Projecting future utilization of medically assisted fertility treatments

References

• ABS. 2016. 3301.0 Births, Australia, 2015: Table 6.1 Births, Country of Birth of Parents, Australia-2015. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics. Available: http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/[email protected]/DetailsPage/3301.02015?OpenDocument.
   Google Scholar
• ABS. 2018. 2080.5 – Information Paper: Australian Census Longitudinal Dataset: Methodology and Quality Assessment, 2011–2016. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics. Available: http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/[email protected]/Lookup/2080.5Main+Features02011-2016?OpenDocument.
   Google Scholar
• Adamson, G. David, Jacques de Mouzon, Georgina M. Chambers, Fernando Zegers-Hochschild, Ragaa Mansour, Osamu Ishihara, Manish Banker, and Silke Dyer. 2018. International committee for monitoring assisted reproductive technology: World report on assisted reproductive technology, 2011. Fertility and Sterility 110(6): 1067–1080. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.06.039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berrington, Ann. 2017. Childlessness in the UK, in M. Kreyenfeld and D. Konietzka (eds.), Childlessness in Europe: Contexts, Causes, and Consequences. Cham: Springer, pp. 57–76.
   Google Scholar
• Berrington, Ann, Juliet Stone, and Éva Beaujouan. 2015. Educational differences in timing and quantum of childbearing in Britain: A study of cohorts born 1940–1969, Demographic Research 33(26): 733–764. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2015.33.26
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boivin, Jacky, Laura Bunting, John A. Collins, and Karl G. Nygren. 2007. International estimates of infertility prevalence and treatment-seeking: Potential need and demand for infertility medical care, Human Reproduction 22(6): 1506–1512. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dem046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmichael, Gordon and Peter McDonald. 2003. Fertility trends and differentials, in S.-E. Khoo and P. McDonald (eds), The Transformation of Australia’s Population. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press, pp. 40–76.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, Georgina M., Elizabeth A. Sullivan, Osamu Ishihara, Michael G. Chapman, and G. David Adamson. 2009. The economic impact of assisted reproductive technology: A review of selected developed countries, Fertility and Sterility 91(6): 2281–2294. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.04.029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers, Georgina M., Van Phuong Hoang, Rong Zhu, and Peter J. Illingworth. 2012. A reduction in public funding for fertility treatment: An econometric analysis of access to treatment and savings to government, BMC Health Services Research 12(142): 1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers, Georgina M., Van Phuong Hoang, Elizabeth A. Sullivan, Michael G. Chapman, Osamu Ishihara, Fernando Zegers-Hochschild, Karl G. Nygren, and G. David Adamson. 2014. The impact of consumer affordability on access to assisted reproductive technologies and embryo transfer practices: An international analysis, Fertility and Sterility 101(1): 191–198. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.09.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandra, Anjani, Casey E. Copen, and Elizabeth Hervey Stephen. 2014. Infertility service use in the United States: Data from the National Survey of Family Growth, 1982–2010, National Health Statistics Report No. 73 (January 22), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, Maryland.
   Google Scholar
• Connolly, Mark P., Stijn Hoorans, and Georgina M. Chambers on behalf of the ESHRE Infertility and Society Task Force. 2010. The costs and consequences of assisted reproductive technology: An economic perspective, Human Reproduction Update 16(6): 603–613. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmq013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Geyter, Christian, Carlos Calhaz-Jorge, Markus S. Kupka, Christine Wyns, Edgar Mocanu, Tatjana Motrenko, Giulia Scaravelli, Jesper M.J. Smeenk, Snežana Vidaković, Veerle Goossens, and The European IVF-monitoring Consortium (EIM) for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE). 2018. ART in Europe, 2014: Results generated from European registries by ESHRE, Human Reproduction 33(9): 1586–1601. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey242
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Health. 2015. Australian Statistics on Medicine. Canberra: The Department of Health. Available: http://www.pbs.gov.au/info/statistics/asm/australian-statistics-on-medicines.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. 2016. Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits and Medical Benefits Linked 10% Sample. Canberra: The Department of Health. Available: http://www.pbs.gov.au/info/news/2016/08/public-release-of-linkable-10-percent-mbs-and-pbs-data.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Human Services. 2019. Medicare Benefit Scheme Item Reports. Canberra: Department of Human Services. Available: http://medicarestatistics.humanservices.gov.au/statistics/mbs_item.jsp.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, Michael P., Richard S. Legro, Christos Coutifaris, Ruben Alvero, Randal D. Robinson, Peter Casson, Gregory M. Christman, Joel Ager, Hao Huang, Karl R. Hansen, Valerie Baker, Rebecca Usadi, Aimee Seungdamrong, G. Wright Bates, Mitchell Rosen, Daniel Haisenleder, Stephen A. Krawetz, Kurt Barnhart, J.C. Trussell, Dana Ohl, Yufeng Jin, Nanette Santoro, Esther Eisenberg, and Heping Zhang. 2015. Letrozole, gonadotropin, or clomiphene for unexplained infertility, New England Journal of Medicine 373(13): 1230–1240. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1414827
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, Andrea L., Tania Stafinski, and Devidas Menon. 2014. An international survey of assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) policies and the effects of these policies on costs, utilization, and health outcomes, Health Policy 116(2): 238–263. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.03.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyer, Silke J., Georgina M. Chambers, J. de Mouzon, Karl-Gösta Nygren, Fernando Zegers-Hochschild, Ragaa Mansour, Osamu Ishihara, Manish Banker, and Geoffrey David Adamson. 2016. International committee for monitoring assisted reproductive technologies world report: Assisted reproductive technology 2008, 2009 and 2010, Human Reproduction 31(7): 1588–1609. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew082
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, Oisín, Katie Harris, Repon C. Paul, and Georgina M. Chambers. 2017. Assisted Reproductive Technology in Australia and New Zealand 2015. Sydney: National Perinatal Epidemiology & Statistics Unit, University of New South Wales. Available: https://npesu.unsw.edu.au/surveillance-reports.
   Google Scholar
• Gameiro, Sofia, Jacky Boivin, Laura A. Peronace and C.M. Verhaak. 2012. Why do patients discontinue fertility treatment? A systematic review of reasons and predictors of discontinuation in fertility treatment, Human Reproduction Update 18(6): 652–669. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dms031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habbema, J. Dik F., Marinus J. C. Eijkemans, Geeta Nargund, Gijs Beets, Henri Leridon, and Egbert R. te Velde. 2009. The effect of in vitro fertilization on birth rates in western countries, Human Reproduction 24(6): 1414–1419. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, Katie, Oisín Fitzgerald, Repon C. Paul, Alan Macaldowie, Evelyn Lee and Georgina M. Chambers. 2016. Assisted Reproductive Technology in Australia and New Zealand 2014. Sydney: National Perinatal Epidemiology & Statistics Unit, University of New South Wales. Available: https://npesu.unsw.edu.au/surveillance-reports.
   Google Scholar
• Heck, Katherine E., Kenneth C. Schoendorf, Stephanie J. Ventura, and John L. Kiely. 1997. Delayed childbearing by education level in the United States, 1969–1994, Maternal and Child Health Journal 1(2): 81–88. doi: 10.1023/A:1026218322723
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Herbert, Danielle L., Jayne C. Lucke, and Annette J. Dobson. 2009. Infertility, medical advice and treatment with fertility hormones and/or in vitro fertilisation: A population perspective from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 33(4): 358–364. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2009.00408.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inhorn, Marcia C. and Pasquale Patrizio. 2015. Infertility around the globe: New thinking on gender, reproductive technologies and global movements in the 21st century, Human Reproduction Update 21(4): 411–426. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmv016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kneale, Dylan and Heather Joshi. 2008. Postponement and childlessness: Evidence from two British cohorts, Demographic Research 19(58): 1935–1968. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.58
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kocourkova, Jirina, Boris Burcin and Tomas Kucera. 2014. Demographic relevancy of increased use of assisted reproduction in European countries, Reproductive Health 11(37): 1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreyenfeld, Michaela and Dirk Konietzka (eds). 2017. Childlessness in Europe: Contexts, Causes, and Consequences. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kulu, Hill. 2005. Migration and fertility: Competing hypotheses re-examined, European Journal of Population/Revue Européenne de Démographie 21(1): 51–87. doi: 10.1007/s10680-005-3581-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marino, Jennifer, Vivienne M. Moore, Alice R. Rumbold and Michael J. Davies. 2011. Fertility treatments and the young women who use them: An Australian cohort study, Human Reproduction 26(2): 473–479. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deq305
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mascarenhas, Maya N., Seth R. Flaxman, Ties Boerma, Sheryl Vanderpoel and Gretchen A. Stevens. 2012. National, regional, and global trends in infertility prevalence since 1990: A systematic analysis of 277 health surveys, Plos Medicine 9(12): 1–12. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, Peter. 2003. Transformations in the Australian family, in S.-E. Khoo and P. McDonald (eds), The Transformation of Australia’s Population. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press, pp. 77–103.
   Google Scholar
• Moultrie, Tom. 2013a. Fertility estimates derived from cohort parity increments, in T. Moultrie, R. Dorrington, A. Hill, K. Hill, I. Timaeus and B. Zaba (eds), Tools for Demographic Estimation. Paris: International Union for the Scientific Study of Population, pp. 103–108.
   Google Scholar
• Moultrie, Tom. 2013b. Synthetic relational Gompertz models, in T. Moultrie, R. Dorrington, A. Hill, K. Hill, I. Timaeus and B. Zaba (eds), Tools for Demographic Estimation. Paris: International Union for the Scientific Study of Population. pp. 96–102.
   Google Scholar
• Neels, Karel, Michael Murphy, Máire Ní Bhrolcháin, and Éva Beaujouan. 2017. Rising educational participation and the trend to later childbearing, Population and Development Review 43(4): 667–693. doi: 10.1111/padr.12112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neyer, Gerda, Jan M. Hoem, and Gunnar Andersson. 2017. Education and childlessness: The influence of educational field and educational level on childlessness among Swedish and Austrian women, in M. Kreyenfeld and D., Konietzka (eds), Childlessness in Europe: Contexts, Causes, and Consequences. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, pp. 183–208.
   Google Scholar
• Ní Bhrolcháin, Máire and Éva Beaujouan. 2012a. Fertility postponement is largely due to rising educational enrolment, Population Studies 66(3): 311–327. doi: 10.1080/00324728.2012.697569
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ní Bhrolcháin, Máire and Éva Beaujouan. 2012b. France and Great Britain: Rising educational participation results in later births, Population and Societies 495(December): 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• NICE. 2013. Fertility Problems: Assessment and Treatment. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Guidlines. Available at: www.nice.org.uk/CG156.
   Google Scholar
• Piotrowski, Martin and Yuying Tong. 2016. Education and fertility decline in China during transitional times: A cohort approach, Social Science Research 55: 94–110. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Präg, Patrick and Melinda C. Mills. 2017. Cultural determinants influence assisted reproduction usage in Europe more than economic and demographic factors. Human Reproduction 32(11): 2305–2314. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex298
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, Andrei. 1995. Multiregional Demography: Principles, Methods and Extensions. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Schaeper, Hildegard, Michael Grotheer, and Gesche Brandt. 2017. Childlessness and fertility dynamics of female higher education graduates in Germany, in M. Kreyenfeld and D. Konietzka (eds), Childlessness in Europe: Contexts, Causes, and Consequences. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, pp. 209–232.
   Google Scholar
• Schoen, Robert. 2006. Dynamic Population Models. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, Lone, Thomas J. Sobotka, Joan Bentzen, and Anders N. Andersen. 2012. Demographic and medical consequences of the postponement of parenthood, Human Reproduction 18(1): 29–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Te Velde, Egbert, Dik Habbema, Henri Leridon, and Marinus Eijkemans. 2012. The effect of postponement of first motherhood on permanent involuntary childlessness and total fertility rate in six European countries since the 1970s. Human Reproduction 27(4): 1179–1183. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der455
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teoh, Pek Joo and Abha Maheshwari. 2014. Low-cost in vitro fertilization: Current insights. International Journal of Womens Health 6: 817–827.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• United Nations. 1983. Manual X: Indirect Techniques for Demographic Estimation. Population Studies No. 81. New York: Department of International Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Willekens, Frans. 2003. Multistate demography, in P. Demey and G. McNicoll (eds), Encyclopedia of Population. New York: Thompson/Gale, pp. 681–684.
   Google Scholar
• Ziebe, Søren and Paul Devroey. 2008. Assisted reproductive technologies are an integrated part of national strategies addressing demographic and reproductive challenges, Human Reproduction Update 14(6): 583–592. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmn038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar