The politics of ageing and retirement: Evidence from Swiss referenda

References

• Baldwin, Peter. 1990. The Politics of Social Solidarity: Class Bases of the European Welfare State, 1875–1975. University Press: Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Bittschi, Benjamin and Berthold Ulrich Wigger. 2019. On the political feasibility of increasing the legal retirement age, CESifo Working Papers.
   Google Scholar
• Blöndal, Sveinbjorn and Stefano Scarpetta. 1997. The retirement decision in OECD countries, OECD Economic Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Boeri, Tito, Axel Börsch-Supan, and Guido Tabellini. 2002. Pension reforms and the opinions of European citizens, American Economic Review 92(2): 396–401. doi: 10.1257/000282802320191688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boeri, Tito and Guido Tabellini. 2012. Does information increase political support for pension reform?, Public Choice 150(1–2): 327–362. doi: 10.1007/s11127-010-9706-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonoli, Giuliano and Silja Häusermann. 2009. Who wants what from the welfare state? Socio-structural cleavages in distributional politics: Evidence from Swiss referendum votes, European Societies 11(2): 211–232. doi: 10.1080/14616690801942116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, Clem and Jeff Manza. 2006. Why do welfare states persist?, Journal of Politics 68(4): 816–827. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busemeyer, Marius, Achim Goerres, and Simon Weschle. 2009. Attitudes towards redistributive spending in an era of demographic ageing: The rival pressures from age and income in 14 OECD countries, Journal of European Social Policy 19(3): 195–212. doi: 10.1177/2F0958928709104736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buti, Marco, Alessandro Turrini, Paul Van den Noord, and Pietro Biroli. 2009. Defying the “Juncker curse”: Can reformist governments be re-elected?, Empirica 36(1): 65–100. doi:10-1007/s10663-008-9093-0
   Google Scholar
• Bütler, Monika. 2002. The political feasibility of increasing the retirement age: Lessons from a ballot on the female retirement age, International Tax and Public Finance 9(4): 349–365. doi:10.1023/A:1016555700763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bütler, Monika and Michel André Maréchal. 2007. Framing effects in political decision making: Evidence from a natural voting experiment, CESifo Working Paper Series.
   Google Scholar
• de Mello, Luiz, Simone Schotte, Erwin Tiongson, and Hernan Winkler. 2017. Greying the budget: Ageing and preferences over public policies, Kyklos 70(1): 70–96. doi:10.1111/kykl.12131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demeny, Paul. 1986. Pronatalist policies in low-fertility countries: Patterns, performance, and prospects, Population and Development Review 12: 335–358. doi: 10.2307/2807916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorn, David and Alfonso Sousa-Poza. 2003. Why is the employment rate of older Swiss so high? An analysis of the social security system, The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance-Issues and Practice 28(4): 652–672. doi:10.1111/1468-0440.00252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ediev, Dalkhat. 2014. Why increasing longevity may favour a PAYG pension system over a funded system, Population Studies 68(1):95–110. doi: 10.1080/00324728.2013.780632
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, Gosta. 2013. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eugster, Beatrix, Raphael Lalive, Andreas Steinhauer, and Josef Zweimüller. 2011. The demand for social insurance: Does culture matter?, The Economic Journal 121(556). doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2011.02479.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fors, ZDA. 2016. VOTO - Survey on the Swiss Popular Vote, 12 February 2017. FORS - Centre of expertise in the social sciences, Centre for Democracy Studies Aarau (ZDA), University of Zurich. Distributed by FORS, Lausanne.
   Google Scholar
• FORS, ZDA. 2017. VOTO - Survey on the Swiss Popular Vote, 24 September 2017. FORS - Centre of expertise in the social sciences, Centre for Democracy Studies Aarau (ZDA), University of Zurich. Distributed by FORS, Lausanne.
   Google Scholar
• Funk, P. and C. Gathmann. 2014. Gender gaps in policy making: Evidence from direct democracy in Switzerland, Economic Policy 30(81): 141–181. doi: 10.1093/epolic/eiu003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galasso, Vincenzo. 2008. The Political Future of Social Security in Aging Societies. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galasso, Vincenzo. 2014. The role of political partisanship during economic crises, Public Choice 158(1–2): 143–165. doi: 10.1007/s11127-012-9956-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galasso, V. and P. Profeta. 2002. The political economy of social security: A survey, European Journal of Political Economy 18(1): 1–29. doi:10.1016/S0176-2680(01)00066-0
   Google Scholar
• Galasso, Vincenzo and Paola Profeta. 2004. Lessons for an ageing society: The political sustainability of social security systems, Economic Policy 19(38): 64–115. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0327.2004.00119.x
   Google Scholar
• Gingrich, Jane. 2014. Visibility, values, and voters: The informational role of the welfare state, The Journal of Politics 76(2): 565–580. doi:10.1017/s0022381613001540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greber, Pierre-Yves. 1988. The Swiss basic pensions scheme is forty years’ old: Criteria for its evaluation, International Social Security Review 41(2): 176–197. doi:10.1111/j.1468-246X.1988.tb01010.x
   Google Scholar
• Gruber, Jonathan and David Wise. 2008. Social Security and Retirement Around the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, Moritz. 2017. Rising preferred retirement age in Europe: Are Europe’s future pensioners adapting to pension system reforms?, Journal of Aging & Social Policy 29(3): 245–261. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2016.1255082
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess, Moritz, Elias Nauman, and Leander Steinkopf. 2017. Population ageing, the intergenerational conflict, and active ageing policies–a multilevel study of 27 European countries, Journal of Population Ageing 10(1): 11–23. doi:10.1007/s12062-016-9161-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, Evelyne and Johan Stephens. 2001. Development and Crisis of the Welfare State: Parties and policies in global markets. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Iversen, Torben and David Soskice. 2001. An asset theory of social policy preferences, American Political Science Review 95(4): 875–893. doi: 10.1017/S0003055400400079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriesi, Hanspeter, Matthias Brunner and François Lorétan. 2017. Enquêtes standardisées VoxIt 1981-2016 [Dataset]. Université de Genève - Faculté des Sciences de la Société - SdS - Département de science politique et relations internationales, Universität Zürich - Philosophische Fakultät - Institut für Politikwissenschaft - IPZ - Lehrstuhl für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, FORS - Centre de compétences suisse en sciences sociales. Distributed by FORS, Lausanne.
   Google Scholar
• Leroux, Marie-Louise, Pierre Pestieau, and Maria Racionero. 2011. Voting on pensions: Sex and marriage, European Journal of Political Economy 27(2): 281–296. doi:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2010.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margalit, Yotam. 2013. Explaining social policy preferences: Evidence from the great recession, American Political Science Review 107(1): 80–103. doi:10.1017/S0003055412000603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moene, Karl Ove and Michael Wallerstein. 2001. Inequality, social insurance, and redistribution, American Political Science Review 95(4): 859–874. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511619793.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2017. Pensions at a Glance 2017. Paris: OECD
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2019. Pensions at a Glance 2019. Paris: OECD
   Google Scholar
• Parlevliet, Jante. 2017. What drives public acceptance of reforms? Longitudinal evidence from a Dutch pension reform, Public Choice 173(1–2): 1–23. doi: 10.1007/s11127-017-0447-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierson, Paul.1996. The new politics of the welfare state, World Politics 48(2): 143–179. doi:10.1093/0198297564.001.0001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razin, Assaf, Efrain Sadka, and Phillip Swagel. 2002. The aging population and the size of the welfare state, Journal of Political Economy 110(4): 900–918. doi:10.1086/340780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehm, Philipp, Jacob Hacker, and Mark Schlesinger. 2012. Insecure alliances: Risk, inequality, and support for the welfare state, American Political Science Review 106(2): 386–406. doi:10.2307/41495084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinn, Hans-Werner and Silke Uebelmesser. 2003. Pensions and the path to gerontocracy in Germany, European Journal of Political Economy 19(1): 153–158. doi:10.1016/S0176-2680(02)00134-9
   Google Scholar
• Tepe, Markus and Pieter Vanhuysse. 2009. Are aging OECD welfare states on the path to gerontocracy?: Evidence from 18 democracies, 1980–2002, Journal of Public Policy 29(1): 1–28. doi:10.1017/S0143814X0900097X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilley, James and Geoffrey Evans. 2014. Ageing and generational effects on vote choice: Combining cross-sectional and panel data to estimate APC effects, Electoral Studies 33: 19–27. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2013.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, Markus and Sylvia Kritzinger. 2012. Ideological dimensions and vote choice: Age group differences in Austria, Electoral Studies 31(2): 285–296. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2011.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar