John Stuart Mill and proportional representation. A misunderstanding

References

• Anonymous. 1891. Petit Catéchisme De La Representation Proportionnelle. Bruxelles: Ligue Reformiste Belge.
   Google Scholar
• Bagehot, W. 1873. The English Constitution. Boston: Little, Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Bowler, S., D. M. Farrell, and R. T. Pettitt. 2005. “Expert Opinion on Electoral Systems: So Which Electoral System Is ´best´?.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties 15: 3–19.
   Google Scholar
• Bromund, T. 2001. “Uniting the Whole People: Proportional Representation in Great Britain, 1884-1885, Reconsidered (Victorian Liberalism and the Building of “Voluntary” Communities during the Reform Crisis).” Historical Research 74 (183): 77–94. doi:10.1111/1468-2281.00117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colomer, J. 2001. Political Institutions: Democracy and Social Choice. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Colomer, J. 2007. “On the Origins of Electoral Systems and Political Parties.” Electoral Studies 26 (2): 262–273. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2006.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Economou, N. 2016. “Electoral Reform and Party System Volatility: The Consequences of the Group Vote Ticket on Australian Senate Elections.” Australasian Parliamentary Review 31: 117–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, D. M., and R. S. Katz. 2014. “Assessing the Proportionality of the Single Transferable Vote.” Representation 50: 13–26. doi:10.1080/00344893.2014.902212.
   Google Scholar
• Hare, T. 1873. The Election of Representatives, Parliamentary and Municipal. A Treatise. 4th ed. London: Longmans, Green, Reader, and Dyer.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, J. 1992. Proportional Representation: Critics of the British Electoral System, 1820-1945. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hermens, F. 1941. Democracy or Anarchy? A Study of Proportional Representation. Indiana: University of Notre Dame.
   Google Scholar
• Hoag, C., and G. Hallett. 1926. Proportional Representation. New York: Macmillan company.
   Google Scholar
• Humphreys, J. H. 1911. Proportional Representation: A Study in Methods of Election. London: Methuen & Company, Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, S. 2013. Mill: A Guide for the Perplexed. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Lijphart, A., and B. Grofman. 1984. Choosing an Electoral System: Issues and Alternatives. New York: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Mclean, I. 1991. “Forms of Representation and Systems of Voting.” In Political Theory Today, edited by D. Held, 172–196. London: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Mill, J. S. 1878. Del Gobierno Representativo. Sevilla: Biblioteca científico-Literaria.
   Google Scholar
• Mill, J. S. 1963. Collected Works. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mirabeau, H. G. 1789. “Discours Prononcé a La Tribune Nationale, Etats De Provence.” In Oeuvres de Mirabeau, Vol. 1 edited by L. E. Pougin, 3–37. Paris: Lecointe et Pougin.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, P. 2014. “The Single Transferable Vote and Ethnic Conflict: The Evidence from Northern Ireland.” Electoral Studies 33: 246–257. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2013.07.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagel, J. H. 2001. “Proportional Representation.” In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, edited by N. J. Smelser and P. B. Baltes, 12216–12219. Oxford: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, F. D. 2009. Thomas Hare and Political Representation in Victorian Britain. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Pitkin, H. 1969. Representation. New York: Atherton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Riley, J. 2007. “Mill’s Neo-Athenian Model of Liberal Democracy.” In J. S. Mill’s Political Thought, edited by N. Urbinati and A. Zakaras, 221–249. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Royal commission on systems on election. 1910. Report of the Royal Commission Appointed to Enquire into Electoral Systems, with Appendices. London: House of Commons.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, A. 2007. “Bureaucracy, Democracy, Liberty: Some Unanswered Questions.” In J. S. Mill’s Political Thought, edited by N. Urbinati and A. Zakaras, 147–165. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, A. 2014. “Mill, John Stuart (1806–73).” In The Encyclopedia of Political Thought, edited by M. T. Gibbons.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, Q. 1969. “Meaning and Understanding in History of Ideas.” History and Theory 8 (1): 3–53. doi:10.2307/2504188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterne, S. 1871. On Representative Government and Personal Representation. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, D. 2007. “Mill in Parliament: When Should a Philosopher Compromise?” In J. S. Mill’s Political Thought, edited by N. Urbinati and A. Zakaras, 166–199. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, D. F. 1976. John Stuart Mill and Representative Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Urbinati, N. 2000. “Representation as Advocacy. A Study of Democratic Deliberation.” Political Theory 28 (6): 758–786. doi:10.1177/0090591700028006003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar