Women’s educational attainment and fertility among Generation X in the United States

References

• Angrist, Joshua D. and Jörn-Steffen Pischke. 2008. Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Antecol, Heather. 2010. The opt-out revolution: A descriptive analysis, IZA Discussion Paper No 5089.
   Google Scholar
• Bartus, Tamás. 2017. Multilevel multiprocess modeling with gsem, The Stata Journal 17(2): 442–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartus, Tamás, Lívia Murinkó, Ivett Szalma, and Bernadett Szél. 2013. The effect of education on second births in Hungary: A test of the time-squeeze, self-selection, and partner-effect hypotheses, Demographic Research 28(1): 1–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baudin, Thomas, David De La Croix, and Paula E. Gobbi. 2015. Fertility and childlessness in the United States, The American Economic Review 105(6): 1852–1882.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauman, Kurt. 2016. College completion by cohort, age and gender, 1967 to 2015, Social, Housing and Economic Statistics Division Working Paper 2016-04.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, Gary S. 1965. A theory of the allocation of time, The Economic Journal 75(299): 493–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, Gary S. and Gregg H. Lewis. 1973. On the interaction between the quantity and quality of children, Journal of Political Economy 81(2): S279–SS88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, Gary S. and Nigel Tomes. 1976. Child endowments and the quantity and quality of children, Journal of Political Economy 84(4): S143–SS62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behrman, Jere R. and Mark R. Rosenzweig. 2002. Does increasing women’s schooling raise the schooling of the next generation? American Economic Review 92(1): 323–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berrington, Ann and Serena Pattaro. 2014. Educational differences in fertility desires, intentions and behaviour: A life course perspective, Advances in Life Course Research 21: 10–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, Dan A., Natalia Kolesnikova, Seth G. Sanders, and Lowell J. Taylor. 2013. Are children ‘normal’? The Review of Economics and Statistics 95(1): 21–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boushey, Heather. 2008. ‘Opting out?’ The effect of children on women’s employment in the United States, Feminist Economics 14(1): 1–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand, Jennie E. and Dwight Davis. 2011. The impact of college education on fertility: Evidence for heterogeneous effects, Demography 48(3): 863–887.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodmann, Stefanie, Gosta Esping-Andersen, and Maia Güell. 2007. When fertility is bargained: Second births in Denmark and Spain, European Sociological Review 23(5): 599–613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandra, Anjani, Casey E. Copen, and Elizabeth Hervey Stephen. 2013. Infertility and impaired fecundity in the United States, 1982–2010: Data from the National Survey of Family Growth, National Health Statistics Report 67(67): 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Edin, Kathryn and Maria Kefalas. 2011. Promises I Can Keep: Why Poor Women Put Motherhood before Marriage. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ely, Danielle M and Brady E Hamilton. 2018. Trends in fertility and mother’s age at first birth among rural and metropolitan counties: United States, 2007–2017, US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
   Google Scholar
• Finer, Lawrence B. and Mia R. Zolna. 2011. Unintended pregnancy in the United States: Incidence and disparities, 2006, Contraception 84(5): 478–485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finer, Lawrence B. and Mia R. Zolna. 2016. Declines in unintended pregnancy in the United States, 2008–2011, New England Journal of Medicine 374(9): 843–852.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frejka, Tomas and Gérard Calot. 2001. Cohort reproductive patterns in low-fertility countries, Population and Development Review 27(1): 103–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furtado, Delia. 2016. Fertility responses of high-skilled native women to immigrant inflows, Demography 53(1): 27–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, Campbell and Kay Jung. 2006. Historical Census Statistics on the Foreign-Born Population of the United States, 1850 to 2000. Population Division, US Census Bureau Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Goldin, Claudia Dale and Lawrence F. Katz. 2009. The Race between Education and Technology. Boston: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, Siv. 2003. Optimal age at motherhood. Theoretical and empirical considerations on postponement of maternity in Europe, in K. F. Zimmermann and Michael Vogler (eds), Family, Household and Work. Berlin: Springer, pp. 345–367.
   Google Scholar
• Hayford, Sarah R. and S. Philip Morgan. 2008. Religiosity and fertility in the United States: The role of fertility intentions, Social Forces 86(3): 1163–1188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazan, Moshe and Hosny Zoabi. 2014. Do highly educated women choose smaller families? The Economic Journal 125(587): 1191–1226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoem, Britta. 1996. The social meaning of education for third-birth fertility: A methodological note on the need to sometimes respecify an intermediate variable, Yearbook of Population Research in Finland 33: 333–339.
   Google Scholar
• Hoem, Jan M. and Michaela Kreyenfeld. 2006. Anticipatory analysis and its alternatives in life-course research: Part 1: Education and first childbearing, Demographic Research 15: 461–484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoem, Jan M., Alexia Prskawetz, and Gerda Neyer. 2001. Autonomy or conservative adjustment? The effect of public policies and educational attainment on third births in Austria, 1975–96, Population Studies 55(3): 249–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isen, Adam and Betsey Stevenson. 2010. Women’s education and family behavior: Trends in marriage, divorce and fertility, in John B. Shoven (ed.), Demography and the Economy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 107–140.
   Google Scholar
• Joshi, Heather. 2002. Production, reproduction, and education: Women, children, and work in a British perspective, Population and Development Review 28(3): 445–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirmeyer, S. E. and B. E. Hamilton. 2011. Transitions between childlessness and first birth: Three generations of US Women, in Vol. Series 2, Data evaluation and methods research. Vital and Health Statistics. 0083–2057.
   Google Scholar
• Klesment, Martin, Allan Puur, Leen Rahnu, and Luule Sakkeus. 2014. Varying association between education and second births in Europe: Comparative analysis based on the Eu-Silc data, Demographic Research 31: 813–860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohler, Hans-Peter, Francesco C. Billari and José Antonio Ortega. 2002. The emergence of lowest-low fertility in Europe during the 1990s, Population and Development Review 28(4): 641–680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosmin, Barry A. and Juhem Navarro-Rivera. 2008. The transformation of Generation X: Shifts in religious and political self-identification, 1990–2008, Trinity College Digital Repository. https://digitalrepository.trincoll.edu/facpub/60/.
   Google Scholar
• Kravdal, Øystein. 2007. Effects of current education on second-and third-birth rates among Norwegian women and men born in 1964: Substantive interpretations and methodological issues, Demographic Research 17(17): 211–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kravdal, Øystein and Ronald R. Rindfuss. 2008. Changing relationships between education and fertility: A study of women and men born 1940 to 1964, American Sociological Review 73(5): 854–873.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreyenfeld, Michaela. 2002. Time-squeeze, partner effect or self-selection? An investigation into the positive effect of women’s education on second birth risks in West Germany, Demographic Research 7(2): 15–48.
   Google Scholar
• Lesthaeghe, Ron. 1995. The second demographic transition in western countries: An interpretation, in A. M. Jensen (ed.), Gender and Family Change in Industrialized Countries. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press, pp. 17–62.
   Google Scholar
• Lesthaeghe, Ron and Guy Moors. 2000. Recent trends in fertility and household formation in the industrialized world, Review of Population and Social Policy 9(1): 121–170.
   Google Scholar
• Lesthaeghe, Ron and Paul Willems. 1999. Is low fertility a temporary phenomenon in the European Union? Population and Development Review 25(2): 211–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lillard, Lee A. 1993. Simultaneous equations for hazards: Marriage duration and fertility timing, Journal of Econometrics 56(1–2): 189–217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littlejohn, Krystale E. 2012. Hormonal contraceptive use and discontinuation because of dissatisfaction: Differences by race and education, Demography 49(4): 1433–1452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingston, Grechen. 2015. Childlessness falls, family size grows among highly educated women, Pew Research Center. http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2015/05/07/childlessness/.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, Steven P. 2000. Diverging fertility among US women who delay childbearing past age 30, Demography 37(4): 523–533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLanahan, Sara. 2004. Diverging destinies: How children are faring under the second Demographic transition, Demography 41(4): 607–627.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meron, Monique, Isabelle Widmer, and David Shapiro. 2002. Unemployment leads women to postpone the birth of their first child, Population (English Edition) 57: 301–330.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, Melinda. 2010. Gender roles, gender (in) equality and fertility: An empirical test of five gender equity indices, Canadian Studies in Population 37(3–4): 445–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, Melinda, Letizia Mencarini, Maria Letizia Tanturri, and Katia Begall. 2008. Gender equity and fertility intentions in Italy and the Netherlands, Demographic Research 18: 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirowsky, John and Catherine E. Ross. 2003. Education, Social Status, and Health. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Mirowsky, John and Catherine E. Ross. 2007. Life course trajectories of perceived control and their relationship to education, American Journal of Sociology 112(5): 1339–1382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, S. Philip. 2015. Variation in US fertility: Low and not so low, but not lowest-low, in R. R. Rindfuss and M. K. Choe (eds), Low and Lower Fertility. Berlin: Springer, pp. 125–141.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, S. Philip and Allan M. Parnell. 2002. Effects on pregnancy outcomes of changes in the North Carolina State Abortion fund, Population Research and Policy Review 21(4): 319–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, S. Philip and Heather Rackin. 2010. The correspondence between fertility intentions and behavior in the United States, Population and Development Review 36(1): 91–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, S. Philip and Ronald R. Rindfuss. 1999. Reexamining the link of early childbearing to marriage and to subsequent fertility, Demography 36(1): 59–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, S. Philip and Miles G. Taylor. 2006. Low fertility at the turn of the twenty-first century, Annual Review Sociology 32: 375–399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musick, Kelly, Paula England, Sarah Edgington, and Nicole Kangas. 2009. Education differences in intended and unintended fertility, Social Forces 88(2): 543–572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myrskylä, Mikko, Hans-Peter Kohler, and Francesco Billari. 2011. High development and fertility: Fertility at older reproductive ages and gender equality explain the positive link, MPIDR Working Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Oláh, Livia Sz. 2003. Gendering fertility: second births in Sweden and Hungary, Population Research and Policy Review 22(2): 171–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oppenheimer, Valerie Kincade. 1994. Women’s rising employment and the future of the family in industrial societies, Population and Development Review 20(2): 293–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Percheski, Christine. 2008. Opting out? Cohort differences in professional women’s employment rates from 1960 to 2005, American Sociological Review 73(3): 497–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prskawetz, Alexia and Barbara Zagaglia. 2005. Second births in Austria, Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 3: 143–170.
   Google Scholar
• Rindfuss, Ronald R., S. Philip Morgan, and Kate Offutt. 1996. Education and the changing age pattern of American fertility: 1963–1989, Demography 33(3): 277–290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rindfuss, Ronald R., David Guilkey, S Philip Morgan, Øystein Kravdal, and Karen Benjamin Guzzo. 2007. Child care availability and first-birth timing in Norway, Demography 44(2): 345–372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayer, Liana, Nathan Wright, and Kathryn Edin. 2003. Class differences in family attitudes, Annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Minneapolis, MN, May.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, Lone, Kirstine Münster, and Peter Helm. 1995. Infertility and the seeking of infertility treatment in a representative population, BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 102(12): 978–984.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shang, Qingyan and Bruce A. Weinberg. 2013. Opting for families: Recent trends in the fertility of highly educated women, Journal of Population Economics 26(1): 5–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, James F., Michael L. Eisenberg, David Glidden, Susan G. Millstein, Marcelle Cedars, Thomas J. Walsh, Jonathan Showstack, Lauri A. Pasch, Nancy Adler, and Patricia P. Katz. 2011. Socioeconomic disparities in the use and success of fertility treatments: Analysis of data from a prospective cohort in the United States, Fertility and Sterility 96(1): 95–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snopkowski, Kristin, Mary C. Towner, Mary K. Shenk, and Heidi Colleran. 2016. Pathways from education to fertility decline: A multi-site comparative study, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 371(1692): 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobotka, Tomáš. 2008. Overview Chapter 6: The diverse faces of the second demographic transition in Europe, Demographic Research 19(8): 171–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stulp, Gert, Rebecca Sear, Susan B. Schaffnit, Melinda C. Mills, and Louise Barrett. 2016. The reproductive ecology of industrial societies, Part II, Human Nature 27(4): 445–470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, Rachel. 2005. The age pattern of first-birth rates among U.S. women: The bimodal 1990s, Demography 42(2): 259–273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamborini, Christopher R. and Howard M. Iams. 2011. Are Generation X’ers different than late Boomers? Family and earnings trends among recent cohorts of women at young adulthood, Population Research and Policy Review 30(1): 59–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torr, Berna Miller and Susan E Short. 2004. Second births and the second shift: A research note on gender equity and fertility, Population and Development Review 30(1): 109–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Kaa, Dirk J. 2003. Second demographic transition, Encyclopedia of Population 2: 872–875.
   Google Scholar
• Vere, James P. 2007. ‘Having it all’ No longer: fertility, female Labor Supply, and the New life Choices of Generation X, Demography 44(4): 821–828.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, Jonas, Karel Neels, and Tine Kil. 2014. The educational gradient of childlessness and cohort parity progression in 14 low fertility countries, Demographic Research 31: 1365–1416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeakey, Marissa Pine, Carie J Muntifering, Daesha V Ramachandran, YeMon Myint, Andreea A Creanga, and Amy O Tsui. 2009. How contraceptive use affects birth intervals: Results of a literature review, Studies in Family Planning 40(3): 205–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar