Partnership transitions among the children of immigrants in Norway: The role of partner choice

References

• Alba, R. 2005. Bright vs. blurred boundaries: Second-generation assimilation and exclusion in France, Germany, and the United States, Ethnic and Racial Studies 28(1): 20–49. doi:10.1080/0141987042000280003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson, G., O. Obucina, and K. Scott. 2015. Marriage and divorce of immigrants and descendants of immigrants in Sweden, Demographic Research 33(2): 31–64. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2015.33.2
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, G., L. Persson, and O. Obucina. 2017. Depressed fertility among descendants of immigrants in Sweden, Demographic Research 36(39): 1149–1184. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2017.36.39
   Google Scholar
• Bernhardt, E., F. Goldscheider, C. Goldscheider, and G. Bjerén. 2007. Immigration, Gender and Family Transitions to Adulthood in Sweden. Lanham: University Press of America.
   Google Scholar
• Blackwell, D. and D. T. Lichter. 2000. Mate selection among married and cohabiting couples, Journal of Family Issues 21(3): 275–302. doi:10.1177/019251300021003001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bredal, A. and T. L. Wærstad. 2014. Gift, men ugift. Om utenomrettslige religiøse vigsler [Married, Yet Unmarried. On Unregistered Religious Marriages]. Report 2014:06. Oslo, Norway: Institute for Social Research.
   Google Scholar
• Brines, J. and K. Joyner. 1999. The ties that bind: Principles of cohesion in cohabitation and marriage, American Sociological Review 64(3): 333–355. doi:10.2307/2657490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celikaksoy, A. 2016. Household formation behavior: An analysis of relative education and exogamy for descendants of immigrants in Sweden, Ethnicities 16(4): 547–567. doi:10.1177/1468796816638397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherlin, A. J. 2004. The deinstitutionalization of American marriage, Journal of Marriage and Family 66(4): 848–861. doi:10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00058.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, K. H. and R. E. Goldberg. 2018. Fertility behavior of interracial couples, Journal of Marriage and Family 80(4): 871–887. doi:10.1111/jomf.12483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortina, C., A. Esteve, and A. Domingo. 2008. Marriage patterns of the foreign-born population in a new country of immigration: The case of Spain, International Migration Review 42(4): 877–902. doi:10.1111/j.1747-7379.2008.00151.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Valk, H. A. G. and A. C. Liefbroer. 2007. Timing preferences for women’s family-life transitions: Intergenerational transmission among migrants and Dutch, Journal of Marriage and Family 69(1): 190–206. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00353.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Valk, H. A. G. and N. Milewski. 2011. Family life transitions among children of immigrants: An introduction, Advances in Life Course Research 26(4): 145–151. doi:10.1016/j.alcr.2011.10.001
   Google Scholar
• Dommermuth, L. and K. A. Wiik. 2014. First, second or third time around? The number of co-residential relationships among young adults, Young 22(4): 323–343. doi:10.1177/1103308814548103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dribe, M. and C. Lundh. 2008. Intermarriage and immigrant integration in Sweden, Acta Sociologica 51(4): 329–354. doi:10.1177/0001699308097377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dribe, M. and C. Lundh. 2011. Cultural dissimilarity and intermarriage. A longitudinal study of immigrants in Sweden 1990-2005, International Migration Review 45(2): 297–324. doi:10.1111/j.1747-7379.2011.00849.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dribe, M. and C. Lundh. 2012. Intermarriage, value context and union dissolution: Sweden 1990–2005, European Journal of Population 28(2): 139–158. doi:10.1007/s10680-011-9253-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esteve, A., R. Lesthaeghe, and A. López-Gay. 2012. The Latin American cohabitation boom, 1970-2007, Population and Development Review 38(1): 55–81. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2012.00472.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falnes-Dalheim, A. 2009. Dokumentasjon av registerbasert familie- og husholdningsstatistikk. Årlig statistikk f.o.m. 2005, basert på folkeregistrert adresse per 1. januar [Documentation of Register-based Family and Household Statistics. Annual Statistics from 2005, based on a Registered Address as of 1 January]. Notater 2009/54. Oslo/Kongsvinger: Statistics Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Feng, Z., P. Boyle, M. van Haam, and G. M. Raab. 2012. Are mixed-ethnic unions more likely to dissolve than co-ethnic unions? New evidence from Britain, European Journal of Population 28(2): 159–176. doi:10.1007/s10680-012-9259-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrari, G. and A. Pailhé. 2017. Transition to adulthood in France: Do children of immigrants differ from natives? Advances in Life Course Research 31(1): 34–56. doi:10.1016/j.alcr.2016.10.001
   Google Scholar
• Foner, N. 1997. The immigrant family: Cultural legacies and cultural changes, International Migration Review 31(4): 961–974. doi:10.2307/2547420
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foner, N. and R. Alba. 2008. Immigrant religion in the US and Western Europe: Bridge or barrier to inclusion? International Migration Review 42(2): 360–392. doi:10.1111/j.1747-7379.2008.00128.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, J. R. and K. Harknett. 2006. Parenting across racial and class lines: Who are married, cohabiting, dating or no longer romantically involved? Social Forces 85(1): 121–143. doi:10.1353/sof.2006.0125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannemann, T. and H. Kulu. 2015. Union formation and dissolution among immigrants and their descendants in the United Kingdom, Demographic Research 33(10): 273–312. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2015.33.10
   Google Scholar
• Hannemann, T., H. Kulu, A. González-Ferrer, A. Pailhé, L. Rahnu, and A. Puur. 2020. Partnership dynamics among immigrants and their descendants in four European countries, Population, Space and Place. doi:10.1002/psp.2315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, R. K., T. H. Lyngstad, and E. Vinberg. 2017. Children and union dissolution across four decades: Evidence from Norway, European Sociological Review 33(2): 317–333. doi:10.1093/esr/jcx039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiekel, N., A. C. Liefbroer, and A.-R. Poortman. 2014. Understanding diversity in the meaning of cohabitation across Europe, European Journal of Population 30(4): 391–410. doi:10.1007/s10680-014-9321-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hohmann-Marriott, B. E. and P. Amato. 2008. Relationship quality in interethnic marriages and cohabitations, Social Forces 87(2): 825–855. doi:10.1353/sof.0.0151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, J. A. 2017. The timing of marriage vis-à-vis co-residence and childbearing in Europe and the United States, Demographic Research 36(20): 609–626. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2017.36.20
   Google Scholar
• Holland, J. A. and H. A. G. de Valk. 2013. Ideal ages for family formation among immigrants in Europe, Advances in Life Course Research 18(4): 257–269. doi:10.1016/j.alcr.2013.08.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huschek, D., H. A. G. de Valk, and A. C. Liefbroer. 2012. Partner choice patterns among the descendants of Turkish immigrants in Europe, European Journal of Population 28(3): 241–268. doi:10.1007/s10680-012-9265-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huschek, D., A. C. Liefbroer, and H. A. G. de Valk. 2010. Timing of first union among second-generation Turks in Europe: The role of parents, peers and institutional context, Demographic Research 22(16): 473–504. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2010.22.16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jalovaara, M. 2013. Socioeconomic resources and the dissolution of cohabitations and marriages, European Journal of Population 29(2): 167–193. doi:10.1007/s10680-012-9280-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalmijn, M. 1998. Intermarriage and homogamy: Causes, patterns, trends, Annual Review of Sociology 24(1): 395–421. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.395
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalmijn, M., P. M. de Graaf, and J. P. G. Janssen. 2005. Intermarriage and the risk of divorce in the Netherlands: The effects of differences in religion and in nationality, 1974–1994, Population Studies 59(1): 71–85. doi:10.1080/0032472052000332719
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalmijn, M. and G. Kraaykamp. 2018. Determinants of cultural assimilation in the second generation. A longitudinal analysis of values about marriage and sexuality among Moroccan and Turkish migrants, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 44(5): 697–717. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2017.1363644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinepier, T. and H. A. G. de Valk. 2016. Ethnic differences in family trajectories of young adult women in the Netherlands: Timing and sequencing of events, Demographic Research 35(24): 671–710. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2016.35.24
   Google Scholar
• Kravdal, Ø. 1999. Does marriage require a stronger economic underpinning than informal cohabitation? Population Studies 53(1): 63–80. doi:10.1080/00324720308067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulu, H. and A. González-Ferrer. 2014. Family dynamics among immigrants and their descendants in Europe: Current research and opportunities, European Journal of Population 30(4): 411–435. doi:10.1007/s10680-014-9322-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulu, H. and T. Hannemann. 2019. Mixed marriage among immigrants and their descendants in the United Kingdom: Analysis of longitudinal data with missing information, Population Studies 73(2): 179–196. doi:10.1080/00324728.2018.1493136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulu, H., T. Hannemann, A. Pailhé, K. Neels, S. Krapf, A. González-Ferrer, and G. Andersson. 2017. Fertility by birth order among the descendants of immigrants in selected European countries, Population and Development Review 43(1): 31–60. doi:10.1111/padr.12037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liefbroer, A. C. and E. Dourleijn. 2006. Unmarried cohabitation and union stability: Testing the role of diffusion using data from 16 European countries, Demography 43(2): 203–221. doi:10.1353/dem.2006.0018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyngstad, T. H. and M. Jalovaara. 2010. A review of the antecedents of union dissolution, Demographic Research 23(10): 257–292. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2010.23.10
   Google Scholar
• Mäenpää, E. and M. Jalovaara. 2014. Homogamy in socio-economic background and education and the dissolution of cohabiting unions, Demographic Research 30(65): 1769–1792. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2014.30.65
   Google Scholar
• Milewski, N. and C. Hamel. 2010. Union formation and partner choice in a transnational context: The case of descendants of Turkish immigrants in France, International Migration Review 44(3): 615–658. doi:10.1111/j.1747-7379.2010.00820.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milewski, N. and H. Kulu. 2014. Mixed marriages in Germany: A high risk of divorce for immigrant-native couples, European Journal of Population 30(1): 89–113. doi:10.1007/s10680-013-9298-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muttarak, R. and A. Heath. 2010. Who intermarries in Britain? Explaining ethnic diversity in intermarriage patterns, The British Journal of Sociology 61(2): 275–305. doi:10.1111/j.1468-4446.2010.01313.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nauck, B. 2001. Intercultural contact and intergenerational transmission in immigrant families, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 32(2): 159–173. doi:10.1177/0022022101032002004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noack, T., E. Bernhardt, and K. A. Wiik. 2014. Cohabitation or marriage? Preferred living arrangements in the West, in A. Abela and J. Walker (eds), Contemporary Issues in Family Studies. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 16–30.
   Google Scholar
• Pailhé, A. 2015. Partnership dynamics across generations of immigration in France: Structural vs. cultural factors, Demographic Research 33(1): 451–498. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2015.33.16
   Google Scholar
• Perelli-Harris, B., M. Kreyenfeld, W. Sigle-Rushton, R. Keizer, T. Lappegård, A. Jasilioniene, C. Berghammer, and P. Di Giulio. 2012. Changes in union status during the transition to parenthood in eleven European countries, 1970s to early 2000s, Population Studies 66(2): 167–182. doi:10.1080/00324728.2012.673004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perelli-Harris, B. and N. Sánchez-Gassen. 2012. How similar are cohabitation and marriage? Legal approaches to cohabitation across Western Europe, Population and Development Review 38(3): 435–467. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2012.00511.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian, Z. and D. T. Lichter. 2007. Social boundaries and marital assimilation: Interpreting trends in racial and ethnic intermarriage, American Sociological Review 72(1): 68–94. doi:10.1177/000312240707200104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian, Z., D. T. Lichter, and D. Tumin. 2018. Divergent pathways to assimilation? Local marriage markets and intermarriage among US Hispanics, Journal of Marriage and Family 80(1): 271–288. doi:10.1111/jomf.12423
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahnu, L., L. Sakkeus, A. Puur, and M. Klesment. 2015. Partnership dynamics among migrants and their descendants in Estonia, Demographic Research 32(1): 1519–1566. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2015.32.56
   Google Scholar
• Raymo, J. M. and Y. Xie. 2000. Temporal and regional variation in the strength of educational homogamy, American Sociological Review 65(5): 773–781. doi:10.2307/2657546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rindfuss, R. R. and A. VandenHeuvel. 1990. Cohabitation: A precursor to marriage or an alternative to being single? Population and Development Review 16(4): 703–726. doi:10.2307/1972963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoen, R. and R. M. Weinick. 1993. Partner choice in marriages and cohabitations, Journal of Marriage and the Family 55(2): 408–414. doi:10.2307/352811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, C. R. 2013. Trends and variation in assortative mating: Causes and consequences, Annual Review of Sociology 39(1): 451–470. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, K. and M. Stanfors. 2011. The transition to parenthood among the second generation: Evidence from Sweden, 1990–2005, Advances in Life Course Research 16(4): 190–204. doi:10.1016/j.alcr.2011.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, S., I. Maas, and F. van Tubergen. 2012. Irreconcilable differences? Ethnic intermarriage and divorce in the Netherlands, 1995–2008, Social Science Research 41(5): 1126–1137. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.02.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smock, P. J. 2000. Cohabitation in the United States: An appraisal of research themes, findings, and implications, Annual Review of Sociology 26(1): 1–20. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobotka, T. and L. Toulemon. 2008. Changing family and partnership behaviour: Common trends and persistent diversity across Europe, Demographic Research 19(6): 85–135. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics Norway. 2019a. Immigrants and Norwegian-born to Immigrant Parents. Available: http://www.ssb.no/en/befolkning/statistikker/innvbef
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Norway. 2019b. Tre av fire enslige mindreårige flyktninger i arbeid eller utdanning [Three Out of Four Unaccompanied Minor Refugees in Work or Education]. Available: https://www.ssb.no/befolkning/artikler-og-publikasjoner/tre-av-fire-enslige-mindrearige-flyktninger-i-arbeid-eller-utdanning
   Google Scholar
• Tønnessen, M. 2014. Fruktbarhet og annen demografi hos innvandrere og deres barn født i Norge [Fertility and Other Demographic Factors of Immigrants and their Norwegian-born Children]. Report 2014/4. Oslo/Kongsvinger: Statistics Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Van Landschoot, L., D. Willaert, H. A. G. de Valk, and J. Van Bavel. 2018. Partner choice and the transition to parenthood for second-generation women of Turkish and Moroccan origin in Belgium, European Journal of Population 34(4): 579–608. doi:10.1007/s10680-017-9438-0
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vitali, A. and B. Arpino. 2015. Living arrangements of second-generation immigrants in Spain: A cross-classified multilevel analysis, Regional Studies 49(2): 189–203. doi:10.1080/00343404.2012.759649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiik, K. A. 2009. You’d better wait! Socio-economic background and timing of first marriage versus first cohabitation, European Sociological Review 25(2): 139–153. doi:10.1093/esr/jcn045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiik, K. A., E. Bernhardt, and T. Noack. 2009. A study of commitment and relationship quality in Sweden and Norway, Journal of Marriage and Family 71(3): 465–477. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00613.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiik, K. A. and J. A. Holland. 2018. Partner choice and timing of first marriage among the children of immigrants in Norway and Sweden, Acta Sociologica 61(2): 143–162. doi:10.1177/0001699317718611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y. and J. Van Hook. 2009. Marital dissolution among interracial couples, Journal of Marriage and Family 71(1): 95–107. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2008.00582.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar