Theory and explanation in demography: The case of low fertility in Europe

References

• Acker, Joan. 1990. Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations, Gender and Society 4(2): 139–158. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/089124390004002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, Icek. 1988. Attitudes, Personality, and Behaviour. Chicago: Dorsey Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ajzen, Icek. 1991. The theory of planned behavior, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50(2): 179–211. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, Icek and Jane Klobas. 2013. Fertility intentions: An approach based on the theory of planned behaviour, Demographic Research 29: 203–232. doi:https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2013.29.8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, Thomas M. and Hans-Peter Kohler. 2015. Demographic transition revisited: Low fertility, socioeconomic development, and gender equity, PSC Working Paper Series 61: 34. Available: https://repository.upenn.edu/psc_working_papers/61/ (accessed: 09/08/2020)
   Google Scholar
• Balbo, Nicoletta, Francesco C. Billari, and Melinda Mills. 2013. Fertility in advanced societies: A review of research, European Journal of Population 29: 1–38. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-012-9277-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, Gary S. 1960. An economic analysis of fertility, in G. S. Becker (ed), Demographic and Economic Change in Developed Countries. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 135–187.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, Gary S. 1981. A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, Gary S. and H. Gregg Lewis. 1973. On the interaction between the quantity and quality of children, Journal of Political Economy 81(2): S279–S288. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/260166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, Gary S., Elisabeth M. Landes, and Robert T. Michael. 1977. An economic analysis of marital instability, Journal of Political Economy 85(6): 1141–1187. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/260631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellani, Daniela. 2020. The institutional and cultural framing of the educational stratification in fertility. A review of the role of labor market institutions and attitudinal orientations, Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 66(April): 31. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2020.100482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bermúdez, S., R. Blanquero, J. A. Hernández, and J. Planelles. 2012. A new parametric model for fitting fertility curves, Population Studies 66(3): 297–310. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.2012.695802
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardi, Laura and Andreas Klärner. 2014. Social networks and fertility, Demographic Research 30: 641–670. doi:https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2014.30.22
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardi, Laura, Johannes Huinink, and Richard A. Settersten, Jr. 2019. The life course cube: A tool for studying lives, Advances in Life Course Research 41: 1–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2018.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardi, Laura, Johannes Huinink, and Richard A. Settersten, Jr. 2020. Linking demographic change and the lifecourse, in J. Falkingham, M. Evandrou, and A. Vlachantoni (eds), Handbook on Demographic Change and the Lifecourse. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 7–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788974875
   Google Scholar
• Bernhardt, Eva. 2004. Is the second demographic transition a useful concept for demography?, Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 1: 25–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1553/populationyearbook2004s25
   Google Scholar
• Billari, Francesco C. 2015. Integrating macro- and micro-level approaches in the explanation of population change, Population Studies 69(S1): S11–S20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.2015.1009712
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billari, Francesco C. and Hans-Peter Kohler. 2004. Patterns of low and lowest-low fertility in Europe, Population Studies 58(2): 161–176. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0032472042000213695
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billari, Francesco C., Dimiter Philipov, and Maria Rita Testa. 2009. Attitudes, norms, and perceived behavioural control: Explaining fertility intentions in Bulgaria, European Journal of Population 25(4): 439–465. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-009-9187-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billingsley, Sunnee and Tommy Ferrarini. 2014. Family policy and fertility intentions in 21 European countries, Journal of Marriage and Family 76(2): 428–445. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bongaarts, John and Griffith Feeney. 1998. On the quantum and tempo of fertility, Population and Development Review 24(2): 271–291. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2807974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bongaarts, John and Tomáš Sobotka. 2012. A demographic explanation for the recent rise in European fertility, Population and Development Review 38(1): 83–120. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2012.00473.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brini, Elisa. 2020. Childlessness and low fertility in context: Evidence from a multilevel analysis on 20 European countries, Genus 76(6): 38. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s41118-020-00074-7
   Google Scholar
• Brinton, Mary C. and Dong-Ju Lee. 2016. Gender-role ideology, labor market institutions, and post-industrial fertility, Population and Development Review 42(3): 405–433. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinton, Mary C., Xiana Bueno, Livia Oláh, and Merete Hellum. 2018. Postindustrial fertility ideals, intentions, and gender inequality: A comparative qualitative analysis, Population and Development Review 44(2): 281–309. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.12128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brons, M.D. (Anne), Aart C. Liefbroer, and Harry B. G. Ganzeboom. 2017. Parental socio-economic status and first union formation: Can European variation be explained by the second demographic transition theory?, European Sociological Review 33(6): 809–822. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcx078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buelens, Mathieu. 2019. Transnational analysis of local fertility: A spatial organisation depending on metropolitan contexts and national borders, Revue Quetelet/Quetelet Journal 7(1): 101–133. doi:https://doi.org/10.14428/rqj2019.07.01.04
   Google Scholar
• Burch, Thomas K. 2001. Longitudinal research in social science: Some theoretical challenges, Canadian Studies in Population 28(2): 263–283. doi:https://doi.org/10.25336/P6H30P
   Google Scholar
• Bystrov, Evgenia. 2014. Testing the second demographic transition theory with seemingly unrelated regression: Marital postponement and human empowerment, European Sociological Review 30(4): 483–499. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcu054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caldwell, John C. 1996. Demography and social science, Population Studies 50(3): 305–333. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0032472031000149516
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandola, T., D. A. Coleman, and R. W. Hiorns. 1999. Recent European fertility patterns: Fitting curves to ‘distorted’ distributions, Population Studies 53(3): 317–329. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00324720308089
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterton, Tim. 2016. An introduction to theories of behaviour, in F. Spotswood (ed), Beyond Behaviour Change: Key Issues, Interdisciplinary Approaches and Future Directions. Bristol: Policy Press, pp. 27–48.
   Google Scholar
• Coast, Ernestina E., Katherine R. Hampshire, and Sara C. Randall. 2007. Disciplining anthropological demography, Demographic Research 16: 493–518. doi:https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2007.16.16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, David. 2004. Why we don’t have to believe without doubting in the “second demographic transition”—Some agnostic comments, Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 1: 11–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.1553/populationyearbook2004s11
   Google Scholar
• Collingwood, R. G. 1970. The Idea of History. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Courgeau, Daniel. 2003. From the macro-micro opposition to multilevel analysis in demography, in D. Courgeau (ed), Methodology and Epistemology of Multilevel Analysis: Approaches from Different Social Sciences, Methodos Series. Vol. 2. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 43–91. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4675-9_3
   Google Scholar
• Courgeau, Daniel, Bijak, Jakub, Robert Franck, and Eric Silverman. 2017. Model-based demography: Towards a research agenda, in A. Grow and J. Van Bavel (eds), Agent-Based Modelling in Population Studies, The Springer Series on Demographic Methods and Population Analysis. Vol. 41. Cham: Springer, pp. 21–51. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32283-4_2
   Google Scholar
• David, Paul A. 1986. Comment: [Altruism and the economic theory of fertility], Population and Development Review 12(Supplement): 77–86. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2807894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dommermuth, Lars, Jane Klobas, and Trude Lappegård. 2011. Now or later? The theory of planned behavior and timing of fertility intentions, Advances in Life Course Research 16(1): 42–53. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2011.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Oro, Giuseppina and Constantine Sandis. 2013. From anti-causalism to causalism and back: A century of the reasons/causes debate, in A. Laitinen, C. Sandis, and G. D’Oro (eds), Reasons and Causes: Causalism and Anti-Causalism in the Philosophy of Action. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 7–48.
   Google Scholar
• Elder, Glen H., Jr., Monica Kirkpatrick Johnson, and Robert Crosnoe. 2003. The emergence and development of life course theory, in J. T. Mortimer and M. J. Shanahan (eds), Handbook of the Life Course. New York: Kluwer Academic, pp. 3–19.
   Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 1999. Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, Gøsta and Francesco C. Billari. 2015. Re-theorizing family demographics, Population and Development Review 41(1): 1–31. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2015.00024.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahlén, Susanne and Livia Sz. Oláh. 2018. Economic uncertainty and first-birth intentions in Europe, Demographic Research 39: 795–834. doi:https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2018.39.28
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falkingham, Jane, Maria Evandrou, and Athina Vlachantoni (eds). 2020. Handbook on Demographic Change and the Lifecourse. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. doi:https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788974875
   Google Scholar
• Fileva, Iskra. 2017. Two senses of “why”: Traits and reasons in the explanation of action, in I. Fileva (ed), Questions of Character. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 182–202.
   Google Scholar
• Fiori, Francesca, Elspeth Graham, and Zhiqiang Feng. 2014. Geographical variations in fertility and transition to second and third birth in Britain, Advances in Life Course Research 21: 149–167. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2013.11.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, Caroline. 2000. The limits to low fertility: A biosocial approach, Population and Development Review 26(2): 209–234. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2000.00209.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, Jonathan, Sebastian Klüsener, and Mikko Myrskylä. 2019. Is a positive relationship between fertility and economic development emerging at the sub-national regional level? Theoretical considerations and evidence from Europe, European Journal of Population 35(3): 487–518. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-018-9485-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frejka, Tomas. 2017. The fertility transition revisited: A cohort perspective, Comparative Population Studies 42: 89–116. doi:https://doi.org/10.12765/CPoS-2017-09
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frejka, Tomas and Jean-Paul Sardon. 2004. Childbearing Trends and Prospects in Low-Fertility Countries. A Cohort Analysis. European Studies of Population. Vol. 13. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. xvi+422.
   Google Scholar
• Fricke, Tom. 1997. Culture theory and demographic process: Towards a thicker demography, in D. Kertzer and T. Fricke (eds), Anthropological Demography. Towards a New Synthesis, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 248–277.
   Google Scholar
• Gauthier, Anne H. 2007. The impact of family policies on fertility in industrialized countries: A review of the literature, Population Research and Policy Review 26(3): 323–346. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-007-9033-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldscheider, Frances, Eva Bernhardt, and Trude Lappegård. 2015. The gender revolution: A framework for understanding changing family and demographic behavior, Population and Development Review 41(2): 207–239. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2015.00045.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, Joshua R., Tomáš Sobotka, and Aiva Jasilioniene. 2009. The end of “lowest-low” fertility?, Population and Development Review 35(4): 663–699. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2009.00304.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, Elspeth. 2000. What kind of theory for what kind of population geography?, International Journal of Population Geography 6(4): 257–272.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, Elspeth. 2005. Theory and theorizing, in N. Castree, A. Rogers, and D. Sherman (eds), Questioning Geography, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 258–274.
   Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh, Susan. 1996. The social construction of population science: An intellectual, institutional, and political history of twentieth-century demography, Comparative Studies in Society and History 38(1): 26–66. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500020119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hara, Nobuko. 2016. Unpaid labor and the critique of political economy in home economics and new household economics: From the feminist economics perspective, The History of Economic Thought 58(1): 1–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.5362/jshet.58.1_1
   Google Scholar
• Hart, Rannveig K. 2015. Earnings and first birth probability among Norwegian men and women 1995–2010, Demographic Research 33: 1067–1104. doi:https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2015.33.38
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellstrand, Julia, Jessica Nisén, and Mikko Myrskylä. 2020. All-time low period fertility in Finland: Demographic drivers, tempo effects, and cohort implications, Population Studies 74(3): 315–329. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.2020.1750677
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hettne, Björn. 2009. Thinking About Development: Development Matters. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hobcraft, John. 1996. Fertility in England and Wales: A fifty-year perspective, Population Studies 50(3): 485–524. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0032472031000149586
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobcraft, John. 2006. The ABC of demographic behaviour: How the interplays of alleles, brains, and contexts over the life course should shape research aimed at understanding population processes, Population Studies 60(2): 153–187. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00324720600646410
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huinink, Johannes and Martin Kohli. 2014. A life-course approach to fertility, Demographic Research 30: 1293–1326. doi:https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2014.30.45
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huinink, Johannes, Martin Kohli, and Jens Ehrhardt. 2015. Explaining fertility: The potential for integrative approaches, Demographic Research 33: 93–112. doi:https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2015.33.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson-Hanks, Jennifer. 2007. What kind of theory for anthropological demography?, Demographic Research 16: 1–26. doi:https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2007.16.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kertzer, David I., Michael J. White, Laura Bernardi, and Giuseppe Gabrielli. 2009. Italy’s path to very low fertility: The adequacy of economic and second demographic transition theories, European Journal of Population 25: 89–115. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-008-9159-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, Leslie. 2018. Gender in the investigation and politics of ‘low’ fertility, in N. E. Riley and J. Brunson (eds), International Handbook on Gender and Demographic Processes, International Handbooks of Population 8. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 55–69. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1290-1_4
   Google Scholar
• Klobas, Jane. 2011. The theory of planned behaviour as a model of reasoning about fertility decisions, Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 9: 47–54. doi:https://doi.org/10.1553/populationyearbook2011s47
   Google Scholar
• Klüsener, Sebastian, Brienna Perelli-Harris, and Nora Sánchez Gassen. 2013. Spatial aspects of the rise of nonmarital fertility across Europe since 1960: The role of states and regions in shaping patterns of change, European Journal of Population 29: 137–165. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-012-9278-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulu, Hill, Andres Vikat, and Gunnar Andersson. 2007. Settlement size and fertility in the Nordic countries, Population Studies 61(3): 265–285. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00324720701571749
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latten, Jan J. and Clara H. Mulder. 2013. Partner relationships in the Netherlands: New manifestations of the second demographic transition, Genus 69(3): 103–121. doi:https://doi.org/10.4402/genus-588
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Ronald. 2015. Becker and the demographic transition, Journal of Demographic Economics 81(1): 67–74. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/dem.2014.9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leick, Birgit and Birgit Glorius. 2016. Editorial on the special issue “geographies of demographic change: Theories and narratives”, Comparative Population Studies 41(3–4): 207–224. doi:https://doi.org/10.12765/CPoS-2017-05en
   Google Scholar
• Lesthaeghe, Ron. 1998. On theory development: Applications to the study of family formation, Population and Development Review 24(1): 1–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2808120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesthaeghe, Ron. 2010. The unfolding story of the second demographic transition, Population and Development Review 36(2): 211–251. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2010.00328.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesthaeghe, Ron. 2011. The “second demographic transition”: A conceptual map for the understanding of late modern demographic developments in fertility and family formation, Historical Social Research 36(2): 179–218. doi:https://doi.org/10.12759/hsr.36.2011.2.179-218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesthaeghe, Ron. 2020. The second demographic transition, 1986–2020: Sub-replacement fertility and rising cohabitation—a global update, Genus 76(10): 38. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s41118-020-00077-4
   Google Scholar
• Lesthaeghe, Ron and Guy Moors. 2000. Recent trends in fertility and household formation in the industrialized world, Review of Population and Social Policy 9: 121–170.
   Google Scholar
• Lesthaeghe, Ron and K. Neels. 2002. From the first to the second demographic transition: An interpretation of the spatial continuity of demographic innovation in France, Belgium and Switzerland, European Journal of Population 18(4): 325–360. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021125800070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liefbroer, Aart C. 2011. On the usefulness of the theory of planned behaviour for fertility research, Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 9: 55–62. doi:https://doi.org/10.1553/populationyearbook2011s55
   Google Scholar
• Liefbroer, Aart C., Jane E. Klobas, Dimiter Philipov, and Icek Ajzen. 2015. Reproductive decision-making in a macro–micro perspective: A conceptual framework, in D. Philipov, A. C. Liefbroer, and J. E. Klobas (eds), Reproductive Decision-Making in a Macro–Micro Perspective. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 1–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9401-5_1
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, Kevin. 1999. An evolutionary perspective on human fertility, Population and Environment 21(2): 223–246. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023362602592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAllister, Lisa S., Gillian V. Pepper, Sandra Virgo, and David A. Coall. 2016. The evolved psychological mechanisms of fertility motivation: Hunting for causation in a sea of correlation, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 371: 20150151. doi:https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, Peter. 2000a. Gender equity, social institutions and the future of fertility, Journal of Population Research 17(1): 1–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03029445
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, Peter. 2000b. Gender equity in theories of fertility transition, Population and Development Review 26(3): 427–439. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2000.00427.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, Peter. 2013. Societal foundations for explaining fertility: Gender equity, Demographic Research 28: 981–994. doi:https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2013.28.34
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, Peter. 2015. Demographic change: How, why and consequences, in G. Bammer (ed), Change: Combining Analytic Approaches with Street Wisdom. Acton: ANU Press, pp. 153–162.
   Google Scholar
• Malnes, Raino. 2019. Explanation: Guidance for social scientists, in J. Valsiner (ed), Social Philosophy of Science for the Social Sciences. Switzerland AG: Springer Nature, pp. 113–124. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33099-6_7
   Google Scholar
• Mathews, Paul and Rebecca Sear. 2013. Family and fertility: Kin influence on the progression to a second birth in the British Household Panel Study, PLoS ONE 8(3): e56941. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056941
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matysiak, Anna, Tomáš Sobotka, and Daniele Vignoli. 2021. The Great Recession and fertility in Europe: A sub-national analysis, European Journal of Population 37(1): 29–64. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-020-09556-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, Karl Ulrich. 2019. On heuristics, theoretical foundations, accounting schemes and theories, Advances in Life Course Research 41: 100277. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2019.04.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mencarini, Letizia, Daniele Vignoli, and Anna Gottard. 2015. Fertility intentions and outcomes: Implementing the theory of planned behavior with graphical models, Advances in Life Course Research 23: 14–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2014.12.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merz, Eva-Maria and Aart C. Liefbroer. 2012. The attitude toward voluntary childlessness in Europe: Cultural and institutional explanations, Journal of Marriage and Family 74(3): 587–600. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2012.00972.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, Melinda. 2010. Gender roles, gender (in)equality and fertility: An empirical test of five gender equity indices, Canadian Studies in Population 37(3–4): 445–474. doi:https://doi.org/10.25336/P6131Q
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, Melinda and Hans-Peter Blossfeld. 2005. Globalization, uncertainty and the early life course: A theoretical framework, in H-P. Blossfeld, E. Klijzing, and M. Mills (eds), Globalization, Uncertainty and Youth in Society. London/New York: Routledge Advances in Sociology Series, pp. 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, Melinda, Letizia Mencarini, Maria Letizia Tanturri, and Katia Begall. 2008. Gender equity and fertility intentions in Italy and the Netherlands, Demographic Research 18: 1–26. doi:https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2008.18.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, S. Philip and Christine A. Bachrach. 2011. Is the theory of planned behaviour an appropriate model for human fertility?, Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 9: 11–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1553/populationyearbook2011s11
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, S. Philip and Heather Rackin. 2010. The correspondence between fertility intentions and behavior in the United States, Population and Development Review 36(1): 91–118. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2010.00319.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mynarska, Monika, Anna Matysiak, Anna Rybińska, Valentina Tocchioni, and Daniele Vignoli. 2015. Diverse paths into childlessness over the life course, Advances in Life Course Research 25: 35–48. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2015.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nauck, Bernhard. 2014. Value of children and the social production of welfare, Demographic Research 30: 1793–1824. doi:https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2014.30.66
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nauck, Bernhard and Rokuro Tabuchi. 2012. One or two pathways to individual modernity? The effects of education on family formation among women in Japan and Germany, Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 10: 49–76. doi:https://doi.org/10.1553/populationyearbook2012s049
   Google Scholar
• Ní Bhrolcháin, Máire and Éva Beaujouan. 2015. How real are reproductive goals? Uncertainty and the construction of fertility preferences, ESRC Centre for Population Change, Working Paper 73, pp. 36.
   Google Scholar
• Örsal, Deniz D. Karaman and Joshua R. Goldstein. 2018. The changing relationship between unemployment and total fertility, Population Studies 72(1): 109–121. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.2017.1404624
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlík, Zdene˘k (ed). 2000. Position of Demography Among Other Disciplines. Prague: Charles University, pp. 116.
   Google Scholar
• Perelli-Harris, Brienna. 2005. The path to lowest-low fertility in Ukraine, Population Studies 59(1): 55–70. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0032472052000332700
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perelli-Harris, Brienna and Laura Bernardi. 2015. Exploring social norms around cohabitation: The life course, individualization, and culture, Demographic Research 33: 701–732. doi:https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2015.33.25
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perelli-Harris, Brienna and Theodore P. Gerber. 2011. Nonmarital childbearing in Russia: Second demographic transition or pattern of disadvantage?, Demography 48(1): 317–342. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-010-0001-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philipov, Dimiter. 2009. The effect of competing intentions and behaviour on short-term childbearing intentions and subsequent childbearing, European Journal of Population 25(4): 525–548. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-009-9197-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philipov, Dimiter and Laura Bernardi. 2011. Concepts and operationalisation of reproductive decisions. Implementation in Austria, Germany, and Switzerland, Comparative Population Studies 36(2–3): 495–530. doi:https://doi.org/10.4232/10.CPoS-2011-14en
   Google Scholar
• Pressat, Roland. 1972. Demographic Analysis: Methods, Results, Applications. London: Edward Arnold (trans. J Matras).
   Google Scholar
• Presser, Harriet B. 1997. Demography, feminism and the science–policy nexus, Population and Development Review 23(2): 295–331. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2137547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley, Nancy E. 2019. Demography of gender, in D. L. Poston, Jr. (ed), Handbook of Population. Switzerland AG: Springer Nature, pp. 107–142. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10910-3_5
   Google Scholar
• Riley, Nancy E. and James McCarthy. 2003. Demography in the Age of the Postmodern. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Risman, Barbara J. 2004. Gender as a social structure: Theory wrestling with activism, Gender and Society 18(4): 429–450. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243204265349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Risman, Barbara J. 2018. Gender as a social structure, in B. Risman, C. Froyum, and W. Scarborough (eds), Handbook of the Sociology of Gender. Cham: Springer, pp. 19–43. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76333-0_2
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, Warren C. 1997. The economic theory of fertility over three decades, Population Studies 51(1): 63–74. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0032472031000149736
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, Alexander. 2008. Philosophy of Social Science. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rossier, Clémentine and Laura Bernardi. 2009. Social interaction effects on fertility: Intentions and behaviors, European Journal of Population 25(4): 467–485. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-009-9203-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotariu, Traian. 2006. Romania and the second demographic transition. The traditional value system and low fertility rates, International Journal of Sociology 36(1): 10–27. doi:https://doi.org/10.2753/IJS0020-7659360102
   Google Scholar
• Sabater, Albert and Elspeth Graham. 2019. International migration and fertility variation in Spain during the economic recession: A spatial Durbin approach, Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy 12(3): 515–546. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-018-9255-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sætra, Henrik Skaug. 2019. Explaining social phenomena: Emergence and levels of explanation, in J. Valsiner (ed), Social Philosophy of Science for the Social Sciences. Switzerland AG: Springer Nature, pp. 169–185. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33099-6_10
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Barricarte, Jesús J. and Remo Fernández-Carro. 2007. Patterns in the delay and recovery of fertility in Europe, European Journal of Population 23(2): 145–170. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-006-9114-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sear, Rebecca. 2015. Evolutionary demography: A Darwinian renaissance in demography, in J. D. Wright (ed), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences (Second Edition). Vol 8. Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 406–412. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.81057-0
   Google Scholar
• Snopkowski, Kristin, Mary C. Towner, Mary K. Shenk, and Heidi Colleran. 2016. Pathways from education to fertility decline: A multi-site comparative study, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 371: 20150156, 12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0156
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobotka, Tomáš. 2008. Overview chapter 6: The diverse faces of the second demographic transition in Europe, Demographic Research 19: 171–224. doi:https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobotka, Tomáš. 2017. Post-transitional fertility: The role of childbearing postponement in fuelling the shift to low and unstable fertility levels, Journal of Biosocial Science 49: S20–S45. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021932017000323
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobotka, Tomáš, Kryštof Zeman, and Vladimíra Kantorová. 2003. Demographic shifts in the Czech Republic after 1989: A second demographic transition view, European Journal of Population 19(3): 249–277. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024913321935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobotka, Tomáš, Vegard Skirbekk, and Dimiter Philipov. 2011. Economic recession and fertility in the developed world, Population and Development Review 37(2): 267–306. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2011.00411.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanfors, Maria and Frances Goldscheider. 2017. The forest and the trees: Industrialization, demographic change, and the ongoing gender revolution in Sweden and the United States, 1870–2010, Demographic Research 36: 173–226. doi:https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2017.36.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surkyn, Johan and Ron Lesthaeghe. 2004. Value orientations and the second demographic transition (SDT) in Northern, Western and Southern Europe: An update, Demographic Research Special 3: 45–86. doi:https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2004.S3.3
   Google Scholar
• van de Kaa, Dirk J. 1996. Anchored narratives: The story and findings of half a century of research into the determinants of fertility, Population Studies 50(3): 389–432. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0032472031000149546
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Kaa, Dirk J. 2004. Is the second demographic transition a useful research concept: Questions and answers, Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 1: 4–10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1553/populationyearbook2004s4
   Google Scholar
• Vitali, Agnese, Arnstein Aassve, and Trude Lappegård. 2015. Diffusion of childbearing within cohabitation, Demography 52(2): 355–377. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-015-0380-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitali, Agnese and Francesco Billari. 2017. Changing determinants of low fertility and diffusion: A spatial analysis for Italy, Population, Space and Place 23: e1998. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.1998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weeks, John R. 2005. Population: An Introduction to Concepts and Issues (Ninth Edition). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Werding, Martin. 2014. Children are costly, but raising them may pay: The economic approach to fertility, Demographic Research 30: 253–276. doi:https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2014.30.8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, Candace and Don H. Zimmerman. 1987. Doing gender, Gender and Society 1(2): 125–151. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243287001002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, Jill R. 2010. Doing feminist-demography, International Journal of Social Research Methodology 13(3): 197–210. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2010.482250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winch, Peter. 1958. The Idea of a Social Science. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, Jonas, Karel Neels, and Jorik Vergauwen. 2016. Economic and institutional context and second births in seven European countries, Population Research and Policy Review 35(3): 305–325. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-016-9389-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaidi, Batool and S. Philip Morgan. 2017. The second demographic transition theory: A review and appraisal, Annual Review of Sociology 43: 473–492. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-060116-053442
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar