The gap between births intended and births achieved in 22 European countries, 2004–07

References

• Barber, Jennifer S. 2001. Ideational influences on the transition to parenthood: Attitudes toward childbearing and competing alternatives, Social Psychology Quarterly 64(2): 101–127. 10.2307/3090128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, Stan and Santosh C. Sutradhar. 2007. Fertility intentions: Are the undecided more like those who want more or want no more children?, Journal of Biosocial Science 39(01): 137–145. 10.1017/S0021932006001283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berrington, Ann. 2004. Perpetual postponers? Women's, men's and couple's fertility intentions and subsequent fertility behaviour, Population Trends (117): 9–19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Billari, Francesco C. 2009. The happiness commonality: Fertility decisions in low-fertility settings, in How Generations and Gender Shape Demographic Change: Towards Policies Based on Better Knowledge, Conference Proceedings. Geneva: United Nations Publications, pp. 7–31.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, David E., David Canning, Günther Fink, and Jocelyn E. Finlay. 2010. The cost of low fertility in Europe, European Journal of Population-Revue Europeenne De Demographie 26(2): 141–158. 10.1007/s10680-009-9182-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bongaarts, John. 2001. Fertility and reproductive preferences in post-transitional societies, Population and Development Review 27(supplement): 260–281. 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2001.00810.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bongaarts, John. 2002. The end of fertility transition, Population and Development Review 28(3): 419–443. 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2002.00419.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonoli, Giuliano. 2008. The impact of social policy on fertility: Evidence from Switzerland, Journal of European Social Policy 18(1): 64–78. 10.1177/0958928707081074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bury, Louise and Thoai D. Ngo. 2009. ‘The Condom Broke!’ Why Do Women in the UK Have Unintended Pregnancies? London: Marie Stopes International.
   Google Scholar
• Chesnais, Jean-Claude. 2000. Determinants of below replacement fertility, Population Bulletin of the United Nations 1999 (40/41): 126–136.
   Google Scholar
• Coombs, Lolagene C. 1974. The measurement of family size preferences and subsequent fertility, Demography 11(4): 587–611. 10.2307/2060472
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coombs, Lolagene C. 1979. Reproductive goals and achieved fertility: A fifteen-year perspective, Demography 16(4): 523–534. 10.2307/2060932
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 2009. Incomplete Revolution: Adapting Welfare States to Women's New Roles. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 1990. European Public Opinion on the Family and the Desire for Children. Report on Special Eurobarometer No. 32. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• ESS Round 2: European Social Survey Round 2 Data. 2004. Data file edition 3.3. Norwegian Social Science Data Services, Norway – Data Archive and distributor of ESS data.
   Google Scholar
• ESS Round 4: European Social Survey Round 4 Data. 2008. Data file edition 4.1. Norwegian Social Science Data Services, Norway – Data Archive and distributor of ESS data.
   Google Scholar
• European Social Survey. 2008a. ESS Round 6 Project Instructions (CAPI). London: Centre for Comparative Social Surveys, City University London.
   Google Scholar
• European Social Survey. 2008b. European Social Survey 2008 Project Instructions (CAPI). London: Centre for Comparative Social Surveys, City University London. Available: http://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/docs/round4/fieldwork/source/ESS4_source_project_instructions.pdf (accessed 6 December 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Finer, Lawrence B. and Mia R. Zolna. 2011. Unintended pregnancy in the United States: Incidence and disparities, 2006, Contraception 84(5):478–485. 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.07.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freedman, Ronald, Deborah S. Freedman, and Arland D. Thornton. 1980. Changes in fertility expectations and preferences between 1962 and 1977: Their relation to final parity, Demography 17(4): 365–378. 10.2307/2061151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, Joshua R., Wolfgang Lutz, and Maria Rita Testa. 2003. The emergence of sub-replacement family size ideals in Europe, Population Research and Policy Review 22(5/6): 479–496. 10.1023/B:POPU.0000020962.80895.4a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, Joshua R., Tomáš Sobotka, and Aiva Jasilioniene. 2009. The end of ‘lowest ow’ fertility?, Population and Development Review 35(4): 663–700. 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2009.00304.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gore, Deanna L. and Elwood Carlson. 2010. Ethnicity, education, and the non-proportional hazard of first marriage in Turkey, Population Studies 64(2): 179–191. 10.1080/00324721003640042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagewen, Kellie J. and S. Philip Morgan. 2005. Intended and ideal family size in the United States, 1970–2002, Population and Development Review 31(3): 507–527. 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2005.00081.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendershot, Gerry E., William D. Mosher, and William F. Pratt. 1982. Infertility and age: An unresolved issue, Family Planning Perspectives 14(5): 287–289. 10.2307/2134890
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Iacovou, Maria and Lara Patricio Tavares. 2011. Yearning, learning, and conceding: Reasons men and women change their childbearing intentions, Population and Development Review 37(1): 89–123. 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2011.00391.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson-Hanks, Jennifer. 2008. Demographic transitions and modernity, Annual Review of Anthropology 37(1): 301–315. 10.1146/annurev.anthro.37.081407.085138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohler, Hans-Peter, Francesco C. Billari, and José Antonio Ortega. 2002. The emergence of lowest-low fertility in Europe during the 1990s, Population and Development Review 28(4): 641–680. 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2002.00641.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohler, Hans-Peter, Francesco C. Billari, and José Antonio Ortega. 2006. Low fertility in Europe: Causes, implications, and policy options, in F. R. Harris (ed), The Baby Bust: Who Will Do the Work? Who Will Pay the Taxes? Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, pp. 48–109.
   Google Scholar
• Luker, Kristin C. 1999. Forum: A reminder that human behaviour frequently refuses to conform to models created by researchers, Family Planning Perspectives 31(5): 248–249. 10.2307/2991574
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martin, Steven P. 2000. Diverging fertility among U.S. women who delay childbearing past age 30, Demography 37(4): 523–533. 10.1353/dem.2000.0007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, Peter. 2000. Gender equity, social institutions and the future of fertility, Journal of Population Research 17(1): 1–16. 10.1007/BF03029445
   Google Scholar
• Monnier, Alain. 1987. Fertility intentions and actual behaviour. A longitudinal study: 1974, 1976, 1979, Population: An English Selection 44: 237–259.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, S. Philip. 1981. Intention and uncertainty at later stages of childbearing: The United States 1965 and 1970, Demography 18(3): 267–285. 10.2307/2060997
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, S. Philip and Heather Rackin. 2010. The correspondence between fertility intentions and behaviour in the United States, Population and Development Review 36(1): 91–118. 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2010.00319.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, S. Philip and Miles G. Taylor. 2006. Low fertility at the turn of the twenty-first century, Annual Review of Sociology 32(1): 375–399. 10.1146/annurev.soc.31.041304.122220
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute (NIDI) and United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). n.d. Generations and Gender Program. The Hague: NIDI. Available: <http://www.ggp-i.org/data/data-access.html> (accessed 8 January 2014).
   Google Scholar
• O'Connell, Martin and Carolyn C. Rogers. 1983. Assesssing cohort birth expectations data from the Current Population Survey, 1971–1981, Demography 20(3): 369–384. 10.2307/2061248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office for National Statistics (ONS). 2011. General Lifestyle Survey. London: ONS. Available: <http://data.gov.uk/dataset/general_lifestyle_survey> (accessed 8 January 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Philipov, Dimiter. 2009. Fertility intentions and outcomes: The role of policies to close the gap, European Journal of Population 225(4): 355–361. 10.1007/s10680-009-9202-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Population Reference Bureau. 2011. The World's Women and Girls, 2011 Data Sheet. Washington, DC: Population Reference Bureau.
   Google Scholar
• Quesnel-Vallée, Amélie and S. Philip Morgan. 2003. Missing the target? Correspondence of fertility intentions and behaviour in the U.S., Population Research and Policy Review 22: 497–525. 10.1023/B:POPU.0000021074.33415.c1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rindfuss, Ronald R. and Larry L. Bumpass. 1976. How old is too old? Age and the sociology of fertility, Family Planning Perspectives 8(5): 226–230. 10.2307/2134315
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rindfuss, Ronald R., S. Philip Morgan, and Gray Swicegood. 1988. First births in America: Changes in the timing of parenthood. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schoen, Robert, Nan Marie Astone, Young J. Kim, and Constance A. Nathanson. 1999. Do fertility intentions affect fertility behaviour?, Journal of Marriage and the Family 61(3): 790–99. 10.2307/353578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, Susheela, Gilda Sedgh, and Rubina Hussain. 2010. Unintended pregnancy: Worldwide levels, trends, and outcomes, Studies in Family Planning 41(4): 241–250. 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2010.00250.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sleebos, Joëlle. 2003. Low Fertility Rates in OECD Countries: Facts and Policy Responses. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Sobotka, Tomáš, Vegard Skirbekk, and Dimiter Philipov. 2011. Economic recession and fertility in the developed world, Population and Development Review 37(2): 267–306. 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2011.00411.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spéder, Zsolt and Balázs Kapitány. 2009. How are time-dependent childbearing intentions realized? Realization, postponement, abandonment, bringing forward, European Journal of Population 25(4): 503–23. 10.1007/s10680-009-9189-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teachman, Jay D., Lucky M. Tedrow, and Kyle D. Crowder. 2000. The changing demography of America's families, Journal of Marriage and Family 62(4): 1234–1246. 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.01234.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Testa, Maria Rita. 2007. Childbearing preferences and family issues in Europe: Evidence from the Eurobarometer 2006 survey. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2007: 357–379. 10.1553/populationyearbook2007s357
   Google Scholar
• Thévenon, Olivier. 2011. Family policies in OECD countries: A comparative analysis, Population and Development Review 37(1): 57–87. 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2011.00390.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tienda, Marta and Jennifer Glass. 1985. Household structure and labor force participation of Black, Hispanic, and White mothers, Demography 22(3): 381–394. 10.2307/2061067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). n.d. Fertility and Family Surveys. Brussles: UNECE. Available: <http://www.unece.org/pau/ffs/ffs.html> (accessed 8 January 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Williams, Lindy, Joyce Abma, and Linda J. Piccinino. 1999. The correspondence between intention to avoid childbearing and subsequent fertility: A prospective analysis, Family Planning Perspectives 31(5): 220–227. 10.2307/2991569
   PubMedGoogle Scholar