Non-voting in the 2018 Romanian referendum: the importance of initiators, campaigning and issue saliency

References

• Aguiar-Conraria, L., and P. C. Magalhães. 2010. “Referendum Design, Quorum Rules and Turnout.” Public Choice 144: pp. 63–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnesen, S., T. S. Broderstad, M. P. Johannesson, and J. Linde. 2019. “Conditional Legitimacy: How Turnout, Majority Size, and Outcome Affect Perceptions of Legitimacy in European Union Membership Referendums.” European Union Politics 20 (2): 176–197. doi:10.1177/1465116518820163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blais, A. 2000. To Vote or Not to Vote?: The Merits and Limits of Rational Choice Theory. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburg Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blais, A. 2014. “Why Is Turnout so Low in Switzerland? Comparing the Attitudes of Swiss and German Citizens Towards Electoral Democracy.” Swiss Political Science Review 20 (4): 520–528. doi:10.1111/spsr.12116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, A., P. Converse, W. Miller, and D. Stokes. 1960. The American Voter. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Côrte-Real, P. P., and P. T. Pereira. 2004. “The Voter Who Wasn’t There: Referenda, Representation and Abstention.” Social Choice and Welfare 22: 349–369. doi:10.1007/s00355-003-0219-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vreese, C. H., and H. A. Semetko. 2004. Political Campaigning in Referendums. Framing the Referendum Issue. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Del Monte, A., S. Moccia, and L. Pennacchio. 2019. “Turnout and Voting Behaviour in Constitutional Referendums: A Regional Analysis of the Italian Case.” Regional Studies, Regional Science 6 (1): 557–573. doi:10.1080/21681376.2019.1680314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs, A. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J., and C. Baronavski 2018. “How Do European Countries Differ in Religious Commitment?” https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/12/05/how-do-european-countries-differ-in-religious-commitment/
   Google Scholar
• Fatke, M. 2014. “Participation and Political Equality in Direct Democracy: Educative Effect or Social Bias.” Swiss Political Science Review 21 (1): 99–118. doi:10.1111/spsr.12127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feher-Gavra, B. 2017. “Congruence and Participation-Does the Discrepancy between the Elite’ S and the Public’ S Ideology Come at the Cost of Reduced Participation?” Disseration, Lincoln.
   Google Scholar
• Fishburn, P. C., and S. J. Brams. 1983. “Paradoxes of Preferential Voting.” Mathematics Magazine 56 (4): 207. doi:10.1080/0025570X.1983.11977044.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, A. G. 2013. “Five Studies on the Causes and Consequences of Voter Turnout.” Doctoral diss., Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, M., M. Marsh, and C. Wlezien. 1994. “Attitudes toward Europe and Referendum Votes: A Response to Siune and Svensson.” Electoral Studies 13 (2): 117–121. doi:10.1016/0261-3794(94)90029-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, M. N. 2002. “Learning from the Danish Case: A Comment on Palle Svensson’s Critique of the Franklin Thesis.” European Journal of Political Research 41 (6): 751–757. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.00029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber, A. S., D. P. Green, and C. W. Larimer. 2008. “Social Pressure and Voter Turnout: Evidence from a Large-scale Field Experiment.” American Political Science Review 102 (1): 33–48. doi:10.1017/S000305540808009X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber, A. S., D. P. Green, and R. Shachar. 2003. “Voting May Be Habit‐Forming: Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment.” American Journal of Political Science 47 (3): 540–550. doi:10.1111/1540-5907.00038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gherghina, S. 2014. Party Organization and Electoral Volatility in Central and Eastern Europe: Enhancing Voter Loyalty. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gherghina, S. 2019. “Hijacked Direct Democracy: The Instrumental Use of Referendums in Romania.” East European Politics and Societies: And Cultures 33 (3): 778–797. doi:10.1177/0888325418800553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gherghina, S., and N. Silagadze. 2019. “And yet It Matters: Referendum Campaigns and Vote Decision in Eastern Europe.” Contemporary Politics 25 (1): 29–46. doi:10.1080/13569775.2018.1543790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gogean, I. 2018. “Ludovic Orban, Prima Reacție După Ce Referendumul a Eșuat (Ludovic Orban, the First Reaction after the Referendum’s Failure).” Evenimentul Zilei, October 7. https://evz.ro/orban-reactie-referendum.html
   Google Scholar
• Haidt, J. 2012. The Righteous Mind: Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion. New York: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hartliński, M. 2015. “The 2015 Referendum in Poland. Direct Democracy Notes.” East European Quarterly 43 (2–3): 235–242.
   Google Scholar
• Herrera, H., and A. Mattozi. 2010. “Qourum and Turnout in Referenda.” Journal of the European Economic Association 8: 838–871. doi:10.1111/j.1542-4774.2010.tb00542.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobolt, S. B. 2007. “Taking Cues on Europe? Voter Competence and Party Endorsements in Referendums on European Integration.” European Journal of Political Research 46 (2): 151–182. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00688.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerolimov, D. M., S. Zrinščak, and I. Borowik, Eds. 2004. Religion and Patterns of Social Transformation. Zagreb: Institute for Social Research.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, R., A. Blais, E. Gidengil, and N. Nevitte. 1996. The Challenge of Direct Democracy: The 1992 Canadian Referen-dum. Montreal/Kingston: McGill–Queen’s University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kriesi, H. 2005. Direct Democratic Choice. The Swiss Experience. Plymouth: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• LeDuc, L. 2002. “Opinion Change and Voting Behaviour in Referendums.” European Journal of Political Research 41 (6): 711–732. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.00027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeDuc, L. 2003. The Politics of Direct Democracy: Referendums in Global Perspective. Toronto: Broadview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lijphart, A. 1997. “Unequal Participation: Democracy’s Unresolved Dilemma.” American Political Science Review 91 (1): 1–14. doi:10.2307/2952255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linder, W. 2005. Schweizerische Demokratie: Institutionen, Prozesse, Perspektiven. Bern. Stuttgart & Wien: Haupt.
   Google Scholar
• Luechinger, S., M. Rosinger, and A. Stutzer. 2007. “The Impact of Postal Voting on Participation: Evidence for Switzerland.” Swiss Political Science Review 13 (2): 167–202. doi:10.1002/j.1662-6370.2007.tb00075.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutz, G. 2007. “Low Turnout in Direct Democracy.” Electoral Studies 26 (3): 624–632. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2006.10.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magleby, D. B. 1984. Direct Legislation: Voting on Ballot Propositions in the United States. Baltimore & London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merkel, W. 2010. “Volksentscheide – Wer ist das Volk?” Neue Gesellschaft/Frankfurter Hefte 12: 11–15.
   Google Scholar
• Morel, L. 1993. “Party Attitudes Towards Referendums in Western Europe.” West European Politics 16 (3): 225–244. doi:10.1080/01402389308424972.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolae, A. 2018. “Sondaj Zdrobitor: 75% Dintre Români Ar Participa La Referendumul Pentru Familie (Overwhelming Survey: 75% of the Romanians Would Vote in the Referendum for Family).” Active News. https://www.activenews.ro/stiri-social/Sondaj-zdrobitor-75-dintre-romani-ar-participa-la-Referendumul-pentru-Familie-desi-Presedintele-Iohannis-spunea-ca-nu-este-o-tema-de-interes-pentru-societatea-romaneasca-150607
   Google Scholar
• PRC (Pew Research Center). 2017. Religious Belief and National Belonging in Central and Eastern Europe. Washington DC.
   Google Scholar
• Qvortrup, M. 2005. A Comparative Study of Referendums: Government by the People. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Qvortrup, M. 2017. “Demystifying Direct Democracy.” Journal of Democracy 28 (3): 141–152. doi:10.1353/jod.2017.0052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sager, F., and M. Buehlmann. 2009. “Checks and Balances in Swiss Direct Democracy.” In Referendums and Representative Democracy: Responsiveness, Accountability and Deliberation, edited by M. Setala and T. Schiller, 186–206. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schelker, M., and M. Schneiter. 2017. “The Elasticity of Voter Turnout: Investing 85 Cents per Voter to Increase Voter Turnout by 4 Percent.” Electoral Studies 49: 65–74. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2017.07.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt-Beck, R., and D. M. Farrell. 2002. “Studying Political Campaigns and Their Effects.” In Do Political Campaigns Matter? Campaign Effects in Elections and Referendums, edited by D. M. Farrell and R. Schmitt-Beck, 1–21. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Silagadze, N., and S. Gherghina. 2018. “When Who and How Matter: Explaining the Success of Referendums in Europe.” Comparative European Politics 16 (5): 905–922. doi:10.1057/s41295-017-0107-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silagadze, N., and S. Gherghina. 2020. “Selective Equality: Social Democratic Parties and the Referendums on Same-Sex Marriage in Eastern Europe.” Europe - Asia Studies, (accepted).
   Google Scholar
• Siune, K., and P. Svensson. 1993. “The Danes and the Maastricht Treaty: The Danish EC Referendum of June 1992.” Electoral Studies 12 (2): 99–111. doi:10.1016/0261-3794(93)90012-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siune, K., P. Svensson, and O. Tonsgaard. 1994. “The European Union: The Danes Said ‘No’ in 1992 but ‘Yes’ in 1995: How and Why?” Electoral Studies 13 (2): 107–116. doi:10.1016/0261-3794(94)90028-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stockemer, D. 2017. “What Affects Voter Turnout? A Review Article/Meta-Analysis of Aggregate Research.” Government and Opposition 52 (4): 698–722. doi:10.1017/gov.2016.30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uleri, P. V. 2002. “On Referendum Voting in Italy: YES, NO or Non-vote? How Italian Parties Learned to Control Referendums.” European Journal of Political Research 41 (6): 863–883. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.t01-1-00036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valkovičová, V. 2017. “‘Regrettably, It Seems that Breaking One Border Causes Others to Tumble’. Nationalism and Homonegativity in the 2015 Slovak Referendum.” Politique Européenne 55: 86–115. doi:10.3917/poeu.055.0086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verba, S., and N. Nie. 1972. Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality. New York: Harper & Row Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Verba, S., K. L. Schlozman, and H. Brady. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar