Multigenerational transmission of family size in contemporary Sweden

References

• Albertini, M., M. Kohli, and C. Vogel. 2007. Intergenerational transfers of time and money in European families: common patterns—different regimes?, Journal of European Social Policy17(4): 319–334. 10.1177/0958928707081068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldous, J. and R. Hill. 1965. Social cohesion, lineage type, and intergenerational transmission, Social Forces43(4): 471–482. 10.2307/2574453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson, G., M. Ronsen, L. B. Knudsen, T. Lappegard, G. Neyer, K. Skrede, K. Teschner, and A. Vikat. 2009. Cohort fertility patterns in the Nordic countries, Demographic Research20: 313–352. 10.4054/DemRes.2009.20.14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderton, D. L., N. O. Tsuya, L. L. Bean, and G. P. Mineau. 1987. Intergenerational transmission of relative fertility and life course patterns, Demography24(4): 467–480. 10.2307/2061386
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axinn, W. G., M. E. Clarkberg, and A. Thornton. 1994. Family influences on family-size preferences, Demography31(1): 65–79. 10.2307/2061908
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balbo, N. and M. Mills. 2011a. The effects of social capital and social pressure on the intention to have a second or third child in France, Germany, and Bulgaria, 2004–05, Population Studies65(3): 335–351. 10.1080/00324728.2011.579148
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balbo, N. and M. Mills. 2011b. The influence of the family network on the realisation of fertility intentions, Vienna Yearbook of Population Research9: 179–206. 10.1553/populationyearbook2011s179
   Google Scholar
• Barber, J. S. 2000. Intergenerational influences on the entry into parenthood: mothers' preferences for family and nonfamily behavior, Social Forces79(1): 319–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, J. S. 2001. The intergenerational transmission of age at first birth among married and unmarried men and women, Social Science Research30(2): 219–247. 10.1006/ssre.2000.0697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardi, L. and R. White. 2010. Close kin influences on fertility behaviour, in P. Heady and M. Kohli (eds.), Family, Kinship and State in Contemporary Europe. Frankfurt: Campus, pp. 177–202.
   Google Scholar
• Björklund, A. and M. Jäntti. 2009. Intergenerational income mobility and the role of family background, in W. Salverda, B. Nolan, and T. M. Smeedin (eds.), Handbook of Economic Inequality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 491–521.
   Google Scholar
• Boholm, Å. 1983. Swedish Kinship: An Exploration into Cultural Processes of Belonging and Continuity. Gothenburg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
   Google Scholar
• Bongaarts, J. and S. C. Watkins. 1996. Social interactions and contemporary fertility transitions, Population and Development Review22(4): 639–682. 10.2307/2137804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breen, R. 2004. Social Mobility in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, C. G. and G. H. Elder. 2000. Matrilineal advantage in grandchild–grandparent relations, Gerontologist40(2): 179–190. 10.1093/geront/40.2.179
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coall, D. A. and R. Hartwig. 2010. Grandparental investment: past, present, and future, Behavioral and Brain Sciences33(1): 1–58. 10.1017/S0140525X09991105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danziger, L. and S. Neuman. 1989. Intergenerational effects on fertility—theory and evidence from Israel, Journal of Population Economics2(1): 25–37. 10.1007/BF00599178
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davey, A., E. E. Femia, D. G. Shea, S. H. Zarit, G. Sundstrom, and S. Berg. 1999. How many elders receive assistance? A cross-national comparison, Journal of Aging and Health11(2): 199–220. 10.1177/089826439901100204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubas, J. S. 2001. How gender moderates the grandparent–grandchild relationship—a comparison of kin-keeper and kin-selector theories, Journal of Family Issues22(4): 478–492. 10.1177/019251301022004005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, O. D., R. Freedman, J. M. Coble, and D. P. Slesinger. 1965. Marital fertility and size of family of orientation, Demography2(1): 508–515. 10.2307/2060135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edin, K. A. and E. P. Hutchinson. 1935. Studies of Differential Fertility in Sweden. Stockholm: P. S. King.
   Google Scholar
• Erola, J. and P. Moisio. 2007. Social mobility over three generations in Finland, 1950–2000, European Sociological Review23(2): 169–183. 10.1093/esr/jcl027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Euler, H. A. and B. Weitzel. 1996. Discriminative grandparental solicitude as reproductive strategy, Human Nature7(1): 39–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, R. 1930. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fokkema, T., S. Bekke, and P. A. Dykstra. 2008. Solidarity between Parents and their Adult Children in Europe, Vol. 76. Amsterdam: KNAW Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fors, S. and C. Lennartsson. 2008. Social mobility, geographical proximity and intergenerational family contact in Sweden, Ageing & Society28(2): 253–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frejka, T. 2008. Overview Chapter 2: Parity distribution and completed family size in Europe: incipient decline of the two-child family model, Demographic Research19(4): 47–72. 10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagnon, A. and E. Heyer. 2001. Intergenerational correlation of effective family size in early Quebec (Canada), American Journal of Human Biology13(5): 645–659. 10.1002/ajhb.1103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaulin, S., D. McBurney, and S. Brakeman-Wartell. 1997. Matrilateral biases in the investment of aunts and uncles, Human Nature8(2): 139–151. 10.1007/s12110-997-1008-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagestad, G. O. 1986. The family: women and grandparents as kin-keepers, in A. J. Pifer and L. Bronte (eds.), Our Aging Society: Paradox and Promise. New York: W. W. Norton, pp. 141–160.
   Google Scholar
• Hagestad, G. O. 1988. Demographic change and the life course: some emerging trends in the family realm, Family Relations37(4): 405–410. 10.2307/584111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoem, J. M., G. Neyer, and G. Andersson. 2006. Educational attainment and ultimate fertility among Swedish women born in 1955–59, Demographic Research14(16): 381–403. 10.4054/DemRes.2006.14.16
   Google Scholar
• Jæger, M. M. 2012. The extended family and children's educational success, American Sociological Review77(6): 903–922. 10.1177/0003122412464040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, N. E. and C. S. Stokes. 1976. Family size in successive generations: the effects of birth order, intergenerational change in lifestyle, and familial satisfaction, Demography13(2): 175–187. 10.2307/2060799
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaptijn, R., F. Thomese, T. G. Van Tilburg, and A. C. Liefbroer. 2010. How grandparents matter, Human Nature21(4): 393–405. 10.1007/s12110-010-9098-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirk, K. M., S. P. Blomberg, D. L. Duffy, A. C. Heath, I. P. F. Owens, and N. G. Martin. 2001. Natural selection and quantitative genetics of life-history traits in Western women: a twin study, Evolution55(2): 423–435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohler, H. P., J. R. Behrman, and S. C. Watkins. 2001. The density of social networks and fertility decisions: evidence from South Nyanza District, Kenya, Demography 38(1): 43–58. 10.1353/dem.2001.0005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohler, H. P. and J. A. Ortega. 2002. Tempo-adjusted period parity progression measures, fertility postponement and completed cohort fertility, Demographic Research6(6): 91–144. 10.4054/DemRes.2002.6.6
   Google Scholar
• Kramer, K. L. 2010. Cooperative breeding and its significance to the demographic success of humans, Annual Review of Anthropology39: 417–436. 10.1146/annurev.anthro.012809.105054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kravdal, Ø. 2002. Is the previously reported increase in second- and higher-order birth rates in Norway and Sweden from the mid-1970s real or a result of inadequate estimation methods, Demographic Research6(9): 241–262. 10.4054/DemRes.2002.6.9
   Google Scholar
• Kreyenfeld, M. 2002. Time-squeeze, partner effect or self-selection? An investigation into the positive effect of women's education on second birth risks in West Germany, Demographic Research7(2): 15–48. 10.4054/DemRes.2002.7.2
   Google Scholar
• Lam, D. 1986. The dynamics of population-growth, differential fertility, and inequality, American Economic Review76(5): 1103–1116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langford, C. M. and C. Wilson. 1985. Is there a connection between a woman's fecundity and that of her mother?, Journal of Biosocial Science17(4): 437–443. 10.1017/S0021932000015947
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundholm, E. and G. Malmberg. 2009. Between elderly parents and grandchildren: geographic proximity and trends in four-generation families, Journal of Population Ageing2(3): 121–137. 10.1007/s12062-010-9022-4
   Google Scholar
• Lyngstad, T. H. and A. Prskawetz. 2010. Do siblings' fertility decisions influence each other?, Demography47(4): 923–934. 10.1007/BF03213733
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malmberg, G. and A. Pettersson. 2007. Distance to elderly parents: analyses of Swedish register data, Demographic Research17(23): 679–704. 10.4054/DemRes.2007.17.23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mare, R. D. 1997. Differential fertility, intergenerational educational mobility, and racial inequality, Social Science Research26(3): 263–291. 10.1006/ssre.1997.0598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mare, R. D. 2011. A multigenerational view of inequality, Demography48(1): 1–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, M. 1999. Is the relationship between fertility of parents and children really weak?, Social Biology46(1/2): 122–145.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Murphy, M. and L. B. Knudsen. 2002. The intergenerational transmission of fertility in contemporary Denmark: the effects of number of siblings (full and half), birth order, and whether male or female, Population Studies56(3): 235–248. 10.1080/00324720215937
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, M. and D. Wang. 2003. The impact of intergenerationally-transmitted fertility and nuptuality on population dynamics in contemporary populations, in J. L. Rodgers and H.-P. Kohler (eds.), Biodemography of Human Reproduction and Fertility. Boston: Kluwer Academic, pp. 209–228.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, M. and D. L. Wang. 2001. Family-level continuities in childbearing in low-fertility societies, European Journal of Population17(1): 75–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, M. 2011. Long term effects of the demographic transition on family and kinship networks in Britain, Population and Development Review37(Suppl. s1): 55–80. 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2011.00378.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, M. 2012. Intergenerational fertility correlations in contemporary developing countries, American Journal of Human Biology24(5): 696–704. 10.1002/ajhb.22300
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pashos, A. and D. H. McBurney. 2008. Kin relationships and the caregiving biases of grandparents, aunts, and uncles—a two-generational questionnaire study, Human Nature19(3): 311–330. 10.1007/s12110-008-9046-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson, K., A. Lee, and L. Bramley-Moore. 1899. Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution. VI. Genetic (reproductive) selection: inheritance of fertility in man, and of fecundity in thoroughbred racehorses, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series A192: 257–330. 10.1098/rsta.1899.0006
   Google Scholar
• Pluzhnikov, A., D. K. Nolan, Z. Tan, M. S. McPeek, and C. Ober. 2007. Correlation of intergenerational family sizes suggests a genetic component of reproductive fitness, The American Journal of Human Genetics81(1): 165–169. 10.1086/518446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollet, T. V., M. Nelissen, and D. Nettle. 2009. Lineage based differences in grandparental investment: evidence from a large British cohort study, Journal of Biosocial Science41(3): 355–379. 10.1017/S0021932009003307
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston, S. H. 1976. Family sizes of children and family sizes of women, Demography13(1): 105–114. 10.2307/2060423
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puur, A., L. Sakkeus, A. Põldma, and A. Herm. 2011. Intergenerational family constellations in contemporary Europe: evidence from the Generations and Gender Survey, Demographic Research25(4): 135–172. 10.4054/DemRes.2011.25.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reher, D., J. Ortega, and A. Sanz-Gimeno. 2008. Intergenerational transmission of reproductive traits in Spain during the demographic transition, Human Nature19(1): 23–43. 10.1007/s12110-008-9032-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodgers, J. L., H.-P. Kohler, K. O. Kyvik, and K. Christensen. 2001. Behavior genetic modeling of human fertility: findings from a contemporary Danish twin study, Demography38(1): 29–42. 10.1353/dem.2001.0009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi, A. S. and P. H. Rossi. 1990. Of Human Bonding: Parent–Child Relations Across the Life Course. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, D. M. and C. B. Cottrell. 1975. The American Kin Universe: A Genealogical Study. Chicago: Department of Anthropology, University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, D. M. and R. T. Smith. 1978. Class Differences in American Kinship. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sear, R. and D. Coall. 2011. How much does family matter? Cooperative breeding and the demographic transition, Population and Development Review37(Suppl. s1): 81–112. 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2011.00379.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steenhof, L. and A. C. Liefbroer. 2008. Intergenerational transmission of age at first birth in the Netherlands for birth cohorts born between 1935 and 1984: evidence from municipal registers, Population Studies62(1): 69–84. 10.1080/00324720701788616
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, A. 1980. The influence of first generation fertility and economic status on second generation fertility, Population & Environment3(1): 51–72. 10.1007/BF01253070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tymicki, K. 2004. Kin influence on female reproductive behavior: the evidence from reconstitution of the Bejsce parish registers, 18th to 20th centuries, Poland, American Journal of Human Biology16(5): 508–522. 10.1002/ajhb.20059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tymicki, K. 2008. When do kinsmen really help? Examination of cohort and parity-specific kin effects on fertility behavior. The case of the Bejsce parish register reconstitution study, 17th–20th centuries, Poland, in T. Bengtsson and G. P. Mineau (eds.), Kinship and Demographic Behavior in the Past. New York: Springer, pp. 135–154.
   Google Scholar
• Uhlenberg, P. and B. G. Hammill. 1998. Frequency of grandparent contact with grandchild sets: six factors that make a difference, Gerontologist38(3): 276–285. 10.1093/geront/38.3.276
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Kaa, D. J. 1987. Europe's second demographic transition, Population Bulletin42(1): 1–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, J. R. and R. M. Hauser. 1997. Social stratification across three generations: new evidence from the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study, American Sociological Review62(4): 561–572. 10.2307/2657426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wrong, D. H. 1980. Class Fertility Trends in Western Nations. New York: Arno Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, M. D. and P. Willmott. 1957. Family and Kinship in East London. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
   Google Scholar