochemistry relationship in non-aqueous solutions: predicting the reduction potential of anthraquinones derivatives in some organic solvents. J Mol Liq [Internet]. 2015;212:52–57. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0167732215304232
- Nič M, Jirát J, Košata B, editors. et al. IUPAC compendium of chemical terminology [Internet]. IUPAC Compend Chem Terminol. Research Triagle Park, NC: IUPAC. 2009; Available from: http://goldbook.iupac.org/H02722.html.
- Zutshi K. Introduction to polarography and allied techniques. New Delhi: New Age International Pvt Ltd Publishers; 2006.
- Gritzner G. Polarographic half-wave potentials of cations in nonaqueous solvents. Pure Appl Chem [Internet]. 1990;62:1839–1858. Available from: http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/pac.1990.62.issue-9/pac199062091839/pac199062091839.xml
- Shao JUN. Linear model selection by cross-validation. J Am Stat Assoc [Internet]. 1993;88:486–494. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2290328?origin=crossref
- Gemperline P Practical guide to chemometrics. 2nd ed. Gemperline P editor. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis Group; 2006.
- Hawkins DM, Basak SC, Mills D. Assessing model fit by cross-validation. J Chem Inf Comput Sci [Internet]. 2003;43:579–586. [cited 2014 Nov 15]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12653524
- Consonni V, Ballabio D, Todeschini R. Evaluation of model predictive ability by external validation techniques. J Chemom [Internet]. 2010;24:194–201. [cited 2014 Nov 5]. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/cem.1290
- Tetko IV, Livingstone DJ, Luik AI. Neural network studies. 1. Comparison of overfitting and overtraining. J Chem Inf Model [Internet]. 1995;35:826–833. [cited 2014 Nov 15]. Available from: http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ci00027a006
- Golbraikh A, Tropsha A. Predictive QSAR modeling based on diversity sampling of experimental datasets for the training and test set selection. Mol Divers [Internet]. 2000;5:231–243. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12549674
- Ojha PK, Mitra I, Das RN, et al. Further exploring rm2 metrics for validation of QSPR models. Chemom Intell Lab Syst [Internet]. 2011;107:194–205. Available from.
- Roy K, Mitra I, Kar S, et al. Comparative studies on some metrics for external validation of QSPR models. J Chem Inf Model [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2014 Mar 6];52:396–408. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22201416
- Roy K, Chakraborty P, Mitra I, et al. Some case studies on application of “ r m 2 ” metrics for judging quality of quantitative structure-activity relationship predictions: emphasis on scaling of response data. J Comput Chem [Internet]. 2013;34:1071–1082. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/jcc.23231
- Eriksson L, Jaworska J, Worth AP, et al. Methods for reliability and uncertainty assessment and for applicability evaluations of classification- and regression-based QSARs. Environ Health Perspect [Internet]. 2003 [cited 2014 Nov 10];111:1361–1375. Available from: http://www.ehponline.org/ambra-doi-resolver/10.1289/ehp.5758
- Mitra I, Saha A, Roy K. Exploring quantitative structure–activity relationship studies of antioxidant phenolic compounds obtained from traditional Chinese medicinal plants. Mol Simul [Internet]. 2010;36:1067–1079. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08927022.2010.503326
- Rücker C, Rücker G, Meringer M. y-Randomization and its variants in QSPR/QSAR. J Chem Inf Model [Internet]. 2007;47:2345–2357. [cited 2014 Nov 15]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17880194
- Hanser T, Barber C, Marchaland JF, et al. Applicability domain: towards a more formal definition. SAR QSAR Environ Res. 2016;27:865–881. Internet. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1062936X.2016.1250229
- Todeschini R, Consonni V, Gramatica P. Chemometrics in QSAR. In: Tauler R, Walczak B, Brown SD, editors. Comprehensive chemometrics chemical and biochemical data analysis. Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V; 2009.
- Roy K, Kar S, Ambure P. On a simple approach for determining applicability domain of QSAR models. Chemom Intell Lab Syst [Internet]. 2015;145:22–29. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0169743915000969
- Moriguchi I, Hirono S, Nakagome I, et al. Comparison of reliability of log P values for drugs calculated by several methods. Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo) [Internet]. 1994;42:976–978. Available from: http://joi.jlc.jst.go.jp/JST.Journalarchive/cpb1958/42.976?from=CrossRef
- Yousefinejad S, Honarasa F, Solhjoo A. On the solubility of ferrocene in nonaqueous solvents. J Chem Eng Data [Internet]. 2016;61:614–621. Available from: http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.jced.5b00768
- Craney TA, Surles JG. Model-dependent variance inflation factor cutoff values. Qual Eng [Internet]. 2002;14:391–403. [cited 2014 Nov 18]. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1081/QEN-120001878
- Roy K, Das RN, Ambure P, et al. Be aware of error measures. Further studies on validation of predictive QSAR models. Chemom Intell Lab Syst [Internet]. 2016;152:18–33. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0169743916000095
- Gutmann V, Peychal-Heiling G, Michlmayr M. Polarographic half-wave potentials and solvation of alkali and alkaline earth metal ions in solvents of different donor number. Inorg Nucl Chem Lett [Internet]. 1967;3:501–505. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0020165067800734
- Todeschini R, Consonni V. Molecular descriptors for chemoinformatics. 2nd ed. Weinheim: WILEY-VCH; 2009.
- Ghose AK, Viswanadhan VN, Wendoloski JJ. Prediction of hydrophobic (Lipophilic) properties of small organic molecules using fragmental methods:? An analysis of ALOGP and CLOGP methods. J Phys Chem [Internet]. 1998;102:3762–3772. Available from: http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jp980230o