Family size and educational attainment in England and Wales

References

• Angrist, J. D. and W. N. Evans. 1998. Children and their parents’ labor supply: evidence from exogenous variation in family size, American Economic Review 88(3): 450–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angrist, J. D., V. Lavy, and A. Schlosser. 2010. Multiple experiments for the causal link between quantity and quality of children, Journal of Labor Economics 28(4): 773–824. doi: 10.1086/653830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, G. S. and H. G. Lewis. 1973. On the interaction between the quantity and quality of children, Journal of Political Economy 81(2): S279–S288. doi: 10.1086/260166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, G. S. and N. Tomes. 1976. Child endowment and the quantity and quality of children, Journal of Political Economy 84: S143–S162. doi: 10.1086/260536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, S. E., P. J. Devereux, and K. G. Salvanes. 2005. The more the merrier? The effect of family size and birth order on children’s education, Quarterly Journal of Economics 120(2): 669–700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, S. E., P. J. Devereux, and K. G. Salvanes. 2007. From the cradle to the labor market: The effect of birth weight on adult outcomes, Quarterly Journal of Economics 122(1): 409–439. doi: 10.1162/qjec.122.1.409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, S. E., P. J. Devereux, and K. G. Salvanes. 2010. Small family, smart family: family size and the IQ scores of young men, Journal of Human Resources 45(1): 33–58. doi: 10.1353/jhr.2010.0001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blake, J. 1989. Family Size and Achievement. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, A. L. and H. J. Kee. 2009. Birth order matters: the effect of family size and birth order on educational attainment, Journal of Population Economics 22(2): 367–397. doi: 10.1007/s00148-007-0181-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braakmann, N. and J. Wildman. 2016. Reconsidering the effect of family size on labour supply: the twin problems of the twin birth instrument, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bukodi, E. and J. H. Goldthorpe. 2011. Class origins, education and occupational attainment in Britain, European Societies 13(3): 347–375. doi: 10.1080/14616696.2011.568259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butcher, K. F. and A. Case. 1994. The effect of sibling sex composition on women’s education and earnings, Quarterly Journal of Economics 109(3): 531–563. doi: 10.2307/2118413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cáceres-Delpiano, J. 2006. The impacts of family size on investment in child quality, Journal of Human Resources 14(4): 738–754. doi: 10.3368/jhr.XLI.4.738
   Google Scholar
• Case, A., A. Fertig, and C. Paxson. 2005. The lasting impact of childhood health and circumstance, Journal of Health Economics 24: 365–389. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2004.09.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conley, D. 2000. Sibship sex composition: effects on educational attainment, Social Science Research 29: 441–457. doi: 10.1006/ssre.2000.0678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conley, D. and R. Glauber. 2006. Parental educational investment and children’s academic risk: estimates of the impact of sibship size and birth order from exogenous variation in fertility, Journal of Human Resources 14(4): 722–737. doi: 10.3368/jhr.XLI.4.722
   Google Scholar
• De Haan, M. 2010. Birth order, family size and educational attainment, Economics of Education Review 29: 576–588. doi: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2009.10.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downey, D. B. 1995. When bigger is not better: family size, parental resources, and children’s educational performance, American Sociological Review 60: 746–761. doi: 10.2307/2096320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downey, D. B., B. Powell, L. C. Steelman, and S. Pribesh. 1999. Much ado about siblings: change models, sibship size, and intellectual development: comment on Guo and VanWey, American Sociological Review 64(2): 193–198. doi: 10.2307/2657526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, B. G., J. Workman, and D. B. Downey. 2016. The (conditional) resource dilution model: state- and community-level modifications, Demography 53: 723–748. doi: 10.1007/s13524-016-0471-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, G. and L. K. VanWey. 1999. Sibship size and intellectual development: Is the relationship causal? American Sociological Review 64(2): 169–187. doi: 10.2307/2657524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauser, R. M. and H.-H. D. Kuo. 1998. Does the gender composition of sibships affect women’s educational attainment? Journal of Human Resources 33(3): 644–657. doi: 10.2307/146336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA). 2015. Improving Outcomes for Fertility Patients: Multiple Births. Technical report, Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Iacovou, M. 2007. Family size, birth order, and educational attainment, Marriage and Family Review 42(3): 35–57. doi: 10.1300/J002v42n03_03
   Google Scholar
• Jaeger, M. M. 2008. Do large sibships really lead to lower educational attainment? New evidence from quasi-experimental variation in couples’ reproductive capacity, Acta Sociologica 51(3): 217–235. doi: 10.1177/0001699308094167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaestner, R. 1997. Are brothers really better? Sibling sex composition and educational achievement revisited, Journal of Human Resources 32(2): 250–284. doi: 10.2307/146215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kugler, A. D. and S. Kumar. 2017. Preference for boys, family size, and educational attainment in India, Demography 54: 835–859. doi: 10.1007/s13524-017-0575-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo, H.-H. D. and R. M. Hauser. 1997. How does size of sibship matter? Family configuration and family effects on educational attainment, Social Science Research 26(1): 69–94. doi: 10.1006/ssre.1996.0586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. 2008. Sibling size and investment in children’s education: An Asian instrument, Journal of Population Economics 21: 855–875. doi: 10.1007/s00148-006-0124-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H., J. Zhang, and Y. Zhu. 2008. The quantity–quality tradeoff of children in a developing country: Identification using Chinese twins, Demography 45(1): 223–243. doi: 10.1353/dem.2008.0006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maralani, V. 2008. The changing relationship between family size and educational attainment over the course of economic development: evidence from Indonesia, Demography 45(3): 693–717. doi: 10.1353/dem.0.0013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marteleto, L. J. and L. R. de Souza. 2012. The changing impact of family size on adolescents’ schooling: Assessing the exogenous variation in fertility using twins in Brazil, Demography 49: 1453–1477. doi: 10.1007/s13524-012-0118-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, J. A., B. E. Hamilton, and M. J. K. Osterman. 2012. Three decades of twin births in the United States. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: NCHS Data Brief 80.
   Google Scholar
• Mulligan, C. B. 1997. Parental Priorities and Economic Inequality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Park, H. 2008. Public policy and the effect of sibship size on educational attainment: A comparative study of 20 countries, Social Science Research 37: 874–887. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2008.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, M. 1999. Sibship size and academic achievement: what we now know and what we still need to know: comment on Guo and VanWey, American Sociological Review 64(2): 188–192. doi: 10.2307/2657525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponczek, V. and A. P. Souza. 2012. New evidence of the causal effect of family size on child quality in a developing country, Journal of Human Resources 47(1): 64–106. doi: 10.1353/jhr.2012.0006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. 2003. Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press, fifth edition.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenzweig, M. R. and K. I. Wolpin. 1980. Testing the quantity–quality tradeoff fertility model: the use of twins as a natural experiment, Econometrica 48(1): 227–240. doi: 10.2307/1912026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenzweig, M. R. and J. Zhang. 2009. Do population control policies induce more human capital investment? Twins, birth weight and China’s “one-child” policy, Review of Economic Studies 76: 1149–1174. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-937X.2009.00563.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sargan, J. D. 1958. The estimation of economic relationships using instrumental variables, Econometrica 26(3): 393–415. doi: 10.2307/1907619
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawhill, I. V. 2014. Generation Unbound: Drifting into Sex and Parenthood. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L. K., B. N. Manktelow, E. S. Draper, E. M. Boyle, S. J. Johnson, and D. J. Field. 2014. Trends in the incidence and mortality of multiple births by socioeconomic deprivation and maternal age in England: population-based cohort study, BMJ Open 4: e004514. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004514
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steelman, L. C. and B. Powell. 1991. Sponsoring the next generation: parental willingness to pay for higher education, American Journal of Sociology 96(6): 1505–1529. doi: 10.1086/229695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steelman, L. C., B. Powell, R. Werum, and S. Carter. 2002. Reconsidering the effects of sibling configuration: recent advances and challenges, Annual Review of Sociology 28: 243–269. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.28.111301.093304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warnock, M. 1984. Report of the Committee of Inquiry into Human Fertilisation and Embryology. London: Department of Health and Social Security, Technical report.
   Google Scholar
• Wellings, K., K. G. Jones, C. H. Mercer, C. Tanton, S. Clifton, J. Datta, A. J. Copas, B. Erens, L. J. Gibson, W. Macdowall, P. Sonnenberg, A. Phelps, and A. M. Johnson. 2013. The prevalence of unplanned pregnancy and associated factors in Britain: findings from the third National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal-3), The Lancet 382: 1807–1816. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62071-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Workman, J. 2017. Sibling additions, resource dilution, and cognitive development during early childhood, Journal of Marriage and Family 79(2): 462–474. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar