When the choice is made matters: voting in Japan’s 2012 House of Representatives election

References

• Abendschön, S., and S. Steinmetz. 2014. “The Gender Gap in Voting Revisited: Women’s Party Preferences in a European Context.” Social Politics 21 (2): 315–344. doi:10.1093/sp/jxu009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alesina, A., and H. Rosenthal. 1995. Partisan Politics, Divided Government, and the Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, C., and Y. Tverdova. 2001. “Winners, Losers, and Attitudes about Government in Contemporary Democracies.” International Political Science Review 22 (4): 321–338. doi:10.1177/0192512101022004003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banducci, S. A., T. Donovan, and J. A. Karp. 1999. “Proportional Representation and Attitudes about Politics: Evidence from New Zealand.” Electoral Studies 18: 533–555. doi:10.1016/S0261-3794(99)00019-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blais, A., and F. Gelineau. 2007. “Winning, Losing, and Satisfaction with Democracy.” Political Studies 55 (2): 425–441. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00659.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Born, R. 1994. “Split-Ticket Voters, Divided Government, and Fiorina’s Policy-Balancing Model.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 19 (1): 95–115. doi:10.2307/439802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burden, B. C. 2009. “Candidate-Driven Ticket Splitting in the 2000 Japanese Elections.” Electoral Studies 28 (1): 33–40. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2008.06.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, A., P. E. Converse, W. E. Miller, and D. E. Stokes. 1960. The American Voter. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, A., and W. E. Miller. 1957. “The Motivational Basis of Straight and Split Ticket Voting.” American Political Science Review 51 (2): 293–312. doi:10.2307/1952193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, M. M. 2006. “Electoral Reform and the Costs of Personal Support in Japan.” Journal of East Asian Studies 6 (2): 233–258. doi:10.1017/S1598240800002319.
   Google Scholar
• Catellani, P., and A. I. Alberici. 2012. “Does the Candidate Matter? Comparing the Voting Choice of Early and Late Deciders.” Political Psychology 33 (5): 619–634. doi:10.1111/pops.2012.33.issue-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, E. 2010. “Economic Voting in Taiwan: The Significance of Education and Lifetime Economic Experiences.” Asian Survey 50 (5): 990–1010. doi:10.1525/as.2010.50.5.990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, K. E., and L. J. Schoppa. 2002. “Interaction Effects in Mixed-Member Electoral Systems.” Comparative Political Studies 35 (9): 1027–1053. doi:10.1177/001041402237505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeVries, W., and L. Tarrance. 1972. The Ticket Splitter: A New Force in American Politics. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrara, F. 2006. “Two in One: Party Competition in the Italian Single Ballot Mixed System.” Electoral Studies 25: 329–350. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2005.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrara, F., E. S. Herron, and M. Nishikawa. 2005. Mixed Electoral Systems: Combination and Its Consequences. New York: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Fiorina, M. P. 1992. Divided Government. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Fukui, H., and S. N. Fukai. 1996. “Pork Barrel Politics, Networks, and Local Economic Development in Contemporary Japan.” Asian Survey 36 (3): 268–286. doi:10.2307/2645692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gschwend, T. 2007. “Ticket Splitting and Strategic Voting under Mixed Electoral Rules: Evidence from Germany.” European Journal of Political Research 46 (1): 1–23. doi:10.1111/ejpr.2007.46.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hainmueller, J., and H. L. Kern. 2006. “Electoral Balancing, Divided Government, and Midterm Loss in German State Elections.” Journal of Legislative Studies 12 (2): 127–149. doi:10.1080/13572330600738845.
   Google Scholar
• Hakhverdian, A., W. van der Burg, and C. de Vries. 2012. “The Emergence of a ‘Diploma Democracy’? The Political Education Gap in the Netherlands, 1971–2010.” Acta Politica 47 (3): 229–247. doi:10.1057/ap.2011.27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, S. I. 2013. “Strategic Voting of Small Parties Supporters in Two-Vote Mixed-Member Majoritarian System.” Korean Political Science Review 5 (12): 235–254.
   Google Scholar
• Herron, E. S. 2002. “Mixed Electoral Rules and Party Strategies: Responses to Incentives by Ukraine’s Rukh and Russia’s Yabloko.” Party Politics 8 (6): 719–733. doi:10.1177/1354068802008006005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herron, E. S., and M. Nishikawa. 2001. “Contamination Effects and the Number of Parties in Mixed Superposition Electoral Systems.” Electoral Studies 20: 63–86. doi:10.1016/S0261-3794(00)00002-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirano, S. 2006. “Electoral Institutions, Hometowns, and Favored Minorities: Evidence from Japanese Electoral Reforms.” World Politics 59 (1): 51–82. doi:10.1353/wp.2007.0017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hizen, Y. 2006. “The Effect of Dual Candidacy on Voting Decisions.” Japanese Journal of Political Science 7 (3): 289–306. doi:10.1017/S1468109906002374.
   Google Scholar
• Inglehart, R., and P. Norris. 2000. “The Developmental Theory of the Gender Gap: Women’s and Men’s Voting Behavior in Global Perspective.” International Political Science Review 21 (4): 441–463. doi:10.1177/0192512100214007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jou, W. 2009. “Electoral Reform and Party System Development in Japan and Taiwan: A Comparative Study.” Asian Survey 49 (5): 759–785. doi:10.1525/as.2009.49.5.759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabashima, I., and S. Reed. 2001. “The Effect of the Choices Available on Voting Behavior: The Two Japanese Elections of 1993.” Electoral Studies 20 (4): 627–640. doi:10.1016/S0261-3794(00)00052-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karp, J. 2006. “Political Knowledge about Electoral Rules: Comparing Mixed Member Proportional Systems in Germany and New Zealand.” Electoral Studies 25 (4): 714–730. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2005.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karp, J., J. Vowles, S. A. Banducci, and T. Donovan. 2002. “Strategic Voting, Party Activity, and Candidate Effects: Testing Explanations for Split Voting in New Zealand’s New Mixed System.” Electoral Studies 21: 1–22. doi:10.1016/S0261-3794(00)00031-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koellner, P. 2009. “Japanese Lower House Campaigns in Transition: Manifest Changes of Fleeting Fads?” Journal of East Asian Studies 9 (1): 121–149. doi:10.1017/S1598240800002836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohno, M. 1997. “Voter Turnout and Strategic Ticket-Splitting under Japan’s New Electoral Rules.” Asian Survey 37 (5): 429–440. doi:10.2307/2645519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H. 2004. “Political Effect of Introduction of Party Bloc Vote.” Paper presented at the Special Conference on the 17th National Assembly Election of the Korean Political Science Association [Korean].
   Google Scholar
• Lewis-Beck, M., W. G. Jacoby, H. Norpoth, and H. F. Weisberg. 2008. The American Voter Revisited. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maeda, K. 2008. “Re-Examining the Contamination Effect of Japan’s Mixed Electoral System Using the Treatment-Effects Model.” Electoral Studies 27 (4): 723–731. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2008.06.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKean, M., and E. Scheiner. 2000. “Japan’s New Electoral System: La Plus Ça Change.” Electoral Studies 19: 447–477. doi:10.1016/S0261-3794(99)00026-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser, R. G., and E. Scheiner. 2005. “Strategic Ticket Splitting and the Personal Vote in Mixed-Member Electoral Systems.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 30 (2): 259–276. doi:10.3162/036298005X201545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser, R. G., and E. Scheiner. 2009. “Strategic Voting in Established and New Democracies: Ticket Splitting in Mixed-Member Electoral Systems.” Electoral Studies 28: 51–61. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2008.06.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadeau, R., and A. Blais. 1993. “Accepting the Election Outcome: The Effect on Participation on Losers’ Consent.” British Journal of Political Science 23 (4): 553–563. doi:10.1017/S0007123400006736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemoto, K., E. Krauss, E, and R. Pekkanen. 2008. “Policy Dissension and Party Discipline: The July 2005 Vote on Postal Privatization in Japan.” British Journal of Political Science 38 (03): 499–525. doi:10.1017/S0007123408000252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otake, H., ed Japanese. 1997. The Study of Political Realignment. Tokyo: Yuhikaku.
   Google Scholar
• Pappi, F. U., and P. W. Thurner. 2002. “Electoral Behavior in a Two-Vote System: Incentives for Ticket Splitting in German Bundestag Elections.” European Journal of Political Research 41 (2): 207–232. doi:10.1111/ejpr.2002.41.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, C. W., and J. Ryu. 2009. “Patterns of Split-Ticket Voting in the 2008 Korean General Election for the National Assembly.” Paper Presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Political Science Association. New Orleans, Louisiana. January 9.
   Google Scholar
• Plescia, C. 2017. “On the Mismeasurement of Sincere and Strategic Voting in Mixed-Member Electoral Systems.” Electoral Studies 48: 19–29. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2017.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, S. R. 1999. “Strategic Voting in the 1996 Japanese General Election.” Comparative Political Studies 32 (2): 257–270. doi:10.1177/0010414099032002004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, S. R., ed. 2003. Japanese Electoral Politics: Creating a New Party System. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rich, T. S. 2012. “The Timing of Split-Ticket Voting Decisions in Mixed member Systems: Evidence from South Korea.” Asian Journal of Political Science 20 (2): 203–220. doi:10.1080/02185377.2012.714134.
   Google Scholar
• Rich, T. S., and V. Banerjee. 2016. “District Competition in Japan’s 2014 Election: The Roles of Nominations, Incumbency, and Dual-Listing.” Representation 52 (2–3): 227–238. doi:10.1080/00344893.2016.1241820.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt-Beck, R., and J. P. Müller. 2012. “Why Voters Decide Late: A Simultaneous Test of Old and New Hypotheses at the 2005 and 2009 German Federal Elections.” German Politics 21 (3): 299–316. doi:10.1080/09644008.2012.716042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, M., and S. Kritzinger. 2012. “Ideological Dimensions and Vote Choice: Age Group Differences in Austria.” Electoral Studies 31: 285–296. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2011.11.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamammura, E. 2011. “Effects of Social Norms and Fractionalization on Voting Behavior in Japan.” Applied Economics 43 (11): 1385–1398. doi:10.1080/00036840802600434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, E., C. Huang, and Y. Hsiao. 2015. “Who Wants Checks and Balances? Endogeneity of the Balancing Perspective.” Asian Journal for Public Opinion Research 2 (3): 196–227. doi:10.15206/ajpor.2015.2.3.196.
   Google Scholar