Children of the (gender) revolution: A theoretical and empirical synthesis of how gendered division of labour influences fertility

References

• Aassve, A., G. Fuochi, L. Mencarini, and D. Mendola. 2015. What is your couple type? Gender ideology, housework sharing, and babies, Demographic Research 32: 835–858. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2015.32.30
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahnert, L. 2006. Parenting and alloparenting, in C. Sue Carter, Lieselotte Ahnert, K. E. Grossmann, Sarah B. Hrdy, Michael E. Lamb, Stephen W. Porges and Norbert Sachser (eds), Attachment and Bonding A New Synthesis. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 229–244.
   Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. 1991. The theory of planned behavior, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50: 179–211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. 2011. Reflections on Morgan and Bachrach’s critique, Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 9: 63–69. doi:10.1553/populationyearbook2011s63
   Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I., and J. Klobas. 2013. Fertility intentions: An approach based on the theory of planned behavior, Demographic Research 29: 203–232. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2013.29.8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alonso, F. G. 2004. The uneven distribution of family responsibilities among women and men, and its link with low fertility: Some evidence for European Union countries from Eurobarometer data (Papers de demografia 253).
   Google Scholar
• Amin, S., and C. B. Lloyd. 2002. Women’s lives and rapid fertility decline: Some lessons from Bangladesh and Egypt, Population Research and Policy Review 21: 275–317. doi:10.1023/A:1020030616075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrade, C., and S. Bould. 2012. Child-care burden and intentions to have a second child: Effects of perceived justice in the division of child-care, International Review of Sociology 22: 25–37. doi:10.1080/03906701.2012.657527
   Google Scholar
• Bachrach, C. A., and S. P. Morgan. 2011. Further reflections on the Theory of Planned Behaviour and fertility research, Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 9: 71–74. doi:10.1553/populationyearbook2011s71
   Google Scholar
• Balbo, N., and M. Mills. 2011. The influence of the family network on the realisation of fertility intentions, Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 9: 179–206. doi:10.1553/populationyearbook2011s179
   Google Scholar
• Barber, J. S. 2011. The theory of planned behaviour: Considering drives, proximity and dynamics, Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 9: 31–35. doi:10.1553/populationyearbook2011s31
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Basu, A. M. 2002. Fertility decline and increasing gender imbalance in India, including a possible South Indian turnaround, Development and Change 30: 237–263. doi:10.1111/1467-7660.00116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basu, A. M. 2017. When women became good for families, did families become bad for women? Historical changes in women’s leisure as one indicator of their “status.” Paper presented at IPC 2017, Cape Town.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, G. 1981. A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, G. 1985. Human capital, effort, and the sexual division of labor, Journal of Labor Economics 3: S33–S58. doi:10.1086/298075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berk, S. F. 1985. The Gender Factory: The Apportionment of Work in American Households. New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bernardi, L., J.-M. Le Goff, and V.-A. Ryser. 2013. Gender role-set, family orientations, and fertility intentions in Switzerland, Swiss Journal of Sociology 39: 9–31. doi:10.12682/lives.2296-1658.2011.5
   Google Scholar
• Bernhardt, E., and F. Goldscheider. 2006. Gender equality, parenthood attitudes, and first births in Sweden, Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 4: 19–39. doi:10.1553/populationyearbook2006s19
   Google Scholar
• Bernhardt, E., F. Goldscheider, and J. Turunen. 2016. Attitudes to the gender division of labor and the transition to fatherhood, Acta Sociologica 59: 269–284. doi:10.1177/0001699316645930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhat, P. N. M. 2002. Returning a favor: Reciprocity between female education and fertility in India, World Development 30: 1791–1803. doi:10.1016/S0305-750X(02)00065-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billari, F. C. 2015. Integrating macro- and micro-level approaches in the explanation of population change, Population Studies 69: S11–S20. doi:10.1080/00324728.2015.1009712
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billari, F. C., D. Philipov, and M. R. Testa. 2009. Attitudes, norms and perceived behavioural control: Explaining fertility intentions in Bulgaria, European Journal of Population / Revue Européenne de Démographie 25: 439–465. doi:10.1007/s10680-009-9187-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, D. V. M. 2018. Fallibility in science: Responding to errors in the work of oneself and others, Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science 1: 432–438. doi:10.1177/2515245918776632
   Google Scholar
• Bongaarts, J. 1978. A framework for analyzing the proximate determinants of fertility, Population and Development Review 4: 105. doi:10.2307/1972149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandén, M., A.-Z. Duvander, and S. Ohlsson-Wijk. 2018. Sharing the caring: Attitude–behavior discrepancies and partnership dynamics, Journal of Family Issues 39: 771–795. doi:10.1177/0192513X16680013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinton, M. C., X. Bueno, L. Oláh, and M. Hellum. 2018. Postindustrial fertility ideals, intentions, and gender inequality: A comparative qualitative analysis, Population and Development Review 44: 281–309. doi:10.1111/padr.12128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinton, M. C., and D.-J. Lee. 2016. Gender-role ideology, labor market institutions, and post-industrial fertility, Population and Development Review 42: 405–433. doi:10.1111/padr.161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinton, M. C., and E. Oh. 2019. Babies, work, or both? Highly educated women’s employment and fertility in East Asia, American Journal of Sociology 125: 105–140. doi:10.1086/704369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodmann, S., G. Esping-Andersen, and M. Guell. 2007. When fertility is bargained: Second births in Denmark and Spain, European Sociological Review 23: 599–613. doi:10.1093/esr/jcm025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buber, I. 2002. The influence of the distribution of household and childrearing tasks between men and women on childbearing intentions in Austria (MPIDR Working Papers WP-2002-004). doi:10.4054/MPIDR-WP-2002-04
   Google Scholar
• Bueno, X. 2019. Fertility decisions in transition: Young adults’ perceptions on fertility three decades apart in Spain, History of the Family: 1–20. doi:10.1080/1081602X.2019.1686049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bueno, X., and M. C. Brinton. 2019. Gender egalitarianism, perceived economic insecurity, and fertility intentions in Spain: A qualitative analysis, Population Studies 73: 247–260. doi:10.1080/00324728.2019.1604979
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkart, J. M., C. Van Schaik, and M. Griesser. 2017. Looking for unity in diversity: Human cooperative childcare in comparative perspective, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 284. doi:10.1098/rspb.2017.1184
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, M. M., N. Prata, and M. Potts. 2013. The impact of freedom on fertility decline, Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care 39: 44–50. doi:10.1136/jfprhc-2012-100405
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cavalli, L., and A. Rosina. 2011. An analysis of reproductive intentions of Italian couples, Population Review 50: 21–39. doi:10.1353/prv.2011.0001
   Google Scholar
• Chen, M., and P. S. F. Yip. 2017. The discrepancy between ideal and actual parity in Hong Kong: Fertility desire, intention, and behavior, Population Research and Policy Review 36: 583–605. doi:10.1007/s11113-017-9433-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cloïn, M. 2012. A Day with the Dutch: Time Use in the Netherlands and Fifteen Other European Countries. The Hague: Netherlands Institute for Social Research.
   Google Scholar
• Coale, A. J., and S. C. Watkins. 1986. Decline of Fertility in Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, L. P. 2004. The gendered division of labor and family outcomes in Germany, Journal of Marriage and Family 66: 1246–1259. doi:10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00090.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, L. P. 2009. Gender equity and fertility in Italy and Spain, Journal of Social Policy 38: 123–140. doi:10.1017/S0047279408002584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, L., and M. Bittman. 2008. The incremental time costs of children: An analysis of children’s impact on adult time use in Australia, Feminist Economics 14: 59–88. doi:10.1080/13545700701880999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, L., and K. Mullan. 2011. How mothers and fathers share childcare, American Sociological Review 76: 834–861. doi:10.1177/0003122411427673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, L., and A. Powell. 2016. Shares of housework between mothers, fathers and young people: Routine and non-routine housework, doing housework for oneself and others, Social Indicators Research 136: 269–281. doi:10.1007/s11205-016-1539-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, L., and P. Siminski. 2010. Men’s housework, women’s housework, and second births in Australia, Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 17: 235–266. doi:10.1093/sp/jxq004
   Google Scholar
• Doepke, M., and F. Kindermann. 2019. Bargaining over babies: Theory, evidence, and policy implications, American Economic Review 109: 3264–3306. doi:10.1257/aer.20160328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dommermuth, L., B. Hohmann-Marriott, and T. Lappegård. 2017. Gender equality in the family and childbearing, Journal of Family Issues 38: 1803–1824. doi:10.1177/0192513X15590686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dommermuth, L., J. Klobas, and T. Lappegård. 2011. Now or later? The Theory of Planned Behavior and timing of fertility intentions, Advances in Life Course Research 16: 42–53. doi:10.1016/j.alcr.2011.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duvander, A.-Z., and G. Andersson. 2006. Gender equality and fertility in Sweden: A study on the impact of the father’s uptake of parental leave on continued childbearing, Marriage & Family Review 39: 121–142. doi:10.1300/J002v39n01_07
   Google Scholar
• Duvendack, M., and R. Palmer-Jones. 2017. Micro-finance, women’s empowerment and fertility decline in Bangladesh: How important was women’s agency? The Journal of Development Studies 53: 664–683. doi:10.1080/00220388.2016.1205731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easterlin, R. A. 1975. An economic framework for fertility analysis, Studies in Family Planning 6: 54–63. doi:10.2307/1964934
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiori, F. 2011. Do childcare arrangements make the difference? A multilevel approach to the intention of having a second child in Italy, Population, Space and Place 17: 579–596. doi:10.1002/psp.567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folbre, N. 1983. Of patriarchy born: The political economy of fertility decisions, Feminist Studies 9: 261–284. doi:10.2307/3177490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortunato, L. 2017. Insights from evolutionary anthropology on the (pre)history of the nuclear family, Cross-Cultural Research 51: 92–116. doi:10.1177/1069397117691006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, E., M. Xiaohong, Y. Ping, Y. Wenshan, and S. Gietel-Basten. 2018. ‘I couldn’t hold the whole thing’: The role of gender, individualisation and risk in shaping fertility preferences in Taiwan, Asian Population Studies 14: 61–76. doi:10.1080/17441730.2017.1386408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukai, T. 2017. Childcare availability and fertility: Evidence from municipalities in Japan, Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 43: 1–18. doi:10.1016/j.jjie.2016.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukuda, S. 2017. Gender role division and transition to the second birth in Japan. National Institute of Population and Social Security Research Working Paper Series (E), Tokyo.
   Google Scholar
• Fuwa, M. 2004. Macro-level gender inequality and the division of household labor in 22 countries, American Sociological Review 69: 751–767. doi:10.1177/000312240406900601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giuliano, P. 2015. The role of women in society: From preindustrial to modern times, CESifo Economic Studies 61: 33–52. doi:10.1093/cesifo/ifu019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldscheider, F., E. Bernhardt, and M. Brandén. 2013. Domestic gender equality and childbearing in Sweden, Demographic Research 29: 1097–1126. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2013.29.40
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldscheider, F., E. Bernhardt, and T. Lappegård. 2015. The gender revolution: A framework for understanding changing family and demographic behavior, Population and Development Review 41: 207–239. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2015.00045.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldscheider, F., L. S. Oláh, and A. Puur. 2010. Reconciling studies of men’s gender attitudes and fertility, Demographic Research 22: 189–198. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2010.22.8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González, M. J., I. Lapuerta, T. Martín-García, and M. Seiz. 2018. Satisfaction with work-life balance: Couples with Egalitarian practices in their transition to first-time parenthood in Spain, L’Année sociologique 68: 341–366. doi:10.3917/anso.182.0341
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, A., I. Koupil, and D. W. Lawson. 2012. Low fertility increases descendant socioeconomic position but reduces long-term fitness in a modern post-industrial society, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 279: 4342–4351. doi:10.1098/rspb.2012.1415
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, P. B., and K. G. Anderson. 2010. Fatherhood: Evolution and Human Parental Behaviour. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harknett, K., F. C. Billari, and C. Medalia. 2014. Do family support environments influence fertility? Evidence from 20 European countries, European Journal of Population 30: 1–33. doi:10.1007/s10680-013-9308-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewlett, B. S. 1992. Intimate Fathers : The Nature and Context of Aka Pygmy Paternal Infant Care. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hewlett, B. S. 2000. Culture, history, and sex, Marriage & Family Review 29: 59–73. doi:10.1300/J002v29n02_05
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochschild, A. 1989. The Second Shift. New York: Avon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Holton, S., J. Fisher, and H. Rowe. 2011. To have or not to have? Australian women’s childbearing desires, expectations and outcomes, Journal of Population Research 28: 353–379. doi:10.1007/s12546-011-9072-3
   Google Scholar
• Hrdy, S. B. 2009. Mothers and Others : The Evolutionary Origins of Mutual Understanding. Cambridge, MA; London, England: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Janssens, A. 2007a. “Were women present at the demographic transition?” A question revisited, The History of the Family 12: 43–49. doi:10.1016/j.hisfam.2007.05.003
   Google Scholar
• Janssens, A. 2007b. Gendering the Fertility Decline in the Western World. Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, D., S. Stevano, H. J. Malapit, E. Hull, and S. Kadiyala. 2018. Review: Time use as an explanation for the agri-nutrition disconnect: Evidence from rural areas in low and middle-income countries, Food Policy 76: 8–18. doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.12.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kan, M.-Y., and E. Hertog. 2017. Domestic division of labour and fertility preference in China, Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan, Demographic Research 36: 557–588. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2017.36.18
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kato, T. 2018. Associations of gender role attitudes with fertility intentions: A Japanese population-based study on single men and women of reproductive ages, Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare 16: 15–22. doi:10.1016/j.srhc.2018.01.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman, G. 2000. Do gender role attitudes matter? Family formation and dissolution among traditional and egalitarian men and women, Journal of Family Issues 21: 128–144. doi:10.1177/019251300021001006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keyfitz, N. 1986. The family that does not reproduce itself, Population and Development Review 12: 139. doi:10.2307/2807898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, E. H.-W. 2017. Division of domestic labour and the lowest-low fertility in South Korea, Demographic Research 37: 743–768. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2017.37.24
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohler, H.-P., and L. Mencarini. 2016. The parenthood happiness puzzle: An introduction to the special issue, European Journal of Population 32: 327–338. doi:10.1007/s10680-016-9392-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komatsu, H. 2011. An Economic Analysis of Fertility in Japan: Will The Husband’s Time Spent in Housework and Childcare Increase Birth Probabilities? PhD thesis, American University, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Kramer, K. L. 2005. Children’s help and the pace of reproduction: Cooperative breeding in humans, Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews 14: 224–237. doi:10.1002/evan.20082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lappegård, T., G. Neyer, and D. Vignoli. 2015. Three dimensions of the relationship between gender role attitudes and fertility intentions, Stockholm Research Reports in Demography 9.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. N., and M. J. Hwang. 2019. Determinants on the number of children among married women in Korea, Journal of Population and Social Studies 27: 53–69. doi:10.25133/JPSSv27n1.004
   Google Scholar
• Lee, M. J., and M. J. Hwang. 2017. Factors contributing to childbearing intentions of married working women in Korea, Journal of Population and Social Studies 25: 213–234. doi:10.25133/JPSSv25n3.004
   Google Scholar
• Li, Y., and Q. Jiang. 2019. Women’s gender role attitudes and fertility intentions of having a second child: Survey findings from Shaanxi Province of China, Asian Population Studies 15: 66–86. doi:10.1080/17441730.2019.1571740
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liefbroer, A. C. 2011. On the usefulness of the Theory of Planned Behaviour for fertility research, Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 9: 55–62. doi:10.1553/populationyearbook2011s55
   Google Scholar
• Luppi, F. 2016. When is the second one coming? The effect of couple’s subjective well-being following the onset of parenthood, European Journal of Population 32: 421–444. doi:10.1007/s10680-016-9388-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackinnon, A. 1995. Were women present at the demographic transition? Questions from a feminist historian to historical demographers, Gender & History 7: 222–240. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0424.1995.tb00022.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mason, K. O. 1997. Gender and demographic change: What do we know?, in G. W. Jones, R. M. Douglas, J. C. Caldwell and R. M. D'Souza (eds), The Continuing Demographic Transition. Oxford: Clarendon, pp. 158–182.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, P. 2000a. Gender equity in theories of fertility transition, Population and Development Review 26: 427–439. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2000.00427.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, P. 2000b. Gender equity, social institutions and the future of fertility, Journal of the Australian Population Association 17: 1–16. doi:10.1007/BF03029445
   Google Scholar
• Mencarini, L., and M. L. Tanturri. 2004. Time use, family role-set and childbearing among Italian working women, Genus 60: 111–137. doi:10.2307/29788795
   Google Scholar
• Miettinen, A., S. Basten, and A. Rotkirch. 2011. Gender equality and fertility intentions revisited: Evidence from Finland, Demographic Research 24: 469–496. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2011.24.20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miettinen, A., L. Lainiala, and A. Rotkirch. 2015. Women’s housework decreases fertility, Acta Sociologica 58: 139–154. doi:10.1177/0001699315572028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, W. B. 1994. Childbearing motivations desires and intentions: A theoretical framework, Genetic Social and General Psychology Monographs 120: 225–258. PMID: 8045374.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, W. B. 2011. Differences between fertility desires and intentions: Implications for theory, research and policy, Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 9: 75–98. doi:10.1553/populationyearbook2011s75
   Google Scholar
• Miller, W. B., J. L. Rodgers, and D. J. Pasta. 2010. Fertility motivations of youth predict later fertility outcomes: A prospective analysis of National Longitudinal Survey of Youth Data, Biodemography and Social Biology 56: 1–23. doi:10.1080/19485561003709131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, W. B., L. Severy, and D. Pasta. 2004. A framework for modelling fertility motivation in couples, Population Studies 58: 193–205. doi:10.1080/0032472042000213712
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, M., L. Mencarini, M. L. Tanturri, and K. Begall. 2008. Gender equity and fertility intentions in Italy and the Netherlands, Demographic Research 18: 1–26. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2008.18.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mogull, S. A. 2017. Accuracy of cited “facts” in medical research articles: A review of study methodology and recalculation of quotation error rate, PLOS ONE 12: e0184727. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0184727
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, S. P., and C. A. Bachrach. 2011. Is the Theory of Planned Behaviour an appropriate model for human fertility? Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 9: 11–18. doi:10.1553/populationyearbook2011s11
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, S. P., and R. B. King. 2001. Why have children in the 21st century? Biological predisposition, social coercion, rational choice, European Journal of Population/ Revue Europenne de Dmographie 17: 3–20. doi:10.1023/A:1010784028474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, S. P., S. Stash, H. L. Smith, and K. O. Mason. 2002. Muslim and Non-Muslim differences in female autonomy and fertility: Evidence from four Asian countries, Population and Development Review 28: 515–537. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2002.00515.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mynarska, M., and J. Rytel. 2018. From motives through desires to intentions: Investigating the reproductive choices of childless men and women in Poland, Journal of Biosocial Science 50: 421–433. doi:10.1017/S0021932017000190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myrskylä, M., H.-P. Kohler, and F. C. Billari. 2013. High Development and Fertility: Fertility at Older Reproductive Ages and Gender Equality Explain the Positive Link (MPIDR Working Paper. WP 2011-017). doi:10.4054/MPIDR-WP-2011-017.
   Google Scholar
• Nagase, N., and M. C. Brinton. 2017. The gender division of labor and second births: Labor market institutions and fertility in Japan, Demographic Research 36: 339–370. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2017.36.11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neyer, G., T. Lappegård, and D. Vignoli. 2013. Gender equality and fertility: Which equality matters? European Journal of Population / Revue Européenne de Démographie 29: 245–272. doi:10.1007/s10680-013-9292-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson, K. 2010. Housework and family formation – exploring the relationship between gender division of housework and having children, The Open Demography Journal 3: 1–10. doi:10.2174/1874918601003010001
   Google Scholar
• Nosaka, A. 2012. Aspirations and desires: Women’s education and fertility strategies in contemporary Japan, Human Organization 71: 188–199. doi:10.17730/humo.71.2.h2x278151g7q6661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2018. OECD Labour Force Statistics 2018. OECD Labour Force Statistics. OECD. doi:10.1787/oecd_lfs-2018-en
   Google Scholar
• Okun, B. S., and L. Raz-Yurovich. 2019. Housework, gender role attitudes, and couples’ fertility intentions: Reconsidering men’s roles in gender theories of family change, Population and Development Review 45: 169–196. doi:10.1111/padr.12207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oláh, L. S. 2003. Gendering fertility: Second births in Sweden and Hungary, Population Research and Policy Review 22: 171–200. doi:10.1023/A:1025089031871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osiewalska, B. 2018. Partners’ empowerment and fertility in ten European countries, Demographic Research 38. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2018.38.49
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S. M. 2012. Social networks and second-childbirth intentions of Korean married women, Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology 30: 398–412. doi:10.1080/02646838.2012.725129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S. M., S. I. Cho, and M. K. Choi. 2010. The effect of paternal investment on female fertility intention in South Korea, Evolution and Human Behavior 31: 447–452. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philipov, D. 2008. Family-related gender attitudes, in C. Höhn, D. Avramov and I. Kotowska (eds), People, Population Change and Policies. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 153–174.
   Google Scholar
• Philipov, D. 2009. Fertility intentions and outcomes: The role of policies to close the gap, European Journal of Population / Revue Européenne de Démographie 25: 355–361. doi:10.1007/s10680-009-9202-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philipov, D., and L. Bernardi. 2011. Concepts and operationalisation of reproductive decisions implementation in Austria, Germany and Switzerland, Comparative Population Studies 36: 531–572. doi:10.4232/10.CPoS-2011-14en.
   Google Scholar
• Pinnelli, A., and F. Fiori. 2008. The influence of partner involvement in fatherhood and domestic tasks on mothers’ fertility expectations in Italy, Fathering: A Journal of Theory, Research, and Practice About Men as Fathers 6: 169–191. doi:10.3149/fth.0602.169
   Google Scholar
• Pollmann-Schult, M. 2014. Parenthood and life satisfaction: Why don’t children make people happy? Journal of Marriage and Family 76: 319–336. doi:10.1111/jomf.12095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puur, A., H. Vseviov, and L. Abuladze. 2018. Fertility intentions and views on gender roles: Russian women in Estonia from an origin-destination perspective, Comparative Population Studies 43: 275–306. doi:10.12765/CPoS-2019-04en
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rackin, H. M., and C. A. Bachrach. 2016. Assessing the predictive value of fertility expectations through a cognitive–social model, Population Research and Policy Review 35: 527–551. doi:10.1007/s11113-016-9395-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinesi, F., A. Pinnelli, S. Prati, C. Castagnaro, and C. Iaccarino. 2011. The transition to second child in Italy : Expectations and realization, Population (English Edition) 66: 391–406. doi:10.3917/pope.1102.0391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaffnit, S. B., and R. Sear. 2017a. Support for new mothers and fertility in the United Kingdom: Not all support is equal in the decision to have a second child, Population Studies 71: 345–361. doi:10.1080/00324728.2017.1349924
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaffnit, S. B., and R. Sear. 2017b. Supportive families versus support from families: The decision to have a child in the Netherlands, Demographic Research 37: 414–454. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2017.37.14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schober, P. S. 2013. Gender equality and outsourcing of domestic work, childbearing, and relationship stability among British couples, Journal of Family Issues 34: 25–52. doi:10.1177/0192513X11433691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoen, R., Y. J. Kim, C. A. Nathanson, J. Fields, and N. M. Astone. 1997. Why do Americans want children? Population and Development Review 23: 333–358. doi:10.2307/2137548
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sear, R. 2015. Evolutionary contributions to the study of human fertility, Population Studies 69: S39–S55. doi:10.1080/00324728.2014.982905
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sear, R., and R. Mace. 2008. Who keeps children alive? A review of the effects of kin on child survival, Evolution and Human Behavior 29: 1–18. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stulp, G., R. Sear, and L. Barrett. 2016. The reproductive ecology of industrial societies, Part I: Why measuring fertility matters, Human Nature 27: 422–444. doi:10.1007/s12110-016-9269-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suwada, K. 2019. Agency in parents’ fertility behaviours—gaps in the Polish family policy system, Social Policy and Administration 53: 1108–1120. doi:10.1111/spol.12507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanturri, M. L. 2012. How much does a child cost its parents in terms of time in an aged society? An estimate for Italy with time use survey data, in G. De Santis (ed), The Family, the Market or the State? Intergenerational Support Under Pressure in Ageing Societies. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp. 179–201. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4339-7_9
   Google Scholar
• Tazi-Preve, I. M., D. Bichlbauer, and A. Goujon. 2004. Gender trouble and its impact on fertility intentions, Finnish Yearbook of Population Research 40: 5–24. doi:10.23979/fypr.44996
   Google Scholar
• Testa, M. R. 2007. Childbearing preferences and family issues in Europe: Evidence from the Eurobarometer 2006 survey, Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2007: 357–379. doi:10.1553/populationyearbook2007s357
   Google Scholar
• Testa, M. R. 2012. Couple disagreement about short-term fertility desires in Austria: Effects on intentions and contraceptive behaviour, Demographic Research 26: 63–98. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2012.26.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torr, B. M., and S. E. Short. 2004. Second births and the second shift: A research note on gender equity and fertility, Population and Development Review 30: 109–130. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2004.00005.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Poppel, F. W. A., H. P. Van Dalen, and E. Walhout. 2009. Diffusion of a social norm: Tracing the emergence of the housewife in the Netherlands, 1812-1922, The Economic History Review 62: 99–127. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0289.2008.00433.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinokur-Kaplan, D. 1978. To have–or not to have–another child: Family planning attitudes, intentions, and behavior1, Journal of Applied Social Psychology 8: 29–46. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1978.tb00763.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, A. C., E. L. Ivanova, T. A. Hart, and M. R. Loutfy. 2014. Examining the Traits-Desires-Intentions-Behavior (TDIB) model for fertility planning in women living with HIV in Ontario, Canada, AIDS Patient Care and STDs 28: 594–601. doi:10.1089/apc.2014.0075
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, J. C. K., R. M. Nesse, R. Sear, R. A. Johnstone, and S. C. Stearns. 2017. Evolutionary public health: Introducing the concept, The Lancet 390: 500–509. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30572-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis, R. 1994. Economic analysis of fertility: Micro-foundations and aggregate implications, in Kiessling Kerstin Lindahl and Hans Landberg (eds), Population and Economic Development and the Environment. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 139–172.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2012. Gender Equality in Development. World Development Report 2012: Gender Equality and Development. Washington, DC: World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/4391
   Google Scholar
• Yang, J. 2017. Gendered division of domestic work and willingness to have more children in China, Demographic Research 37: 1949–1974. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2017.37.62
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, H. 2014. Factors that affect women’s intentions to have additional children: The role of the state, market, and family, Korea Journal 54: 79–102. doi:10.25024/kj.2014.54.3.79
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, S. Y. 2016. Is gender inequality a barrier to realizing fertility intentions? Fertility aspirations and realizations in South Korea, Asian Population Studies 12: 203–219. doi:10.1080/17441730.2016.1163873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, M., and M.-Y. Kan. 2019. A new family equilibrium? Changing dynamics between the gender division of labor and fertility in Great Britain, 1991–2017, Demographic Research 40: 1455–1500. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2019.40.50
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar